Impact on binocular visual function of small-incision lenticule extraction for high myopia

Visual function after ultrathin Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty or Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with cataract surgery: a randomised controlled clinical trial

AIMS

To compare best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity and endothelial cell density (ECD) after ultrathin Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) and Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

METHODS

A randomised, single-blinded, single-centre design was used. 72 patients with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and cataract were randomised to UT-DSAEK or DMEK combined with phacoemulsification and lens implantation. 27 patients with cataract were included in a control group and treated with phacoemulsification and lens implantation. The primary outcome was BCVA at 12 months.

RESULTS

Compared with UT-DSAEK, DMEK resulted in better BCVA with mean differences of 6.1 early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) (p=0.001) after 3 months, 7.4 ETDRS (p<0.001) after 6 months and 5.7 ETDRS (p<0.001) after 12 months. The control group obtained significantly better BCVA with a mean difference of 5.2 ETDRS (p<0.001) compared with DMEK 12 months postoperatively. Compared with UT-DSAEK, contrast sensitivity was significantly better 3 months after DMEK with a mean difference of 0.10 LogCS (p=0.03). However, our study found no effect after 12 months (p=0.08). ECD was significantly lower after UT-DSAEK compared with DMEK with mean differences of 332 cells/mm2 (p<0.01) after 3 months, 296 cells/mm2 (p<0.01) after 6 months and 227 cells/mm2 (p=0.03) after 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with UT-DSAEK, DMEK resulted in better BCVA 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Twelve months postoperatively, DMEK had a higher ECD than UT-DSAEK; however, no difference in contrast sensitivity was found.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04417959.

Impact of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for High Myopia on Intraocular Pressure Measurements With Pneumotonometry

PURPOSE

To evaluate the medium-term impact of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) on air-puff tonometry (APT) and how it may be corrected.

METHODS

In this controlled prospective study, 69 eyes from 69 patients treated with SMILE for high myopia (mean: -7.22 diopters) were included. Central corneal thickness (CCT), spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ), corneal power, and intraocular pressure (IOP) (assessed by APT) were measured before and 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The measured IOP decreased significantly after SMILE surgery (mean: -6.43 mm Hg), indicating a significant underestimation of the true IOP by APT. There was a significant correlation between change in SEQ, CCT, and apparent IOP. Correcting the apparent IOP measurement by applying a multiple regression correction did not provide significantly better estimates compared to adding 6.4 mm Hg to the measurement.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that previous SMILE surgery should be considered when interpreting APT measurements, because the measurements underestimate the true IOP. Multiple regressions cannot estimate the true IOP with certainty. For screening purposes, adding 6.4 mm Hg to the apparent IOP of a patient treated for high myopia may be sufficient. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(9):606-611.].

Dynamic Visual Acuity After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia Patients

In the present study we compared dynamic visual acuity (DVA) of 84 eyes (for 42 adults with myopia; M age = 28.4, SD = 6.6 years; males = 38.1%, females = 61.9%) at 40 and 80 degree per second (dps) before surgery with eyeglass corrections and after a surgical procedure - a small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Participants underwent binocular SMILE surgery with plano refraction targets. Their eyeglass-corrected binocular DVA at 40 and 80 dps was evaluated preoperatively, and their uncorrected binocular DVA was assessed post-operatively at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months. The mean logMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities (UDVA and CDVA) were -0.09 and -0.11 respectively, 3 months postoperatively. The mean preoperative eyeglass-corrected DVAs at 40 and 80 dps were 0.141 and 0.184, respectively, and significant improvements were observed for 40 dps and 80 dps DVAs 3 months postoperatively. Pearson's correlations were statistically significant between the postoperative DVAs at 3 months and for both the preoperative DVA and postoperative UDVA at both 40 dps and 80 dps. The change in the DVAs at 3 months were significantly associated with the preoperative DVAs at 40 dps and 80 dps. In conclusion, myopic patients' DVAs significantly improved following SMILE in comparison to corrected preoperative visual acuity when wearing eyeglasses. The post-SMILE DVA was associated with both the preoperative DVA and the postoperative UDVA.