Exploring the Relationship Between Objective Pupillometry Metrics and Midline Shift

Anisocoria After Direct Light Stimulus is Associated with Poor Outcomes Following Acute Brain Injury

BACKGROUND

Assessing pupil size and reactivity is the standard of care in neurocritically ill patients. Anisocoria observed in critically ill patients often prompts further investigation and treatment. This study explores anisocoria at rest and after light stimulus determined using quantitative pupillometry as a predictor of discharge modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores.

METHODS

This analysis includes data from an international registry and includes patients with paired (left and right eye) quantitative pupillometry readings linked to discharge mRS scores. Anisocoria was defined as the absolute difference in pupil size using three common cut points (> 0.5 mm, > 1 mm, and > 2 mm). Nonparametric models were constructed to explore patient outcome using three predictors: the presence of anisocoria at rest (in ambient light); the presence of anisocoria after light stimulus; and persistent anisocoria (present both at rest and after light). The primary outcome was discharge mRS score associated with the presence of anisocoria at rest versus after light stimulus using the three commonly defined cut points.

RESULTS

This analysis included 152,905 paired observations from 6,654 patients with a mean age of 57.0 (standard deviation 17.9) years, and a median hospital stay of 5 (interquartile range 3-12) days. The mean admission Glasgow Coma Scale score was 12.7 (standard deviation 3.5), and the median discharge mRS score was 2 (interquartile range 0-4). The ranges for absolute differences in pupil diameters were 0-5.76 mm at rest and 0-6.84 mm after light. Using an anisocoria cut point of > 0.5 mm, patients with anisocoria after light had worse median mRS scores (2 [interquartile range 0-4]) than patients with anisocoria at rest (1 [interquartile range 0-3]; P < .0001). Patients with persistent anisocoria had worse median mRS scores (3 [interquartile range 1-4]) than those without persistent anisocoria (1 [interquartile range 0-3]; P < .0001). Similar findings were observed using a cut point for anisocoria of > 1 mm and > 2 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Anisocoria after light is a new biomarker that portends worse outcome than anisocoria at rest. After further validation, anisocoria after light should be considered for inclusion as a reported and trended assessment value.

Describing Anisocoria in Neurocritically Ill Patients

BACKGROUND

Anisocoria (unequal pupil size) has been defined using cut points ranging from greater than 0.3 mm to greater than 2.0 mm for absolute difference in pupil size. This study explored different pupil diameter cut points for assessing anisocoria as measured by quantitative pupillometry before and after light stimulus.

METHODS

An exploratory descriptive study of international registry data was performed. The first observations in patients with paired left and right quantitative pupillometry measurements were included. Measurements of pupil size before and after stimulus with a fixed light source were used to calculate anisocoria.

RESULTS

The sample included 5769 patients (mean [SD] age, 57.5 [17.6] years; female sex, 2558 patients [51.5%]; White race, 3669 patients [75.5%]). Anisocoria defined as pupil size difference of greater than 0.5 mm was present in 1624 patients (28.2%) before light stimulus; 645 of these patients (39.7%) also had anisocoria after light stimulus (P < .001). Anisocoria defined as pupil size difference of greater than 2.0 mm was present in 79 patients (1.4%) before light stimulus; 42 of these patients (53.2%) also had anisocoria after light stimulus (P < .001).

DISCUSSION

The finding of anisocoria significantly differed before and after light stimulus and according to the cut point used. At most cut points, fewer than half of the patients who had anisocoria before light stimulus also had anisocoria after light stimulus.

CONCLUSION

The profound difference in the number of patients adjudicated as having anisocoria using different cut points reinforces the need to develop a universal definition for anisocoria.

