Distinct temporal filtering mechanisms are engaged during dynamic increases and decreases of noxious stimulus intensity

Oxaliplatin causes increased offset analgesia during chemotherapy - a feasibility study

OBJECTIVES

Offset analgesia (OA) is the phenomenon where the perceived pain intensity to heat stimulation disproportionally decreases after a slight decrease in stimulation temperature. The neural mechanisms of OA are not fully understood, but it appears that both peripheral and central temporal filtering properties are involved. Chemotherapy with oxaliplatin often causes acute peripheral sensory neuropathy, and manifests primarily as a cold induced allodynia. The aim of this exploratory patient study was to investigate if OA was affected by the neurotoxic effects of adjuvant oxaliplatin treatment.

METHODS

OA was assessed in 17 colon cancer patients during 12 cycles of adjuvant oxaliplatin treatment. The OA response was estimated as the decrease in pain intensity caused by a temperature decrease from 46 °C to 45 °C. Changes in the OA during the treatment period was estimated using a mixed linear model and corrected for multiple comparisons by Sidak's test.

RESULTS

OA was increased significantly when assessed before the 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 6th, 9th, and 10th treatment cycle compared to the first (baseline) treatment (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

OA is generally decreased in persons suffering from chronic pain or peripheral neuropathy as compared to healthy controls. But in the present study, OA increased during chemotherapy with oxaliplatin. The underlying mechanism of this unexpected increase should be further explored.

A novel temperature-controlled laser system to uniformly activate cutaneous thermal receptors during movable thermal stimulation

Objective. Laser stimulators have been widely used in pain studies to selectively activate Aδand C nociceptors without coactivation of mechanoreceptors. Temperature-controlled laser systems have been implemented with low-temperature variations during stimulations, however, these systems purely enabled stationary stimulation. This study aimed to implement, test and validate a new laser stimulation system that controls skin temperature by continuously adjusting laser output during stimulus movement to allow accurate investigation of tempo-spatial mechanisms in the nociceptive system.Approach. For validation, laser stimuli were delivered to the right forearm of eight healthy subjects using a diode laser. The laser beam was displaced across the skin to deliver a moving thermal stimulation to the skin surface. To test the function and feasibility of the system, different stimulation parameters were investigated involving two control modes (open-loop and closed-loop), three displacement velocities (5, 10 and 12 mm s^-1), two intensities (high 46 °C and low 42 °C), two stimulus lengths (20 and 100 mm) and two directions (distal and proximal).Main results. During closed-loop control, the stimulation error and variation of stimulation temperatures were significantly smaller than during open-loop control. The standard deviation of stimulation temperatures increased significantly with stimulation intensity and displacement length.Significance. This study showed that more accurate, less variable laser stimulations were delivered to the skin using closed-loop control during a movable stimulus. The more uniform skin temperature during stimuli is likely to ensure a more uniform nociceptor activation.

Temporal properties of pain contrast enhancement using repetitive stimulation

BACKGROUND

Offset analgesia (OA) is characterized by a disproportionately large reduction in pain following a small decrease in noxious stimulation and is based on temporal pain contrast enhancement (TPCE). The underlying mechanisms of this phenomenon are still poorly understood. This study is aiming to investigate whether TPCE can also be induced by repetitive stimulation, i.e., by stimuli clearly separated in time.

METHODS

A repetitive TPCE paradigm was induced in healthy, pain-free subjects (n = 33) using heat stimuli. Three different interstimulus intervals (ISIs) were used: 5, 15, and 25 seconds. All paradigms were contrasted with a control paradigm without temperature change. Participants continuously rated perceived pain intensity. In addition, electrodermal activity (EDA) was recorded as a surrogate measure of autonomic arousal.

RESULTS

Temporal pain contrast enhancement was confirmed for ISI 5 seconds (p < 0.001) and ISI 15 seconds (p = 0.005) but not for ISI 25 seconds (p = 0.07), however, the magnitude of TPCE did not differ between ISIs (p = 0.11). A TPCE-like effect was also detected with increased EDA values.

CONCLUSIONS

TPCE can be induced by repetitive stimulation. This finding may be explained by a combination of the mechanisms underlying the OA and a facilitated pain habituation.

