Ex vivo photoactivated chromophore for keratitis-corneal crosslinking on inverted graft: new approach to manage interface infectious keratitis after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty

Clinical outcome and endothelial loss following prepupillary and retropupillary implantation of iris claw intraocular lenses

PURPOSE

Iris claw intraocular lenses (IOLs) were successfully used for the management of aphakia in patients that lack capsular support. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of prepupillary and retropupillary implantation of these IOLs.

METHODS

The files of the 26 patients that had an iris claw IOL implantation between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Detailed ophthalmological examination findings including corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), intraocular pressure, endothelial cell counts, slit lamp and dilated fundus examination findings were specifically tabulated. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were also specifically recorded.

RESULTS

There were 18 patients in the prepupillary implantation group and eight patients in the retropupillary implantation group. Age and gender distribution were similar between the groups. CDVA significantly increased in prepupillary and retropupillary implantation groups (p = 0.001 and p = 0.012, respectively). Median endothelial cell loss was 6.7% in prepupillary group and 7.2% in retropupillary group. The only intraoperative complication was iridodialysis (n = 1). Postoperative complications included retinal detachment (n = 1), cystoid macular edema (n = 2) and IOL tilt (n = 1). All of these complications occurred in the prepupillary implantation group.

CONCLUSION

Prepupillary and retropupillary implantation of iris claw IOLs resulted with similar visual gain and endothelial loss rates in a follow-up time of 6 months. There was an insignificant trend toward a reduced complication rate following retropupillary implantation.

Early postoperative infection following lamellar keratoplasty: a review

With the growing popularity of lamellar keratoplasty for selective replacement of diseased corneal tissue, it is important to understand the risk of developing an infection after the procedure. Although lesser than that postpenetrating keratoplasty, the reports on post lamellar keratoplasty infectious keratitis are not negligible. Trends of acute infections arising within 2 months of surgery are a subject of interest. Most of these infections are reported post Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty with a preponderance of Candida species. A donor to host transmission of infection is not uncommon. Among the Candida cases, about 80% seem to occur due to a donor to host transmission. Infections presenting as or progressing to endophthalmitis lead to a poor visual outcome. Strict aseptic measures and protocols during corneal tissue harvesting, tissue processing, tissue storage and surgery are essential to prevent occurrence of these infections. After the infection has occurred, determining the aetiology and drug susceptibility through microbiological testing is vital. This helps to guide treatment protocols and hence determines final outcome of these cases. Most cases require some form of surgical management for resolution of infection, most often a graft removal and therapeutic keratoplasty. Secondary surgical interventions are performed to restore graft clarity and achieve a good final visual outcome.