Orbital Pseudotumor—Historical Origin and Modern Relevance

An Evidence-Based Approach to Diagnosing Patients Presenting With Orbital Inflammatory Syndromes (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis)

PURPOSE

The initial management of patients presenting with orbital inflammatory syndromes varies-with some pursuing a diagnostic workup while others treat without any testing. The evidence behind this rationale is limited. A review of patients with orbital inflammation is performed with an analysis of diagnostic testing to develop a workflow for such patients.

DESIGN

A retrospective review of patients presenting with acute orbital inflammation at a single institution from 2011 to 2020 was conducted.

METHODS

Orbital imaging was required for inclusion. Patients with high suspicion of neoplasm, bacterial infection, vascular malformation, or thyroid eye disease were excluded. A review of presenting clinical findings, laboratory workup, orbital imaging, and biopsy were performed. Statistical analysis was performed identifying statistically significant diagnostic and treatment maneuvers.

RESULTS

In total, 172 patients met inclusion criteria (66% female, mean age 46 years). The primary clinical presentation was myositis, dacryoadenitis, and infiltrative in 67, 73, and 32 patients (39.0%, 43.0%, 18.6%, respectively). Laboratory studies were conducted in 145 (84%) while biopsy was performed in 55 (32%). Specific orbital inflammation (SOI) was diagnosed in 29 (16.9%) with the most frequent diagnoses being sarcoidosis, IgG4-related disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and systemic lupus erythematosus. The majority (147, 85.5%) was initially treated with steroids, but steroid-sparing agent use was statistically higher in patients with SOI.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients presenting with orbital inflammatory syndromes, distinguishing myositis, dacryoadenitis, and infiltrative disease has workup and differential diagnosis impacts. Because SOI is relatively common, sequelae of SOI, and potential steroid-sparing therapy needs, diagnosis via an evidence-based systemic approach is critical. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.

A single-institution review of lacrimal gland biopsies between 1962 and 2017

PURPOSE

To examine the clinical and histopathologic characteristics of lacrimal gland biopsies at a tertiary academic center.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing lacrimal gland biopsy or excision between 1962 and 2017 was performed via the ocular pathology specimen log. All cases were reviewed for demographics, clinical presentation, and histopathologic diagnoses.

RESULTS

Four hundred and two eyes in 356 patients were included in the analysis. Median age was 49 (range 5-91) with a female predominance (255, 72%, p < .001). Most had unilateral involvement (308, 86.5%) and visual acuity of 20/50 or better (332 eyes, 83%). Limitation in extraocular motility was present in 71 eyes (18%), relative afferent pupillary defect in 10 eyes (2.5%), and intraocular pressure 20 mmHg or above in 80 eyes (20%). The pre-operative radiology report commented on the enlargement of the lacrimal gland in 236 eyes (58.7%), and lack thereof in 73 eyes (18.2%). The most common histopathologic diagnoses were nonspecific inflammation or orbital pseudotumor (170, 42%), lymphoma (65, 16%), pleomorphic adenoma (22, 5.5%), adenoid cystic carcinoma (19, 4.7%), granulomatous inflammation (19, 4.7%), and normal lacrimal gland (16, 4%). Three hundred and seven cases were benign (76%) and 95 malignant (24%). The biopsy specimen was diagnostic in 343 (85%), and non-diagnostic in 59 (15%).

CONCLUSIONS

This is a comprehensive review of one of the largest ocular pathology databases of lacrimal gland lesions. This study confirms the wide range of inflammatory and neoplastic conditions affecting the lacrimal gland and highlights the nuances of histopathologic diagnoses and diagnostic yield of biopsies in clinical practice.

Canine idiopathic orbital inflammation: A case series of four affected dogs (five orbits)

PURPOSE

In humans, idiopathic orbital inflammation (IOI) is a diagnosis attributed to benign, inflammatory orbital conditions without identifiable local or systemic cause. We describe the clinical signs, imaging and histopathological findings, management and outcome of four dogs diagnosed with IOI.

METHODS

Multicentric retrospective study.

RESULTS

A total of four dogs (five orbits) of three different breeds (three cases were English Springer Spaniels [ESS] or ESS-cross) and ages ranging from 3 to 12 years were included. Initial presenting signs were unilateral and included exophthalmos, enophthalmos, globe deviation, thickening and protrusion of the third eyelid and conjunctival hyperemia. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging identified heterogeneous space-occupying, contrast-enhancing orbital lesions in all cases. Sparing of the retrobulbar space was detected in four of five orbits. Histopathology revealed mixed inflammatory infiltrates of lymphocytes, plasma cells, and histiocytes. Immunohistochemistry was performed in two cases highlighting the presence of histiocytes and lymphocytes, predominantly T cells. Resolution of clinical signs was achieved in two cases managed with oral immunosuppressant medication (corticosteroids alone or combined with cyclosporine or azathioprine), one went into spontaneous remission, one resolved with topical corticosteroids, and one underwent exenteration. Recurrence occurred in two cases within 15 months of initial diagnosis and required further immunosuppressant medication. One case developed signs in the contralateral orbit within 8 months of presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

IOI is an uncommon condition in dogs. Its diagnosis relies on the combination of advanced imaging and histology. As in humans, it appears that spontaneous remission and recurrence may occur requiring long-term immunosuppressant medication.

