1
|
Arrigoni A, Rossettini G, Palese A, Thacker M, Esteves JE. Exploring the role of therapeutic alliance and biobehavioural synchrony in musculoskeletal care: Insights from a qualitative study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2024; 73:103164. [PMID: 39151365 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2024] [Revised: 08/06/2024] [Accepted: 08/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Person-centred care underscores the therapeutic alliance (TA) as fundamental, fostering positive treatment outcomes through collaborative patient-clinician interactions. Biobehavioural synchrony within the TA, essential for effective care, reflects an adaptive process where organisms align responses during interactions. Enactivism and active inference provide profound insights into human perception, reshaping musculoskeletal care understanding. Touch and verbal communication, integral to the TA, foster synchrony and alignment of personal beliefs. AIM This study aimed to identify the tools used by manual therapists in musculoskeletal care to establish a TA with patients. Furthermore, it endeavours to evaluate the alignment of these strategies with current literature and their correlation with biobehavioural synchrony, enactivism, and the role of touch in active inference. METHODS The methodology followed rigorous qualitative research principles, particularly Grounded Theory and interpretative-constructivist principles, conducting eleven semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions. RESULTS The core category identified in the study is elucidated as follows: "Interwoven Connection: The Fabric of Therapeutic Synchrony." The interviews unveiled three main categories, each comprising sub-categories: (1) Creating a meaningful dialogue; (2) Promoting active patient participation; (3) Synchronisation. CONCLUSION Fostering meaningful dialogue, patient involvement, and therapeutic synchrony is crucial for a robust therapeutic alliance in musculoskeletal care. This underscores the importance of establishing a deep connection between clinicians and patients, central to effective person-centred care. Clinicians must prioritise two-way communication, empathy, and patient collaboration in defining personalised goals. Emphasizing touch and seeking patient feedback are also pivotal. Further research is needed to explore these elements and their impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giacomo Rossettini
- School of Physiotherapy, University of Verona, Via Bengasi 4, 37134, Verona, Italy; Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Musculoskeletal Pain and Motor Control Research Group, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670, Villaviciosa de Odón, Spain.
| | - Alvisa Palese
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
| | - Mick Thacker
- Department of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Jorge E Esteves
- Malta ICOM Educational, Santa Venera, Malta; UCO School of Osteopathy, Health Sciences University, London, UK; Clinical-Based Human Research Department, Foundation COME Collaboration, Pescara, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tidmarsh LV, Harrison R, Finlay KA. Prehabilitation: The underutilised weapon for chronic pain management. Br J Pain 2024; 18:354-364. [PMID: 39092207 PMCID: PMC11289902 DOI: 10.1177/20494637241250239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Prehabilitation encompasses preparatory clinical intervention(s) delivered during the period between diagnosis and treatment commencement. Despite widespread successful usage preoperatively, psychological prehabilitation is neglected in outpatient chronic pain management. Although pain management waitlists are associated with treatment attrition and psychological and physical decline, this time window is underutilised in preventing escalation. Waitlists present an under-explored opportunity to 'prehabilitate' patients waiting for treatment. This topical review aimed to: (1) examine the effectiveness of psychological prehabilitation for pain services; (2) evaluate the psychological and physical decline associated with waiting for pain management; (3) highlight key psychological prehabilitative targets for increasing treatment engagement; (4) promote pain management psychological prehabilitation within personalised pain medicine, building recommendations for future interventions. Methods Studies regarding the impact of waitlists and prehabilitation for chronic pain were reviewed. Results Findings demonstrated that the psychological constructs of patient expectations, health locus of control, self-efficacy and pain catastrophizing dynamically influence attrition, treatment engagement and outcomes while waiting. These constructs are amenable to change, emphasising their potential utility within a targeted waitlist intervention. Conclusions Prehabilitating chronic pain patients towards treatment engagement could circumvent cycles of failed treatment seeking, preventing psychological and physical decline, and reducing healthcare utilisation. Utilising the waitlist to identify psychosocial risk factors (external health locus of control, low self-efficacy and high pain catastrophizing) would identify who requires additional support to prevent increased risk of treatment failure, enhancing personalised care before prescribed treatment is accessed. This review cements the urgent need for pain services to engage proactively with prehabilitation innovation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia V. Tidmarsh