Adaptation to tonic heat in healthy subjects and patients with sensory polyneuropathy

Adaptation to a constant sensory stimulus involves many sites along the path of sensory volleys towards perception. The evaluation of such phenomenon may be of clinical interest. We studied adaptation to a constant temperature stimulus in healthy subjects to set normative data, and in patients with sensory polyneuropathy (SPN), as proof of concept. Twenty-six healthy subjects and 26 patients with SPN in the context of chemotherapy treatment with oxaliplatin for colon cancer were instructed to express through an electronic VAS system (eVAS) the level of sensation felt when a thermode set at either 39º, 41º, 43º, 45º or 47º was applied to their ventral forearm. The eVAS recordings showed typically an abrupt onset that slowed to approach maximum sensation and continued with a slow decrease indicating adaptation. The time to respond (TR), the velocity of the initial response (VR), the maximum sensation (MA), the time to reach MA (MAt), the onset of adaptation (AO), and the decrease in the sensation level with respect to MA at 30 s after stimulus application (SL30), were dependent on the temperature level in all subjects. However, patients showed significantly delayed TR, slowed VR, decreased MA, delayed AO, and reduced SL30, with respect to healthy subjects. Differences were more pronounced at low temperature levels, with absent AO in 25 patients vs. 2 healthy subjects at temperatures of 39º and 41ºC. The study of adaptation to a constant temperature stimulus can furnish valuable data for the assessment of SPN patients.

Offset analgesia is associated with opposing modulation of medial versus dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activations: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study

Offset analgesia is defined by a dramatic drop in perceived pain intensity with a relatively small decrease in noxious input. Although functional magnetic resonance imaging studies implicate subcortical descending inhibitory circuits during offset analgesia, the role of cortical areas remains unclear. The current study identifies cortical correlates of offset analgesia using functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Twenty-four healthy volunteers underwent fNIRS scanning during offset (OS) and control (Con) heat stimuli applied to the forearm. After controlling for non-neural hemodynamic responses in superficial tissues, widespread increases in cortical oxygenated hemoglobin concentration were observed, reflecting cortical activation during heat pain. OS-Con contrasts revealed deactivations in bilateral medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and bilateral somatosensory cortex (SSC) associated with offset analgesia. Right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) showed activation only during OS. These data demonstrate opposing cortical activation patterns during offset analgesia and support a model in which right dlPFC underlies ongoing evaluation of pain intensity change. With predictions of decreasing pain intensity, right dlPFC activation likely inhibits ascending noxious input via subcortical pathways resulting in SSC and mPFC deactivation. This study identifies cortical circuitry underlying offset analgesia and introduces the use of fNIRS to study pain modulation in an outpatient clinical environment.

Offset analgesia and onset hyperalgesia with different stimulus ranges

A comparison between the effects of offset analgesia and onset hyperalgesia and how these effects relate to the stimulus range of thermal stimulation.

Introduction:

Offset analgesia (OA), a large reduction in pain after a brief increase in intensity of an otherwise stable painful stimulus, has been established by a large body of research. But the opposite effect, onset hyperalgesia (OH), a disproportional hyperalgesic response after a briefly decreased intensity of a painful stimulus, has only been investigated in one previous study.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to induce OA and OH in healthy participants and explore the effects of different stimulus ranges (increase/decrease of temperature) on OA and OH.

Methods:

A total of 62 participants were tested in 2 identical experiments. Offset analgesia and OH conditions included 2 different temperature deviations (±1°C/±2°C) from initial temperature and were compared with a constant temperature (control).

Results:

Offset analgesia was successfully elicited in OA_1°C in experiment 1, and in OA_1°C and OA_2°C in experiment 2. Results indicate a continuous stimulus–response relationship between the stimulus range and the resulting hypoalgesic response. Onset hyperalgesia was only elicited in OH_2°C in experiment 1. Exploratory analysis showed that the lack of OH response in experiment 2 could be explained by sex differences, and that OA and OH responses were only weakly correlated.

Conclusions:

The asymmetry between pain responses after a brief temperature increase and decrease suggests that different mechanisms are involved in the pain responses to increasing and decreasing temperature. This asymmetry may also be explained by high temperatures in OA condition (+1°C/+2°C above baseline) that could be seen as salient “learning signals,” which augment the response to following changes in temperature.

