Emergency Department Triage Nurses' Self-reported Adherence With American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Myocardial Infarction Guidelines

A Nationwide Study of Emergency Nurses' Triage Decisions for Potential Acute Coronary Syndrome

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to identify the symptoms used to assess angina, determine how emergency nurses make triage decisions for potential acute coronary syndrome, and determine emergency nurses' initial actions.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional, survey-based design. Emergency nurses were recruited through a posting on the Emergency Nurses Association website and through postcards. Measures included demographic data, assessment of angina, and the Nurses' Cardiac Triage Instrument. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and ordinal logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 414 registered nurses with a mean age of 41.7 (SD = 12.0) years participated. They were predominantly female (80.7%), had a baccalaureate degree (60.1%), and worked as a registered nurse for a median 10.0 years. Common terms used to assess angina were chest pain (79.5%), chest pressure (77.3%), chest tightness (72.9%), and chest discomfort (72.5%). The severity of chest pressure (median 5.0, interquartile range 1.0) and nature of chest pain (median 5.0, interquartile range 1.0) had the highest overall median scores to support initial cardiac triage decisions. Associated symptoms of diaphoresis, fatigue, and shortness of breath along with health history contributed to decision making.

DISCUSSION

Emergency nurses primarily used chest symptoms and health history when deciding to evaluate for acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department. Associated symptoms of diaphoresis, fatigue, and shortness of breath, along with health history, also contributed to decision making. Initial registered nurse actions were to obtain an electrocardiogram, prepare the patient for the cardiac catheterization laboratory, and notify the emergency physician of the patient's admission.

Suboptimal Knowledge and Care of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Among Nurses Working in Selected Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2021

Background

Acute Coronary Syndrome is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in developing nations including Ethiopia. As frontline healthcare providers, nurses need to be prudent in handling cases of acute coronary syndrome. However, nurses' knowledge and practice of acute coronary syndrome are not well-known across Ethiopia. Thus, this study aimed to assess knowledge, practice, and associated factors regarding the care of acute coronary syndrome among acute care nurses working at selected hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Methods

Institution-based descriptive cross-sectional study design was conducted from February to March among 252 purposively selected nurses working in tertiary hospitals of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. A pretested and structured questionnaire was used for data collection. Data were entered into Epi-Data 4.6 and exported to SPSS version 25. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to describe and test the association between selected variables. P-values < 0.05 were declared as significant factors for the outcome variable.

Results

Out of 252 nurses, (52%) had good knowledge, and (44.4%) had good practice towards care of Acute Coronary Syndrome. Being a master's degree [AOR=3.801, (95% CI:1.314-10.996), P =0.014] and having guidelines [AOR= 10.998, (95% CI:2.478-48.805), P =0.002] were significantly associated with nurse's good knowledge of ACS. While having a master's degree [AOR=4.258, (95% CI:1.676-10.820), P=0.002] and getting in-service training [AOR= 1.902, (95% CI:1.022-3.539), P = 0.042] were significantly associated with nurse's good level of practice.

Conclusion

In this study, nurses had inadequate knowledge and practice regarding the care of Acute Coronary Syndrome. Nurses' educational level, presence of clinical practice guidelines, and getting training were determinant factors associated with good knowledge and practice. Therefore, organizational and nursing educational support are needed to improve this gap by providing short- and long-term training, and updated evidence-based clinical practice guidelines should be available for all acute care nurses.

Effect of triage training on nurses' practice and triage outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Accurate assessment and prompt management of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a complex process for emergency department (ED) nurses and has variable clinical outcomes. The aim of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of an educational intervention on nurses' practice during the triage of patients with ACS and the triage outcomes in this group of patients.

METHODS

In this quasi-experimental study, a pretest-posttest group of 24 nurses were included by convenience sampling method and 960 patients with ACS were selected by sequential sampling during the pre-intervention (n = 480) and post-intervention (n = 480) phases. A case-based learning (CBL) intervention was performed for nurses for one month considering the role of the triage nurse according to the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) recommendations as well as the factors affecting the proper identification and management of patients with ACS. During patient triage in the pre- and post-intervention phases, the "Triage Nurse Practice Checklist" and the "Medical Electronic Records" were used to assess nurses' practice and the triage outcomes in patients, respectively.

