Safety and Feasibility of Out-of-Bed Mobilization for Patients With External Ventricular Drains in a Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit

Acute orthostatic responses during early mobilisation of patients with acquired brain injury - Innowalk pro versus standing frame

Introduction

Early mobilisation is paramount in the rehabilitation of patients with acquired brain injuries. However, the effectiveness of mobilisation to standing combined with passive leg movement in mitigating orthostatic intolerance remains uncertain. Hence, we investigated whether participants exhibited better tolerance standing in a motorized standing device with passive leg movements, Innowalk Pro, compared to a traditional standing frame.

Methods

17 patients with acquired brain injury (<1 year post-injury) performed two sessions in each standing device on four separate days. Maximum standing time was 30 min, less when symptoms of syncope or volitional exhaustion occurred. Besides total standing time, electromyography of thigh muscles, and changes in mean arterial pressure and heart rate were monitored at rest and during standing.

Results

No significant differences were found in standing time, changes in mean arterial pressure or heart rate between standing in Innowalk Pro and the standing frame. However, participants had significantly more thigh muscle activation (p = 0.006) when standing in Innowalk Pro.

Conclusions

Mobilising participants with a subacute acquired brain injury in a standing frame with motorised passive movements of the lower limbs did, despite higher thigh muscle activation, not lead to better orthostatic tolerance or prolonged standing time compared to a traditional standing frame.

Multidisciplinary Teamwork Perceptions When Mobilizing Ventilated Neurosurgery Patients

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary teamwork is essential in delivering holistic care to critically ill populations, including ventilated neurosurgery patients. Although it is considered a safe and feasible aspect of patient care, mobilization is often missed in this population because of negative healthcare provider perceptions regarding barriers and patient safety. Nurse-led teamwork has been suggested to overcome these barriers and to achieve earlier mobilization for patients, as well as positive provider perceptions, which may affect the culture and frequency of mobilization on neurointensive care units. Quantitative studies analyzing multidisciplinary teamwork perceptions to mobilize ventilated neurosurgery patients with or without a nurse-led protocol have not been previously conducted. Analyzing such perceptions may provide insight to team-related barriers related to missed mobility. This pilot quasi-experimental study aimed to determine whether the use of a nurse-led mobility protocol affects teamwork perceptions when mobilizing ventilated neurosurgery patients. METHODS: A sample of multidisciplinary teams, composed of nurses, patient care technicians, and respiratory therapists, mobilized ventilated neurosurgery patients according to either standard of care (for the control group) or a nurse-led mobility protocol (for the interventional group). Teamwork perceptions were measured via the reliable and valid Nursing Teamwork Survey tool. RESULTS: Linear mixed model analyses revealed that multidisciplinary teams in the nurse-led mobility protocol group had significantly higher levels of overall perceived teamwork than those in the control group, t3 = -3.296, P = .038. Such differences were also noted for teamwork variables of team leadership and mutual trust. CONCLUSION: Nurse-led mobility protocols should be considered to increase teamwork when performing multidisciplinary teamwork-based mobility for ventilated neurosurgery patients. Future studies should continue to evaluate teamwork perceptions after nurse-led mobility.

Mobilization phases in traumatic brain injury

Mobilization in traumatic brain injury (TBI) have shown the improvement of length of stay, infection, long term weakness, and disability. Primary damage as a result of trauma's direct effect (skull fracture, hematoma, contusion, laceration, and nerve damage) and secondary damage caused by trauma's indirect effect (microvasculature damage and pro-inflammatory cytokine) result in reduced tissue perfusion & edema. These can be facilitated through mobilization, but several precautions must be recognized as mobilization itself may further deteriorate patient's condition. Very few studies have discussed in detail regarding mobilizing patients in TBI cases. Therefore, the scope of this review covers the detail of physiological effects, guideline, precautions, and technique of mobilization in patients with TBI.

Analysis of Risk Factors of Neurobiological Pipeline Care and Investigation of Preventive Measures

During clinical care, most neurosurgical patients are critically ill. They have sudden onset of illness that should be treated on time with proper care. The patients require continuous hospitalization for proper treatment. The recovery of patients may be relatively slow and takes some time. Patients and Methods. To explore where the risks of pipeline care lie and the preventive measures. (1) In this paper, 100 neurosurgical patients were treated in our hospital from September 2018 to March 2020. They were firstly selected and divided into two groups. Group A was implemented with routine pipeline care and group B was implemented with the intervention developed by the pipeline team. (2) The design and SMOTE assume that, during the generation of a new synthetic sample of minority classes, the immediate neighbors of the minority class instances were also all minority classes, regardless of their true distribution characteristics, to analyze risk factors during care and summarize preventive measures. Results. The experimental results showed that the total efficiency of nursing care was higher in group B as compared to group A, P < 0.05; also, the number of pipeline accidents was lower in group B. Conclusion It is important to be meticulous and thoughtful in pipeline care and to comprehensively analyze the possible risk events and then propose preventive measures so that risk events can be reduced.

An Integrative Review: Early Mobilization of Patients With External Ventriculostomy Drains in the Neurological Intensive Care Unit

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are at a high risk for immobility due to their high acuity and need for invasive devices including external ventriculostomy drains (EVDs). Prolonged patient immobilization is associated with poor outcomes. METHODS: Whittemore and Knafl's 5-stage framework was used to conduct an integrative review to synthesize findings from quantitative research studies on early patient mobilization for patients with EVDs in the neurological ICU. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist was used as the reporting guideline. RESULTS: In 12 studies, a total of 412 patients with EVDs in neurological ICUs were actively mobilized with a goal of progressing to ambulation. Mobilization out of bed with a ventriculostomy drain was safe and feasible without significant adverse events. CONCLUSION: There is a need to clarify best practices for early mobilization of patients with EVDs in the neurological ICU and to explore the influence of early mobilization on patients' rates of venous thromboembolism, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, catheter line-associated blood stream infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and ventriculostomy-related infections. No studies measured the total time the EVD was clamped during the patient mobilization intervention or the total amount of cerebrospinal fluid drainage on the day of mobilization. Early mobilization of patients with EVDs in the neurological ICU who were permitted out of bed was universally safe and feasible, with minimal adverse events when safety checks were integrated into mobilization protocols.