Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis With Ceftaroline

Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis Ventriculostomy-Related Infection Successfully Treated by Intravenous Ceftaroline after Failure of Daptomycin Treatment

BACKGROUND

Ventriculostomy-related infection with multidrug-negative strains are challenging to treat. We report the use of new antibiotics in such a case.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We report the case of a neurosurgical intensive care unit patient who developed ventriculostomy-related infection with a multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. Vancomycin, recommended in such cases, was not used due to high minimal inhibitory concentrations and concerns for lack of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment. Daptomycin and ceftaroline remained the only treatment options. Daptomycin was shown microbiologically ineffective after 10 treatment days, with undetectable cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentration. Ceftaroline, a novel beta-lactam agent to which the strain showed susceptibility, was thus used. Serum and CSF samples were assessed for antibiotic concentrations. Our results show that CSF bacterial clearance was obtained after 6 days of such treatment. Serum and CSF samplings showed low penetration ratios (2.6%-4.8%), probably due to mild inflammatory CSF profile, with CSF concentration at minimal inhibitory concentration level.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed than even in the case of mild meningeal inflammation, ceftaroline penetration in CSF, although moderate, enabled efficient bacterial clearance and clinical efficacy, in adjunction to correct ventriculoperitoneal shunt management.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: A review of the currently available treatment options

This review is the result of discussions that took place at the 5th MRSA Working Group Consensus Meeting and explores the possible treatment options available for different types of infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), focusing on those antibiotics that could represent a valid alternative to vancomycin. In fact, whilst vancomycin remains a viable option, its therapy is moving towards individualised dosing. Other drugs, such as the new lipoglycopeptides (oritavancin, dalbavancin and telavancin) and fifth-generation cephalosporins (ceftaroline and ceftobiprole), are showing good in vitro potency and in vivo efficacy, especially for patients infected with micro-organisms with higher vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Tedizolid is an attractive agent for use both in hospital and community settings, but the post-marketing data will better clarify its potential. Daptomycin and linezolid have shown non-inferiority to vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA bacteraemia and non-inferiority/superiority to vancomycin in the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia. Thus, several options are available, but more data from clinical practice, especially for invasive infections, are needed to assign specific roles to each antibiotic and to definitely include them in the new antibacterial armamentarium.

Ceftaroline: clinical and microbiology experience with focus on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus after regulatory approval in the USA

Ceftaroline fosamil was approved in 2010 by the United States Food and Drug Administration (USA-FDA) for the treatment of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). After approval, several studies and case reports have described the postmarketing clinical experience with ceftaroline in ABSSSIs and CABP and in patients with invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, many of whom had failed prior antibiotics. Successful clinical outcomes observed among the majority of these patients were supported by preapproval and postapproval in vitro surveillance of ceftaroline activity using breakpoint criteria that have been harmonized between the USA-FDA and CLSI. MIC90 values/percentage of strains susceptible to ceftaroline has remained stable over the period 2009-2012. Taken together, these postapproval studies support the use of ceftaroline for ABSSSI as well as CABP. Importantly, these data also suggest that ceftaroline can be effective in patients with serious invasive MRSA infections who have failed other therapies.

High incidence of discontinuations due to adverse events in patients treated with ceftaroline

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine clinical outcomes in patients who received ceftaroline (Teflaro) 600 mg intravenously every 8 or 12 hours after failing or developing intolerance to first-line agents including vancomycin, daptomycin, or linezolid.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review and review of the literature.

SETTING

Large academic medical center and regional Level 1 trauma and burn center.

PATIENTS

Twelve patients who received ceftaroline for the treatment of refractory methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus infections between March 2011 and October 2012.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Ceftaroline was discontinued in 9 (75%) of 12 patients secondary to adverse effects. The average age of patients who discontinued ceftaroline was 53 years, with a mean body mass index of 29 kg/m(2) and an average of four comorbidities (range one to eight). The median time to discontinuation due to perceived adverse effect was 22 days (range 5-62 days). The reasons for discontinuation of therapy were hematologic toxicities in seven patients and severe rash in two patients. Two patients completed therapy without documented adverse events, and one patient died on day 9 of ceftaroline therapy.

CONCLUSION

When given for off-label indications to 12 patients at our institutions, ceftaroline was associated with an unexpectedly high rate (75%) of discontinuation due to perceived adverse events, including hematologic toxicities and rash.