RESULTS

The overall mean score of the triage nurses' practice and its subscales, including Primary monitoring and assessment, cardiovascular risk factors assessment, evaluation of coronary heart disease (CHD) symptoms, chest pain management, and adherence to the ACC/AHA practice guidelines were significantly improved in the post-intervention phase compared with the pre-intervention phase (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the triage outcomes, including in-hospital mortality within 24 hours, death in ED, hospitalization in other wards, and discharge from ED in the pre and post-intervention phases (P = 0.723).

CONCLUSION

The development of a cardiac triage-specific educational program could improve the performance of nurses in the evaluation and management of patients with ACS, but had no effect on the triage outcomes in this group of patients. We recommend a quality improvement project or a critical outcomes-based triage system to assess ACS patients' care needs in the ED.

A National Survey Identifying the Factors Associated With Cardiovascular Care Nurses' Perceived Knowledge of International Practice Guidelines: The First Step in the Development of an Implementation Strategy

BACKGROUND

The implementation of international guidelines within everyday practice remains problematic, which can have a detrimental impact on quality of care delivered. This study aimed to ascertain the factors associated with clinical nurses' perceived knowledge of international guidelines.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional survey, nurses from 45 hospitals across Ireland were recruited. A previously validated anonymous questionnaire that assessed guideline knowledge, use, and barriers to implementation was used. Data were analyzed using SPSS 23 and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 542 responses, 54% had used international guidelines relevant to their practice and 50% had consulted within the last year. Most nurses perceived that poor patient follow-up, lack of time and resources, poor clinical leadership, workload, long guidelines, and not understanding guideline detail were barriers to guideline use and implementation. Forty-five percent rated their perceived knowledge of guidelines as "low." Logistic regression identified that "high" knowledge levels were significantly associated with having read guidelines in the last year and their use with practice. In contrast, low knowledge of the guidelines was associated with perceptions that they were lengthy and not easy to use, lack of confidence to challenge colleagues when guidelines are not implemented, or not being able to influence current practice.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified the specific knowledge needs in this cohort of mainly basic grade registered nurses, with low perceived guideline knowledge. A whole unit or team approach led by nurse champions is needed to develop and establish practice and educational strategies that would increase the availability, application, and knowledge of guidelines within everyday practice.

Oxygen Administration Does Not Influence the Prognosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of supplemental oxygen in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unclear.

STUDY QUESTION

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of supplemental oxygen in patients who present with AMI.

DATA SOURCES

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and conference proceedings from inception through January 2016.

STUDY DESIGN

Eligible studies were randomized trials that evaluated the role of oxygen compared with room air in AMI. The clinical outcome measured was 30-day mortality, and odds ratio (OR) was calculated for the measured outcome. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to pool 30-day mortality in a random-effects model. Sensitivity analysis was carried out to evaluate the effect of revascularization of the culprit artery on the outcome.

RESULTS

The pooled analysis suggested no difference in 30-day mortality [OR 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.30-4.00; P = 0.89] between oxygen and room air. Metaregression demonstrated that all the between-study variance was because of coronary revascularization (P = 0.01, R = 1.0). A subgroup analysis suggested a trend toward increased mortality with oxygen (OR 3.26; 95% CI, 0.94-11.29; P = 0.06) when less than half of the patient population underwent revascularization. On the other hand, there was a nonsignificant numerical decrease in mortality with oxygen (OR 0.41; 95% CI, 0.14-1.19; P = 0.10) in the presence of coronary revascularization. Metaregression confirmed that all the between-study variance was because of coronary revascularization (P = 0.01, R = 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis, we found that the evidence on the safety and efficacy of oxygen was not only weak and inconsistent but also had modest statistical power. The variation in results was mainly because of the presence or absence of revascularization of the culprit artery. Adequately powered studies are needed to further delineate the role of oxygen in patients undergoing coronary revascularization.