Advanced Trauma Care for Nurses (ATCN): A Single-Center Analysis of Trauma Nurses Knowledge Gaps

Trauma nursing competency in the emergency department: a concept analysis

OBJECTIVES

Despite numerous published concept analyses of nursing competency, the specific understanding of trauma nursing competency in emergency departments remains limited, with no clear definition. This study aimed to clarify the definitions and attributes of trauma nursing competencies in emergency departments.

DESIGN

Walker and Avant's method was used to clarify the concept of trauma nursing competency in emergency departments.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and RISS were searched from inception to 23 April 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Relevant studies that included combinations of the terms 'nurse', 'nursing', 'emergency', 'trauma', 'competency', 'capability' and 'skill' were selected. We restricted the literature search to English and Korean full-text publications, with no limit on the publication period; grey literature was excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

This study uses defining attributes, antecedents and consequences extracted through data analysis. To aid comprehension of the model, related and contrary cases of the concept were created, and empirical referents were defined.

RESULTS

After excluding duplicates, irrelevant studies, incomplete texts and articles unrelated to the context and study population, 15 of the initial 927 studies were included. Five additional studies were added after a manual search of the references. The final concept analysis therefore included 20 studies. The attributes of trauma nursing competency for emergency nurses included 'rapid initial assessments considering injury mechanisms', 'priority determinations based on degrees of urgency and severity', 'clinical knowledge of trauma nursing', 'skills of trauma nursing', 'interprofessional teamwork' and 'emotional care'.

CONCLUSIONS

The concept analysis revealed that it is possible to promote the enhancement and development of trauma nursing competency in emergency departments across various contexts, such as clinical practice, education, research and organisational settings. This could ultimately improve trauma nursing quality and treatment outcomes.

Nurses' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the application of the injury severity score in emergency departments: A cross-sectional multicentre study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding the application of the Injury Severity Score (ISS) among emergency department nurses in China and the factors influencing these variables.

BACKGROUND

ISS is the first trauma scoring method to be developed and the most widely used in clinical practice. The correct application of the ISS by emergency department nurses plays an important role in assisting in the diagnosis and treatment of trauma patients, and it is crucial to understand nurses' knowledge, attitudes and practices.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional multicentre study.

METHODS

Nurses from the emergency departments of 25 grade II and grade III hospitals in Gansu Province, China participated in this study. Data was collected online using a self-administered questionnaire. Student's t-test or analysis of variance was performed to compare the differences between the groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified factors influencing nurses' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding applying ISS. A STROBE checklist was used to report findings.

RESULTS

Among 459 nurses, a good level of attitude and passing levels of knowledge and practice regarding applying the ISS were revealed. Nurses in higher hospital grades, who had been exposed to ISS and received training had higher levels of knowledge and practices. Previous exposure to the ISS and training related to it were factors that influenced nurses' attitudes.

CONCLUSIONS

Chinese emergency department nurses' knowledge, attitudes and practices of applying the ISS still need to be improved. Hospitals and nursing managers should provide training opportunities for nurses about ISS knowledge and practices, while grade II hospitals should pay more attention to training and continuing education in this area.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

In hospitals, nursing managers may benefit from enhancing related education and training to promote the emergency department nurses' knowledge and practice of the ISS, by developing specific curricula and providing continuing education and training opportunities, while grade II hospitals should pay more attention to training and continuing education in this area.

NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS

This study focused on emergency department nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding the application of the ISS. The research questions and design were derived from clinical nursing practice, literature review, and expert panel review, and patients or the public are temporarily not involved.

Elements of an Advanced Trauma Education Program for Emergency Nurses: A Modified Delphi Approach

BACKGROUND

Basic trauma education for emergency department (ED) staff is available, but there are currently no advanced trauma nursing practice standards for ED nurses.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify consensus-based elements of an advanced trauma nursing program for ED nurses.

