Arcuate Pubic Ligament Injury-An Unknown Cause of Athletic Pubalgia

New Anatomical Concepts regarding Pubic-Related Groin Pain: A Dissection Study

OBJECTIVE

Pubis-related groin pain remains a difficult topic in orthopedic and sports medicine. A better understanding of the anatomy of the adductors and the pubic ligaments is necessary. The aim of this study is to map all the musculotendinous attachments to the pubic ligaments and to investigate in detail all the possible inter-adductor fusions.

METHODS

The pubic symphyses were dissected in eight male and fourteen female embalmed cadavers (mean age 85 years), focusing on the fusion between the adductors, pubic ligaments, and musculotendinous attachments at the pubic ligaments. The 95% confidence intervals for the prevalence of the different conjoint tendons and tendon attachment to ligament were calculated.

RESULTS

The presence of three types of conjoint tendons was found: adductor brevis and gracilis (AB/G) 90.9 [72.2 - 97.5]%; adductor brevis and adductor longus (AB/AL) 50.0 [30.7 - 69.3]%; adductor longus and gracilis (AL/G) 50.0 [30.7 - 69.3]%. The AL, AB and G were in every cadaver attached to the anterior pubic ligament (APL). 64% of the AB and 100% of the G were attached to the inferior pubic ligament (IPL).

CONCLUSION

The proximal anatomy of the adductors is more complex than initially described. This study identified three possible conjoint tendons between the proximal adductors. The AB/G conjoint tendon was significantly more present than the AB/AL or AL/G conjoint tendon. The IPL has attachments only from the AB and G. Rectus Abdominis (RA) and AL were not attached to IPL. Mapping the musculotendinous attachments on the pubic ligaments creates more clarity on the pathophysiology of lesions in this area.

New Insights into the Musculotendinous and Ligamentous attachments at the Pubic Symphysis: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Collection and meta-analysis of all relevant anatomical studies related to the pubic symphysis to provide a state of the art review of its musculotendinous and ligamentous attachments from 2010 to date.

METHODS

A systematic search of published literature databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Embase) was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines from January 2010 up until now. All papers investigating the anatomy of the musculotendinous attachments of the pubis and the pubic ligaments were eligible. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Appraisal for Cadaveric Studies (QUACS scale). A narrative analysis approach was adopted to synthesise the findings.

RESULTS

After screening and review of 1313 papers, a total of six studies investigating the anatomy of the pubic ligaments and tendons were included. Of the six articles included in this systematic review, five articles performed a macroscopic anatomical dissection, three articles performed a microscopic (histological) study, and one article combined microscopic examination with an MRI imaging examination. The anatomy of the pubic symphysis was examined in 76 anatomical cadavers (60 embalmed, 16 fresh frozen). In total 44 male cadavers (58%), 28 female cadavers (37%) and four cadavers whose gender was not stated were dissected.

CONCLUSION

The age-old accepted concept of the fusion of the rectus abdominis with the adductor longus via the aponeurotic plate is outdated. New anatomical concepts like the pyramidalis-anterior pubic ligament-adductor longus complex (PLAC), recto-gracilis tendon, fusion of adductor brevis with gracilis, etc. are recently introduced. The awareness of anatomy and morphology of the pubic ligaments plays a significant role in understanding the diagnosis and treatment of groin pain.