Orbital inflammatory disease

Orbital inflammatory disease (OID), commonly known as orbital pseudotumour, is an inflammatory disease of unknown cause. It has different forms of presentation and different degrees of severity. Its variable nature is the main cause for this disease to be misdiagnosed and misclassified. The prognosis of OID depends on the tissues affected and the histology. OID usually responds favourably to systemic steroid treatment. However, empiric steroids may mask other underlying diseases that respond well to this treatment as well, namely, IgG4-related disease or lymphoproliferative disorders. This fact has led to controversy among various authors as some recommend performing a biopsy in most of the cases, whereas others defend that this procedure should only be performed if the patient has not responded to empiric steroid treatment. Although steroids have been the mainstream treatment of OID, the side effects, relapse rates and lack of response in some cases have resulted in them being replaced by immunosuppressive and immunomodulator therapies that currently stand as a key steroid-sparing treatment option, in addition to radiotherapy and surgery. The aim of this review is to update the evidence on the diagnosis and treatment of OID.

Idiopathic inferior rectus myositis: A rare cause of diplopia and a therapeutic success

Orbital myositis is a rare inflammatory condition of a single or multiple extraocular muscles. It usually presents with unilateral or sequential bilateral sub-acute eye swelling, orbital pain, restricted eye movement, and redness of the eyelid. The swelling of extraocular muscles may lead to limited range of motion that produces blurred vision or diplopia. In this article, we report a male patient with idiopathic inferior rectus myositis presenting with diplopia who was managed successfully by medical and surgical intervention. Acute onset of diplopia with eye pain or limited extraocular movement is an ophthalmic emergency requiring urgent assessment and diagnostic imaging studies such as CT or MRI. The present case shows the crucial role of surgery as an adjunctive modality to achieve an improved clinical picture in patients not responding to immunosuppressive therapy. The secret to the success of management includes regular follow-up with frequent examination and comprehensive radiological and tissue investigations.

Non-specific orbital inflammation: Current understanding and unmet needs

Non-specific orbital inflammation (NSOI) is a noninfectious inflammatory condition of the orbit. Although it is generally considered the most common diagnosis derived from an orbital biopsy, it is a diagnosis of exclusion, meaning that the diagnosis requires exclusion of a systemic process or another identifiable etiology of orbital inflammation. The clinical diagnosis of NSOI is ill-defined, but it is typically characterized by acute orbital signs and symptoms, including pain, proptosis, periorbital edema, chemosis, diplopia, and less commonly visual disturbance. NSOI poses a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge: The clinical presentations and histological findings are heterogeneous, and there are no specific diagnostic criteria or treatment guidelines. The etiology and pathogenesis of NSOI are poorly understood. Here we recapitulate our current clinical understanding of NSOI, with an emphasis on the most recent findings on clinical characteristics, imaging findings, and treatment outcomes. Furthermore, gene expression profiling of NSOI and its implications are presented and discussed.

Idiopathic orbital inflammation with bone destruction and extension into the paranasal sinuses

Idiopathic orbital inflammation developed in the right orbit of a woman in her mid-thirties, causing tearing, photophobia, diplopia, altered depth perception, proptosis, and pain on eye movements. Computed tomography disclosed a mass involving the intraconal and extraconal nasal right orbit, extending to the orbital apex with anterior displacement of the globe, effacement of the medial rectus muscle, portions of the fat plane, and the superior oblique muscle, and bone destruction with extension of the mass through the orbital floor into the superior maxillary sinus and through the lamina papyracea into the ethmoid sinus. Orbital biopsy disclosed dense fibrous connective tissue with numerous lymphocytes and macrophages. Immunohistochemical stains supported a diagnosis of idiopathic inflammatory pseudotumor involving the orbit and sinus mucosa. Treatment with a prednisone taper and a retrobulbar injection of triamcinolone acetonide have relieved her symptoms and diminished her proptosis. This patient highlights the rare potential of idiopathic orbital inflammation to erode though bone into adjacent cranial structures.

Sclerosing Orbital Inflammation Caused by Leishmania braziliensis

Orbital biopsy of nonspecific orbital inflammation, commonly referred to as "orbital pseudotumor," typically shows a combination of polyclonal lymphocytes, plasmocytes, leukocytes, macrophages, and variable degrees of collagen deposition. Herein, we report a patient with a positive history of mucocutaneous leishmaniasis who presented with an orbital mass with a histological profile of idiopathic orbital inflammation. Immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of the orbital specimens demonstrated that the orbital inflammation was associated with the presence of antigens of Leishmania braziliensis and DNA from the parasite.