Real-world incidence of monofocal toric intraocular lens repositioning: analysis of the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS Registry

Comparison of the effect of capsular bend on the rotational stability between 2 toric intraocular lenses

PURPOSE

To compare the effect of capsular bend on the rotational stability between 2 toric intraocular lenses (IOLs).

SETTING

Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

METHODS

Patients with preexisting astigmatism received AcrySof IQ (SN6AT) or TECNIS (ZCT/ZMT) toric IOL during cataract surgery. CASIA2 was used to record the toric IOL axial orientation and capsular bend index (CBI) at the 1-day, 1-week, 1-month, and 3-month interval postoperatively. The postoperative rotational stability and CBI of both models were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 58 eyes from 58 patients were enrolled in this study. The total misalignment of the TECNIS (ZCT/ZMT) group (6.96 ± 5.10 degrees, 7.41 ± 5.19 degrees, 6.93 ± 5.29 degrees, and 6.86 ± 5. 27 degrees) was significantly higher than that of the AcrySof IQ (SN6AT) group (3.55 ± 2.21 degrees, 4.00 ± 2.74 degrees, 3.72 ± 2.72 degrees, and 3.52 ± 2.50 degrees) at all follow-up intervals ( P < .05). The mean rotation of the TECNIS (ZCT/ZMT) group (2.66 ± 2.18 degrees) was significantly greater than that of the AcrySof IQ (SN6AT) group (1.65 ± 1.47 degrees) from 1 day to 1 week postoperatively ( P < .05). The capsular bend formation in the TECNIS (ZCT/ZMT) group was delayed compared with the AcrySof IQ (SN6AT) group ( P < .05, at the 1-week, 1-month, and 3-month interval). The TECNIS (ZCT/ZMT) group showed fibrosis in the peripheral anterior capsule, leading to its stretching away from the IOL surface, while the AcrySof IQ (SN6AT) group exhibited gentle adherence of the anterior capsule to the IOL surface.

CONCLUSIONS

The AcrySof IQ toric IOL (SN6AT) exhibited greater rotational stability than the TECNIS toric IOL (ZCT/ZMT), which may partially result from the delay in capsular bend formation of TECNIS at the 1-day to 1-week follow-up postoperatively.

Intraocular lens power calculation formulas: a scientometric analysis

Background

The most accurate method of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in cataract surgery has not been determined, and further studies are needed to reach a consensus. The aim of this study was to assess publications related to IOL power calculation formulas, mapping their yearly trends, most productive authors, top publishing countries and institutions, and areas of specialization for IOL power formulas.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive analysis of research articles published on the topic of IOL power calculation formulas. Using PubMed, we employed appropriate search terms and filtered the results for the period of January 1, 1946, to June 28, 2023. Data were analyzed using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Microsoft Excel programs. The visual representations of the collected data through the use of figures was provided to demonstrate the aspects of IOL power calculation research.

Results

We retrieved 5475 documents in the initial search. Analysis of these documents revealed an increase in the number of publications, from one publication in 1946 to 201 publications in 2023. The top three countries contributing to these publications were the United States, China, and Japan, collectively accounting for over 27% of the total articles. However, the two institutions with the highest contributions were located in the United Kingdom and Hungary, neither of which was among the top 10 countries in overall contributions. Overall 15 326 authors contributed to publications pertaining to IOL power calculation formulas. Among these authors, the most prolific contributors included Achim Langenbucher from Saarland University (Germany), Giacomo Savini from G.B. Bietti Foundation I.R.C.C.S. (Italy), and Kenneth J Hoffer from the University of California (United States). Saarland University emerged as the most productive institution, contributing equally to two distinct departments: the Dr. Rolf M. Schwiete Center for Limbal Stem Cell Research and Congenital Aniridia, as well as the Department of Experimental Ophthalmology. The School of Physical Science at the Open University in the United Kingdom engaged in partnership with various institutions including Eye & Laser Clinic Castrop Rauxel in Germany and Johannes Kepler University Linz in Austria. Among the top 10 keywords found in the publications were "cataract", "cataract surgery", and "intraocular lens".