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | - Richard Harrison
- Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Neurodynamics, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | - Katherine A. Finlay
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schwartz M, Fischer LM, Bläute C, Stork J, Colloca L, Zöllner C, Klinger R. Observing treatment outcomes in other patients can elicit augmented placebo effects on pain treatment: a double-blinded randomized clinical trial with patients with chronic low back pain. Pain 2022; 163:1313-1323. [PMID: 35262315 PMCID: PMC9199107 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Clinical research on social observational learning (SoL) as an underlying mechanism for inducing expectancy and eliciting analgesic placebo effects is lacking. This double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial investigated the influence of SoL on medication-augmenting placebo effects in 44 patients with chronic low back pain. Our hypothesis was that observing positive drug effects on pain and mobility in another patient could increase pain reduction and functional capacity. To test this, we compared the effects of observing positive treatment outcomes in a sham patient (the social learning group [SoLG]) vs hearing the same sham patient report neutral effects (the control group). In the SoLG, the sham patient told peers about pain reduction due to amitriptyline and demonstrated his improved mobility by bending forwards and sideways while he told the control group only that he was taking amitriptyline. The primary outcome was a reduction in clinical low back pain self-ratings. The secondary outcome was perceptions of pain-related disability. The exploratory outcome was mood and coping statements. Data collection occurred before and after the intervention and 2 weeks later. After the intervention, pain decreased in both groups (F [1, 41] = 7.16, P < 0.05, d = 0.83), with no difference between groups. However, the SoLG showed a significantly larger decrease in perceived disability (F [1, 41] = 5, P < 0.05, d = 0.63). The direct observation of patient with chronic low back pain of positive treatment outcomes in the sham patient seems to have enhanced the treatment effects while indirect verbal reports of reduced pain did not.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Schwartz
- Zentrum für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Laura-Marie Fischer
- Zentrum für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Corinna Bläute
- Zentrum für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jan Stork
- Zentrum für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Luana Colloca
- University of Maryland School of Nursing & School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Christian Zöllner
- Zentrum für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Regine Klinger
- Zentrum für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schwartz M, Klinger R. Analgetische Placeboeffekte und Implikationen für die Behandlung chronischer Schmerzen. PSYCHOTHERAPEUT 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s00278-022-00592-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
ZusammenfassungDie Behandlung von chronischen Schmerzen kann langwierig sein. Erste Ansätze zur Nutzung von Placeboeffekten bei der Behandlung von chronischen Schmerzen zeigen erfolgversprechende Ergebnisse und können dazu beitragen, die z. T. frustranen Therapieoptionen zu verbessern. Daher sollten Placeboeffekte zur verbesserten Behandlung genutzt werden. Im derzeitigen Modell zur Entstehung von Placeboeffekten spielt die Erwartung eine zentrale Rolle. Eine positive oder negative Erwartung wird durch psychologische und biologische „State“- und „Trait“-Faktoren der Patient:innen sowie die früheren Lernerfahrungen, die der:die Patient:in mitbringt, beeinflusst. Aus diesem Modell ergeben sich Implikationen für die klinische Praxis: Positive Erwartungen sollten unterstützt werden, wobei unrealistische Erwartungen wiederum den Placeboeffekt reduzieren. Negative Erwartungen sollten kritisch diskutiert werden. Es sollte im interdisziplinären Team eine gemeinsame Botschaft an die Patient:innen vermittelt werden. Open-Label-Placebos können als Intervention genutzt werden, um die Selbstwirksamkeit zu steigern.
