Lower Extremity Movement Differences Persist After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and When Returning to Sports

Lower extremity joint angle, moment, and coordination throughout a double limb drop vertical jump in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) utilise different landing biomechanics between limbs, but previous analyses have not considered the continuous or simultaneous joint motion that occurs during landing and propulsion. The purpose of this study was to compare sagittal plane ankle/knee and knee/hip coordination patterns as well as ankle, knee, and hip angles and moments and vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) between the ACLR and uninjured limbs during landing and propulsion. Fifteen females and thirteen males performed a drop vertical jump from a 30 cm box placed half their height from force platforms. Coordination was compared using a modified vector coding technique and binning analysis. Kinematics and kinetics were time normalised for waveform analyses. Coordination was not different between limbs. The ACLR limb had smaller dorsiflexion angles from 11 to 16% of landing and 24 to 75% of landing and propulsion, knee flexion moments from 5 to 15% of landing, 20 to 31% of landing, and 35 to 91% of landing and propulsion, and vGRF from 92 to 94% of propulsion compared with the uninjured limb. The ACLR limb exhibited smaller dorsiflexion angles to potentially reduce the knee joint moment arm and mitigate the eccentric and concentric demands on the ACLR knee during landing and propulsion, respectively.

Lower extremity joint contact force symmetry during walking and running, 2-7 years post-ACL reconstruction

Premature osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is common among athletes. Reduced knee contact forces after ACLR likely contribute to the multifactorial etiology of the disease. Whether this reduction is accompanied by compensatory increases in joint contact forces (JCF) at adjacent or contralateral joints is unclear. It is also unclear if compensatory effects depend on the task demands. Thus, we compared hip, knee, and ankle JCF symmetry between individuals with reconstruction and a matched control group during walking and running. Thirty participants (19 females), 2-7 years post-unilateral ACLR (mean = 47.8 months), and 30 controls matched on sex, mass, and activity level were recruited. Limb symmetry indices of peak contact forces and force impulses were calculated for each joint during walking and running, and analyzed using two-factor (group, activity) analysis of variances. Lower ACLR group peak knee JCF (p = 0.009) and knee JCF impulse (p = 0.034) during walking and running were observed. An interaction of group and activity was observed for peak hip JCF, with ACLR participants demonstrating greater involved limb peak hip JCF during running (p = 0.012). Ankle JCF and ground reaction force symmetry indices were not different between groups or across tasks. Decreased knee and increased ipsilateral peak hip JCF during running suggests that proximal adaptations exist at 2-7 years after ACLR, particularly during activities with increased task demand. Clinical significance: Knee and hip JCF asymmetry at 2-7 years after ACLR may underscore a need for clinical strategies and follow-up assessments to identify and target such outcomes.

Using load sensing insoles to identify knee kinetic asymmetries during landing in patients with an Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Knee extension moment asymmetry is a known second anterior cruciate ligament injury risk factor in patients who have had an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Traditionally, assessing asymmetries requires motion capture and force platforms which are expensive and occupy a large space. Wireless force sensing insoles could be a feasible surrogate.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction performed ten bilateral stop jumps while insole forces, ground reaction forces, and lower extremity kinematics were collected. Peak knee extension moment symmetry was computed using the kinematic and kinetic data, and peak impact force symmetry and impulse symmetry were computed using both the insole force data and vertical ground reaction force data. The relationship between outcomes was analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients. Patients were classified as symmetric or asymmetric for each outcome based on an 85% symmetry cutoff. The resulting classifications were qualitatively compared across outcome measures.

FINDINGS

Peak knee extension moment symmetry had a strong association with the force plate symmetry outcomes (r = 0.72-0.96, p < 0.001) and a moderate to strong association with insole symmetry outcomes (r = 0.67-0.77, p < 0.001). There was strong agreement between insole and force plate symmetry outcomes (r = 0.69-0.90, p < 0.001). Four patients were identified as symmetric when using the peak knee extension moment symmetry, five when using force plate data, and eight when using insole data.

INTERPRETATION

Force sensing insoles could be used as a surrogate for knee extension moment asymmetry in patients who have had an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Analysis of limb kinetic asymmetry during a drop vertical jump in adolescents post anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Limb asymmetry after ACL reconstruction is often cited as a risk factor for ACL reinjury. We assessed ground reaction forces on each limb during a drop vertical jump, and compared kinetic symmetry between limbs in adolescents post-ACL reconstruction versus healthy controls.

