Outcomes after microsurgical treatment of lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cross-Sectional Analysis of Patients Referred to a Tertiary Lymphatic Surgery Center

BACKGROUND

Secondary lymphedema has become an increasingly common reason for referral to plastic surgery. Understanding referral patterns for lymphedema patients is crucial to optimizing care.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients referred to plastic surgery for lymphedema at a lymphatic surgery center between January 2016 and 2023 were identified. Primary outcomes of interest included clinical lymphedema staging and characteristics, patient demographics, and referral sources. Secondary outcomes were prior lymphedema treatment, agreement between referring provider and plastic surgeon's diagnosis, and patient disposition after surgical evaluation. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 285 patients with extremity edema were referred to plastic surgery; 60.0% of patients had prior malignancy, 45.6% of patients had undergone a prior lymph node procedure, and 40% had received radiation, while 56.8% of patients had previously seen occupational therapy. Body mass index (BMI, OR 1.09, p = 0.013), age (OR 1.25, p = 0.005), and prior physical or occupational therapy (OR 1.23, p = 0.011) were associated with later stages of lymphedema upon presentation, while prior radiation (OR 0.79, p = 0.006) and malignancy (OR 0.85, p = 0.034) were associated with earlier stages of lymphedema. Self-referral (27.4%), primary care (17.9%), and medical oncology (14.7%) were the most common referral sources. Lymphedema was confirmed in 68.1% of referrals, and 28.5% of these patients proceeded to surgery. Patients were more likely to be operative candidates if referred by primary care (RR 2.1, p = 0.006) or occupational therapy (RR 4.6, p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

Referred patients ultimately undergo lymphedema surgery at relatively low rates, indicating that most referred patients are not ideal surgical candidates. Optimizing referral patterns through multidisciplinary education may enhance the referral process and improve access to lymphedema surgery.

MR Lymphangiography: Congenital Lymphatic Flow Disorders

ABSTRACT

Congenital lymphatic flow disorders collectively refer to a heterogeneous group of diseases that manifest as chylothorax, chylous ascites, intestinal lymphangiectasia, protein-losing enteropathy, and peripheral extremity or genital lymphedema, all in the absence of identifiable injury to the lymphatic system. We have only recently begun to understand congenital lymphatic flow disorders through the ability to image lymph flow dynamically. Intranodal dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography (DCMRL) is a crucial technique for imaging lymphatic flow in pediatric patients with congenital lymphatic flow disorders. However, as lymphatic imaging is still a nascent discipline with many uncertainties regarding optimal imaging and treatment, effective patient management requires a comprehensive understanding of imaging techniques, disease pathophysiology, and multidisciplinary treatment approaches. Above all, a fundamental understanding of the physiological lymphatic flow of the central conducting lymphatics is essential for the correct interpretation of DCMRL images. This knowledge helps to avoid unnecessary examinations, erroneous diagnoses, and potentially harmful treatment approaches. This review provides an overview of the methods, advantages, and precautions for interpreting the DCMRL examination, a state-of-the-art lymphatic system imaging technique, and shares various case studies.

Staging Approaches to Lymphatic Surgery: Techniques and Considerations

Lymphatic surgery has demonstrated promising outcomes for the treatment of lymphedema alongside nonsurgical techniques. Physiologic lymphatic surgeries including lymphovenous bypass and vascularized lymph node transplants address the fluid burden in lymphedema whereas reductive surgeries including suction lipectomy and excisional techniques address the fibroadipose component of the disease. Lymphedema patients often present with both fluid and fat components that may require different procedures for optimal results. In addition, the chronic, progressive nature of lymphedema can warrant the need for multiple procedures to address different anatomic areas as well as further improve outcomes. This paper reviews the current literature on staging different or repeated lymphatic procedures and proposes an algorithm to navigate physiologic and reductive lymphatic surgery when multiple procedures are needed to optimize surgical outcomes.

Post-operative care for patients following surgical treatment of lymphedema

Surgical treatments are promising for the treatment of lymphedema. It is important for patients, healthcare providers, and lymphedema community to understand that surgical treatments currently are not a cure for lymphedema but have provided promising options for patients. Post-operative care for patients following surgical treatment of lymphedema is vital to optimize and sustain patient outcomes. This expert-consensus statement addresses current practice and research needs for standardized post-operative care, a core set of outcome measures, quality of care, and training of healthcare providers. Current research and clinical practice support non-surgical lymphedema therapy, also known as conservative therapy of lymphedema (e.g., compression therapy, or manual lymph drainage, or Complete Decongestive Therapy) as an essential part of post-operative care. Importantly, patient education should focus on patients' understanding that surgery is not a cure and the importance to adhere to post-operative care and life-long self-monitoring to sustain surgical results of limb volume reduction, relief of symptoms, and mitigate known or ongoing risk factors for recurrence of lymphedema. To optimize patient outcomes, it is crucial to have a multidisciplinary professional team consisting of well-qualified and credentialed healthcare providers participating in ongoing training and education. The essentials recommended by this expert-consensus are an initial and foundational step to build clinical standards for best practice and provide directions for future research.

