PET measurement of receptor occupancy as a tool to guide dose selection in neuropharmacology: are we asking the right questions?

Predicting the dopamine D2 receptor occupancy of ropinirole in rats using positron emission tomography and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling

1. The purpose of this study was to measure dopamine D_2/3 receptor occupancy (RO) as a marker of the clinical efficacy of ropinirole in rats via positron emission tomography (PET) using ¹⁸F-fallypride as the radiotracer and to explore the relationship between dopamine RO and the plasma concentration of ropinirole via pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling. 2. Plasma was collected from 16 rats treated with one of four doses of ropinirole. For the time-dependent study, the data of 16 rats in the 15 mg/kg dose group at four time points were averaged, and another 24 rats were divided into three dose groups (5 mg/kg, 30 mg/kg and 60 mg/kg) for the dose-dependent study; the animals were assessed via ¹⁸F-fallypride PET scans. The correlation between dopamine RO and the ropinirole plasma concentration was investigated, and a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model was established with WinNonlin 6.3 software. Both the plasma concentration and the binding potential changed in a time- and dose-dependent manner, and the plasma concentration that induces 50% RO (EC₅₀) as calculated by the PK-PD model was 1391 ng/mL. 3. ¹⁸F-fallypride appeared to be a suitable radiotracer for ropinirole imaging, and its binding to the dopamine D₂ receptor has time- and concentration-dependent characteristics. A theory-based PK-PD model was developed to describe the relationship between the plasma ropinirole concentration and RO, providing a methodological foundation for noninvasive and in vivo clinical evaluations of ropinirole treatment.

NK1 receptor antagonists for depression: Why a validated concept was abandoned

BACKGROUND

NK1 receptor antagonists were abandoned despite antidepressant efficacy in five randomized clinical trials. The loss of confidence may be attributed to the failure of a Phase III clinical program with the NK1 receptor antagonist aprepitant in Major Depression. This review examines how PET receptor occupancy was used to select doses for aprepitant and that these may not have achieved adequate exposure.

METHODS

PubMed, Google Scholar, and FDA databases were searched for articles concerning NK1 receptor antagonists, human PET receptor occupancy and clinical trials in Major Depression.

RESULTS

Antidepressant efficacy was initially demonstrated with three NK1 receptor antagonists, including aprepitant. A nanoparticle formulation of aprepitant was then developed to improve oral bioavailability. In PET studies, doses of 80 and 160mg achieved a high level (~ 90%) of occupancy of NK1 receptors in the human brain and were selected for Phase III. The efficacy of these doses of the nanoparticle formulation may not have been established in depressed patients prior to Phase III, and previous formulations required a dose of 300mg of aprepitant for efficacy. No antidepressant effect of 80 or 160mg of aprepitant was found, and it was concluded that the NK1 antagonist concept was flawed. However, subsequent studies with other compounds showed that a higher level of NK1 receptor occupancy (100%) was required for antidepressant efficacy.

LIMITATIONS

Key data concerning the bioequivalence of different formulations of aprepitant have not been published. The importance of NK1 antagonists for pharmacotherapy of depression and other psychiatric disorders has not been established in clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

Aprepitant may have failed in Phase III because of an inadequate understanding of the relationship between brain NK1 receptor occupancy and clinical response. A validated and novel mechanistic approach to treat depression has been misperceived as ineffective and abandoned. Caution should be exercised in the appropriate use of PET occupancy data to select doses for drug development programs in neuropsychiatry. The relationship between exposure, receptor occupancy and clinical response should be established. A crisis of confidence has followed the failure of this and other programs in neuropsychiatry, with a far reaching and detrimental impact on pharmaceutical research.

Antiinflammatory effects of aprepitant coadministration with cART regimen containing ritonavir in HIV-infected adults

BACKGROUND

HIV-infected individuals, even well controlled with combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), have systemic inflammation and comorbidities. Substance P (SP) is an undecapeptide, which mediates neurotransmission and inflammation through its cognate neurokinin 1 receptor (NK1R). Plasma SP levels are elevated in HIV-infected individuals. The FDA-approved antiemetic aprepitant, an NK1R antagonist, has anti-HIV effects and antiinflammatory actions. We evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiinflammatory properties of aprepitant in HIV-positive individuals receiving cART.

METHODS

We conducted a phase 1B study of 12 HIV-positive individuals on a ritonavir-containing regimen (HIV viral load less than 40 copies/ml and CD4 > 400 cells/μl). Participants received open-label aprepitant 375 mg per day for 28 days and were followed for an additional 30 days. Changes in plasma levels of proinflammatory markers were assessed using flow cytometry, ELISA, luminex, and SOMAscan assays.

RESULTS

The mean peak aprepitant plasma concentration was 30.7 ± 15.3 μg/ml at day 14 and 23.3 ± 12.3 μg/ml at day 28. Aprepitant treatment resulted in decreased plasma SP levels and affected 176 plasma proteins (56 after FDR) and several metabolic pathways, including inflammation and lipid metabolism. No change in soluble CD163 was observed. Aprepitant treatment was associated with a moderate increases in total and HDL cholesterol and affected select hematologic and metabolic markers, which returned to baseline levels 30 days after aprepitant treatment was stopped. There were 12 mild and 10 moderate adverse events (AE).

CONCLUSIONS

Aprepitant is safe and well tolerated. The antiinflammatory properties of aprepitant make it a possible adjunctive therapy for comorbid conditions associated with HIV infection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02154360).

FUNDING

This research was funded by NIH UO1 MH090325, P30 MH097488, and PO1 MH105303.