Use of Six Sigma strategies to pull the line on central line-associated bloodstream infections in a neurotrauma intensive care unit

Streamlining the External Ventricular Drain and Intracranial Pressure Monitor Procedural Setup: A Quality Improvement Initiative

OBJECTIVE

External ventricular drain (EVD) and intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor placements are among the most common critical care procedures for severe brain injury. Quality improvement initiatives have streamlined similar processes. The aim of the project was to decrease the time to collect supplies for EVD or ICP monitor placement by 25% by April 1, 2021.

METHODS

The project followed the define-measure-analyze-improve-control 6 sigma framework. Several quality gaps were identified: equipment stored separately, delays in replacing faulty items, and wasted resources. The team defined the process using the suppliers-inputs-processes-outputs-customers + requirements method, measured time to collect supplies, and analyzed data with an Ishikawa/fishbone diagram. The improve phase included a kaizen burst to generate solutions and an impact/effort grid to evaluate options. The team concluded that the optimal plan was to stock a mobile EVD cart and an ICP monitor pole with disposable go-bags.

RESULTS

The average time for nurses to collect EVD placement supplies decreased from 411 to 63 seconds (7-1 minute), and the average time for nurses to collect ICP monitor placement supplies decreased from 418 to 53 seconds (7-<1 minute). Residents decreased the time to obtain EVD placement supplies from 330 to 56 seconds (6-<1 minute) and ICP monitor supplies from 489 to 77 seconds (8-1 minute). Feedback was overwhelmingly positive and focused on improved process efficiency and reduced waste.

CONCLUSIONS

The time reduction and enthusiasm are likely associated with the simplicity and comprehensiveness of the intervention design. Including key stakeholders in decision-making and succinct communications reduced resistance to change.

Application of DMAIC Cycle and Modeling as Tools for Health Technology Assessment in a University Hospital

Background

The Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is used to evaluate health services, manage healthcare processes more efficiently, and compare medical technologies. The aim of this paper is to carry out an HTA study that compares two pharmacological therapies and provides the clinicians with two models to predict the length of hospital stay (LOS) of patients undergoing oral cavity cancer surgery on the bone tissue.

Methods

The six Sigma method was used as a tool of HTA; it is a technique of quality management and process improvement that combines the use of statistics with a five-step procedure: “Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control” referred to in the acronym DMAIC. Subsequently, multiple linear regression has been used to create two models. Two groups of patients were analyzed: 45 were treated with ceftriaxone while 48 were treated with the combination of cefazolin and clindamycin.

Results

A reduction of the overall mean LOS of patients undergoing oral cavity cancer surgery on bone was observed of 40.9% in the group treated with ceftriaxone. Its reduction was observed in all the variables of the ceftriaxone group. The best results are obtained in younger patients (−54.1%) and in patients with low oral hygiene (−52.4%) treated. The regression results showed that the best LOS predictors for cefazolin/clindamycin are ASA score and flap while for ceftriaxone, in addition to these two, oral hygiene and lymphadenectomy are the best predictors. In addition, the adjusted R squared showed that the variables considered explain most of the variance of LOS.

Conclusion

SS methodology, used as an HTA tool, allowed us to understand the performance of the antibiotics and provided variables that mostly influence postoperative LOS. The obtained models can improve the outcome of patients, reducing the postoperative LOS and the relative costs, consequently increasing patient safety, and improving the quality of care provided.

Lean Six Sigma methodology application in health care settings: an integrative review

OBJECTIVE

to analyze the scientific production on the results of Lean Six Sigma methodology in health care institutions.

METHODS

an integrative literature review, with the following question: what are the results in health institutions using Lean Six Sigma and Six Sigma methodology? The search was carried out at MEDLINE, LILACS, BDENF, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus, with no time frame.

RESULTS

thirty-four articles were included, published between 2005 and 2019, of which 52.9% came from the United States of America. The most commonly found improvements were in hospital institutions and from the perspective of customers and internal processes.

CONCLUSION

using Lean Six Sigma methodology proved to be effective in the different health care settings, evidencing a gap in its application regarding people engagement and training.

A health technology assessment between two pharmacological therapies through Six Sigma: the case study of bone cancer

Purpose

Head and neck cancers are multi-factorial diseases that can affect many sides of people's life and are due to a lot of risk factors. According to their characteristics, the treatment can be surgical, use of radiation or chemotherapy. The use of a surgical treatment can lead to surgical infections that are a main theme in medicine. At the University hospital of Naples “Federico II”, two antibiotics were employed to tackle the issue of the infections and they are compared in this paper to find which one implies the lowest length of hospital stay (LOS) and the reduction of infections.

Design/methodology/approach

The Six Sigma methodology and its problem-solving strategy DMAIC (define, measure, analyse, improve, control), already employed in the healthcare sector, were used as a tool of a health technology assessment between two drugs. In this paper the DMAIC roadmap is used to compare the Ceftriaxone (administered to a group of 48 patients) and the association of Cefazolin plus Clindamycin (administered to a group of 45 patients).

Findings

The results show that the LOS of patients treated with Ceftriaxone is lower than those who were treated with the association of Cefazolin plus Clindamycin, the difference is about 41%. Moreover, a lower number of complications and infections was found in patients who received Ceftriaxone. Finally, a greater number of antibiotic shifts was needed by patients treated with Cefazolin plus Clindamycin.

Research limitations/implications

While the paper enhances clearly the advantages for patients' outcomes regarding the LOS and the number of complications, it did not analyse the costs of the two antibiotics.

Practical implications

Employing the Ceftriaxone would allow the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery to obtain lower LOS and a limited number of complications/infections for recovered patients, consequently reducing the hospitalization costs.

Originality/value

There is a double value in this paper: first of all, the comparison between the two antibiotics gives an answer to one of the main issues in medicine that is the reduction of hospital-acquired infections; secondly, the Six Sigma through its DMAIC cycle can be employed also to compare two biomedical technologies as a tool of health technology assessment studies.

Evidence-based measures to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections: a systematic review

Objective:

to identify evidence-based care to prevent CLABSI among adult patients hospitalized in ICUs.

Method:

systematic review conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cinahl, Web of Science, Lilacs, Bdenf and Cochrane Studies addressing care and maintenance of central venous catheters, published from January 2011 to July 2014 were searched. The 34 studies identified were organized in an instrument and assessed by using the classification provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute.

Results:

the studies presented care bundles including elements such as hand hygiene and maximal barrier precautions; multidimensional programs and strategies such as impregnated catheters and bandages and the involvement of facilities in and commitment of staff to preventing infections.

Conclusions:

care bundles coupled with education and the commitment of both staff and institutions is a strategy that can contribute to decreased rates of central line-associated bloodstream infections among adult patients hospitalized in intensive care units.