Contextual influences on pain communication in couples with and without a partner with chronic pain

Is all validation equal? Evaluating sensory- and emotion-focused validation in the context of experimentally induced pain

Validation has been examined in experimental and clinical settings, but examination of whether specific content of validation responses affect pain-related outcomes has not been considered. We examined the impact of sensory- or emotion-focused validation following a pain task. Participants (N = 140) were randomly assigned to one of three validation conditions (i.e. sensory, emotional, or neutral) and completed the cold pressor task (CPT). Participants provided self-report ratings of pain and affective-related variables. Subsequently, a researcher validated emotional, sensory, or no aspects of participants' experience. The CPT was repeated, as were the self-report ratings. No significant differences were observed across conditions in pain or affective outcomes. All conditions reported an increase in pain intensity and pain unpleasantness across CPT trials. These findings suggest validation content may not impact pain outcomes during painful experiences. Future directions to understanding the nuances of validation across interactions and settings are discussed.

An Eye Tracking Investigation of Pain Decoding Based on Older and Younger Adults' Facial Expressions

Nonverbal pain cues such as facial expressions, are useful in the systematic assessment of pain in people with dementia who have severe limitations in their ability to communicate. Nonetheless, the extent to which observers rely on specific pain-related facial responses (e.g., eye movements, frowning) when judging pain remains unclear. Observers viewed three types of videos of patients expressing pain (younger patients, older patients without dementia, older patients with dementia) while wearing an eye tracker device that recorded their viewing behaviors. They provided pain ratings for each patient in the videos. These observers assigned higher pain ratings to older adults compared to younger adults and the highest pain ratings to patients with dementia. Pain ratings assigned to younger adults showed greater correspondence to objectively coded facial reactions compared to older adults. The correspondence of observer ratings was not affected by the cognitive status of target patients as there were no differences between the ratings assigned to older adults with and without dementia. Observers' percentage of total dwell time (amount of time that an observer glances or fixates within a defined visual area of interest) across specific facial areas did not predict the correspondence of observers' pain ratings to objective coding of facial responses. Our results demonstrate that patient characteristics such as age and cognitive status impact the pain decoding process by observers when viewing facial expressions of pain in others.

The gender context of pain

Pain is a major source of global suffering, with women bearing the greatest burden. Alongside biology, psychological and social factors, including gender, help explain these differences. However, there has been no direct attempt to develop a unified social psychological model of men and women's pain. By drawing on approaches to both gender and pain, a gender context model of pain is presented. It proposes that pain is partly influenced by the gender context in which it occurs, which operates at both individual and interpersonal levels. The model is used to structure an appraisal of the existing evidence around gender and pain, and explore whether the model helps explain why such variation occurs. It is argued that despite evidence for an association between gender and pain, there are empirical gaps that need to be addressed. Implications and directions for future investigations into sex, gender and pain are considered.

Pain Expressions in Dementia: Validity of Observers' Pain Judgments as a Function of Angle of Observation

Facial expressions of pain are important in assessing individuals with dementia and severe communicative limitations. Though frontal views of the face are assumed to allow for the most valid and reliable observational assessments, the impact of viewing angle is unknown. We video-recorded older adults with and without dementia using cameras capturing different observational angles (e.g., front vs. profile view) both during a physiotherapy examination designed to identify painful areas and during a baseline period. Facial responses were coded using the fine-grained Facial Action Coding System, as well as a systematic clinical observation method. Coding was conducted separately for panoramic (incorporating left, right, and front views), and a profile view of the face. Untrained observers also judged the videos in a laboratory setting. Trained coder reliability was satisfactory for both the profile and panoramic view. Untrained observer judgments from a profile view were substantially more accurate compared to the front view and accounted for more variance in differentiating non-painful from painful situations. The findings add specificity to the communications models of pain (clarifying factors influencing observers' ability to decode pain messages). Perhaps more importantly, the findings have implications for the development of computer vision algorithms and vision technologies designed to monitor and interpret facial expressions in a pain context. That is, the performance of such automated systems is heavily influenced by how reliably these human annotations could be provided and, hence, evaluation of human observers' reliability, from multiple angles of observation, has implications for machine learning development efforts.

Contextual influences in decoding pain expressions: effects of patient age, informational priming, and observer characteristics

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Informational primes (about pain undertreatment or social deception) interact with observer characteristics and patient age in the interpretations of pain signals.

We aimed to examine the effects of contextual factors (ie, observers' training background and priming texts) on decoding facial pain expressions of younger and older adults. A total of 165 participants (82 nursing students and 83 nonhealth professionals) were randomly assigned to one of 3 priming conditions: (1) information about the possibility of secondary gain (misuse); (2) information about the frequency and undertreatment of pain in the older adult (undertreatment); or (3) neutral information (control). Subsequently, participants viewed 8 videos of older adults and 8 videos of younger adults undergoing a discomforting physical therapy examination. Participants rated their perception of each patient's pain intensity, unpleasantness, and condition severity. They also rated their willingness to help, sympathy level, patient deservingness of financial compensation, and how negatively/positively they feel towards the patient (ie, valence). Results demonstrated that observers ascribed greater levels of pain and other indicators (eg, sympathy and help) to older compared with younger patients. An interaction between observer type and patient age demonstrated that nursing students endorsed higher ratings of younger adults' pain compared with other students. In addition, observers in the undertreatment priming condition reported more positive valence towards older patients. By contrast, priming observers with the misuse text attenuated their valence ratings towards younger patients. Finally, the undertreatment prime influenced observers' pain estimates indirectly through observers' valence towards patients. In summary, results add specificity to the theoretical formulations of pain by demonstrating the influence of patient and observer characteristics, as well as informational primes, on decoding pain expressions.