Pupillary light reflex measured with quantitative pupillometry has low sensitivity and high specificity for predicting neuroworsening after traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

Triage and neurological assessment of the 1.7 million traumatic brain injuries occurring annually is often done by nurse practitioners and physician assistants in the emergency department. Subjective assessments, such as the neurological examination that includes evaluation of the pupillary light reflex (PLR), can contain bias. Quantitative pupillometry (QP) standardizes and objectifies the PLR examination. Additional data are needed to determine whether QP can predict neurological changes in a traumatic brain injury (TBI) patient.

PURPOSE

This study examines the effectiveness of QP in predicting neurological decline within 24 hours of admission following acute TBI.

METHODOLOGY

This prospective, observational, clinical trial used pragmatic sampling to assess PLR in TBI patients using QP within 24 hours of ED admission. Chi-square analysis was used to determine change in patient status, through Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), at baseline and within 24 hours of admission, to the QP.

RESULTS

There were 95 participants included in the analysis; of whom 35 experienced neuroworsening, defined by change in GCS of >2 within the first 24 hours of admission. There was a significant association between an abnormal Neurological Pupil index (NPi), defined as NPi of <3, and neuroworsening (p < .0001). The sensitivity (51.43%) and specificity (91.67%) of abnormal NPi in predicting neuroworsening were varied.

CONCLUSION

There is a strong association between abnormal NPi and neuroworsening in the sample of TBI patients with high specificity and moderate sensitivity.

IMPLICATIONS

NPi may be an early indicator of neurological changes within 24 hours of ED admission in patients with TBI.

Pilot Study of Neurologic Pupil Index as A Predictor of External Ventricular Drain Clamp Trial Failure After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

External ventricular drains (EVDs) provide a temporary egress for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in patients with symptomatic hydrocephalus following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Before EVD removal, a wean trial, which involves clamping the EVD, is typically attempted to ensure that CSF self-regulation is achieved. Automated infrared pupillometry (AIP) has been shown to detect early neurologic decline. We sought to explore the use of AIP to detect early EVD clamping trial failure.

METHODS

This prospective observational pilot study enrolled aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients before an EVD clamp trial. On initiating the clamp trial, nurses included hourly AIP assessment in documentation. Clamp trial outcome was based on neurologic examination and neuroimaging. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) models were constructed to explore computed tomography (CT) versus AIP as predictors of clamp trial outcome.

RESULTS

Among the 30 subjects enrolled, there were 38 clamping trials and 22 successful EVD removals. CT scan as a predictor of clamp trial was found to have a sensitivity of 68.8% and specificity of 89.5% (PPV = 84.6%, NPV = 77.3%). AIP assessment as a predictor of wean trial outcome was found to have a sensitivity of 58.3% and specificity of 100% (PPV = 100%, NPV = 63.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The pilot study data support that Neurological Pupil index <3 is a potential indicator of early clamp trial failure, but a CT scan has a higher sensitivity and NPV for predicting successful EVD removal. This finding suggests the benefits of including AIP assessments during clamping trials.

Inter-device reliability of the NPi-200 and NPi-300 pupillometers

The pupillary evaluation is an essential part of the neurological examination. Research suggests that the traditional examination of the pupil with a handheld flashlight has limited interrater reliability. Automated pupillometers were developed to provide an objective scoring of various pupillary parameters. The NPi-200 pupillometer is used for quantitative pupillary examinations, the NPi-300 was launched in July 2021 with enhanced features. The purpose of this study is to compare results from the NPi-200 to the NPi-300 to ensure that data are translatable across both platforms. This study examines the inter-device reliability of the NPi-200 compared to the NPi-300 in two cohorts: 20 patients at risk for cerebral edema and 50 healthy controls. Paired assessments of the devices were made from all participants. Each assessment included bilateral PLR readings within a 5-minute interval. Data showed high agreement between the two devices for the Neurological Pupil Index (NPi) reading (k = 0.94; CI: 0.91-0.99) and for pupil diameter assessment (k = 0.91; CI: 0.87-0.96). There is a very high level of agreement between the NPi-200 and NPi-300 among healthy controls and critically ill patients. Clinicians and researchers can interpret the results from either device equally.