Collapse
|
5
|
Bishop F, Al-Abbadey M, Roberts L, MacPherson H, Stuart B, Carnes D, Fawkes C, Yardley L, Bradbury K. Direct and mediated effects of treatment context on low back pain outcome: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e044831. [PMID: 34006548 PMCID: PMC8130743 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Contextual components of treatment previously associated with patient outcomes include the environment, therapeutic relationship and expectancies. Questions remain about which components are most important, how they influence outcomes and comparative effects across treatment approaches. We aimed to identify significant and strong contextual predictors of patient outcomes, test for psychological mediators and compare effects across three treatment approaches. DESIGN Prospective cohort study with patient-reported and practitioner-reported questionnaire data (online or paper) collected at first consultation, 2 weeks and 3 months. SETTING Physiotherapy, osteopathy and acupuncture clinics throughout the UK. PARTICIPANTS 166 practitioners (65 physiotherapists, 46 osteopaths, 55 acupuncturists) were recruited via their professional organisations. Practitioners recruited 960 adult patients seeking treatment for low back pain (LBP). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES The primary outcome was back-related disability. Secondary outcomes were pain and well-being. Contextual components measured were: therapeutic alliance; patient satisfaction with appointment systems, access, facilities; patients' treatment beliefs including outcome expectancies; practitioners' attitudes to LBP and practitioners' patient-specific outcome expectancies. The hypothesised mediators measured were: patient self-efficacy for pain management; patient perceptions of LBP and psychosocial distress. RESULTS After controlling for baseline and potential confounders, statistically significant predictors of reduced back-related disability were: all three dimensions of stronger therapeutic alliance (goal, task and bond); higher patient satisfaction with appointment systems; reduced patient-perceived treatment credibility and increased practitioner-rated outcome expectancies. Therapeutic alliance over task (ηp2=0.10, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.14) and practitioner-rated outcome expectancies (ηp2=0.08, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.11) demonstrated the largest effect sizes. Patients' self-efficacy, LBP perceptions and psychosocial distress partially mediated these relationships. There were no interactions with treatment approach. CONCLUSIONS Enhancing contextual components in musculoskeletal healthcare could improve patient outcomes. Interventions should focus on helping practitioners and patients forge effective therapeutic alliances with strong affective bonds and agreement on treatment goals and how to achieve them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felicity Bishop
- Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Miznah Al-Abbadey
- Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Lisa Roberts
- Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Therapy Services, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Beth Stuart
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Dawn Carnes
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Carol Fawkes
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Lucy Yardley
- Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Effectiveness of placebo interventions for patients with nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain 2021; 162:2792-2804. [PMID: 33769366 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Little is known about the effectiveness of placebo interventions in patients with nonspecific low back pain (LBP). This systematic review assessed the magnitude of the effects of placebo interventions as compared to no intervention in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including patients with LBP. Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid), and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched from inception to December 5, 2019. Randomized controlled trials comparing placebo intervention vs no intervention in adult patients with nonspecific LBP were included. Pain intensity, physical functioning, and health-related quality of life measured at short-term, medium-term, and long-term follow-up were the outcomes of this review. Twenty-one randomized controlled trials were included; one concerning acute LBP and one subacute LBP, whereas 19 studies reported on chronic LBP. In chronic LBP, placebo interventions were more effective than no intervention at short-term follow-up for pain intensity (standardized mean difference = -0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.55 to -0.18, moderate-quality evidence), physical functioning (standardized mean difference -0.19, 95% CI = -0.39-0.01, moderate-quality evidence), and physical quality of life (mean difference = -2.71, 95% CI = -4.71-0.71, high-quality evidence), respectively. These effects were not significant at medium-term follow-up, and no data were available at long-term follow-up. These results show placebo interventions are more effective than no intervention at short-term follow-up in patients with chronic LBP. However, the magnitude of the effects is probably not clinically relevant (approximately 8 points on a 0-100 pain scale). Future research should identify effect modifiers and causal mechanisms explaining the short-term effects of placebo interventions in patients with chronic LBP.
