Multidisciplinary Frontotemporal Orbitozygomatic Craniotomy for Spheno-orbital Meningiomas: Ophthalmic and Orbital Outcomes

Spheno-Orbital Meningioma - Treatment Outcomes and Factors Influencing Recurrence

PURPOSE

To determine treatment outcomes, recurrence rates, and predictors of recurrence, to inform future therapeutic approaches for spheno-orbital meningiomas (SOM).

METHODS

A retrospective single-center study of SOM treated from 1990 to 2021 was conducted with comprehensive neuro-ophthalmologic follow-up at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC). Recurrence requiring reintervention was defined clinically as worsening of visual acuity, visual field defect, or ocular motility after an initial period of stabilization or 6 months of improvement following treatment, or radiologically as either a regrowth with an increase in tumor size by 20% at the site of previous growth or a new region of tumor growth.

RESULTS

In total 46 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up was 106 months (range 1-303). Dictated by the phenotype of the disease, patients underwent either gross- (50%), near- (17%), or subtotal resection (26%). Removal of the anterior clinoid process (ACP) was performed in 52% of patients. Nine patients (20%) required an enucleation or exenteration. Radiotherapy was employed at some point of treatment in 50% of cases. Inherited cases (24%) were referred to CUMC for treatment following 1 or more recurrences. The total recurrence rate, including inherited cases, was 54%, occurring at a mean interval of 43 months. The recurrence rate of patients treated solely at CUMC was 40%, occurring at a mean interval of 41 months. A subset of patients (32%) had 2 or more recurrences. Histopathology at the first surgery was WHO grade I (87%) and II (13%) and at the final surgery was WHO grade I (74%), II (21%), and III (4%). A subset of grade I tumors that received radiotherapy (35%) evolved to a higher grade or developed multiple recurrences without a change in histologic grade I. Grade II tumors and treatment with radiotherapy increased the odds of recurrence. Removal of the ACP and gross total resection decreased the odds of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Due to the routinely long interval to tumor recurrence, lifelong surveillance of patients with SOM is prudent. ACP resection and gross total resection, where possible, reduce tumor recurrence and the need for further treatment. Radiotherapy should be reserved for higher-grade meningiomas and select grade I tumors.

Quality indicators and early adverse in surgery for atypical meningiomas: A 16-year single centre study and systematic review of the literature

Introduction

Atypical meningiomas represent approximately 20% of all intracranial meningiomas and are characterized by distinct histopathological criteria and an increased risk of postoperative recurrence. Recently, quality indicators have been introduced to monitor quality of the delivered care.

Research question

Which quality indicators/outcome measures are being applied in patients being operated for atypical meningiomas? What are risk factors associated with poor outcome? How is the surgical outcome and which quality indicators are reported in the literature?

Material and methods

The primary outcomes of interest were 30-days readmission-, 30-day reoperation-, 30-day mortality-, 30-day nosocomial infection- and the 30-day surgical site infection (SSI) rate, CSF-leakage, new neurological deficit, medical complications, and lengths of stay. The secondary aim was the identification of prognostic factors for the mentioned primary outcomes. A systematic review of the literature was performed screening studies for the mentioned outcomes.

Results

We included 52 patients. 30-days outcomes in terms of unplanned reoperation were 0%, unplanned readmission 7.7%, mortality 0%, nosocomial infection 17.3%, and SSI 0%. Any adverse event occurred in 30.8%. Preoperative C-reactive protein over 5 ​mg/l was independent factor for the occurrence of any postoperative adverse event (OR: 17.2, p ​= ​0.003). A total of 22 studies were included into the review.

Discussion and conclusion

The 30-days outcomes at our department were comparable with reported outcomes in the literature. Currently applied quality indicators are helpful in determining the postoperative outcome but mainly report the indirect outcome after surgery and are influenced of patient, tumor and treatment related factors. Risk adjustment is vital.

Fronto-Temporo-Orbito-Zygomatic Approach with Orbital Reconstruction in Lesions causing Unilateral Non-pulsating Proptosis

Background Unilateral non-pulsating proptosis can be caused by lesions with intraorbital extensions compressing the globe including sphenoid wing en plaque meningiomas and paranasal sinuses lesions.

Patients and Methods We operated on 20 patients with unilateral non-pulsating proptosis using fronto-temporo-orbito-zygomatic (FTOZ) approach with orbital reconstruction in six patients. Eighteen patients had sphenoid wing en plaque meningioma, 1 patient had paranasal sinuses fungal infection with intraorbital and intracranial extension, and 1 patient had frontal sinus dermoid with intraorbital extension.

Results Proptosis was corrected in 50% of the patients, improved in 25%, and remained stationary in 25%. Vision improved in three patients, remained stationary in three, and deteriorated in one patient. Two patients had temporary oculomotor ophthalmoplegia that resolved within 3 months.

Conclusion Although it is an invasive approach, FTOZ gives excellent exposure of the orbit and anterolateral skull base that allows the excision of intracranial lesions with orbital extension. If needed, the orbit could be reconstructed easily due to excellent exposure.

Spheno-orbital meningiomas: Is orbit reconstruction mandatory? Long-term outcomes and exophthalmos improvement

Background:

Meningiomas correspond to one-third of all primary central nervous system tumors. Approximately 9% of them are spheno-orbital meningiomas (SOMs), presenting significant clinical symptoms as visual impairment and orbital esthetics. This article aims to evaluate exophthalmos’ improvement in a surgical series without orbital reconstruction.

Methods:

We consecutively included all patients diagnosed with SOM, admitted to a single institution for 10 years. Surgical resection was the standard of care, associated or not with adjuvant radiation therapy. The radiological investigation included preoperative and postoperative head CT or MRI. We quantified proptosis through imaging.

Results:

Forty patients composed this series, 87.5% were female. Proptosis was the most common presentation (90%), followed by decreased visual acuity (65%), motility deficit (20%), and headache (20%). Gross total resection was achieved in 65% of the procedures. In late outcomes, 78% of the patients maintained or improved visual acuity and 85% maintained or improved headache. Proptosis significantly improved after surgery and along with the follow-up (P < 0.001). Ten patients were submitted to adjuvant RT, six of them after a subtotal resection. All patients of this subgroup had proptosis. It was observed a higher frequency of worse in visual acuity in patients submitted to RT (71% vs. 28%, P = 0.038).

Conclusion:

Resection of SOM was sufficient to stop the evolution of visual deficit and allowed the improvement of proptosis. Orbital reconstruction does not seem to be an essential step in reducing enophthalmos.