Repeatability and Agreement of Wavefront aberrations of Pentacam AXL Wave- a new hybrid topographer and aberrometer with ITrace in healthy eyes

Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography devices, a Scheimpflug camera system and a ray-tracing aberrometer in the measurement of corneal power in patients with cataract

PURPOSE

To assess the differences and similarities in the corneal curvature obtained by two swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) devices, Scheimpflug imaging system and one ray tracing aberrometer in patients with cataracts. Moreover, this study aimed to compare the differences in posterior corneal (PK), total corneal (TK) and true net power (TNP) measurements among the IOLMaster 700, CASIA2, and Pentacam.

METHODS

A total of 200 eyes of 200 patients (116 female, 58%) were enrolled in this study, with a mean age of 65.9 ± 9.5 years. The flattest (Kf), steepest (Ks), and mean cornal powers (Km), J0, and J45 were obtained using two SS-OCT-based biometric devices, one rotating camera system and one ray-tracing aberrometer. The PK, TK and TNP values were also measured using these devices. To evaluate the differences and similarities between the devicves, the Friedman test, Pearson correlation coefficient (r), intraclass coefficient correlation (ICC) and Bland‒Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were used, and boxplots and stacked histograms were generated to describe the distributions of the data.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam for any of the keratometry values. Additionally, there were no significant differences between the IOLMaster 700 and iTrace in evaluating J0 and J45. Bland‒Altman plots revealed relatively wide LoA widths, almost larger than 1 diopter for the keratometry values and almost larger than 0.5 diopter for J0 and J45 values among the four devices. In terms of PK and TK values, significant differences and low ICCs were found among the three devices.

CONCLUSIONS

Although strong correlations and good agreement were found among the IOLMaster700, CASIA2, Pentacam and iTrace for Kf, Ks, Km and J0, J45, it seems that the measurements should not be used interchangeably because of the wide LoA widths and the presence of significant differences among the devices. Similarly, due to significant differences and low ICCs, the PK, TK and TNP values obtained by IOLMaster 700, CASIA2, and Pentacam should not be used interchangeably.

A Comprehensive Wavefront Assessment of Keratoconus Using an Integrated Scheimpflug Corneal Tomographer/Hartmann-Shack Wavefront Aberrometer

OBJECTIVES

To characterize higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in different severities of keratoconus (KC) from the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces and whole eye using an integrated Scheimpflug corneal tomographer/Hartmann-Shack wavefront aberrometer.

METHODS

This study included eyes with clinical KC, topographic KC (no clinical signs), fellow eyes with very asymmetric ectasia with normal topography and no clinical signs (VAE-NT), and control eyes. Corneal and ocular wavefront aberrations were obtained using an integrated Scheimpflug tomographer/Hartmann-Shack wavefront aberrometer. The diagnostic capability of distinguishing VAE-NT from the control was also tested.

RESULTS

This study included 68 eyes with clinical KC, 44 with topographic KC, 26 with VAE-NT, and 45 controls. Clinical KC had significantly greater total HOAs and coma from the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces and whole eye than the other groups ( P <0.05). Although topographic KC had significantly greater values in all wavefront parameters than the control ( P <0.05), ocular and corneal HOAs did not differ between the VAE-NT and control groups. The coma from the anterior cornea in topographic KC was significantly greater than that in VAE-NT ( P <0.05); the coma from the posterior cornea and whole eye did not differ. Total HOAs from the anterior corneal surface exhibited the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.774 (sensitivity, 73%; specificity, 78%).

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive wavefront assessment can be used to quantitatively evaluate corneal and ocular HOAs across various severity of KC. Total HOAs from the anterior corneal surface exhibited the potential ability in distinguishing VAE-NT from the control eyes.

Potential vision tester using adaptive optics, Maxwellian view, and small pupil

We demonstrate a free-space, trolley-mounted potential vision tester (PVT), designed to study and improve the accuracy of visual acuity (VA) measurements in the aging eye. Key features include a high-resolution visual display presented in Maxwellian view, a 3 mm pupil to limit wavefront (WF) aberrations, and a moderate cost deformable mirror to induce or correct higher order optical aberrations. The visual display supported accurate measurement of visual acuities down to 20/5. The moderate cost, piezo deformable mirror induced seven nominal aberrations, calibrated as 0, -0.32, -0.23, + 0.27, and +0.39 microns spherical aberration; + 0.49 microns Y coma; and -0.51 microns X coma. A custom Hartmann Shack (HS) calibration (HSc) system demonstrated that induced aberrations were repeatable and stable. A Badal optometer provided the coarse focus. WF aberrations were measured for five normal subjects with a commercially available HS device (HSP) (OCULUS Pentacam AXL Wave), providing estimates of WF errors for 3 mm and other pupil sizes. VA was measured using four alternative forced-choice for a single black on white E stimulus in each trial. Using the method of constant stimuli yielded robust standard deviation measurements. The 50% fit for VA plotted against induced aberration resulted in linear functions for each subject for the range of our positive and negative spherical aberration data. Subjects differed, but higher order terms were unnecessary to describe data across spherical aberrations.