Onset hyperalgesia and offset analgesia: Transient increases or decreases of noxious thermal stimulus intensity robustly modulate subsequent perceived pain intensity

Reported pain intensity depends not only on stimulus intensity but also on previously experienced pain. A painfully hot temperature applied to the skin evokes a lower subjective pain intensity if immediately preceded by a higher temperature, a phenomenon called offset analgesia. Previous work indicated that prior pain experience can also increase subsequent perceived pain intensity. Therefore, we examined whether a given noxious stimulus is experienced as more intense when it is preceded by an increase from a lower temperature. Using healthy volunteer subjects, we observed a disproportionate increase in pain intensity at a given stimulus intensity when this intensity is preceded by a rise from a lower intensity. This disproportionate increase is similar in magnitude to that of offset analgesia. We call this effect onset hyperalgesia. Control stimuli, in which a noxious temperature is held constant, demonstrate that onset hyperalgesia is distinct from receptor or central sensitization. The absolute magnitudes of offset analgesia and onset hyperalgesia correlate with each other but not with the noxious stimulus temperature. Finally, the magnitude of both offset analgesia and onset hyperalgesia depends on preceding temperature changes. Overall, this study demonstrates that the perceptual effect of a noxious thermal stimulus is influenced in a bidirectional manner depending upon both the intensity and direction of change of the immediately preceding thermal stimulus.

New Insights into Cutaneous Laser Stimulation - Dependency on Skin and Laser Type

Cutaneous laser stimulation is a proficient tool to investigate the function of the nociceptive system. However, variations in laser-skin interactions, causes by different skin anatomies and laser wavelength, affects the robustness of nociceptor activation. Thus, thoroughly understanding how the skin is heated by a laser pulse is important to characterize the thermal response properties of nociceptors. The study aim was to investigate how skin type and laser wavelength influences nociceptor activation during laser stimulation. Ten healthy subjects were exposed to brief CO₂ (low skin penetrance) and Nd:YAP (high skin penetrance) laser stimuli delivered to the dorsum and palm of the hand, using three different intensities. Reaction times and perception intensities were recorded. A computational model simulated heat transfer in the skin and nociceptor activation in different skin types across different wavelengths and intensities. Intensity ratings were significantly lower and reaction-times significantly increased for CO₂ laser stimuli in the palm compared to the dorsum. This was not the case for Nd:YAP laser stimuli. The computational model showed that these differences can be explained by the different skin absorption of CO₂ and Nd:YAP lasers. For CO₂ laser stimuli, the thicker stratum corneum of the glabrous skin reduces nociceptor activation, whereas the high penetrating Nd:YAP laser elicits a similar nociceptor activation, irrespective of skin type. Nociceptor activation during laser stimulation highly depends on skin composition and laser wavelength, especially for lasers having a low penetrance wavelength. A computational model showed that this difference could be explained primarily due to differences in skin composition.

Stepwise increasing sequential offsets cannot be used to deliver high thermal intensities with little or no perception of pain

Offset analgesia (OA) is the disproportionate decrease in pain experience following a slight decrease in noxious heat stimulus intensity. We tested whether sequential offsets would allow noxious temperatures to be reached with little or no perception of pain. Forty-eight participants continuously rated their pain experience during trials containing trains of heat stimuli delivered by Peltier thermode. Stimuli were adjusted through either stepwise sequential increases of 2°C and decreases of 1°C or direct step increases of 1°C up to a maximum of 46°C. Step durations (1, 2, 3, or 6 s) varied by trial. Pain ratings generally followed presented temperature, regardless of step condition or duration. For 6-s steps, OA was observed after each decrease, but the overall pain trajectory was unchanged. We found no evidence that sequential offsets could allow for little pain perception during noxious temperature presentation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Offset analgesia is the disproportionate decrease in pain experience following a slight decrease in noxious heat stimulus intensity. We tested whether sequential offsets would allow noxious temperatures to be reached with little or no perception of pain. We found little evidence of such overall analgesia. In contrast, we observed analgesic effects after each offset with long-duration stimuli, even with relatively low-temperature noxious stimuli.

