A Moment of Equipoise with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Comparison Between Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Sublobar Resection for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of primary treatment with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) versus sublobar resection (SLR) for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients with medical comorbidities.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent SBRT (n = 106) or SLR (100 wedge resection, 41 segmentectomy) because of medical comorbidities associated with stage I NSCLC were enrolled. Lesions located in the outer third of the lung field on computed tomography were defined as external, and others were defined as internal. A propensity score-matched analysis was also performed that compared SBRT and SLR results. Charts were reviewed to determine local tumor recurrence, disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A propensity score-matched analysis, recurrence-free survival (RFS) became significant in favor of surgery (p = 0.036). For large nodules of greater than 2.0 cm in diameter, RFS was significantly better in the surgery group (p = 0.042). No significant differences in OS, DSS, or RFS were observed with small nodules of less than 2.0 cm in diameter. In the external group, a higher recurrence rate was seen for SBRT group. For internal group, there was no statistical difference between each treatment. Local recurrence rate was higher in the SBRT group (p = 0.0082) in the external group.

CONCLUSIONS

In a matched comparison of stage I NSCLC in patients with medical comorbidities, RFS was in favor of surgery comparing SBRT, but there were no significant differences in OS or DSS. The tumor size and tumor location should be considered before deciding whether to perform SBRT or surgery.

Narcissus, the Beam, and lung cancer

In the management of lung cancer, the rules of engagement of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) are not clearly defined. The potential for SABR to affect to an unprecedented level current protocols and in all disease stages emerges vehemently from the literature. However, in a time when the role of surgery is being reassessed, surgeons need to take a closer look at the evidence for the use of SABR in lung cancer patients and clearly define their indisputable role within the context of multidisciplinary teams. The myth of Narcissus exemplified in the absolute masterpiece by Caravaggio seems to represent an ideal metaphor to explain the ever-evolving interaction between surgery and SABR in lung cancer management.

Comparison of long-term survival outcomes between stereotactic body radiotherapy and sublobar resection for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer in patients at high risk for lobectomy: A propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to perform a survival comparison between stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and sublobar resection (SLR) in patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at high risk for lobectomy.

METHODS

All patients who underwent SBRT or SLR because of medical comorbidities for clinical stage I NSCLC were reviewed retrospectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce selection bias between SLR and SBRT patients based on age, gender, performance status, tumour diameter, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI).

RESULTS

One hundred and fifteen patients who underwent SBRT and 65 SLR were enrolled. The median potential follow-up periods for SBRT and SLR were 6.7 and 5.3 years, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Before PSM, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 40.3% and 60.5% for SBRT and SLR, respectively (P=0.008). PSM identified 53 patients from each treatment group with similar characteristics: a median age of 76 years, a performance status of 0-1, a median tumour diameter of ∼20 mm, a median FEV1 of ∼1.8L and a median CCI of 1. The difference in OS became insignificant between the matched pairs (40.4% and 55.6% at 5 years with SBRT and SLR; P=0.124). The cumulative incidence of cause-specific death was comparable between groups (35.3% and 30.3% at 5 years, P=0.427).

CONCLUSION

SBRT can be an alternative treatment option to SLR for patients who cannot tolerate lobectomy because of medical comorbidities.