METHODS

Forty-four participants who underwent an ACL reconstruction (16 male/28 female, mean age 16.1 ± 1.5, mean 7.3 ± 0.9 months post-ACL reconstruction) and 34 controls (20 male/14 female, mean age 14.9 ± 1.1) completed a drop vertical jump captured on a Vicon system and Bertec force plates. Kinetic variables were calculated individually for each limb. Inter-limb asymmetry was calculated as an index between each limb (involved versus uninvolved for the ACL reconstruction group, and left versus right for controls), and was compared between groups using independent t-tests.

FINDINGS

Asymmetry was significantly more pronounced in the ACL reconstruction group versus the controls for peak contact ground reaction force (11.6% vs 4.4%, p = 0.009), eccentric impulse (8.8% vs 3.8%, p = 0.009), eccentric mean force (8.0% vs 3.4%, p = 0.006), concentric peak ground reaction force (4.1% vs 0.8%, p = 0.003), concentric impulse (5.1% vs 1.1%, p = 0.001), and peak landing ground reaction force (12.7% vs 1.7%, p < 0.001).

INTERPRETATION

Limb kinetic asymmetry during a drop vertical jump was more pronounced in adolescents post-ACL reconstruction versus controls for both eccentric- and concentric-phase variables, which may indicate the use of compensatory strategies to offload the post-operative limb. Targeted interventions to produce more symmetric loading and unloading during jumping tasks should be developed, tested, and monitored to determine the impact on rehabilitation programs, return-to-sport evaluations, and injury prevention outcomes.

Reduction of risk factors for ACL Re-injuries using an innovative biofeedback approach: A phase I randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

Determine the safety and initial efficacy of a novel biofeedback intervention to improve landing mechanics in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

Forty patients post-ACLR (age: 16.9 ± 2.0 years) were randomly allocated to a biofeedback intervention or an attention control group. Patients in the biofeedback group completed 12 sessions over six-weeks that included bilateral unweighted squats with visual and tactile biofeedback. Patients in the control group completed a six-week educational program. Lower extremity mechanics were collected during a bilateral stop jump at baseline, six-weeks, and 12-weeks post-intervention. Linear mixed-effects models adjusted for sex and graft type determined the main effects of and interactions between group and time.

RESULTS

No group by time interaction existed for peak knee extension moment symmetry. A group by time interaction existed for peak vertical ground reaction force symmetry (p = 0.012), where patients in the biofeedback group had greater improvements in symmetry between baseline and post-intervention that were not maintained through the retention assessments.

CONCLUSION

This novel biofeedback program did not reduce risk factors for second ACL injuries. Future work could develop and test multidisciplinary interventions for reducing second ACL injury risk factors.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIER: (NCT03273673).

Neuromuscular and biomechanical landing alterations persist in athletes returning to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed (ACLR) athletes show increased hamstrings activation and decreased knee flexion moments (KFMs) during single leg landing tasks at time of return-to-sport (RTS). Although these landing alterations seem protective in the short term, they might become undesirable if they persist after RTS. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to investigate whether those landing alterations persist in the months following RTS.

METHODS

Sixteen athletes who had an ACLR performed five unilateral landing tasks at three different time points (at RTS, and at 3 and 6 months after RTS) while KFMs and hamstrings activation were recorded. The following clinical parameters were registered: isokinetic strength of quadriceps and hamstrings, ACL return-to-sport after injury scale (ACL-RSI), Tampa scale of kinesiophobia, self-reported instability and single leg hop distance. A one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess whether landing deficits changed over time. Additionally, an explorative analysis was performed to assess whether those athletes whose deficits persisted the most could be identified based on baseline clinical parameters.

RESULTS

The ANOVA showed no differences in landing deficits between sessions, indicating persisting reduced KFMs and increased hamstrings activation in the injured leg compared with the contralateral leg. A significant improvement of the quadriceps concentric strength (at 120°/s), ACL-RSI score and jump distance of the single leg hop was found over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Landing alterations were not resolved 6 months after RTS. Additional interventions may be needed to normalize landing alterations prior to return to sport.

Landing Asymmetry Is Associated with Psychological Factors after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSES

The goals of this work were to 1) determine the relationship between psychological readiness for return to sport and side-to-side symmetry during jump-landing in patients recovering from anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and 2) determine whether psychological readiness for return to sport, graft type, meniscal pathology, sex, and time since surgery could predict landing symmetry in ACLR patients.

