Profile and Determinants of Neurocognitive Dysfunction in a Sample of Adult Nigerians With Heart Failure

Prevalence and Incidence of Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in Heart Failure - A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression

INTRODUCTION

The burden of cognitive impairment in HF patients is significant and leads to longer hospital stay, higher readmission rates, and increased mortality. This review seeks to synthesize the available studies to determine the prevalence and incidence of cognitive impairment and dementia in HF patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, PsychoINFO and Cochrane databases were systematically searched from their inception through to 3 May 2021. Study and population characteristics, total patients with HF, prevalence of cognitive impairment and dementia in HF patients and cognitive assessment tool were abstracted by two reviewers.

RESULTS

In heart failure patients, overall prevalence for cognitive impairment and dementia was 41.42% (CI) and 19.79% (dementia) respectively. We performed a meta-regression analysis which demonstrated that the risk of cognitive impairment and dementia increased with age.

DISCUSSION

Further research should investigate whether HF accelerates the rate of cognitive decline and the progression of dementia.

Cognitive decline and risk of dementia in individuals with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To determine the association between heart failure (HF) and cognitive change and dementia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Systematic search of three electronic databases was performed and 29 eligible studies involving approximately 3 million participants were identified. Twelve studies examined dementia and 20 cognitive change, but only a subset of studies could be included in the meta-analysis. These findings indicated that HF was not significantly associated with dementia (n=8, hazard ratio [HR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.93, 1.50]), but increased the risk of cognitive impairment (n=3, HR 1.80, 95%CI [1.14,2.86]) . Additionally, HF was associated with poorer mean cognitive performance in global cognition (Hedges' g -0.73, 95%CI [-1.12, -0.35]), memory (Hedges' g -0.57, 95%CI [-0.72, -0.42]), executive function (Hedges' g -0.58, 95%CI [-0.72, -0.43]), attention/speed (Hedges' g -0.50, 95%CI [-0.63, -0.37]) and language (Hedges' g -0.61, 95%CI [-1.05, -0.17]).

CONCLUSION

Patients with HF perform worse on all cognitive tests, and have an increased risk of cognitive impairment. These findings highlight the need for clinicians to consider cognition as part of routine care for patients with HF.

Cognitive dysfunction in Nigerian women with epilepsy on carbamazepine and levetiracetam monotherapy

BACKGROUND

This study aims to identify the determinants of cognitive dysfunction and compare the effect of CPZ and LTC on cognition in WWE.

METHODS

An observational study involving 87 consenting adult WWE aged between 16 and 40 years on LTC or CZP monotherapy. At enrollment, an interviewer-based questionnaire was used to obtain demographic and clinical information from participants. The diagnosis of epilepsy was mainly clinical and supported by electroencephalographic (EEG) features and classified based on recommendation by the 2017 International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE). Zung Self-Reporting Depression Scale (ZSRDS) was used to assess the mood of participants. The Community Screening Interview for Dementia (CSID) was used to assess various cognition domains. The National Hospital Seizure Severity Scale (NHS-3) was used to assess disease severity.

RESULTS

There were statistical differences between the CZP and LTC groups in all domains of cognition assessed except for orientation. The total CSID scores of the LTC group were 59.2 (4.9) as opposed to CZP group, 57.2 (5.0); p: .005. Those with focal onset seizures had lower median total CSID score (58; IQR: 54-62) when compared to those with generalized onset seizures (62; IQR: 58-62), p: .012. There was a significant correlation between ZSRD score and NHS-3 score; rho: 0.30, p: .007. Bivariate analysis shows statistically significant correlation between total CSID score and ZSRDS (rho: -0.65), BMI (rho: 0.22), and NHSS-3 score (rho: -0.36), respectively. However, the effect of AED on CSID scores was lost after multivariate quantile regression with only ZSRDS retaining significance.

CONCLUSION

Depression, seizure severity, type and structural etiology were associated with cognitive impairment among WWE. However, on regression model, only depression was statistically significant. The presence of more risks for cognitive impairment in the CZP group limits possible conclusion of LTC superiority.

Neuropsychological Assessment and Screening in Heart Failure: a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

A variety of neuropsychological changes secondary to heart failure have been documented in the literature. However, what remains unclear are which neuropsychological abilities are the most impacted by heart failure and what tests have the sensitivity to measure that impact. Eight databases were searched for articles that examined the neuropsychological functioning of patients with heart failure. Some of the inclusion criteria were articles had to have a heart failure group with a demographically comparable control group and standardized neuropsychological testing. Exclusion criteria included articles with a heart failure group with any other type of major organ failure, or comparisons that were between different classes of heart failure rather than between a heart failure and non-heart failure group. A total of 33 articles met the inclusion criteria (total heart failure sample n = 8900) and provided effect size data for 20 neuropsychological domains. All observed domain-level differences between heart failure and non-heart failure groups were statistically significant, except for simple motor functioning and confrontation naming. The greatest differences in performance were in executive functioning, global cognition, complex psychomotor speed, and verbal memory. The highest effect sizes came from Trail-Making Test-Part B, CAMCOG, Symbol Digit Modality Test, and California Verbal Learning Test. The neuropsychological patterns of heart failure suggested diffuse cognitive involvement, with higher-level processes being most affected. It is important to track neurocognition in this clinical population since neuropsychological impairment is prevalent, and screening measures appear to be reliable. Such screening and further assessment would inform future medical treatment and may improve patient care management.

Comparison of Neuropsychological Patterns in Nigerians with different Heart Failure Phenotypes

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of left ventricular dysfunction type on the pattern of neuropsychological dysfunctions among heart failure (HF) subjects.

Method

A sub-analysis of the data of subjects recruited in a cross-sectional survey of cognitive dysfunction among Nigerians with HF was performed. Cognitive performance on the Community Screening Interview for Dementia (CSI'D), Word List Learning Delayed Recall (WLLDR), Boston Naming Test (BNT), and Modified Token Test (MTT) were compared between heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Clinical and echocardiographic correlation analysis with cognitive performance was performed.

Results

Subjects with HFpEF were impaired on the WLLDR (71.4% vs. 34.6%, p = .026). The group with HFpEF scored lower on the language domain (definition subscale) of CSI'D (p = .036), and WLLDR (p = .005). The performance on the MTT (p = .185) and BNT (p = .923) were comparable between the two groups. An inverse relationship was found between pulse pressure and delay recall (r = -.565 p = .003) among the cohort with HFpEF whereas body mass index, BMI (r = -.737, p = .023) and tricuspid valve E/A ratio, TVEA (r = -.650, p = .042) showed an inverse relationship with the total CSI'D score in the cohort with HFrEF.

Conclusions

Cognitive dysfunction is largely similar between the two groups. Delay recall is however poorer among subjects with HFpEF. Regular cognitive screening is advocated among HF subjects to prevent non-adherence with therapeutic options.