Intraindividual comparison of cytokine and prostaglandin levels with and without low-energy, high-frequency femtosecond laser cataract pretreatment after single-dose topical NSAID application

Comparison of low-energy FLACS and conventional cataract surgery: meta-analysis and systematic review

TOPIC

To systematically compare the effectiveness of conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS) and low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) in patients with cataract.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Cataract surgery is a common procedure, and comparing different techniques such as CPS and low-energy FLACS is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

METHODS

The PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were searched for clinical trials. Outcomes of procedure time, effective phacoemulsification time, balanced salt solution usage, cumulative dissipated energy, mean change of corrected distance visual acuity, endothelial cells reduction, central corneal thickness (CCT), and aqueous cytokine level were evaluated. The effect measures were weighted mean differences with 95% CI. The protocol was registered at the Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (registration number CRD42023420173).

RESULTS

11 studies were included in this meta-analysis, of which 1680 eyes were analyzed (637 eyes in the low-energy FLACS group and 1043 eyes in the CPS group). Low-energy FLACS demonstrated significantly fewer reductions in endothelial cell count at 6 months ( P < .001) compared with CPS. It also exhibited a shorter effective phacoemulsification time ( P < .001) and less balanced salt solution usage ( P < .001). However, there were no differences in cumulative dissipated energy, corrected distance visual acuity, CCT changes, or aqueous cytokine levels between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both low-energy FLACS and CPS are effective in treating cataracts, but low-energy FLACS may offer advantages such as reduced phacoemulsification time and less endothelial cell loss.

Long-term impact of low-energy femtosecond laser and manual cataract surgery on macular layer thickness: A prospective randomized study

PURPOSE

To evaluate change in retinal layers 18 months after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (LCS) and manual cataract surgery (MCS) in a representative age-related cataract population using artificial intelligence (AI)-based automated retinal layer segmentation.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized and intraindividual-controlled study including 60 patients at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria. Bilateral same-day LCS and MCS were performed in a randomized sequence. To provide insight into the development of cystoid macular oedema (CME), retinal layer thickness was measured pre-operatively and up to 18 months post-operatively in the central 1 mm, 3 mm and 6 mm.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients completed all follow-up visits. LCS compared to MCS did not impact any of the investigated retinal layers at any follow-up visit (p > 0.05). For the central 1 mm, a significant increase in total retinal thickness (TRT) was seen after 1 week followed by an elevated plateau thereafter. For the 3 mm and 6 mm, TRT increased only after 3 weeks and 6 weeks and decreased again until 18 months. TRT remained significantly increased compared to pre-operative thickness (p < 0.001). Visual acuity remained unaffected by the macular thickening and no case of CME was observed. Inner nuclear layer (INL) and outer nuclear layer (ONL) were the main causative layers for the total TRT increase. Photoreceptors (PR) declined 1 week after surgery but regained pre-operative values 18 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Low-energy femtosecond laser pre-treatment did not influence thickness of the retinal layers in any topographic zone compared to manual high fluidic phacoemulsification. TRT did not return to pre-operative values 18 months after surgery. The causative layers for subclinical development of CME were successfully identified.

Surgical time and efficacy of illuminated chopper-assisted cataract surgery involving miosis after femtosecond laser pretreatment

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of the illuminated chopper-assisted cataract surgery in terms of shortening the surgical time in eyes with miosis after femtosecond laser pretreatment.

METHODS

As retrospective study, three hundred thirty-six eyes of 336 consecutive patients who underwent the femtosecond laser and illuminated chopper-assisted cataract surgery were included. Cases with pupil less than 6 mm after femtosecond laser pretreatment were included in the miosis group. Pupil diameter, surgical time, and improved efficacy (100/surgical time×pupil size) were compared between eyes with and without miosis.

