Reoperation for complications within 90 days of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery

The Evolution and Current Landscape of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgeries: A Review

This review examines the evolution, current status, and future potential of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS), a significant advancement in the treatment of glaucoma, a leading cause of irreversible blindness. MIGS offer a less invasive alternative to traditional glaucoma surgeries, primarily aimed at reducing intraocular pressure, minimizing tissue trauma, and providing a safer profile. With the emergence of devices such as the Trabectome, iStent, and others, MIGS have expanded the surgical toolkit, allowing personalized, patient-centered care. Despite their advantages, MIGS face challenges such as efficacy in severe cases, long-term data, and accessibility. Ongoing research and technological innovations continue to refine their capabilities and applications, promising to further transform glaucoma management and patient outcomes. This paper provides an in-depth analysis of MIGS, reflecting on their impact and contemplating future directions in this dynamically evolving field.

IOP-lowering and drug-sparing effects of trabectome surgery with or without cyclodialysis ab interno

PURPOSE

To compare the postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) after ab interno trabeculectomy (AIT; trabectome surgery) alone or combined with cyclodialysis ab interno (AITC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-three eyes with insufficiently controlled open-angle glaucoma were included in this consecutive case series. All eyes received AIT, combined with phacoemulsification and IOL-implantation in phakic instances, with or without additional cyclodialysis ab interno. Postoperative visual acuity, IOP, number of IOP-lowering medications and complications were registered over 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 19 eyes (14 patients) received AIT and 24 (19 patients) received AITC. Both groups were comparable for baseline IOP (AIT: 19.7 ± 8.2 mmHg; AITC: 19.4 ± 6.8 mmHg; p = 0.96), there was a comparable IOP reduction after 6 months (AIT: - 3.8 ± 12.3, median (interquartile range (IQR)): - 3.8 (- 7.8-4.8) mmHg; AITC: - 4.9 ± 8.3, median (IQR): - 2.0 (- 10.8-2.0) mmHg; p = 0.95) and 12 months (AIT: - 4.3 ± 6.6, median (IQR): - 4.0 (- 8.0 to - 1.0) mmHg; AITC: - 3.7 ± 6.7, median (IQR): - 1.5 (- 5.5 to - 0.5) mmHg; p = 0.49). While final visual acuity was similar between the groups, they differed regarding topical IOP-lowering medications (baseline: AIT 2.9 ± 1.2 and AITC 2.9 ± 1.2; 1 year after surgery: AIT 2.6 ± 1.5 (p = 0.16) and AITC 1.3 ± 1.3; p < 0.001)). Depending on the definition, a complete or qualified success of 33.4-45.8% was achieved in AITC compared to 15.8-21.1% in AIT.

CONCLUSION

The additional suprachoroidal outflow when AIT is combined with cyclodialysis ab interno (AITC) seems to result in an additional drug sparing effect for at least 1 year without critical safety signals. Thus, AITC might be further investigated prospectively prior to advocating its use in routine minimally invasive glaucoma surgery.

Reoperations for complications within 90 days after gel stent implantation or trabeculectomy

Purpose

To describe reoperations in the operating room for complications that occurred within the first 90 days after gel stent implantation or trabeculectomy at a single institution over 5 years.

Methods

In this retrospective chart review, patients who have undergone gel stent implantation with mitomycin C (MMC) or trabeculectomy with MMC were enrolled. Postoperative complications that required reoperations within the first 90 days were evaluated.

Results

A total of 510 surgeries were performed on 392 patients over a 57-month period by 2 glaucoma surgeons. Of these, 284 were gel stent implantation, and 226 were trabeculectomy. Combined phacoemulsification was performed in 52/284 (18.3%) in the gel stent group and in 26/226 (11.5%) of eyes in the trabeculectomy group (p = 0.03). Reoperations took place in 13/510 (2.5%) eyes, including 4/284 (1.4%) in the gel stent group, 9/226 (4.0%) in the trabeculectomy group (p = 0.07). In the gel stent group, indications for reoperation were bleb failure (2), suprachoroidal hemorrhage (1), bullous keratopathy (1). In the trabeculectomy group, indications for reoperation were bleb failure (3), overfiltration (2), persistent wound leak (2), aqueous misdirection (2).

Conclusions

The rates of reoperation for early postoperative complications after gel stent or trabeculectomy was low and comparable with previous studies. A slightly higher number of reoperations within 90 days was observed in the trabeculectomy group than the gel stent group despite the more significant number of combined procedures in the latter group. Bleb failure was the most common indications for reoperation in both groups. Excessive outflow was a cause of reoperation mostly in the trabeculectomy group.