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients recovering from primary unilateral ACLR (22 men/16 women; 19 patellar tendon autograft/19 hamstring autograft; age: 16.3 ± 1.9 yr; 25.7 ± 6.2 wk postoperative) completed the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) and 10 bilateral stop-jumps. Three-dimensional lower extremity kinematics and kinetics were collected at 240 and 1920 Hz, respectively. Peak knee extension moment limb symmetry index (LSI) was computed during the first landing of the stop-jump. The relationship between the ACL-RSI and peak knee extension moment LSI was determined using Pearson correlations. Multivariate regression was used to determine the ability of the ACL-RSI, graft type, meniscal pathology, sex, time since surgery, stop jump entry speed, and jump height to predict knee extension moment LSI.

RESULTS

There was a significant relationship between the ACL-RSI and peak knee extension moment LSI (r = 0.325; P = 0.047). The backward regression model found that 36.9% of the variance in knee extension moment LSI could be explained by the ACL-RSI (P = 0.040), graft type (P = 0.006), and jump height (P = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant moderate association between psychological readiness for return to sport and asymmetric landing kinetics in patients after ACLR. Future work should investigate whether improving movement confidence results in improved kinetic landing symmetry.

Analysis of Different Stop-Jumping Strategies on the Biomechanical Changes in the Lower Limbs

The stop-jumping task is one of the most important technical actions in basketball. A previous study showed 70% probability of non-contact ACL injuries during stop-jumping tasks. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the differences in lower extremity biomechanical changes between the rear foot as the initial contact area to terminate the jump (SJR) and the fore foot as the initial contact area to also terminate the jump (SJF) during the horizontal landing during a stop-jumping phase. In total, 25 male amateur Ningbo University basketball athletes from China were recruited for this study. The participants were asked to jump vertically by using two different stop-jumping strategies. Kinematic and kinetics data were amassed during a stop-jumping task. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) analysis was used to find the differences between SJR and SJF. Our results indicated that the change of different ankle range of motion caused significantly different values for knee angle (p < 0.001), velocity (p = 0.003) (p = 0.023) (p < 0.001), moment (p = 0.04) (p < 0.001), (p = 0.036) and power (p = 0.015) (p < 0.001) during the stop-jumping phase and the horizontal landing phase. The same biomechanical parameters of the hip joint were also significantly different for hip angle (p < 0.001), moment (p = 0.012) (p < 0.001) (p < 0.001), and power (p = 0.01) (p < 0.001) (p < 0.001). These findings indicate that altering the primary contact at the ankle angle might effectively reduce the risk of a knee injury.

A longitudinal investigation of landing biomechanics following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

Abnormal movement patterns have been shown during landing in patients who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate landing biomechanics over time in this patient group to determine whether asymmetry between limbs reduced with time and after a return to physical activity.

DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal study.

SETTING

Biomechanics laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

Fourteen patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Single limb landing assessments were made at two time points; within the first year (mean of 10 months) and at 3 years (after patients had returned to sport) following ACL reconstruction. Three-dimensional motion analysis was used to record kinematic and kinetic variables, which were compared across time and limb using ANOVA models.

RESULTS

Most biomechanical variables showed little change over time except for the external knee adduction moment at the operated knee, which increased (effect size d = 0.5), but remained less than the contralateral side. In the sagittal plane, asymmetrical landing patterns were seen at both assessments. Patients landed with reduced knee flexion angles (effect size range 0.76-0.9) and moments (effect size range 0.56-0.9) compared to the uninjured limb and made compensations for this by increasing the hip flexion moment (effect size range d = 0.6-0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Asymmetrical landing biomechanics persisted at three years after ACL reconstruction in athletes who returned to sporting activity. Long term implications of controlling the landing by increasing the hip moment are unknown and require further investigation.

Lower Limb Asymmetry After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Adolescent Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To identify reported (1) common biomechanical asymmetries in the literature after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in adolescents during landing and (2) timescales for asymmetry to persist postsurgery.

DATA SOURCES

We identified sources by searching the CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus electronic databases using the following search terms: asymmetry OR symmetry AND landing AND biomechanics OR kinematics OR kinetics.

STUDY SELECTION

We screened the titles and abstracts of 85 articles using our inclusion criteria. A total of 13 articles were selected for further analysis.

DATA EXTRACTION

Three reviewers independently assessed the methodologic quality of each study. We extracted the effect sizes directly from studies or calculated them for biomechanical variables assessing asymmetry between limbs of participants with ACL reconstruction. We conducted meta-analyses on variables that were assessed in multiple studies for both double- and single-limb landings.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Asymmetry was more commonly identified in kinetic than kinematic variables. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction appeared to have a large effect on asymmetry between limbs for peak vertical ground reaction force, peak knee-extension moment, and loading rate during double-limb landings, as well as mean knee-extension moment and knee energy absorption during both double- and single-limb landings.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggested that return-to-sport criteria after ACL reconstruction should incorporate analysis of the asymmetry in loading experienced by each limb rather than movement patterns alone.