RESULTS

Of 336 eyes, 20 were included in the miosis group (6.0%). Pupil diameter was smaller in eyes with miosis than in those without miosis (5.23 ± 0.38 mm vs 7.35 ± 0.64 mm, p < 0.001); however, surgical time was not different (6.86 ± 0.73 min vs 6.60 ± 1.27 min, p = 0.071) between the two groups. Mechanical pupil dilations were not needed in any cases. As a result, improved efficacy was calculated to be higher in patients with miosis (2.83 vs 2.14, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In terms of surgical time and improved efficacy, using the illuminated chopper simplified cataract surgery involving miosis after femtosecond laser pretreatment. The use of an illuminated chopper is expected to be a good solution for femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgeries.

Anterior chamber cytokine production and postoperative macular edema in patients with diabetes undergoing FLACS

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and manual cataract surgery (MCS) on proinflammatory cytokine expression in patients with diabetes vs nondiabetic patients.

SETTING

Outpatient surgical center in Vaughan, Ontario, Canada.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

METHODS

Patients with diabetes and nondiabetic patients undergoing noncomplicated MCS or FLACS were assigned into 4 cohorts: MCS nondiabetic (n = 30), FLACS nondiabetic (n = 42), MCS diabetic (n = 40), and FLACS diabetic (n = 40). Aqueous humor inflammatory mediator concentrations were evaluated at MCS onset and after femtosecond laser treatment. The presence of cystoid macular edema, anterior chamber (AC) inflammation, central retinal thickness, macular volume, and retinal microvascular changes (through optical coherence tomography angiography) were evaluated preoperatively and on postoperative day 1, week 1, month 1 (POM1), and month 3 (POM3).

RESULTS

Patients with diabetes receiving FLACS had a higher concentration of interleukin (IL)-7, IL-13, and interferon-induced protein-10 than MCS diabetic patients; they also demonstrated higher levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and lower levels of interferon (IFN)-γ, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and IFN-α2 compared with MCS nondiabetic patients. Macular volume appeared to be significantly higher in MCS diabetic vs MCS non-diabetic patients at POM1 and between FLACS diabetic vs FLACS nondiabetic patients at POM3. There were no other significant differences between the cohorts for any parameter.

CONCLUSIONS

FLACS use in patients with diabetes demonstrated some differences in AC cytokine expression compared with non-diabetic FLACS or diabetic patients undergoing MCS; however, there was no increase in clinical inflammatory biomarkers. FLACS seems to be a safe technique to use in patients with diabetes.

Laser-assisted cataract surgery versus standard ultrasound phacoemulsification cataract surgery