Collapse
|
7
|
Peerdeman KJ, Hinnen C, van Vliet LM, Evers AWM. Pre-consultation information about one's physician can affect trust and treatment outcome expectations. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:427-431. [PMID: 32814682 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2020] [Revised: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Information about physicians' skills is increasingly available on the internet and consulted by patients. The impact of such information on patient expectations is largely unknown. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether information about the competence and empathic skills of a physician may impact pre-consultation trust and treatment outcome expectations in mild and severe medical conditions. METHODS In this experimental web-based study, participants (n = 237) read vignettes describing competence and empathic skills (low versus high) of a fictive physician who would surgically remove a mole or melanoma (low versus high severity) following a 2 × 2 × 2 between-subjects design. Participants rated trust in the physician and treatment outcome expectations. RESULTS High competence and empathy raised trust in the physician, regardless of condition severity. High competence and high empathy both also increased expected surgery success, while only high competence reduced expected side effects. CONCLUSION Pre-consultation information highlighting a physician's competence and/or empathy may lead to higher trust in that physician, higher expected surgery success, and lower expected side effects. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Physicians and hospital staff should be aware of the effects of written information available and might, for example, provide profiles on hospital websites emphasizing healthcare providers' competence and empathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaya J Peerdeman
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition (LIBC), Leiden, Netherlands.
| | - Chris Hinnen
- Oncology Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth M van Vliet
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition (LIBC), Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Andrea W M Evers
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition (LIBC), Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mohamed Mohamed WJ, Joseph L, Canby G, Paungmali A, Sitilertpisan P, Pirunsan U. Are patient expectations associated with treatment outcomes in individuals with chronic low back pain? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Int J Clin Pract 2020; 74:e13680. [PMID: 33166045 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.13680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM The importance of patient expectations (PEs) on treatment outcomes is poorly understood in clinical practice. The aim of this review is to investigate the evidence behind association between pre-treatment PEs and treatment outcomes such as pain intensity (PI), level of function (LF) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHODS A systematic search was conducted for randomised controlled trials published between 1946 and May 2019 across major databases using the key MeSH terminologies. The association between PEs and PI, LF and HRQoL were extracted and categorised into positive, negative or no association for analysing the data. A descriptive synthesis was conducted and the association between PEs and PI, LF and HRQoL were reported. RESULTS Among the total of seven trials, two trials demonstrated a positive association between PEs and PI in short (≤6 weeks) and long term (>6 months), while another two trials demonstrated no association at medium term (>6 weeks-≤6 months). About four trials demonstrated a positive significant association between PEs and LF, 2 at medium and 2 at long terms. The only available trial demonstrated no association between PEs and HRQoL at medium term. CONCLUSION PEs is associated with PI at short and long terms. Also, evidence suggests association between PEs and LF at medium and long terms. Currently, there is no evidence of association between PEs and HRQoL. Further studies with valid tools to measure PE are warranted among individuals with CLBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Leonard Joseph
- School of Health Science, University of Brighton, East Sussex, UK
| | - Guy Canby
- School of Health Science, University of Brighton, East Sussex, UK
| | - Aatit Paungmali
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Thailand
| | - Patraporn Sitilertpisan
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Thailand
| | - Ubon Pirunsan
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schmitz J, Müller M, Stork J, Eichler I, Zöllner C, Flor H, Klinger R. Positive Treatment Expectancies Reduce Clinical Pain and Perceived Limitations in Movement Ability Despite Increased Experimental Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Sham Opioid Infusion in Patients with Chronic Back Pain. PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS 2020; 88:203-214. [PMID: 31302644 DOI: 10.1159/000501385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 06/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing evidence for the efficacy of analgesic placebo effects in laboratory studies with healthy persons raises the question whether placebos could be used to improve the treatment of pain patients. Expectancies play a central role in shaping analgesic placebo but also nocebo effects. OBJECTIVES We investigated to what extent a sham opioid infusion (saline solution) produces sustained clinically relevant placebo and nocebo effects in chronic back pain patients. METHODS Fifty-nine patients received the sham opioid infusion applied via a large drain dressing and were compared to 14 control patients without intervention (natural history, NH) while experimental pain stimuli were applied. All subjects were told that the infusion would decrease pain although in rare cases pain increase would be possible (induction of expectancy). In addition, conditioning was introduced where the participants either experienced a decrease in experimental pain (n = 17; placebo conditioning), an increase (n = 21; nocebo conditioning), or no change (n = 21, no conditioning). RESULTS Compared to the NH group, all infusion groups showed positive treatment expectancies and significantly (p < 0.001) reduced clinical back pain (primary outcome) and pain-related disability (secondary outcome, assessed by self-reported functional capacity and perceived impairment of mobility). Even the nocebo conditioned group experiencing increased experimental pain developed positive treatment expectancies followed by reduced pain experience. Positive treatment expectancies and relief in clinical back pain were significantly positively correlated (r = 0.72, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that it may be beneficial to explicitly shape and integrate treatment expectancies into clinical pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Schmitz
- Division of Pain Medicine and Pain Psychology, Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maike Müller
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jan Stork
- Division of Pain Medicine and Pain Psychology, Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Iris Eichler
- Division of Pain Medicine and Pain Psychology, Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Zöllner
- Division of Pain Medicine and Pain Psychology, Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Herta Flor
- Department of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Regine Klinger
- Division of Pain Medicine and Pain Psychology, Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rowe CA, Sirois FM, Toussaint L, Kohls N, Nöfer E, Offenbächer M, Hirsch JK. Health beliefs, attitudes, and health-related quality of life in persons with fibromyalgia: mediating role of treatment adherence. PSYCHOL HEALTH MED 2019; 24:962-977. [PMID: 30724586 DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2019.1576913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Fibromyalgia is a chronic illness characterized by pain and fatigue. Persons with fibromyalgia experience increased the risk for poor mental and physical health-related quality of life, which may be dependent on multiple factors, including health beliefs, such as confidence in physicians and the health-care system, and health behaviors, such as treatment adherence. Respondents with fibromyalgia (n = 409) were recruited nationally, via support organizations, and completed self-report measures: Multidimensional Health Profile - Health Functioning Index (MHP-H), Short-Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36v2), and Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Measure of Patient Adherence - General Adherence Items. In mediation models, belief in the healthcare system and health-care personnel, and health efficacy exerted an indirect effect through treatment adherence on mental and physical quality of life. Adaptive health beliefs and attitudes were related to greater treatment adherence and, in turn, to a better quality of life. Maladaptive health beliefs and mistrusting attitudes about physician-level and systemic-level healthcare provision are negatively related to both treatment adherence and consequent physical and mental health-related quality of life in persons with fibromyalgia. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to determine if therapeutic strategies to alter health values might improve adherence and self-rated health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fuschia M Sirois
- b Department of Psychology , University of Sheffield , Sheffield , UK
| | - Loren Toussaint
- c Department of Psychology , Luther University , IA , Decorah , US
| | - Niko Kohls
- d Department of Integrative Health Promotion , Coburg University of Applied Sciences and Arts , Coburg , Germany
| | - Eberhard Nöfer
- d Department of Integrative Health Promotion , Coburg University of Applied Sciences and Arts , Coburg , Germany
| | | | - Jameson K Hirsch
- f Department of Psychology , East Tennessee State University , Johnson City , TN , USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
A Context-Based Analgesia Model in Rats: Involvement of Prefrontal Cortex. Neurosci Bull 2018; 34:1047-1057. [PMID: 30178433 PMCID: PMC6246847 DOI: 10.1007/s12264-018-0279-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Cognition and pain share common neural substrates and interact reciprocally: chronic pain compromises cognitive performance, whereas cognitive processes modulate pain perception. In the present study, we established a non-drug-dependent rat model of context-based analgesia, where two different contexts (dark and bright) were matched with a high (52°C) or low (48°C) temperature in the hot-plate test during training. Before and after training, we set the temperature to the high level in both contexts. Rats showed longer paw licking latencies in trials with the context originally matched to a low temperature than those to a high temperature, indicating successful establishment of a context-based analgesic effect in rats. This effect was blocked by intraperitoneal injection of naloxone (an opioid receptor antagonist) before the probe. The context-based analgesic effect also disappeared after optogenetic activation or inhibition of the bilateral infralimbic or prelimbic sub-region of the prefrontal cortex. In brief, we established a context-based, non-drug dependent, placebo-like analgesia model in the rat. This model provides a new and useful tool for investigating the cognitive modulation of pain.
