Lacrimal Drainage Anomalies in CHARGE Syndrome: Case Report and Review of Literature

Developments in pediatrics in 2020: choices in allergy, autoinflammatory disorders, critical care, endocrinology, genetics, infectious diseases, microbiota, neonatology, neurology, nutrition, ortopedics, respiratory tract illnesses and rheumatology

In this article, we describe the advances in the field of pediatrics that have been published in the Italian Journal of Pediatrics in 2020. We report progresses in understanding allergy, autoinflammatory disorders, critical care, endocrinology, genetics, infectious diseases, microbiota, neonatology, neurology, nutrition, orthopedics, respiratory tract illnesses, rheumatology in childhood.

Punctal agenesis and delayed-onset dacryocystocele in CHARGE syndrome

Punctal agenesis and other nasolacrimal abnormalities have been infrequently reported in CHARGE syndrome-a constellation of findings affecting the eyes, heart, choana, and ears-which generally presents at birth. We present a rare case of punctal agenesis with delayed-onset dacryocystocele/lacrimal sac mucocele in a teenager with CHARGE syndrome.

Updates on congenital lacrimal drainage anomalies and their association with syndromes and systemic disorders: A major review

BACKGROUND

To review and update the syndromic and non-syndromic systemic associations of congenital lacrimal drainage anomalies.

METHODS

The authors performed a PubMed search of all articles published in English on congenital lacrimal drainage anomalies (CLDA). The current review provides an update from January 2017 to August 2020 on all CLDA associated with clinical syndromes or non-syndromic systemic disorders. The update intends to appraise the readers on all papers that were published in the interim 3-year period since the publication of the previous major review by authors (1933-2016). Patients with specific syndromes or systemic disorders were then reviewed. Pertinent cross-references from each of the short-listed articles were also included. Data reviewed include syndromic descriptions, systemic details, demographics, lacrimal presentations, management, and outcomes.

RESULTS

There have been significant new updates. Eleven new syndromes have been added to the list of syndromic associations, of which three were suspects. Among the new syndromic associations, three (PHACE, Williams-Beuren, and Peter's plus syndromes) described CLDA details in depth. Several new non-syndromic systemic conditions with associated CLDA also came to light, the foremost amongst them being proboscis lateralis, diprosopus dirrhinus, cerebral palsy, and NGLY-1 related disorders. Although familial presentations have been reported, the inheritance patterns are unclear for most anomalies. Surgical challenges in these patients are distinct, and a thorough pre-operative assessment, including detailed imaging when indicated, may facilitate good outcomes. Two updated tables reflecting the summary of syndromic and non-syndromic systemic associations are provided to capture the details at a glance.

CONCLUSION

It is not very uncommon to find CLDA in syndromic or non-syndromic systemic disorders. Diagnosis of a craniofacial syndrome should prompt the physician to look out for CLDA. Similarly, a diagnosis of multiple CLDA should alert the examiner for the possible presence of associated systemic anomalies.

Preliminary report on screening IGSF3 gene mutation in families with congenital absence of lacrimal puncta and canaliculi

AIM

To investigate the variation of IGSF3 gene in three families with congenital absence of lacrimal puncta and canaliculi, and to lay a foundation for further research on the pathogenic gene of congenital lacrimal duct agenesis.

METHODS

The members of the three families were recruited. The ophthalmologic examinations in details, including slit-lamp biomicroscope, intraocular pressure and fundus examination, etc. were carried out. All patients were checked with paracentesis of puncta membrane and lacrimal duct probing, as well as the computed tomography-dacryocystography (CT-DCG). Peripheral blood of 14 participants (3 normal) from three families were collected, 4 mL each, for genomic DNA extraction, and 11 exon fragments of IGSF3 gene were amplified and sequenced by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to determine whether there were IGSF3 genetic variation.

RESULTS

A total of 14 members from three families were screened for 4 synonymous variants: c.930C>T (p.Pro366=), c.1359T>C (p.Ser709=), c.1797G>A (p.Ser855=), c.1539G>A (p.Ser769=), and 6 missense variants: c.1507G>A (p.Gly759Ser), c.1783T>C (p.Trp851Arg), c.1952G>T (p.Ser 907Ile), c.3120C>G (p.Asp1040Glu), c.3123C>G (p.Asp1041Glu), c.3139_3140insGAC (p.Asp1046_Pro1047insAsp), and the latter three were only found in two patients with absence of lacrimal puncta and canaliculi combined with congenital osseous nasolacrimal canal obstruction from the first family.

CONCLUSION

The same IGSF3 gene mutation c.3139_3140insGAC is found in the patients with congenital absence of lacrimal puncta and canaliculi combine with osseous nasolacrimal canal obstruction.