Loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% vs prednisolone acetate suspension 1% for the treatment of inflammation after cataract surgery in children

The Efficacy and Safety of Standard versus Soft Topical Steroids after Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

TOPIC

Review of the efficacy and safety of standard versus soft topical steroid application after cataract surgery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The control of postoperative inflammation is the mainstay of treatment after cataract surgery. However, no consensus exists regarding the postoperative steroid of choice. Basing the choice of topical postoperative steroidal treatment on high-quality data regarding both risks and benefits of various drugs would be advantageous for both patients and clinicians.

METHODS

A systematic search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Embase electronic databases for all peer-reviewed published randomized control trials that included clinical outcomes of topical steroidal treatment after uneventful cataract surgery was performed. Individual study data were extracted and evaluated in a weighted pooled analysis including grading of total anterior chamber (AC) inflammation, AC cells, AC flare, postoperative visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and rate of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Overall, 508 studies were found, of which 7 were eligible for the systematic review and ultimately were included for analysis, reporting on 593 patients from 5 countries. Age of included patients, when available, ranged between 3.7 and 73.4 years. Follow-up data were available for analysis at 1, 7, and 28 days after surgery. Except for a significantly lower grade of AC flare in the standard steroid group at day 7 (standardized mean difference, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.47; I2 = 0%), inflammatory activity measurements displayed insignificant differences at every other follow-up (days 1 and 28 after surgery). Pooled analysis of IOP at each follow-up demonstrated a higher IOP at the 7-day visit in the standard steroid group, whereas IOP at other time points was comparable among the groups. Qualitative analysis of ocular AEs showed similarities among the groups.

DISCUSSION

The findings of this study suggest that for the average patient, both groups produce a comparable effect on both AC inflammation and postoperative IOP and VA.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Dose Uniformity of Loteprednol Etabonate (Submicron) Ophthalmic Gel 0.38% Compared with Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic Suspension 1

INTRODUCTION

Loteprednol etabonate (submicron) ophthalmic gel 0.38% (LE SM gel 0.38%) is a corticosteroid formulation designed to retain the nonsettling characteristics of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic gel 0.5%, but with reduced drug particle size to improve ocular penetration, allowing for reduced dosing frequency. This study compared the dose uniformity of LE SM gel 0.38% with branded and generic prednisolone acetate (PA) 1% suspensions under simulated in-use dosing conditions.

METHODS

Drug concentrations in drops of LE SM gel 0.38% and PA 1% suspensions, expressed from bottles that were shaken or not shaken, were determined during 2 weeks of simulated on-label dosing (LE SM gel 0.38%: three times daily; PA suspensions: four times daily). Sedimentation of drug particles was assessed for each product using dispersion analysis.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) percent declared drug concentration of LE SM gel 0.38% over 2 weeks was 103.2% (1.3%) when the drug was dispensed from shaken bottles and 103.3% (1.5%) when dispensed from unshaken bottles. However, for branded and generic PA suspensions, mean (SD) percent declared concentrations were 102.2% (1.4%) and 98.3% (2.9%), respectively, when dispensed from shaken bottles; and 89.2% (18.6%) and 78.3% (13.5%), respectively, when dispensed from unshaken bottles. Dispersion analysis showed that drug particles in LE SM gel 0.38% remained fully suspended under accelerated sedimentation conditions, whereas both branded and generic PA suspension drug particles settled out of suspension.

CONCLUSIONS

LE SM gel 0.38% delivered the drug consistently at the declared concentration over the entire 2 weeks of simulated in-use dosing conditions, regardless of whether the drug was dispensed from shaken or unshaken bottles. However, both branded and generic PA suspensions required the bottle to be shaken to provide a consistent drug concentration.