BACKGROUND

Cataract is the leading cause of blindness in the world and, as such, cataract surgery is one of the most commonly performed operations globally. Surgical techniques have changed dramatically over the past half century with associated improvements in outcomes and safety. Femtosecond lasers can be used to perform the key steps in cataract surgery, such as corneal incisions, lens capsulotomy and fragmentation. The potential advantage of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) is greater precision and reproducibility of these steps compared to manual techniques. The disadvantages are the costs associated with FLACS technology.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness and safety of FLACS with standard ultrasound phacoemulsification cataract surgery (PCS) by gathering evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; 2022, Issue 5); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; LILACS; the ISRCTN registry; ClinicalTrials.gov; the WHO ICTRP and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 10 May 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs where FLACS was compared to PCS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently screened the search results, assessed risk of bias and extracted data using the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary outcome for this review was intraoperative complications in the operated eye, namely anterior capsule, and posterior capsule tears. The secondary outcomes included corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), quality of vision (as measured by any validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM)), postoperative cystoid macular oedema complications, endothelial cell loss and cost-effectiveness. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 42 RCTs conducted in Europe, North America, South America and Asia, which enrolled a total of 7298 eyes of 5831 adult participants. Overall, the studies were at unclear or high risk of bias. In 16 studies the authors reported financial links with the manufacturer of the laser platform evaluated in their studies. Thirteen of the studies were within-person (paired-eye) studies with one eye allocated to one procedure and the other eye allocated to the other procedure. These studies were reported ignoring the paired nature of the data. There was low-certainty evidence of little or no difference in the odds of developing anterior capsular tears when comparing FLACS and PCS (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40 to 1.72; 5835 eyes, 27 studies) There was one fewer anterior capsule tear per 1000 operations in the FLACS group compared with the PCS group (95% CI 4 fewer to 3 more).  There was low-certainty evidence of lower odds of developing posterior capsular tears with FLACS compared to PCS (Peto OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.00; 5767 eyes, 26 studies). There were four fewer posterior capsule tears per 1000 operations in the FLACS group compared with the PCS group (95% CI 6 fewer to same).  There was moderate-certainty evidence of a very small advantage for the FLACS arm with regard to CDVA at six months or more follow-up, (mean difference (MD) -0.01 logMAR, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.00; 1323 eyes, 7 studies). This difference is equivalent to 1 logMAR letter between groups and is not thought to be clinically important. From the three studies (1205 participants) reporting a variety of PROMs (Cat-PROMS, EQ-5D, EQ-SD-3L, Catquest9-SF and patient survey) up to three months following surgery, there was moderate-certainty evidence of little or no difference in the various parameters between the two treatment arms. There was low-certainty evidence of little or no difference in the odds of developing cystoid macular oedema when comparing FLACS and PCS (Peto OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.28; 4441 eyes, 18 studies). There were three fewer cystoid macular oedema cases per 1000 operations in the FLACS group compared with the PCS group (95% CI 10 fewer to 6 more).  In one study the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (cost difference divided by quality-adjusted life year (QALY) difference) was GBP £167,620 when comparing FLACS to PCS. In another study, the ICER was EUR €10,703 saved per additional patient who had treatment success with PCS compared to FLACS. Duration ranged from three minutes in favour of FLACS to eight minutes in favour of PCS (I2 = 100%, 11 studies) (low-certainty evidence).  There was low-certainty evidence of little or no important difference in endothelial cell loss when comparing FLACS with PCS (MD 12 cells per mm2 in favour of FLACS, 95% CI -40 to 64; 1512 eyes, 10 studies).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review of 42 studies provides evidence that there is probably little or no difference between FLACS and PCS in terms of intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative visual acuity and quality of life. Evidence from two studies suggests that FLACS may be the less cost-effective option. Many of the included studies only investigated very specific outcome measures such as effective phacoemulsification time, endothelial cell count change or aqueous flare, rather than those directly related to patient outcomes. Standardised reporting of complications and visual and refractive outcomes for cataract surgery would facilitate future synthesis, and guidance on this has been recently published.

Management of inflammation after the cataract surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review most recent studies and clinical trials regarding pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention of inflammation after the cataract surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

FLACS gave opportunity to evaluate inflammatory cytokines in the aqueous humour right after the laser procedure, which led to acknowledging the inflammation pathogenesis during the phacoemulsification. Although there is still a lack of evidence, which would prove the long-term benefit of NSAIDs, they are indicated and effective when risk factors for PCME are present. PREMED studies showed that combination of NSAID and steroids after the surgery for healthy subjects is cost-effective. The triamcinolone injection together with topical steroids and NSAIDs for diabetic patients after the cataract surgery was the most cost-effective in preventing PCME according to the PREMED. Dropless cataract surgery is another emerging topic: dexamethasone implants and suspensions look promising as we await more clinical trials with drug-loaded IOLs.

SUMMARY

Inflammation after the cataract surgery can be prevented, and these methods are one of the most essential topics with growing phacoemulsification rate. Topical NSAIDs are cost-effective not only for patients with risk factors for PCME but also for healthy subjects. New dropless techniques are being successfully introduced in the clinical practice.

