Opioid Use After Orbital, Eyelid, or Lacrimal Surgery

Opioid Usage Following Oculoplastic Procedures

BACKGROUND

With the rising toll of the opioid crisis, oculoplastic surgeons have been looking at methods to decrease opioid prescription.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify factors that correlate with opioid usage after oculoplastic surgery.

METHODS

This was a prospective study conducted at University of Texas Southwestern. All patients who underwent an oculoplastic procedure were eligible for inclusion. Patients enrolled were provided 20 tablets of tramadol 50 mg, to take 1 tablet every 6 hours as needed for pain. At their postoperative week 1 appointment, participants had the remaining number of unused opioid tablets counted. The number of tablets taken were calculated by subtracting the remaining number of tablets from the original prescribed amount.

RESULTS

A total of 310 patients were enrolled in our study. Of these, 129 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was a statistically significant difference in the number of tramadol tablets taken between procedures for upper eyelids, lower eyelids, and both eyelids (P < .01). There were no statistically significant differences in tramadol usage when comparing procedures on eyelids with orbit procedures(P = .30), cosmetic with noncosmetic procedures (P = .52), males with females (P = .87), or patients naive to oculoplastic procedures with those undergoing reoperation (P = .58). Longer procedures were correlated with greater tramadol usage (R = 0.28, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study in the literature that has objectively quantified opioid usage after oculoplastic surgery in a prospective manner. Procedures that involve both upper and lower eyelids simultaneously and longer procedures resulted in higher opioid use. Orbital procedures, cosmetic procedures, sex, and procedural naivety were not found to be associated with higher opioid usage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Interspecialty Opioid Prescribing Patterns in Ophthalmology Following Declaration of a Public Health Emergency

Purpose: Previous literature has investigated opioid prescription trends in ophthalmology at large, however, little has been done looking at differences between subspecialties. We evaluate if significant trends exist among subspecialties in opioid prescribing patterns. This study aims to illuminate potential over-usage of opioids in ophthalmology that could compromise patient quality of life. Methods: Medicare data and "National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES) Downloadable File" were queried for cases of ophthalmologists with nonsuppressed opioid prescription data from 2014 to 2019. Ophthalmologists with no subspecialty code or missing regional, gender, degree, or graduation information were excluded. Chi-squared analysis, analysis of variance, t-tests, and multivariate logistic regression were utilized. Results: Five thousand one hundred forty-three physician records were included in analysis, 450 of which were by cornea subspecialists. Most cornea cases were male, graduated before 2005, and practiced in the South. All subspecialties had a significantly increased likelihood of making opioid claims and higher prescription rates compared with cornea (P < 0.050) besides glaucoma (P = 0.357). Only oculoplastics had significantly increased likelihood of greater total supply of opioids compared with cornea (odds ratio [OR] = 22.195, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 12.209-40.350, P < 0.001), while pediatrics (OR = 4.036, 95% CI = 1.377-11.831, P = 0.011) and neuro-ophthalmology (OR = 4.158, 95% CI = 1.237-13.975, P = 0.021) in addition to oculoplastics (OR = 64.380, 95% CI = 26.306-157.560, P < 0.001) were predicted to have significantly greater opioid beneficiaries. Males, the South/Midwest, and graduating before 2005, all were generally associated with increased likelihood of greater total opioid claims, supply, beneficiaries, and prescription rate (P < 0.050). Conclusion: Subspecialty, demographic, chronological, and regional trends exist for opioid prescribing patterns in ophthalmology.

Opioid prescribing patterns among oculofacial plastic surgeons

PURPOSE

Oculofacial plastic surgeons (OPS) prescribe narcotic pain prescriptions at a rate four times higher than that of other ophthalmologists. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to understand trends in opioid prescriptions among oculofacial plastic surgeons after common oculoplastic surgeries.

METHODS

This cross-sectional survey was sent to OPS in the USA between June 19, 2020 and December 1, 2020. Participants were asked about their training and practice as well as their top two choices for post-operative pain management both overall and for seven common oculoplastic surgeries. Fisher's exact and chi-square tests were performed to analyze relationships between categorical variables.

RESULTS

The two most common opioid medications, in percentage of respondents (n = 82), prescribed overall by OPS were hydrocodone-acetaminophen (35%) and tramadol (21%). Between OPS completed training before 1990 (16%) and those who completed training from 1991 to 2000 (12%), the latter cohort is 4.9 times more likely to prescribe opioids overall ([95% CI = 1.3-15.4], p = .01). Additionally, OPS who are currently practicing in the Southeast USA are 4.2 times more likely to prescribe opioids overall than those practicing in the Northeast USA ([95% CI: 1.4-12.8], p = .02).

CONCLUSION

This study has helped identify patterns in opioid prescribing behavior among OPS based on demographic information and common oculoplastic surgeries. This knowledge will help bring awareness of prescribing behavior to the oculoplastics community and identify areas of improvement to reduce opioid prescriptions. Kindly check and confirm the OD and ON has been correctly identified in 2nd affiliationYes.