Expert-consensus on lymphedema surgeries: candidacy, prehabilitation, and postoperative care

For over 2 decades, the mainstay of lymphedema treatment has been complete decongestive therapy, however, surgical options are available when conservative treatment is not successful in reducing lymphedema. Standardized pre-surgical and post-surgical guidelines for candidates are not readily available. As part of the 2023 Lymphedema Summit that was sponsored by the American Cancer Society, and the Lymphology Association of North America, an expert consensus workgroup was formed and developed an expert consensus which affirms the importance of pre-surgical guidelines for candidates with lymphedema. The workgroup recommended that guidelines should be tailored to four major end-user groups: (1) patients, (2) referring physicians, (3) allied health professionals, and (4) surgeons.

State of Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction: Current and Future Directions

Since its inception, microvascular free tissue transfer has broadened possibilities for oncologic ablation and restoration of form and function. Developments throughout recent decades have resulted in increasing flap success rates and complexity. Advances in technology and knowledge gained from past experiences will continue to improve surgical efficiency, flap success rates, and ultimately, patient outcomes.

Quality of Life in Lymphedema Patients Treated by Microsurgical Lymphatic Vessel Transplantation-A Long-Term Follow-Up

INTRODUCTION

Lymphedema is a chronic condition characterized by the accumulation of lymph fluid in the upper or lower extremities, leading to swelling, discomfort, and disability in everyday life. While various treatment modalities exist, microsurgical lymphatic vessel transplantation (LVT) has emerged as a promising option. However, there is little to no long-term follow-up data regarding patients' improvement in quality of life for this surgical technique. The present study conducts an investigation of the long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over more than 20 years in patients with lymphedema treated with LVT and accomplishes this by utilizing an adapted SF-12 survey.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent LVT between 1 January 1983 and 1 October 2010 at LMU Clinic Munich (n = 35). Quality of life scores were assessed preoperatively and today in terms of physiological conditions, psychological conditions, and burden of therapy using a SF-12 survey adapted to the symptoms and impairments that chronic lymphedemas are known to cause.

RESULTS

Our findings demonstrate a significant improvement in HRQoL following LVT, with notable enhancements in physiological and psychological conditions such as burden of therapy. Physiological conditions showed a significant positive change of 3.2648 (p < 0.01). Psychological conditions improved significantly by a factor of 2.0882 (p < 0.01). Additionally, the burden of therapy improved significantly by 1.5883 points (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Previous studies have already shown a significant improvement of HRQoL within the first postoperative years for patients treated by LVT. This study also demonstrates significant long-term improvement after LVT, thus underlining the effectiveness of using LVT to improve the quality of live for patients with both primary and secondary lymphedema long-term.

[Cost comparison of conservative vs. surgical treatment of chronic lymphedema]

BACKGROUND

Lymphedema is primarily treated conservatively using complex physical decongestion treatment (CDT). Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA), vascularized lymph node transplantation (VLNT) and liposuction are available as surgical treatment methods; however, reimbursement in the diagnosis-related groups (DRG) system is sometimes inadequate or only possible following an individual application. The costs of these relatively new surgical procedures have not yet been set in relation to those of CDT.

METHOD

The costs of conservative treatment were determined in accordance with the guidelines. The costs for LVA, VLNT and liposuction of the upper and lower extremities were estimated on the basis of the DRG reimbursement per case and the expected reduction in conservative measures according to current knowledge. The annual treatment costs were then compared.

RESULTS

The annual treatment costs of LVA and VLNT are already lower than conservative treatment alone in the second postoperative year. Liposuction reaches this point in the 6th (upper extremity) or 47th postoperative year (lower extremity).

CONCLUSION

The evidence for the positive effects of lymphatic surgery is still limited; however, it is recognizable that the curative surgical approach can significantly reduce the treatment costs and improve the quality of life of lymphedema patients; however, there is a lack of adequate reflection of the surgical effort in the reimbursement.

Comparative study of conservative treatment and lymphaticovenular anastomosis with compression therapy for early-stage breast cancer-related lymphoedema

This single-centre retrospective cohort study aimed to clarify the superiority of treatment by comparing the outcomes of lymphaticovenular anastomosis with compression therapy and conservative treatment centred on compression therapy in the early stage of breast cancer-related lymphoedema. Data were collected from all patients treated for breast cancer-related lymphoedema between January 2015 and December 2022. The patients were classified into conservative treatment and surgical treatment groups. The upper extremity lymphoedema index value was calculated, based on five circumference values of the upper extremity and body mass index, to compare the 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month outcomes between the groups. Of 101 patients with breast cancer-related lymphoedema, 81 (conservative treatment: 52; surgical treatment: 29) were included in the analysis. The therapeutic effect was significantly higher in the surgical treatment group than in the conservative treatment group, when comparing the rate of change in oedema at 6 (-6.6% ± 7.3% vs. 0.9% ± 7.5%; p < 0.001), 12 (-7.3% ± 6.2% vs. 2.9% ± 8.6%; p < 0.001), 18 (-7.6% ± 8.0% vs. 3.9% ± 9.2%; p < 0.001) and 24 (-5.6% ± 6.0% vs. 4.4% ± 10.7%; p < 0.001) months. The incidence of cellulitis increased in the conservative treatment group (from 9.6% to 15.4%), whereas it was suppressed in the surgical treatment group (from 13.8% to 0%). Conservative treatment centred on compression therapy increased oedema over time; however, lymphaticovenular anastomosis with compression therapy effectively reduced oedema.