Intraoperative complications of cataract surgery using a low-energy femtosecond laser: Results from a real-world high-volume setting

In this study, we report data on intraoperative complications occurring after cataract surgery in a high-volume single-center setting using a low-energy, mobile femtosecond laser. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) in our hospital between August 2015 and December 2019. Among the sample of 1,806 eyes of 1,131 patients (903 left and 903 right eyes), the mean age was 75.8 years (range, 21-99 years). The overall intraoperative complication rate was 0.28% (n = 5), with three cases of anterior capsule tear (0.17%) and two cases of posterior capsule tear (0.11%). No further complications occurred. This study underlines the safety of low-energy femtosecond-assisted cataract surgery in a real-world setting with a very low rate of intraoperative complications.

The Effects of High Energy Capsulotomy on Aqueous Cytokine Profiles and Pupil Size During Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery

PURPOSE

To assess whether aqueous cytokine profiles and pupil size are altered when high capsulotomy energy is used in eyes undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS), and if preoperative use of a topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) has an effect on this.

METHODS

This prospective study recruited 83 eyes (63 patients) that were allocated to four treatment groups: conventional phacoemulsification (n = 20 eyes); FLACS with 90% capsulotomy energy without NSAID pretreatment (n = 20 eyes); FLACS with 90% capsulotomy energy with NSAID pre-treatment (n = 21 eyes); and FLACS with 150% capsulotomy energy with NSAID pretreatment (n = 22 eyes). Aqueous humor was collected before and after phacoemulsification to assess cytokine profiles. Pupil size was measured before and after laser capsulotomy.

RESULTS

FLACS increased aqueous concentrations of pros-taglandin E₂ (PGE₂), interferon γ (IFN-γ), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) compared to conventional phacoemulsification. However, when increasing capsulotomy energy from 90% to 150% (with topical NSAID pretreatment), there was no significant increase in aqueous concentrations of PGE₂ (37.7 ± 21.7 vs 33.6 ± 27.6 pg/mL, P = .99), IFN-γ (3.6 ± 1.1 vs 3.6 ± 0.8 pg/mL, P = .99), or IL-6 (7.1 ± 2.9 vs 6.3 ± 2.4 pg/mL, P = .99). For 90% and 150% capsulotomy energy, there was significant miosis following laser capsulotomy. Increased PGE₂ concentration was significantly correlated with a reduction in pupil area (r = -0.58, P < .001) and pupil diameter (r = -0.57, P < .001). However, when a topical NSAID was given preoperatively, there was no difference in the degree of miosis between the 90% and 150% capsulotomy energy groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment with a topical NSAID prevented a rise in PGE₂, IFN-γ, and IL-6 levels and excessive miosis when a higher capsulotomy energy was used. When a topical NSAID is used preoperatively, it is safe to use higher capsulotomy energy settings (with a low pulse energy femtosecond laser system) to achieve a satisfactory capsulotomy. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(9):587-594.].

Prostaglandin Release After Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery Without Anti-Inflammatory Drug Premedication

PURPOSE

To compare prostaglandin E2 (PGE-2) levels in the aqueous and pupil diameter in patients undergoing low-pulse energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (LCS) without non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) pretreatment with either fragmentation or capsulotomy performed first.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, fellow-eye controlled comparison.

METHODS

This study was undertaken at the Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna. The population consisted of 140 eyes of 70 patients with bilateral age-related cataract. Bilateral same-day LCS with either anterior capsulotomy before lens fragmentation (Caps-First) in one eye or vice versa (Frag-First) in a random sequence were performed. Aqueous was tapped 5 minutes after LCS and PGE-2 concentration was analyzed. Pupil diameters were recorded immediately before and after femtosecond laser pretreatment. The main outcome measure was PGE-2 concentrations in picograms/milliliter and pupil diameter in millimeters.

RESULTS

Mean PGE-2 concentrations were 42.0 ± 63.7 pg/mL in the Caps-First group versus 71.8 ± 160.7 pg/mL with the Frag-First group (P = .186). Mean pupil diameters before and after pretreatment were 7.6 ± 0.8 mm and 7.6 ± 0.8 mm, respectively (P = .871). Mean PGE-2 concentrations and pupil diameters did not show any significant difference between time points or groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-energy femtosecond laser pretreatment did not increase PGE-2 levels in the absence of NSAID pretreatment. This was independent of whether capsulotomy or fragmentation was performed first. Moreover, no pupillary miosis was observed.