Collapse
|
12
|
Danielsson K, Jansson-Fröjmark M, Broman JE, Markström A. Light Therapy With Scheduled Rise Times in Young Adults With Delayed Sleep Phase Disorder: Therapeutic Outcomes and Possible Predictors. Behav Sleep Med 2018; 16:325-336. [PMID: 27712107 DOI: 10.1080/15402002.2016.1210150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Clinical trials with light therapy (LT) for delayed sleep phase disorder (DSPD) are sparse and little is known about factors that are favorable for improvements. In this study, LT with scheduled rise times was conducted at home for 14 days by 44 participants with DSPD aged 16-26 years. Primary outcomes were sleep onset and sleep offset. Potential predictors were demographic characteristics, chronotype, dim light melatonin onset, the number of days the LT lamp was used, the daily duration of LT, daytime sleepiness, anxiety, depression, worry, and rumination. Significant advances were observed in sleep onset and sleep offset from baseline to the end of treatment. The number of days of LT predicted earlier sleep onset and sleep offset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarina Danielsson
- a Department of Neuroscience , Psychiatry, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden
| | | | - Jan-Erik Broman
- c Department of Neuroscience, Psychiatry, Department of Medical Sciences, Lung, Allergy and Sleep Research , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden
| | - Agneta Markström
- d Department of Medical Sciences, Lung, Allergy, and Sleep Research , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Beasley MJ, Ferguson-Jones EA, Macfarlane GJ. Treatment expectations but not preference affect outcome in a trial of CBT and exercise for pain. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PAIN-REVUE CANADIENNE DE LA DOULEUR 2017. [PMID: 29521378 PMCID: PMC5824705 DOI: 10.1080/24740527.2017.1384297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/30/2022]
Abstract
Background: Patients' beliefs and attitudes toward a treatment can affect treatment response. In unblinded trials this can affect outcomes. Aims: The aim of this analysis was to examine the association between treatment preference and expectation and outcome in a trial of pain treatments. Methods: In a randomized trial (ISRCTN67013851) of four treatments for chronic widespread pain, participants were asked which they would prefer and what improvement they expect from each. The proportion of participants reporting positive health outcomes at three time points after treatment were compared between those matched or unmatched with their preference and between those with and without expectation for improvement. Odds ratios were calculated adjusted for baseline characteristics associated with preference and expectation. Results: Four hundred forty-two participants were recruited to the trial (69.5% female). The proportion reporting positive outcomes among participants matched to their preference compared to those unmatched was 33.3% vs. 34.4% at the end of treatment (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-1.46), 34.4% vs. 29.0% at 3 months (aOR = 1.23, 95% CI, 0.67-2.26), and 34.8% vs. 30.3% at 2 years (aOR = 1.31, 95% CI, 0.70-2.46). The proportion of participants reporting positive outcomes among those expecting improvement compared to those not expecting improvement was 36.6% vs. 15.0% at the end of treatment (aOR = 2.03, 95% CI, 1.07-3.85), 34.1% vs. 13.2% at 3 months (aOR = 2.31, 95% CI, 1.22-4.38), and 32.8% vs. 19.1% at 2 years (aOR = 1.16, 95% CI, 0.67-2.36). Conclusions: Treatment preference had no clear effect on outcomes, but expectation did. These results could inform future approaches to management, and researchers assessing treatments should take into account this expectation effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus John Beasley
- Epidemiology Group, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.,Aberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth Alice Ferguson-Jones
- Epidemiology Group, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.,Aberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Gary John Macfarlane
