Correlation of preoperative MRI and MRA with arthroscopically proven articular cartilage lesions of the elbow

Update in diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum

Osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum is debilitating and is a potentially sports career-ending injury in a young and athletic population. Osteochondritis dissecans typically occurs in patients between the ages of 10 and 24 years, and boys are more commonly affected than girls. Conventional radiographs have low diagnostic accuracy, and magnetic resonance imaging (with or without contrast) or computed tomography may aid in accurate diagnosis. The primary indication for non-operative treatment is the presence of an intact cartilage cap on magnetic resonance imaging, indicating a "stable lesion." However, if operative treatment is necessary, various surgical procedures are available when operative treatment for an osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum is considered, including open or arthroscopic removal of loose bodies, with or without microfracturing, fragment fixation, osteochondral autograft transplantation, and osteochondral allograft transplantation. The decision-making process for selecting the appropriate treatment considers factors such as the patient's characteristics, functional limitations, and lesion morphology.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Elbow Pain

Chronic elbow pain can be osseous, soft tissue, cartilaginous, and nerve related in etiology. Imaging plays an important role in differentiating between these causes of chronic elbow pain. This document provides recommendations for imaging of chronic elbow pain in adult patients. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer-reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which peer-reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Does an elbow arthrogram change management after closed reduction of mildly displaced lateral condyle fractures in children?

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether an elbow arthrogram after closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of lateral condyle fractures results in a change in surgical management. This is a retrospective review of lateral condyle fractures managed with closed reduction and percutaneous fixation followed by an elbow arthrogram at our institution between 2008 and 2019. Chart and radiographic review was performed and operative notes were reviewed to determine rates of subsequent intervention after arthrogram. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. This study included 47 patients. The majority of patients were male (34 patients, 72%), and the mean age at time of injury was 5.5 ± 2.6 years. The mean radiographic displacement was 2.6 mm (range 0.8-6.9 mm). All fractures were managed by fellowship-trained pediatric orthopaedic surgeons with an average of 10.5 years of experience (range 0-32 years). Fractures were stabilized with percutaneous pins in 44 patients (94%) and percutaneous screws in three patients (6%). No patients had subsequent changes in management after an elbow arthrogram. There were no complications related to performance of the arthrogram. Closed reduction and percutaneous fixation is often indicated for mildly displaced lateral condyle fractures. Articular reduction after percutaneous fixation is commonly assessed using an elbow arthrogram; however, it did not change surgical management in any case reviewed over the 10-year study period. While there seems to be little risk of performing an arthrogram, the clinical utility should be further evaluated.

[What do orthopedic and trauma surgeons expect from radiologists when interpreting imaging of the elbow?]

CLINICAL ISSUE

The elbow is a complex joint with a multitude of acute and chronic pathologies. In addition to the clinical examination, radiological diagnostics play a decisive role in the further therapeutic management.

DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP/PERFORMANCE

While acute traumatic injuries often present with obvious structural changes and the need for rapid treatment decisions, chronic processes can present with less evident alterations. Especially in these cases there is a need for clear communication between the treating physician and the radiologist with respect to managing optimal imaging as the basis for a certain diagnosis and therefore optimal treatment. Basic prerequisites on both sides are detailed knowledge of all elbow pathologies, classifications and the spectrum of radiological diagnostic imaging.

ACHIEVEMENTS/PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

From the point of view of orthopedic surgeons the radiologist is responsible for the correct performance and interpretation of the necessary imaging procedures. The aim of this article is to give an overview of important aspects in the imaging of typical orthopedic/traumatic pathologies.

Magnetic Resonance Arthrography of the Wrist and Elbow

Magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography of the wrist and elbow is useful for detecting a variety of intra-articular pathologies. MR dictations should address whether intrinsic ligament tears of the wrist are partial-thickness or full-thickness, and involve the dorsal, membranous, and/or volar components of the ligaments. With regard to elbow soft tissue pathology, partial-thickness tears of the anterior band of the ulnar collateral ligament in overhead-throwing athletes are well evaluated with MR arthrography. MR arthrography also is helpful in staging osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum, caused by repetitive valgus impaction injury in adolescent or young adult baseball pitchers.

Osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum in adolescents

Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is a disorder of articular cartilage and subchondral bone. In the elbow, an OCD is localized most commonly at the humeral capitellum. Teenagers engaged in sports that involve repetitive stress on the elbow are at risk. A high index of suspicion is warranted to prevent delay in the diagnosis. Plain radiographs may disclose the lesion but computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are more accurate in the detection of OCD. To determine the best treatment option it is important to differentiate between stable and unstable OCD lesions. Stable lesions can be initially treated nonoperatively with elbow rest or activity modification and physical therapy. Unstable lesions and stable lesions not responding to conservative therapy require a surgical approach. Arthroscopic debridement and microfracturing has become the standard initial procedure for treatment of capitellar OCD. Numerous other surgical options have been reported, including internal fixation of large fragments and osteochondral autograft transfer. The aim of this article is to provide a current concepts review of the etiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of elbow OCD.

Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting biceps pathology in patients with rotator cuff disorders: comparison with arthroscopy

BACKGROUND

There is limited information on the validity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detection of biceps disease. The purpose of this study was to examine the measurement properties of noncontrasted MRI in diagnosis of biceps disease using arthroscopic surgery as the "gold standard."

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospectively collected surgical data of patients with impingement syndrome or rotator cuff tear, with biceps disease (study group) or without biceps disease (control group), were reviewed. MRI reports of radiologists with fellowship training in musculoskeletal imaging were retrospectively reviewed and compared with surgical findings.

RESULTS

Data of 183 (130 study and 53 control) patients (73 women [40%], 110 men [60%]; mean age, 62 years [standard deviation, 9]) who had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff-related surgery during a period of 11 years were used for analysis. Sensitivity and specificity of MRI for detection of full tears of the biceps tendon were 0.54 and 0.98, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.27 and 0.86 for partial tears of the biceps tendon, respectively. For biceps subluxation or dislocation, sensitivity was 1.00 and specificity was 0.83. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, which quantify the overall accuracy of the tests, were 0.57, 0.75, and 0.92 for partial tear, full tear, and instability of the biceps tendon, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Noncontrasted MRI has a low sensitivity and high specificity for detection of full-thickness tears of the biceps tendon. It is highly sensitive for diagnosis of instability of the long head of the biceps. However, its usefulness for diagnosis of partial tears of the biceps tendon remains limited.