Comparison of Ocular Wavefront Aberration Measurements Obtained Using Two Hartmann-Shack Wavefront Aberrometers

OBJECTIVES

To assess agreement between measurements of ocular wavefront aberrations obtained using the Pentacam AXL Wave (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) (Aberrometer A) and KR-1W (Topcon Corp) (Aberrometer B), both of which are based on the Hartmann-Shack principle.

METHODS

In this prospective case-control study, ocular wavefront aberrations measurements were obtained using both aberrometers in patients with keratoconus (KC) and control participants. Ocular wavefront aberrations were measured through the natural pupil without dilation using both devices in a dark room. For both aberrometers, accommodation was inhibited by automatically adding fogging. The individual Zernike coefficients from the second to fourth order were compared between the two aberrometers for a 4-mm pupil diameter.

RESULTS

Twenty-six KC and 29 control eyes were assessed. Statistically significant correlations ( P <0.05) were observed for all Zernike coefficients, except for Z 4-2 in the control group. Bland-Altman analysis indicated good agreement between aberrometers and no statistically significant differences in the control group. However, in the KC group, patterns of proportional error were observed in vertical coma Z 3-1 (r=0.338, P =0.008), trefoil Z 4-4 (r=0.701, P =0.003), secondary astigmatism Z 4-2 (r=0.348, P =0.025), and spherical aberrations Z 40 (r=0.407, P =0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

The Zernike coefficient values measured by the two aberrometers were well correlated in the control and KC groups. However, in eyes with KC, Aberrometer B tended to present greater values in several Zernike coefficients than Aberrometer A, suggesting that wavefront measurements obtained using the two aberrometers are not interchangeable in patients with KC.

Comparison of anterior corneal aberrations measured by Scheimpflug and Placido Disc System for myopes

BACKGROUND

To ascertain the agreement of corneal aberrations obtained from the Pentacam and the KR-1W in myopic populations and to investigate the influence of the level of myopia as well as the laterality on the agreement.

METHODS

In this observational study, a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam AXL) and a Hartmann-Shack wavefront analyzer with Placido-disc topographer (KR-1W) were used to measure the aberrations of myopes in the anterior corneal surface by one experienced operator. All examinations were computed across a 6 mm diameter. Six subgroups were generated according to the degree of myopia (mild, moderate, and severe myopia) and the laterality of eyes (right and left eyes).

RESULTS

The study included 245 eyes of 170 participants. For certain anterior corneal aberrations, statistically significant differences existed between the Pentacam and the KR-1W (all P < .05). The values of Zernike (Z)(2,0), Z(2,2), Z(3,1), and Z(4,0) varied in all levels of myopia regardless of the laterality, with the values of the Pentacam constantly larger than the KR-1W in the measurement of Z(2,0), Z(2,2), and Z(4,0). For 2nd to 6th aberrations, both instruments correlated poorly to moderately. The width of limits of agreement between the two instruments was clinically too wide (> 0.1 μm) for aberrations closely correlated with visual quality, including Z(3, ± 3), Z(3, ± 1), and Z(4,0), and almost all aberrations, indicating poor agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

In clinical practice, the Pentacam based on Scheimpflug technology and the KR-1W based on Placido Disc System are not interchangeable in measuring anterior corneal aberration for myopes regardless of myopia degree and the laterality, suggesting that a consistent instrument should be selected for surgical design as well as follow-up.

Wavefront aberrometry repeatability and agreement—A comparison between Pentacam AXL Wave, iTrace and OPD‐Scan III

INTRODUCTION

To compare intrasession agreement and repeatability of wavefront aberration measurements from three different aberrometers obtained using Hartmann-Shack, ray tracing and automated retinoscopy methods, as well as their interdevice agreement.

METHODS

Three consecutive measurements were obtained using the Pentacam AXL Wave, the iTrace and the OPD-Scan III in 47 eyes of 47 patients. Wavefront refractions, root mean square of total aberrations (RMS total), RMS of higher-order aberrations (HOA) and second-, third- and fourth-order HOAs were exported for 4-mm pupils. Wavefront refractions were converted into vector components: M, J₀ and J₄₅ . Intrasession agreement and repeatability were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and repeatability coefficients (RCs); interdevice agreement was assessed using the Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

The intrasession agreement and repeatability of RMS HOA were comparable between the three devices; both the Pentacam AXL Wave and the OPD-Scan III had better intrasession agreement and repeatability for the RMS total than the iTrace (p ≤ 0.02). Intrasession repeatability for the majority of second- and third-order aberrations was better on the Pentacam AXL Wave than on the iTrace (p ≤ 0.01) and OPD-Scan III (p ≤ 0.04), although their agreement and repeatability in spherical aberration were comparable (p ≥ 0.24). Significant systematic differences and proportional bias were detected for almost all refraction power vectors and Zernike coefficients among the three devices.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, all three devices provided good-to-excellent agreement for aberration measurements. Most of the individual Zernike's components were not exchangeable between different aberrometers. Their relative intrasession performance in agreement and repeatability varied significantly across different ocular aberration parameters.