Biomechanical asymmetries persist after ACL reconstruction: results of a 2-year study

PURPOSE

This study was aimed to examine longitudinal (6, 12, 18, 24 months) asymmetries in double-leg landing kinetics and kinematics of subjects with and without unilateral ACLR.

METHODS

Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic parameters of 40 participants (n = 20 post-ACLR, n = 20 healthy) were collected with a motion analysis system and force plate during a drop-landing task, and asymmetry indices were compared between groups.

RESULTS

The asymmetry index (AI) in the ACLR group compared to the healthy group decreased from six to 24 months for vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) from 100% to 6.5% and for anterior posterior ground reaction force (a-pGRF) from 155.5% to 7%. Also, the AI decreased for peak hip flexion moment from 74.5% to 17.1%, peak knee flexion moment from 79.0% to 5.8% and peak ankle dorsiflexion moment from 59.3% to 5.9%. As a further matter, the AI decreased for peak hip abduction moment from 67.8% to 5.1%, peak knee adduction moment from 55.7% to 14.8% and peak knee valgus angle from 48.7% to 23.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Results obtained from this longitudinal study showed that ACLR patients still suffer from limb asymmetries during landing tasks, which appear to normalize by 24-monthspost-surgery. This finding can help us to better understand biomechanics of the limbs after ACLR, and design more efficient post-surgery rehabilitation programs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Individual hop analysis and reactive strength ratios provide better discrimination of ACL reconstructed limb deficits than triple hop for distance scores in athletes returning to sport

BACKGROUND

The triple hop for distance test commonly uses a limb symmetry index (LSI) 'pass' threshold of >90% for total hop distance following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, understanding the manner in which athletes generate and dissipate forces during consecutive hops within the test may provide greater insight into residual limb deficits. The aim of the study was to examine reactive strength ratios (RSR) of individual hops during a triple hop test in a cohort of ACLR patients at discharge prior to return-to-sport.

METHODS

Twenty male athletes (24.6 ± 4.2 years; height 175.3 ± 10.2 cm; mass 73.6 ± 14.5 kg) completed the test on both non-operated and operated limbs. Total distance hopped, contact times, flight times and RSR were collected for each hop using a floor-level optical measurement system.

RESULTS

Significant, small to moderate between-limb differences (p < 0.05; d = 0.45-0.72) were shown for triple hop distance, flight time and RSR for each hop, with lower performance consistently displayed in the operated limb. Large, significant differences in RSR were evident between hops one and two on the operated limb (p < 0.05; d = 0.97). Despite 80% of participants achieving >90% LSI for total hop distance, less than 50% of participants reached the >90% LSI threshold for RSR.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardised LSI 'pass' thresholds (>90% LSI) for triple hop distance may mask residual deficits in reactive strength performance of operated limbs; therefore, more detailed analyses of individual hop performance may be warranted to enhance return to sport criteria following ACLR.

Hop testing symmetry improves with time and while wearing a functional knee brace in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed athletes

BACKGROUND

There is currently no consensus among orthopaedic surgeons as to when patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are ready to return to sport or whether or not patients should wear a functional knee brace during athletic activity. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effects of time since return to sport and of a functional knee brace on hop distance and loading symmetry during hop testing in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction completed hop testing after being released to return to sport and again 3 months later, both with and without wearing a custom fit extension constraint functional knee brace. The loadsol® captured plantar loading data (100 Hz) to quantify peak impact force, loading rate, and impulse during the final landing of every hop test. A limb symmetry index was calculated between surgical and non-surgical limbs for hop distance and loading measures.

FINDINGS

Wearing a knee brace increased hop distance symmetry during the single and crossover hop tests and peak impact force symmetry on each test (all p < 0.05). While single (p = 0.022) and triple (p = 0.002) hop distance symmetry increased with time, there was no effect of time on any loading symmetry outcomes.

INTERPRETATION

These results support using a functional knee brace during athletic activities for improving symmetry in the early return to sport period. These results also support previous findings that while hop distance symmetry improves with time, asymmetrical landing mechanics do not and should be addressed clinically.