Conclusions

This study represents the first scientometric analysis of publications related to IOL power calculation formulas. The study offers valuable insights into the geographic distribution, contributing authors, and emphasis of research on the IOL power calculation formulas. Further cooperation is essential to pinpoint the most suitable formula and to address gaps in our current understanding.

Repositioning Rates of Toric IOLs Implanted in Cataract Surgery Patients: A Retrospective Chart Review

Purpose

To determine the incidence of postoperative repositioning of toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) due to clinically significant rotation.

Patients and Methods

This study included consecutive cataract patients with pre-existing astigmatism who had undergone cataract surgery with toric IOL implantation by a single experienced surgeon. Case records of patients who were recommended to undergo toric IOL repositioning surgery due to clinically significant postoperative IOL rotation from the implanted axis were identified. The need for a secondary intervention to manage residual astigmatism was based upon postoperative residual astigmatic error ≥0.75 D, the patient's qualitative dissatisfaction with the level of postoperative distance vision, dilated post-op examination, and confirmation of the significant potential for astigmatism reduction.

Results

Case records of 993 eyes implanted with AcrySof toric (N = 362), Tecnis Toric I (N = 53), Tecnis Toric II (N = 308), or enVista Toric IOLs (N = 270) were included. Postoperative toric IOL repositioning was recommended in 16 eyes (1.6%). The repositioning rate was highest in the eyes implanted with Tecnis Toric I (5.7%), followed by AcrySof Toric (2.2%), enVista Toric IOLs (1.1%), and Tecnis Toric II (0.6%).

Conclusion

This real-world analysis of eyes implanted with toric IOLs revealed that the rate of surgical IOL repositioning due to clinically significant IOL rotation was lower than 2% for enVista and Tecnis Toric II IOLs. When needed and with appropriate planning, toric IOL repositioning can be very successful.

Comparison of two objective methods for measuring postoperative toric intraocular lens orientation under the natural pupil

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the accuracy of iTrace and CASIA2 in measuring the postoperative orientation of toric intraocular lens (IOL) without mydriasis.

SETTING

Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

METHODS

Patients with SN6AT toric IOLs implanted after cataract surgery were enrolled. 1 month after surgery, the toric IOL orientation were measured by iTrace and CASIA2 in non-mydriatic, semi-dark conditions. Then, the toric axis was directly reviewed using the slit-lamp under full mydriasis. Axis measurement differences between each of the 2 devices and the slit-lamp, described as their relative differences (RDs), were calculated and compared. The percentage of RDs within 5 degrees, within 10 degrees and greater than 30 degrees were analyzed.

RESULTS

77 eyes of 70 patients were included. Generally, the mean toric axis measurement RDs of CASIA2 and iTrace were 9.24 ± 10.53 degrees and 13.89 ± 15.47 degrees respectively ( P = .04). For CASIA2 (72 eyes), 54.17% (39), 72.22% (52), and 4.17% (3) of eyes had RDs within 5 degrees, within 10 degrees and greater than 30 degrees, compared with 40.00% (28), 61.43% (43) and 12.86% (9) for iTrace (70 eyes). The 95% limits of agreements of CASIA2 with slit-lamp was narrower than that of iTrace with slit-lamp. The median RD of CASIA2 was significantly smaller in eyes with pupil ≥4 mm under dark condition compared with eyes with pupil <4 mm ( P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

CASIA2 demonstrates greater precision in measuring toric IOL orientation under non-mydriatic conditions compared with iTrace. Moreover, the accuracy of CASIA2 is enhanced in cases of pupil >4 mm.

Rotational stability and refractive outcomes of the DFT/DATx15 toric, extended depth of focus intraocular lens

PURPOSE

To quantitatively assess postoperative rotational stability and visual acuity with the DFT/DATx15 extended depth of focus (EDOF) toric intraocular lens (IOL).

METHODS

In this prospective case series, thirty-five patients with a calculated IOL power between + 15.0 D and + 25.0 D, corneal astigmatism between 0.75 D and 2.25 D, and no significant ocular pathology underwent cataract surgery. Primary outcome was rotational stability of the IOL at 1 month post-operatively. Secondary outcomes included residual refractive astigmatism, absolute residual astigmatism prediction error, and monocular distance and intermediate visual acuities.