Ultrasound energy consumption and macular changes with manual and femtolaser-assisted high-fluidics cataract surgery: a prospective randomized comparison

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to compare ultrasound (US) consumption and central macular thickness (CMT) and volume changes with manual and femtosecond laser (FSL)-assisted cataract nucleus workup.

METHODS

Sixty patients scheduled for immediate sequential bilateral surgery underwent a prospective randomized intraindividual comparison of nucleus sector fragmentation performed manually in one eye and with low-energy FSL assistance in the partner eye, followed by high-fluidics phacoaspiration with a maximum US power of 30%. Ultrasound (US) energy consumption and macular thickness and volume were compared as measured by intraoperative effective phacoemulsification time (EPT) and high-resolution spectral domain optical coherence tomography pre- and 1 week, 3 weeks and 6 weeks postoperatively. Results are presented as means ± SD or medians [min; max].

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients completed the full follow-up. For the manual and FSL-assisted groups, nuclear hardness was almost identical with a mean LOCS III grade of 2.44 ± 1.08 and 2.50 ± 1.00 (p = 0.371). Median EPT was 1.40 [0.2; 8.3] and 1.25 [0.2; 9.4] seconds. Median preoperative CMT was 276.50 [263.25; 289.75] µm and 276.00 [262.00; 290.00] µm. Median postoperative CMT was 278.00 [260.50; 288.00] versus 275.50 [264.00; 290.50] µm at 1 week, 279.50 [266.75; 292.25] versus 280.00 [266.50; 294.50] µm at 3 weeks and 280.50 [268.00, 293.75] versus 279.50 [264.75; 295.25] µm at 6 weeks. Differences in CMT and total macular volume between the groups were not statistically significant at any point in time.

CONCLUSION

Femtosecond laser (FSL) prefragmentation of the nucleus into six sectors did not reduce US energy consumption compared with manual splitting of the nucleus into four quadrants in this particular surgical setting. Sectorial FSL-prechopping with the low-energy FSL used had no additional impact on postoperative macular thickness and volume.

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing 1-Year Outcomes of Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery versus Conventional Phacoemulsification

Purpose: To compare 1-year clinical outcomes, phacoemulsification energy, aqueous profiles, and patient-reported outcomes of low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) vs. conventional phacoemulsification.

Methods: The study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with paired-eye design. Eighty-five patients were randomized to receive FLACS (Ziemer LDV Z8) in one eye and conventional phacoemulsification in the fellow eye. Clinical data including phacoemulsification energy parameters (cumulative dissipated energy, phacoemulsification power, and phacoemulsification time), uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities (UCDVA and BCDVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell count (ECC), anterior chamber flare, and post-operative complications were obtained for 1 year. Aqueous humor was collected for the analysis of prostaglandin (PGE)₂, cytokines and chemokines concentrations. Patients' reported-outcomes on surgical experiences were evaluated using an in-house questionnaire.

Results: Compared to conventional phacoemulsification, the low-energy assisted FLACS group had significantly less ECC reduction at 3 months (1.5 ± 0.3% vs. 7.0 ± 2.4%; P < 0.01) and 1 year (8.2 ± 2.8% vs. 11.2 ± 3.6%; P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in the phacoemulsification energy parameters, UCDVA, BCDVA, MRSE, CCT, occurrence of post-operative complications between the 2 groups throughout post-operative 1 year. Patients' subjective surgical experiences, including the surgical duration and perceived inconvenience, were comparable between the 2 groups. FLACS resulted in significantly higher aqueous PGE₂ (P < 0.01), interleukin (IL)-6 (P = 0.03), IL-8 (P = 0.03), and interferon (IFN)-γ (P = 0.04) concentrations and greater anterior chamber flare at 1 day (P = 0.02).