- Epidemiology Group, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.,Aberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Laferton JAC, Kube T, Salzmann S, Auer CJ, Shedden-Mora MC. Patients' Expectations Regarding Medical Treatment: A Critical Review of Concepts and Their Assessment. Front Psychol 2017; 8:233. [PMID: 28270786 PMCID: PMC5318458 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 150] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2016] [Accepted: 02/06/2017] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients’ expectations in the context of medical treatment represent a growing area of research, with accumulating evidence suggesting their influence on health outcomes across a variety of medical conditions. However, the aggregation of evidence is complicated due to an inconsistent and disintegrated application of expectation constructs and the heterogeneity of assessment strategies. Therefore, based on current expectation concepts, this critical review provides an integrated model of patients’ expectations in medical treatment. Moreover, we review existing assessment tools in the context of the integrative model of expectations and provide recommendations for improving future assessment. The integrative model includes expectations regarding treatment and patients’ treatment-related behavior. Treatment and behavior outcome expectations can relate to aspects regarding benefits and side effects and can refer to internal (e.g., symptoms) and external outcomes (e.g., reactions of others). Furthermore, timeline, structural and process expectations are important aspects with respect to medical treatment. Additionally, generalized expectations such as generalized self-efficacy or optimism have to be considered. Several instruments assessing different aspects of expectations in medical treatment can be found in the literature. However, many were developed without conceptual standardization and psychometric evaluation. Moreover, they merely assess single aspects of expectations, thus impeding the integration of evidence regarding the differential aspects of expectations. As many instruments assess treatment-specific expectations, they are not comparable between different conditions. To generate a more comprehensive understanding of expectation effects in medical treatments, we recommend that future research should apply standardized, psychometrically evaluated measures, assessing multidimensional aspects of patients’ expectations that are applicable across various medical treatments. In the future, more research is needed on the interrelation of different expectation concepts as well as on factors influencing patients’ expectations of illness and treatment. Considering the importance of patients’ expectations for health outcomes across many medical conditions, an integrated understanding and assessment of such expectations might facilitate interventions aiming to optimize patients’ expectations in order to improve health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes A C Laferton
- Department of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Psychologische Hochschule BerlinBerlin, Germany; Department of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of MarburgMarburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Kube
- Department of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg Marburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Salzmann
- Department of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg Marburg, Germany
| | - Charlotte J Auer
- Division of Psychotherapy and Psychiatry, University Hospital Lübeck Lübeck, Germany
| | - Meike C Shedden-Mora
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Accumulating evidence suggests an association between patient pretreatment expectations and numerous health outcomes. However, it remains unclear if and how expectations relate to outcomes after treatments in multidisciplinary pain programs. The present study aims at investigating the predictive association between expectations and clinical outcomes in a large database of chronic pain patients. In this observational cohort study, participants were 2272 patients treated in one of 3 university-affiliated multidisciplinary pain treatment centers. All patients received personalized care, including medical, psychological, and/or physical interventions. Patient expectations regarding pain relief and improvements in quality of life and functioning were measured before the first visit to the pain centers and served as predictor variables. Changes in pain intensity, depressive symptoms, pain interference, and tendency to catastrophize, as well as satisfaction with pain treatment and global impressions of change at 6-month follow-up, were considered as treatment outcomes. Structural equation modeling analyses showed significant positive relationships between expectations and most clinical outcomes, and this association was largely mediated by patients' global impressions of change. Similar patterns of relationships between variables were also observed in various subgroups of patients based on sex, age, pain duration, and pain classification. Such results emphasize the relevance of patient expectations as a determinant of outcomes in multimodal pain treatment programs. Furthermore, the results suggest that superior clinical outcomes are observed in individuals who expect high positive outcomes as a result of treatment.
Collapse
|
16
|
|