RESULTS

Mean absolute postoperative IOL rotation was 1.1 ± 0.2 degrees, with no rotation of more than 3 degrees at the final visit. Monocular mean best spectacle-corrected distance visual acuity (BSCDVA) improved from logMAR 0.27 ± 0.030 to 0.078 ± 0.017 (P < .001). Monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA) improved from 0.93 ± 0.096 to 0.18 ± 0.022 (P < .001). Best spectacle-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DSCIVA) was 0.17 ± 0.025, and uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UCIVA) was 0.27 ± 0.040. Residual regular astigmatic refractive error was 0.21 ± 0.047 D.

CONCLUSIONS

The toric DFT/DATx15 EDOF lens showed excellent rotational stability and effective and predictable correction of astigmatism. Its refractive outcomes and safety profile were similar to those identified in prior studies of the non-toric DFT/DAT015 EDOF IOL. A small difference in monocular BSCDVA, of uncertain clinical significance, was found when comparing these outcomes with prior DFT/DAT015 data. The trial was retrospectively registered on November 5, 2021 (TRN ​​NCT05119127).

Application of big data in ophthalmology

The advents of information technologies have led to the creation of ever-larger datasets. Also known as big data, these large datasets are characterized by its volume, variety, velocity, veracity, and value. More importantly, big data has the potential to expand traditional research capabilities, inform clinical practice based on real-world data, and improve the health system and service delivery. This review first identified the different sources of big data in ophthalmology, including electronic medical records, data registries, research consortia, administrative databases, and biobanks. Then, we provided an in-depth look at how big data analytics have been applied in ophthalmology for disease surveillance, and evaluation on disease associations, detection, management, and prognostication. Finally, we discussed the challenges involved in big data analytics, such as data suitability and quality, data security, and analytical methodologies.

A Case Exhibiting Late, Postoperative, Toric Intraocular Lens Rotation

Purpose: We present a case of spontaneous toric intraocular lens (IOL) rotation in the late postoperative period (after 10 months).Case summary: A 44-year-old male underwent phacoemulsification and placement of an IOL (AcrySof IQ Toric, Alcon Laboratories Inc., Fort Worth, FL, USA) in the right eye. The preoperative best corrected visual acuities (BCVAs) were 0.2 in the right eye and 0.3 in the left eye, and the corneal astigmatisms -2.25 × 175° and -2.25 × 178°. Ten months later, the astigmatic IOL axis was 85° (the initial [correct] value). The BCVA after surgery was 1.0. At 11 months postoperatively, the patient presented with a sudden decrease in visual acuity in the right eye. The IOL had rotated 50° clockwise; we decided to reposition it. A capsular tension ring had been placed during surgery. The IOL was re-aligned but rotated again 1 week later. We replaced the IOL with a monofocal non-toric IOL (enVista MX60, Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA).Conclusions: Severe toric IOL rotation is a late postoperative complication.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Repositioning Surgery to Correct Misalignment of Toric Intraocular Lenses after Cataract Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and outcomes of repositioning surgery to correct misalignment of several toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) after cataract surgery.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients who underwent repositioning surgery to correct misalignment of toric IOLs following cataract surgery between January 2019 and December 2021 were enrolled. The medical data on patients' age, gender, preoperative axial length, corneal astigmatism, the axis of astigmatism, IOL models, IOL axis, uncorrected distance visual acuity, residual refraction, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 1,135 eyes implanted with toric IOLs at Qingdao Eye Hospital, 23 (2.026%, 23/1,135) underwent repositioning surgery. Univariate analysis revealed that the incidence of repositioning surgery was significantly lower with AcrySof (0.636%, 5/786) than with ZEISS (2.959%, 5/169) and TECNIS (7.222%, 13/180) IOL platforms; the incidence of repositioning surgery with monofocal toric IOLs (1.169%, 11/941) was significantly lower than multifocal toric IOLs (6.186%, 12/194) (p < 0.001); additionally, a significant difference in age was also observed (p = 0.002). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the IOL platform (p = 0.004) and younger age (p = 0.006) were independent risk factors for repositioning surgery.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of repositioning surgery of toric IOLs after cataract surgery was 2.026%. It was linked to the IOL platform, multifocal toric IOLs, and younger age.