The diagnosis of asthma and exercise-induced bronchospasm in division I athletes

How to detect young athletes at risk of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction?

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is a prevalent condition in elite athletes caused by transient airway narrowing during or after exercise. Young athletes nowadays start early to perform high level exercise, highlighting the need to screen for EIB in a younger population. The purpose of this review is to evaluate current evidence of pre-tests with high probability to predict a positive provocation test in young and adolescent athletes, aged 12-24 years and thus indicate whether a young athlete is at risk of having EIB. Up to now, there is no validated screening test available to increase the pre-test probability of a provocation test of EIB in young and adolescent athletes. We would recommend that a clinical guideline committee might consider the development of a flow chart to screen for EIB in adolescent athletes. It could be composed of a symptom-based questionnaire focusing on wheezing during exercise, atopic state, reversibility test (to exclude EIB with asthma) and completed with markers in blood/serum. However, more research is necessary.

Evaluating the Athlete with Suspected Exercise-Induced Asthma or Bronchospasm

Exercise-induced asthma (EIA) and exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB)/bronchoconstriction (EIC) describes two clinical entities by which exercise triggers bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Exercise is a common trigger of bronchospasm in the asthmatic (EIA), as well as athletes without the underlying inflammation associated with asthma (EIC/EIB). Approximately 10% to 20% of the general population have EIA or EIB (). The approach to the diagnosis and subsequent management relies on the clinician's ability to recognize clinical signs and symptoms, then selecting the correct diagnostic test. A baseline spirometry/pulmonary function test is recommended for all athletes to evaluate for underlying asthma. Subsequent direct or indirect bronchial provocation testing is recommended to correctly diagnose EIA or EIB (). Athletes should not be treated empirically with bronchodilators based on symptoms alone without confirmatory spirometry and provocative testing.

Exhaled nitric oxide indicates poorly athlete's asthma

INTRODUCTION

In athletes, exercise-induced respiratory symptoms are common and their assessment is time and resource consuming.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to evaluate fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) as a predictor of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and of asthma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-seven elite athletes and a control group of 87 sedentary patients with symptoms suggesting asthma underwent measurements of FENO and of BHR by using methacholine provocation test (MCH) and eucapnic voluntary hyperpnoea (EVH) (athletes) or histamine provocation test (HIST) (controls).

RESULTS

In athletes, elevated FENO (>30 ppb) was not associated with lung function-confirmed asthma or with MCH positivity, but receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis showed some predictive value for EVH positivity [Area Under Curve (AUC) 0.652, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53 to 0.78, P = 0.020]. However, the sensitivity (55%) and the specificity (71%) were poor. In sedentary patients, FENO was significantly associated with both confirmed asthma and HIST positivity, ROC analysis showing FENO to be significantly predictive for HIST positivity (AUC 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70 to 0.96, P = 0.001) and for asthma (AUC 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.85, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that in contrast to sedentary patients, FENO seems to be a poor predictor of BHR and of clinical asthma in elite athletes. We find it unlikely that FENO could be a useful screening tool in athletes with exercise-induced respiratory symptoms.

Asthma in elite athletes

Asthma is frequently found among elite athletes performing endurance sports such as swimming, rowing and cross-country skiing. Although these athletes often report symptoms while exercising, they seldom have symptoms at rest. Moreover, compared with nonathletic asthmatic individuals, elite athletes have been shown to have a different distribution of airway inflammation and unequal response to bronchial provocative test. Elite athletes display signs of exercise-induced symptoms, for example, nonasthmatic inspiratory wheeze, vocal cord dysfunction and cardiac arrhythmias, which could limit their physical capacity. Elite athletes should undergo comprehensive assessment to confirm an asthma diagnosis and determine its degree of severity. Treatment should be as for any other asthmatic individual, including the use of β2-agonist, inhaled steroid as well as leukotriene-antagonist. It should, however, be noted that daily use of β-agonists could expose elite athletes to the risk of developing tolerance towards these drugs. Use of β2-agonist should be replaced with daily inhaled corticosteroid treatment, the most important treatment of exercise-induced asthma. All physicians treating asthma should be aware of the doping aspects. Systemic β2-agonist intake is strictly prohibited, whereas inhaled treatment is allowed in therapeutic doses when asthma is documented and dispensation has been granted when needed.

Exercise-Induced Lung Disease: Too Much of a Good Thing?

Exercise in children has important health benefits. However, in elite endurance athletes, there is an increased prevalence of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and airway inflammation. Particularly at risk are those who practice in cold weather, ice rinks, swimming pools, and air pollution. The inflammation is caused by repetitive episodes of hyperventilation of cold, dry air, allergens, or toxins such as chlorine or air pollution. Children may be particularly at risk for lung injury under these conditions because of the immaturity and ongoing development of their lung. However, studies in pediatric athletes and exercising young children are sparse. Epithelial injury associated with hyperventilation of cold, dry air has not been described in children. However, exercise in the presence of air pollution and chlorine is associated with airway injury and the development of asthma in children; the effect appears to be modulated by both atopy and genetic polymorphisms. While management of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and asthma is well established, there is little data to guide treatment or prevention of remodeling in athletes or inhalational lung injury in children. Studies underscore the need to maintain high levels of air quality. More investigations should be undertaken to better define the natural history, pathophysiology, and treatment of exercise-induced pulmonary inflammation in both elite athletes and exercising children.