Internal Impingement: Concurrent Superior Labral and Rotator Cuff Injuries

The significance of subjective mechanical symptoms in rotator cuff pathology

BACKGROUND

The presence of subjective mechanical symptoms, such as clicking or popping, is common in patients presenting for shoulder pain and dysfunction, with unclear clinical significance. The primary objective of this study was to assess whether subjective mechanical symptoms in the affected shoulder were associated with full-thickness rotator cuff tearing in a consecutive, prospective cohort of patients undergoing shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for suspected rotator cuff pathology.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was performed of 100 consecutive patients with suspected rotator cuff tendinopathy and/or tearing who underwent shoulder MRI. The presence of subjective shoulder mechanical symptoms, including clicking or popping, was documented prior to MRI. Indications for MRI included weakness on isolated testing of rotator cuff muscle(s) or symptoms refractory to conservative treatment including at least a 6-week course of physical therapy. The primary outcome variable was the presence of full-thickness rotator cuff tearing; secondary outcome variables included any (full-thickness or partial-thickness) rotator cuff tearing and biceps long head subluxation. Radiographic parameters, including critical shoulder angle, Goutallier grade, tear retraction, and tear size were quantified. One patient was lost to follow-up, and 99 patients completed MRI imaging.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 60% of patients reported subjective mechanical symptoms in the affected shoulder. Full-thickness rotator cuff tearing was identified in 42% of patients, any rotator cuff tearing in 69% of patients, and biceps long head subluxation in 14% of patients. Subjective mechanical symptoms were not associated with full-thickness rotator cuff tearing, any rotator cuff tearing, biceps long head subluxation, critical shoulder angle, Goutallier grade, tear size, or tear retraction. Older age was associated with full-thickness and any rotator cuff tearing. As a diagnostic test for full-thickness rotator cuff tearing, subjective shoulder mechanical symptoms has a sensitivity of 64%, a specificity of 44%, and Youden's index of 0.08, consistent with poor diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjective mechanical symptoms in the affected shoulder are a common complaint in patients with suspected rotator cuff pathology. Patients may be reassured that a sensation of clicking or popping alone does not necessarily entail structural shoulder derangement.

The anterior translation of the humeral head leads to a decrease in the coracohumeral distance in subscapularis tear

A total of 297 patients who classified as subscapularis (SC) tears through arthroscopic evaluation were retrospectively enrolled, and Fifty-seven patients with impingement syndrome were also enrolled as the control group for normal-population comparison. The coracohumeral distance (CHD) and humeral head anterior translation (HHAT) were measured on magnetic resonance imaging. Our study demonstrated that the anterior translation of the humeral head is related with a decrease in the coracohumeral distance in subscapularis tear. Although, correlation between radiologic parameters (coracohumeral distance and anterior translation of the humeral head) and severity of subscapularis tear was note detected.

Level of evidence

Level IV, retrospective study.

Pediatric Sports Injuries

With increasing pediatric participation in organized sport and the early specialization of children in single sports, the number of injuries seen in the pediatric and adolescent athletic population continues to increase. Children experience acute traumatic injuries during practice and competition as well as chronic overuse injuries secondary to the repetitive stress on their developing bodies. The unique nature of the pediatric patient often requires a different diagnostic, prognostic, and treatment approach to sports injuries compared with their adult counterparts.

Stabilization of Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: A Prospective Assessment of the Clavicular Hook Plate Versus the Double Double-Button Suture Procedure

BACKGROUND

The stabilization strategy for acute high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations with AC-stabilizing clavicular hook plate (cHP) or coracoclavicular (CC)-stabilizing double double-button suture (dDBS) is still under consideration.

