Personalizing Environmental Health: At the Intersection of Precision Medicine and Occupational Health in the Military

Development and Validation of the Veteran Military Occupational and Environmental Exposure Assessment Tool

INTRODUCTION

Military exposures may present a cumulative load and increased individual susceptibility to negative health outcomes. Currently, there are no comprehensive and validated environmental exposure assessment tools covering the full spectrum of occupational and environmental exposures for Veterans. The Veterans Affairs (VA) War Related Illness and Injury Study Center in Washington, DC, developed the Veteran Military Occupational and Environmental Exposure Assessment Tool (VMOAT) to establish a structured, comprehensive self-report tool that captures military and non-military occupational and environmental exposures. The VMOAT is clinically insightful, modular, and flexible for adding novel exposures, meeting the needs of modern evolving threats and exposures in both clinical and research settings. This manuscript reviews the ongoing development and validation plans for the VMOAT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The VMOAT is a self-reported structured questionnaire, and VMOAT 1.0 was developed to cover an individual's 3 life phases (pre, during, post-military service); 5 exposure domains (chemical, physical, biological, injuries including ergonomic, and psychological stress exposures, plus military preventive health measures); and 64 specific exposures nested within exposure categories. VMOAT 1.0 addresses exposure dose (frequency, duration, proximity, route), and can be administered online via VA approved Qualtrics survey software. VMOAT 1.0 to 2.0 updates began in December 2022 with changes focused on readability, streamlining the exposure history, refining the exposure metrics, and improving the skip logic embedded within the survey design.

RESULTS

The initial VMOAT 1.0 development included face and construct validation with expert internal and external academic and military collaborators, undergoing an iterative 5-cycle review as well as sample testing among a small group of Veterans. The VMOAT 1.0 was used in Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved longitudinal study, which has been examined preliminarily to compare the VMOAT 1.0 with other exposure assessments and to compare responses of Explosive Ordnance Disposal Veterans, a high occupational exposure cohort, to non-Explosive Ordnance Disposal Veterans. Ongoing VMOAT 2.0 updates will include integration of experiences from piloting the VMOAT 1.0 as well as additional face and content validation and survey cognitive testing with Veterans. VMOAT 2.0 data will improve the development of exposure-informed models using composite survey data to create scored- and scale-based exposure metrics for specific exposures and exposure domains. These data will highlight the effectiveness of the VMOAT as a structured comprehensive occupational and environmental exposure assessment instrument.

CONCLUSIONS

VMOAT development supports the 2022 Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act and fits into the existing VA exposure assessment approach as a standardized, comprehensive self-reported exposure assessment tool. It can be utilized as a stand-alone instrument or supplemented by clinician interviews in research or specialty evaluation programs. The collected VMOAT self-report information on military occupational and environmental exposures will allow direct evaluation with objective measures of exposure and health outcomes. These data outcomes have a high potential to guide the DoD and VA environmental exposure risk mitigation and risk communication efforts.

A Clinician's Guide to Occupational Exposures in the Military

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Adverse occupational and environmental exposures are common causes of respiratory disease and health consequences requiring medical care. Understanding how these various exposures affect patients and how to elicit an adequate history is critical for any clinician. Military personnel are often overlooked when discussing groups at risk for environmental exposure-associated airway disease. There are close to 20 million active duty and veterans in the USA, and nearly all clinicians will at some point care for a patient that has served in the military.

RECENT FINDINGS

Exposures related to military work include burn pits, chemicals/toxins, sandstorms, and living conditions. Burn pits and military waste are increasingly recognized as potential hazards attributed to the ongoing conflicts in the Middle East. The link between these various military exposures and acute or chronic airway diseases remains difficult. Epidemiological studies are emerging to demonstrate correlations with chronic lung disease and prolonged burn pit exposure. This review provides an overview of potential occupational and environmental exposures that may affect current and/or former military service men and women.

A Review of Genome-Based Precision Medicine Efforts Within the Department of Defense

INTRODUCTION

Providing patient-specific clinical care is an expanding focus for medical professionals and researchers, more commonly referred to as personalized or precision medicine. The goal of using a patient-centric approach is to provide safer care while also increasing the probability of therapeutic success through careful consideration of the influence of certain extrinsic and intrinsic human factors in developing the patient care plan. Of increasing influence on patient care is the phenotype and genotype information gathered from employing various next-generation sequencing methods. Guided by and partnered with our civilian colleagues, clinical components within the DoD are embracing and advancing genomic medicine in many facets-from the bench to the bedside-and in many therapeutic areas, from Psychiatry to Oncology. In this PubMed-based review, we describe published clinical research and interventions within the DoD using genome-informed data and emphasize precision medicine efforts in earlier stages of development with the potential to revolutionize the approach to therapeutics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The new PubMed database was searched for articles published between 2015 and 2020 with the following key search terms: precision medicine, genomic, pharmacogenetic, pharmacogenomic, US military, and Department of Defense.

RESULTS

Eighty-one articles were retrieved in our initial search. After screening the abstracts for studies that only involved direct testing of (or clinical interaction with) active duty, Reserve, National Guard, or civilian personnel working within the DoD and excluding any epidemiological or microbial isolation studies, seven were included in this review.

CONCLUSION

There are several programs and studies within the DoD, which investigate or use gene-based biomarkers or gene variants to deliver more precise clinical assessment and treatment. These genome-based precision medicine efforts aim to optimize the clinical care of DoD beneficiaries, particularly service members in the operational environment.