Conclusions: Our RCT presented 1-year longitudinal clinical and laboratory data. The long-term ECC result was more favorable in low-energy FLACS. The rest of the intraoperative and post-operative outcomes, as well as patient-reported outcomes, were comparable between these two procedures.

Perioperative pupil size in low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To assess potential changes in pupil size during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) using a low-energy laser system.

METHODS

The pupil sizes of eyes undergoing FLACS were measured using the Ziemer LDV Z8 by extracting images from the laser software after each of the following steps: application of suction, lens fragmentation, and capsulotomy. Furthermore, the pupil diameters were measured based on preoperative surgical microscope images and after releasing the suction. Paired t-test and the two one-sided tests (TOST) procedure were used for statistical analyses. The horizontal and vertical pupil diameters were compared in each of the steps with preoperative values.

RESULTS

Data were available for 52 eyes (52 patients, mean age 73.4 years, range 51-87 years). The equivalence between mean preoperative pupil size and status immediately after femtosecond laser treatment was confirmed (p<0.001; 95% confidence interval [-0.0637, 0.0287] for horizontal and p<0.001; 95% CI [-0.0158, 0.0859] for vertical diameter). There was statistically significant horizontal and vertical enlargement of pupil diameters between 0.15 and 0.24 mm during the laser treatment steps as compared with preoperative values (all p values <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

No progressive pupil narrowing was observed using low-energy FLACS. Although a suction-induced, slight increase in pupil area became apparent, this effect was completely reversible after removing the laser interface.

One-Year Results of Arcuate Keratotomy in Patients With Low to Moderate Corneal Astigmatism Using a Low-Pulse-Energy Femtosecond Laser

PURPOSE

To investigate corneal astigmatism (CA) reduction and corneal optical quality after surface-penetrating femtosecond laser arcuate keratotomies (Femto AK) considering anterior (CA_ant) and posterior corneal curvature (CA_post), total corneal refractive power astigmatism (CA_tot), and corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) through 1 year.

DESIGN

Prospective interventional case series.

METHODS

Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna. PatientPopulation: Forty-three eyes of 43 patients with age-related cataract and CA_tot between 1 and 3 diopters (D).

INTERVENTION

Paired keratotomies were created with a low-energy femtosecond laser (LDV Z8; Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems, Port, Switzerland) and combined with an astigmatic neutral manual posterior-limbal cataract incision. CA and HOAs measurements were obtained preoperatively and after 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year. MainOutcomeMeasure: Change of CA and HOAs after low-energy Femto AK through 1 year.

RESULTS

Mean preoperative CA_ant and CA_tot (1.62 ± 0.49 D and 1.58 ± 0.44 D) were significantly reduced, to 0.66 ± 0.38 and 0.50 ± 0.30 D (P < .001) 1 year after surgery, respectively. CA_post showed no significant change, from 0.31 ± 0.19 D preoperatively to 0.31 ± 0.13 D (P = .732) at the 1-year follow-up period. Astigmatism as calculated by vector astigmatism analysis stayed stable at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year. Corneal wavefront HOAs significantly improved at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Paired surface-penetrating keratotomies created by a low-energy femtosecond laser showed efficient and stable CA reduction within 1 year after surgery. The optical quality of the cornea was preserved with lower HOAs than preoperatively.

Femtosecond-Laser Assisted Surgery of the Eye: Overview and Impact of the Low-Energy Concept

This article provides an overview of both established and innovative applications of femtosecond (fs)-laser-assisted surgical techniques in ophthalmology. Fs-laser technology is unique because it allows cutting tissue at very high precision inside the eye. Fs lasers are mainly used for surgery of the human cornea and lens. New areas of application in ophthalmology are on the horizon. The latest improvement is the high pulse frequency, low-energy concept; by enlarging the numerical aperture of the focusing optics, the pulse energy threshold for optical breakdown decreases, and cutting with practically no side effects is enabled.