The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review

Development of a scale to gain insight into the experience of living with chronic heart failure: The UNAV-Experience of Living with Chronic Heart Failure Scale

BACKGROUND

To date, there are no tools for the nursing staff to gain systematic insight on the experience lived by patients with chronic heart failure. The objective of this study was to develop a scale for this purpose.

METHODS

The study was conducted between January 2018 and December 2020 in three Spanish hospitals. The process described by DeVellis was used for the development of the scale. The items were built based on a phenomenological study and a systematic review of the literature. Next, feedback from a panel of experts was obtained, the scale was administered to a sample of patients with chronic heart failure, and a cognitive interview and an observational study were conducted to create the final version of the scale.

RESULTS

The first version of the scale had in seven domains and 76 items. After its evaluation by a panel of experts, it was reduced to a second version with six domains and 55 items. Following the administration of Version 2 to 17 patients (58.8% male, mean age 59.53, 70.6% classified as NYHA functional class II), five items were modified and two eliminated. Thus, the third version of the UNAV-CHF Experience Scale was composed of six domains and 53 items.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents the development of the UNAV-experience of living with chronic heart failure scale. It is an original and novel instrument that allows systematically explore this experience. A larger-scale study is necessary to confirm the validity of our scale.

Development and validation of the self-volume management behaviour questionnaire for patients with chronic heart failure

AIMS

We aim to develop and validate a questionnaire on the behaviour of self-volume management of patients with chronic heart failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Based on the specific situation theory of heart failure self-care, the items of this questionnaire were formed through literature review and expert consultation. Content validity is judged by expert consultation. Item analysis was used for further filter entries. Cronbach's alpha and retest were used for reliability. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to test the structural validity. The questionnaire finally contained 3 subscales and 22 items. The Cronbach's α was between 0.732 and 0.797. The reliability of the retest was between 0.983 and 0.998. In expert consultation, the I-CVI of each item was 0.92-1, and the S-CVI of each subscale was 0.99, 1.00, and 0.99. In exploratory factor analysis, each subscale has two factors. In confirmatory factor analysis, the model fits of the three subscales were good: χ2/df < 3, RMSEA < 0.08, CFI > 0.9, TLI > 0.9, and SRMR < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

The study has shown that the questionnaire on the behaviour of self-volume management of patients with chronic heart failure has good reliability and validity. It can be used as an evaluation tool for evaluating the self-volume management behaviour of patients with chronic heart failure.