Soldier-Centered Care: A Concept Analysis

INTRODUCTION

It is critical for the U.S. Army Medical Department to acknowledge the distinctive medical needs of soldiers and conceptualize soldier-centered care as a unique concept. In addition to the nationally recognized standards of patient-centered care, soldier-centered care includes provisions for the priorities of soldier health and wellness, injury prevention, illness and injury management, and the preservation of physical performance and medical readiness. The development of soldier-centered care as a distinctive concept may strengthen the evidence base for interventions that support improvements to soldier care and thus, enhance health outcomes specific to soldiers. The purpose of this article is to analyze the concept of soldier-centered care, clarify the meaning of soldier-centered care, and propose a theoretical definition.

METHODS

Rodgers' evolutionary concept analysis method was used to search and analyze the literature for related terms, attributes, antecedents, and consequences and to create a theoretical definition for soldier-centered care.

RESULTS

The results of this concept analysis indicated that soldier-centered care is realized through the presence of nine attributes: operational alignment of care, provider and support staff therapeutic competence, management of transitions and care coordination, technology and accessibility, management of limited and lost work days, trust and expectation management, leadership support, continuity, and access to care. Soldier-centered care is focused on health and wellness promotion, disease and injury prevention, and early diagnosis and treatment of acute injuries in the primary care setting to facilitate timely injury recovery, reduce reinjury, and prevent long-term disabilities. The result of soldier-centered care is enhanced physical performance, medical readiness, and deployability for soldiers. Based on the literature analysis, the following theoretical definition of soldier-centered care is proposed: Soldier-centered care is individualized, comprehensive healthcare tailored to the soldier's unique medical needs delivered by a care team of competent primary care providers and support staff who prioritize trust and expectation management, operational alignment of care, leadership support, care coordination, and the management of limited and lost workdays through the use of evidence-based practice approaches that employ innovative information technology to balance access to care and continuity.

CONCLUSIONS

The concept of soldier-centered care often emerges in discussions about optimal physical performance and medical readiness for soldiers. Although soldier-centered care and patient-centered care have similar conceptual underpinning, it is important to clarify the unique physical and medical requirements for soldiers that differentiate soldier-centered care from patient-centered care. Implementing the defining attributes of soldier-centered care in the U.S. Army primary care setting may improve the quality of care and health outcomes for soldiers. When defining performance metrics for primary care models of care, the U.S. Army Medical Department must consider assessing outcomes specific to the soldier population. Developing empirical indicators for the attributes of soldier-centered care will support meaningful testing of the concept.

Personalised Medicine: implication and perspectives in the field of occupational health

"Personalised medicine" relies on identifying and integrating individual variability in genomic, biological, and physiological parameters, as well as in environmental and lifestyle factors, to define "individually" targeted disease prevention and treatment. Although innovative "omic" technologies supported the application of personalised medicine in clinical, oncological, and pharmacological settings, its role in occupational health practice and research is still in a developing phase. Occupational personalised approaches have been currently applied in experimental settings and in conditions of unpredictable risks, e.g.. war missions and space flights, where it is essential to avoid disease manifestations and therapy failure. However, a debate is necessary as to whether personalized medicine may be even more important to support a redefinition of the risk assessment processes taking into consideration the complex interaction between occupational and individual factors. Indeed, "omic" techniques can be helpful to understand the hazardous properties of the xenobiotics, dose-response relationships through a deeper elucidation of the exposure-disease pathways and internal doses of exposure. Overall, this may guide the adoption/implementation of primary preventive measures protective for the vast majority of the population, including most susceptible subgroups. However, the application of personalised medicine into occupational health requires overcoming some practical, ethical, legal, economical, and socio-political issues, particularly concerning the protection of privacy, and the risk of discrimination that the workers may experience. In this scenario, the concerted action of academic, industry, governmental, and stakeholder representatives should be encouraged to improve research aimed to guide effective and sustainable implementation of personalised medicine in occupational health fields.

Advances in Comprehensive Exposure Assessment: Opportunities for the US Military

OBJECTIVE

Review advances in exposure assessment offered by the exposome concept and new -omics and sensor technologies.

METHODS

Narrative review of advances, including current efforts and potential future applications by the US military.

RESULTS

Exposure assessment methods from both bottom-up and top-down exposomics approaches are advancing at a rapid pace, and the US military is engaged in developing both approaches. Top-down approaches employ various -omics technologies to identify biomarkers of internal exposure and biological effect. Bottom-up approaches use new sensor technology to better measure external dose. Key challenges of both approaches are largely centered around how to integrate, analyze, and interpret large datasets that are multidimensional and disparate.

CONCLUSIONS

Advances in -omics and sensor technologies may dramatically enhance exposure assessment and improve our ability to characterize health risks related to occupational and environmental exposures, including for the US military.

Potential and Actual Health Hazards in the Dense Urban Operational Environment: Critical Gaps and Solutions for Military Occupational Health

: This paper presents environmental health risks which are prevalent in dense urban environments.We review the current literature and recommendations proposed by environmental medicine experts in a 2-day symposium sponsored by the Department of Defense and supported by the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.Key hazards in the dense urban operational environment include toxic industrial chemicals and materials, water pollution and sewage, and air pollution. Four critical gaps in environmental medicine were identified: prioritizing chemical and environmental concerns, developing mobile decision aids, personalized health assessments, and better real-time health biomonitoring.As populations continue to concentrate in cities, civilian and military leaders will need to meet emerging environmental health concerns by developing and delivering adequate technology and policy solutions.