No temporal contrast enhancement of simple decreases in noxious heat

Offset analgesia (OA) studies have found that small decreases in the intensity of a tonic noxious heat stimulus yield a disproportionately large amount of pain relief. In the classic OA paradigm, the decrease in stimulus intensity is preceded by an increase of equal size from an initial noxious level. Although the majority of researchers believe this temporal sequence of two changes is important for eliciting OA, it has also been suggested that the temporal contrast mechanism underlying OA may enhance detection of simple, isolated decreases in noxious heat. To test whether decreases in noxious heat intensity, by themselves, are perceived better than increases of comparable sizes, we used an adaptive two-interval alternative forced choice task to find perceptual thresholds for increases and decreases in radiant and contact heat. Decreases in noxious heat were more difficult to perceive than increases of comparable sizes from the same initial temperature of 45°C. In contrast, decreases and increases were perceived equally well within a common range of noxious temperatures (i.e., when increases started from 45°C and decreases started from 47°C). In another task, participants rated the pain intensity of heat stimuli that randomly and unpredictably increased, decreased, or remained constant. Ratings of unpredictable stimulus decreases also showed no evidence of perceptual enhancement. Our results demonstrate that there is no temporal contrast enhancement of simple, isolated decreases in noxious heat intensity. Combined with previous OA findings, they suggest that long-lasting noxious stimuli that follow an increase-decrease pattern may be important for eliciting the OA effect.

NEW & NOTEWORTHY Previous research suggested that a small decrease in noxious heat intensity feels surprisingly large because of sensory enhancement of noxious stimulus offsets (a simplified form of “offset analgesia”). Using a two-alternative forced choice task where participants detected simple increases or decreases in noxious heat, we showed that decreases in noxious heat, by themselves, are no better perceived than increases of comparable sizes. This suggests that a decrease alone is not sufficient to elicit offset analgesia.

Evidence for a spinal involvement in temporal pain contrast enhancement

Spatiotemporal filtering and amplification of sensory information at multiple levels during the generation of perceptual representations is a fundamental processing principle of the nervous system. While for the visual and auditory system temporal filtering of sensory signals has been noticed for a long time, respective contrast mechanisms within the nociceptive system became only recently subject of investigations, mainly in the context of offset analgesia (OA) subsequent to noxious stimulus decreases. In the present study we corroborate in a first experiment the assumption that offset analgesia involves a central component by showing that an OA-like effect accounting for 74% of a corresponding OA reference can be evoked by decomposing the stimulus offset into two separate box-car stimuli applied within the same dermatome but to separate populations of primary afferent neurons. In order to draw conclusions about the levels of the CNS at which temporal filtering of nociceptive information takes place during OA we investigate in a second experiment neuronal activity in the spinal cord during a painful thermal stimulus offset employing high-resolution fMRI in healthy volunteers. Pain-related BOLD responses in the spinal cord were significantly reduced during OA and their time course followed widely behavioral hypoalgesia, but not the thermal stimulation profile. In summary, the results suggest that temporal pain contrast enhancement during OA comprises a central mechanism and this mechanism becomes already effective at the level of the spinal cord.

A central mechanism enhances pain perception of noxious thermal stimulus changes

Pain perception temporarily exaggerates abrupt thermal stimulus changes revealing a mechanism for nociceptive temporal contrast enhancement (TCE). Although the mechanism is unknown, a non-linear model with perceptual feedback accurately simulates the phenomenon. Here we test if a mechanism in the central nervous system underlies thermal TCE. Our model successfully predicted an optimal stimulus, incorporating a transient temperature offset (step-up/step-down), with maximal TCE, resulting in psychophysically verified large decrements in pain response ("offset-analgesia"; mean analgesia: 85%, n = 20 subjects). Next, this stimulus was delivered using two thermodes, one delivering the longer duration baseline temperature pulse and the other superimposing a short higher temperature pulse. The two stimuli were applied simultaneously either near or far on the same arm, or on opposite arms. Spatial separation across multiple peripheral receptive fields ensures the composite stimulus timecourse is first reconstituted in the central nervous system. Following ipsilateral stimulus cessation on the high temperature thermode, but before cessation of the low temperature stimulus properties of TCE were observed both for individual subjects and in group-mean responses. This demonstrates a central integration mechanism is sufficient to evoke painful thermal TCE, an essential step in transforming transient afferent nociceptive signals into a stable pain perception.