Lower extremity kinematic analysis in male athletes with unilateral anterior cruciate reconstruction in a jump-landing task and its association with return to sport criteria

Background

Return to sport (RTS) criteria are widely being used to identify anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed (ACLR) athletes ready to return to sportive activity and reduce risk of ACL re-injury. However, studies show a high rate of ACL re-injury in athletes who passed RTS criteria. This indicates that the current RTS criteria might not be sufficient to determine return to sport time in ACLR athletes. Previous studies have reported a close association between altered lower limb kinematics and ACL re-injury. However, it is not clear how lower extremity kinematics differs between ACLR athletes who passed the RTS-criteria and who failed. This study compared lower extremity kinematics in a jump-landing task between ACLR athletes who passed the RTS criteria (Limb symmetry in hop tests, quadriceps strength and questionnaires) to those who failed and to the healthy individuals.

Methods

Participants were 27 male football players with unilateral ACLR including 14 who passed -RTS criteria and 13 failed, and 15 healthy football players. A 3D motion capture system recorded participants’ lower extremity motion while performing 10 trials of a bilateral jump-landing task. Hip, knee and ankle angular motion were examined at initial contact. Two-way mixed analysis of variances (2 limbs × 3 groups) and Bonferroni post-hoc tests were performed to compare the joint angles between the limbs and groups.

Results

lower hip abduction angle was found in the failed (involved limb 4.1 ° ± 4.2) and passed RTS (involved limb 6.8° ± 3.3) groups compared to the healthy group (non-dominant limb 10.7° ± 3.7). Ankle inversion in the failed RTS (0.4° ± 4.9) group was significantly lower than both passed RTS (4.8° ± 4.8, p = 0.05) and healthy (8.2° ± 8.1, p < 0.001) groups. There were no significant differences between the groups in knee kinematics.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate reduced hip abduction during initial contact phase of landing in athletes returned to sport. Reduced hip abduction during the complex multiplanar movement of jump-landing is a risk factor for ACL re-injury. Current RTS criteria may not be sufficient to identify ACLR athletes at high risk of re-injury. The kinematic analysis in conjunction with current RTS criteria can provide additional insight into the return to sport decision making.

Validity and Repeatability of Single-Sensor Loadsol Insoles during Landing

Clinically feasible methods for quantifying landing kinetics could help identify patients at risk for secondary anterior cruciate ligament injuries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and between-day repeatability of the loadsol insole during a single-hop and bilateral stop-jump. Thirty healthy recreational athletes completed seven single-hops and seven stop-jumps while simultaneous loadsol (100 Hz) and force plate (1920 Hz) measurements were recorded. Peak impact force, loading rate, and impulse were computed for the dominant limb, and limb symmetry was calculated between limbs for each measure. All outcomes were compared between the loadsol and force plate using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots. Fifteen participants completed a second day of testing to assess between-day repeatability of the loadsol. Finally, an additional 14 participants completed the first day of testing only to assess the validity of the newest generation loadsol, which sampled at 200 Hz. At 100 Hz, validity ICC results were moderate to excellent (0.686–0.982), and repeatability ICC results were moderate to excellent (0.616–0.928). The 200 Hz loadsol demonstrated improved validity ICC (0.765–0.987). Bland–Altman plots revealed that the loadsol underestimated load measures. However, this bias was not observed for symmetry outcomes. The loadsol device is a valid and repeatable tool for evaluating kinetics during landing.

Limb asymmetry during recovery from anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

There is limited literature that follows a population of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) patients through recovery. Our aim was to examine differences in movement and loading patterns across time and between limbs over four visits during 12 months post-ACLR. We hypothesized that kinematic and kinetic data during a stop-jump would have time- and limb-dependent differences through 12 months post-surgery. Twenty-three ACLR athletes performed five vertical stop-jumps at 4, 5, 6, and 12 months post-op with motion capture and force plate data collection. The peak knee flexion (PKF) was different between the 4 and 12, 5 and 6, and the 5 and 12 month visits with earlier months exhibiting higher PKF. The peak vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) was lower at 4 than at 5 and 6 months. The peak posterior ground reaction force (pGRF) was lower at 4 months than all other visits. Frontal knee and sagittal hip range of motion (ROM) were different between 12 months and each previous visit. Asymmetries were present in peak vGRF, peak knee extension moment and impulse up to 12 months. The loading rate and peak pGRF demonstrated between limb differences up to 6 months; limb stiffness demonstrated differences up to 5 months post-ACLR. PKF was only asymmetric at the 4 month visit. While some variables improved in the 12 months post-ACLR, limb asymmetries in peak knee extension moment, peak vGRF and impulse persisted up to 12 months. Additionally, frontal plane knee and sagittal hip ROM had not normalized at 12 months. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:1887-1893, 2018.