HYPOTHESIS

The CC-stabilizing dDBS is superior to the cHP according to an AC-specific radiologic assessment and score system.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Seventy-three consecutive patients with acute high-grade AC joint separation were prospectively followed in 2 treatment groups (64.4% randomized, 35.6% patient-selected treatment): open reduction and cHP (cHP group) or arthroscopically assisted dDBS (dDBS group) performed within 14 days of injury. Patients were prospectively analyzed by clinical scores (Taft, Constant score [CS], numeric analog scale for pain) and AC-specific radiographs (AC distance, CC distance [CCD], relative CCD [rCCD; 100 / AC distance × CCD]) at points of examination (preoperative and 6, 12, and 24 months). The minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) were assessed by the anchor-based method.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven of 35 patients (mean age ± SD: 37.7 ± 9.7 years) after cHP implantation and 29 of 38 patients (34.2 ± 9.7 years) after dDBS implantation were continuously followed until the 24-month follow-up. All patients showed significantly increased scores after surgery as compared with preoperative status (all P < .05). As compared with GI, GII had significantly better outcomes at 24 months (Taft: cHP = 9.4 ± 1.7 vs dDBS = 10.9 ± 1.1, P < .05, MCID = 2.9; CS: cHP = 90.2 ± 7.8 vs dDBS = 95.3 ± 4.4, P < .02, MCID = 16.6) and at 24 months for Rockwood IV/V (Taft: cHP = 9.4 ± 1.7 vs dDBS = 11.1 ± 0.8, P < .0005; CS: cHP = 90.1 ± 7.7 vs dDBS = 95.5 ± 3.1, P < .04). Clinically assessed horizontal instability persisted in 18.52% (GI) and 6.89% (GII; P = .24). The rCCD showed equal loss of reduction at 24 months (GII = 130.7% [control = 111%] vs GI = 141.8% [control = 115%], MCID = 11.1%).

CONCLUSION

This prospective study showed significantly superior outcomes in all clinical scores between GII and GI. The subanalysis of the high-grade injury type (Rockwood IV/V) revealed that these patients showed significant benefits from the dDBS procedure in the clinical assessments. The cHP procedure resulted in good to excellent clinical outcome data and displayed an alternative procedure for patients needing less restrictive rehabilitation protocols.

Sonographic Findings in Subcoracoid Impingement Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review

Subcoracoid impingement syndrome is a rare and underrecognized cause of anterior shoulder pain. Currently, subcoracoid impingement syndrome is understood to involve impingement of anatomic structures such as the subcoracoid bursa and subscapularis tendon within the coracohumeral space, and there are no reports of sonographic findings in subcoracoid impingement syndrome other than the impingement of thickened subscapularis bursa. Here we report a case of subcoracoid impingement syndrome, including a novel sonographic finding, arthroscopic findings, and a proposed pathophysiology.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Return to Preinjury Levels of Participation After Superior Labral Repair in Overhead Athletes: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Athletes often preoperatively weigh the risks and benefits of electing to undergo an orthopaedic procedure to repair damaged tissue. A common concern for athletes is being able to return to their maximum levels of competition after shoulder surgery, whereas clinicians struggle with the ability to provide a consistent prognosis of successful return to participation after surgery. The variation in study details and rates of return in the existing literature have not supplied clinicians with enough evidence to give overhead athletes adequate information regarding successful return to participation when deciding to undergo shoulder surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the odds of overhead athletes returning to preinjury levels of participation after arthroscopic superior labral repair.

DATA SOURCES

The CINAHL, MEDLINE, and SPORTDiscus databases from 1972 to 2013.

STUDY SELECTION

The criteria for article selection were (1) The study was written in English. (2) The study reported surgical repair of an isolated superior labral injury or a superior labral injury with soft tissue debridement. (3) The study involved overhead athletes equal to or less than 40 years of age. (4) The study assessed return to the preinjury level of participation.

DATA EXTRACTION

We critically reviewed articles for quality and bias and calculated and compared odds ratios for return to full participation for dichotomous populations or surgical procedures.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of 215 identified articles, 11 were retained: 5 articles about isolated superior labral repair and 6 articles about labral repair with soft tissue debridement. The quality range was 11 to 17 (42% to 70%) of a possible 24 points. Odds ratios could be generated for 8 of 11 studies. Nonbaseball, nonoverhead, and nonthrowing athletes had a 2.3 to 5.8 times greater chance of full return to participation than overhead/throwing athletes after isolated superior labral repair. Similarly, nonoverhead athletes had 1.5 to 3.5 times greater odds for full return than overhead athletes after labral repair with soft tissue debridement. In 1 study, researchers compared surgical procedures and found that overhead athletes who underwent isolated superior labral repair were 28 times more likely to return to full participation than those who underwent concurrent labral repair and soft tissue debridement (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of return to participation after shoulder surgery within the literature is inconsistent. Odds of returning to preinjury levels of participation after arthroscopic superior labral repair with or without soft tissue debridement are consistently lower in overhead/throwing athletes than in nonoverhead/nonthrowing athletes. The variable rates of return within each group could be due to multiple confounding variables not consistently accounted for in the articles.