METHODS

We used a modified Delphi process with three rounds of online survey data collection to ensure a large group of geographically diverse experts. Data were collected from February 2023 to May 2023. The sample for Round 1 was recruited from members of the Emergency Nurses Association reporting job titles, including trauma coordinator, trauma nursing core course instructor, and vice president of trauma services (n = 829). Participants in subsequent rounds were drawn from respondents to the initial invitation to participate (n = 131). Members of an emergency nursing research council with clinical and research expertise reviewed the results and provided expert input.

RESULTS

An initial sample of 131 experts identified 17 elements that were assigned a median score equivalent to "agree/strongly agree" (i.e., median 4/5 or 5/5) in Round 2 (n = 69). These elements were presented in Round 3 (n = 43) to determine a rank order. Critical thinking/clinical judgment was the overall priority, followed by assessment/reassessment and early recognition of trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency department trauma care experts identified priority content for advanced trauma education. Heterogeneity in the final ranking of components for this advanced trauma course, specifically differences by facility, regional, or demographic characteristics, suggests that training and education may not conform to a one-size-fits-all model.

Perceived trauma nursing core competency, interprofessional collaborative competency, and associated barriers among regional trauma center nurses

INTRODUCTION

As key members of interprofessional teams working in complex settings, nurses in trauma centers require trauma nursing core competency.

PURPOSE

This study sought to determine the levels and relationships of the perceived importance and performance of trauma nursing core competency, as well as the interprofessional collaborative competency and associated barriers among Korean regional trauma center nurses.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, descriptive, and correlational survey involved a convenience sample of 190 Korean trauma center nurses. Data were collected using a web-based self-reporting questionnaire about the perceived importance and performance of trauma nursing core competency, as well as the interprofessional collaborative competency and associated barriers. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation, and multiple regression (Enter method) analyses.

RESULTS

The perceived performance and importance of interprofessional collaborative competency, the perceived importance of trauma nursing core competency, and the perceived barriers to resources, training, competency, and interest significantly affected trauma nursing core competency performance, accounting for 64.5 % of the variance.

CONCLUSIONS

Training programs are needed to improve the core and interprofessional collaborative competencies of trauma nurses. Individual, team, and organizational approaches are essential to addressing the perceived barriers. The effects of training programs on the core competency of trauma nurses should be validated.

Developing a core competency training curriculum system for emergency trauma nurses in China: a modified Delphi method study

OBJECTIVES

To develop a core competency training curriculum system for emergency trauma nurses in China.

DESIGN

A modified Delphi study design.

PARTICIPANTS

The selection criteria for participants identified in practitioner roles were to be currently engaged in trauma care for over 5 years, to serve as the manager of emergency or trauma surgery department, and to have a bachelor's degree or higher. A total of 15 trauma experts from three grade A tertiary hospitals were invited to participate in this study by email or face to face in January 2022. The expert group comprised four trauma specialist doctors and 11 trauma specialist nurses. There were 11 women and 4 men. The age ranged from 32 to 50 (40.27±5.120) years. The number of years worked ranged from 6 to 32 (15.87±7.110).

RESULTS

Two rounds of questionnaires were issued to 15 experts in each round, and the effective recovery rate was 100.00%. In this study, expert judgement=0.947, expert familiarity with the content=0.807 and authority coefficient=0.877, and the results are highly reliable. The Kendall's W of the two rounds in this study ranged from 0.208 to 0.467, and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). In the two rounds of expert consultations, four items were deleted, five items were modified, two items were added and one item was merged. Ultimately, the curriculum system of core competency training for emergency trauma nurses includes training objectives (8 theoretical knowledge and 9 practical skills), training contents (6 first-level indicators, 13 second-level indicators and 70 third-level indicators), training methods (9), evaluation indicators (4) and evaluation methodologies (4).

CONCLUSIONS

This study proposed a core competency training curriculum system with systematic and standardised courses for emergency trauma nurses, which could be applied to assess trauma care performance, highlight areas for improvement for emergency trauma nurses and contribute to the accreditation of emergency trauma specialist nurses.