Spectrum of operative childhood intra-articular shoulder pathology

PURPOSE

With increased sports participation and medical community awareness, there appears to be an increase in pediatric musculoskeletal injuries. Our purpose was to identify the intra-articular injury pattern seen within the pediatric shoulder.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed at two tertiary-care children's hospitals between 2008 and 2011 on all patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and subsequent shoulder arthroscopy. Exclusion criteria included: girls >14 years old and boys >16 years old. Demographics, MRI and arthroscopic findings were recorded. Labral pathology was grouped: Zone I (Bankart lesions, 3-6 o'clock for right shoulder), Zone II (posterior labral lesions, 6-11 o'clock), Zone III (SLAP lesions, 11-1 o'clock), and Zone IV (anatomic variants, 1-3 o'clock).

RESULTS

One hundred and fifteen children met criteria, mean age 14.4 years (range 8-16). There were 24 girls and 91 boys, with 70 right shoulders. Of 108 children, labral pathology involved: 72 Zone I (16 isolated anterior), 56 Zone II (15 isolated posterior), 38 Zone III (four isolated superior), and three had an isolated Buford complex. Seventy had more than one labral zone injured, and 31 (30 %) had more than two zones injured. Non-labral pathology included partial rotator cuff tears and humeral avulsions of the glenohumeral ligament.

CONCLUSION

With 94 % of intra-articular pathology being labral tears, the distribution of proportion in children differs from adults; moreover, 23 % involved only the posterior or posterosuperior labrum. Treating surgeons should be prepared to find anterior tears extending beyond the zone of a classic Bankart lesion and an association with C rotator cuff tears.

Subcoracoid impingement and subscapularis tendon: is there any truth?

Subcoracoid impingement and stenosis have been described related to anterior shoulder pain and subscapularis tendon tears, but the pathogenesis and related treatment of this condition has still not been explained properly. Variability of coracoid morphology has been described and both traumatic and iatrogenic factors can modify it. Some authors referred this to a primary narrow coracohumeral distance with different threshold values defined as increased risk factor for subscapularis and antero-superior RC tear; opposite theories stated that the stenosis is secondary to an anterosuperior translation of the humeral head toward the coracoid due to degenerative changes of the rotator cuff tendons. Limited coracoplasty can be performed when related risk factors are identified; however no clear consensus arises from specific literature review and extensive clinical and instrumental examination of the patient should be performed in order to identify specific risk factors for subscapularis tendon pathology and, subsequently, tailor the proper approach.

Clinical implications of scapular dyskinesis in shoulder injury: the 2013 consensus statement from the 'Scapular Summit'

The second international consensus conference on the scapula was held in Lexington Kentucky. The purpose of the conference was to update, present and discuss the accumulated knowledge regarding scapular involvement in various shoulder injuries and highlight the clinical implications for the evaluation and treatment of shoulder injuries. The areas covered included the scapula and shoulder injury, the scapula and sports participation, clinical evaluation and interventions and known outcomes. Major conclusions were (1) scapular dyskinesis is present in a high percentage of most shoulder injuries; (2) the exact role of the dyskinesis in creating or exacerbating shoulder dysfunction is not clearly defined; (3) shoulder impingement symptoms are particularly affected by scapular dyskinesis; (4) scapular dyskinesis is most aptly viewed as a potential impairment to shoulder function; (5) treatment strategies for shoulder injury can be more effectively implemented by evaluation of the dyskinesis; (6) a reliable observational clinical evaluation method for dyskinesis is available and (7) rehabilitation programmes to restore scapular position and motion can be effective within a more comprehensive shoulder rehabilitation programme.