Treatment of Peripheral Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

An optimal dose-fractionation for stereotactic body radiotherapy in peripherally, centrally and ultracentrally located early-stage non-small lung cancer

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), also known as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), is commonly used in inoperable patients with early-stage non-small lung cancer (NSCLC). This treatment has good outcomes and low toxicity in peripherally located tumors. However, in lesions which are located close to structures such as the bronchial tree or mediastinum the risk of severe toxicity increases. This review summarizes the evidence of dose-fractionation in SBRT of NSCLC patients in various locations.

DNA Nanoclusters Combined with One-Shot Radiotherapy Augment Cancer Immunotherapy Efficiency

Immunotherapy shows immense promise for improving cancer treatment. Combining immunotherapy with radiotherapy provides a conspicuous advantage due to its enhanced abscopal effect. However, established immune tolerance mechanisms in the tumor microenvironment can hamper the generation of a sufficient abscopal effect. Herein, a type of DNA nanocluster (DNAnc) that is self-assembled by a CpG-ODNs-loaded Y-shaped double-stranded DNA vector based on the unique complementary base-pairing rules is designed. The unique structure of DNAnc makes it load more than ≈8125.5 ± 822.5 copies of CpG ODNs within one single nanostructure, which effectively increases resistance to nuclease degradation and elevates the efficiency of repolarizing macrophages to an M1-like phenotype. Mechanistic studies reveal that more DNAncs are endocytosed by macrophages in the cancer tissue and repolarized macrophages to elicit a robust abscopal effect with the accumulation of macrophages induced by radiotherapy, generating potent, long-term, and durable antitumor immunity for the inhibition of tumor metastasis and the prevention of tumor recurrence, which provides a novel strategy to boost cancer immunotherapy.

A meta-analysis comparing stereotactic body radiotherapy vs conventional radiotherapy in inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) superseded conventional radiotherapy (CRT) for the treatment of patients with inoperable early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over a decade ago. However, the direct comparisons of the outcomes of SBRT and CRT remain controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the survival and safety of SBRT and CRT in patients with inoperable stage I NSCLC.

METHODS

We systematically searched the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Google Scholar for relevant articles. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), local control rate (LCR) and adverse effects (AEs) were the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 11,110 articles, 17 of which were eventually included in this study; these 17 articles had 17,973 patients (SBRT: 7395; CRT: 10,578). Compared to CRT for the treatment of inoperable stage I NSCLC, SBRT had superior survival in terms of OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62-0.70, P < .00001), LCSS (HR: 0.42 [0.35-0.50], P < .00001), and PFS (HR: 0.34 [0.25-0.48], P < .00001). The 4-year OS rate (OSR); 4-year LCSS rate (LCSSR); 3-year local control rate (LCR); 5-year PFS rate (PFSR) with SBRT were all higher than those with CRT. With regard to all-grade AEs, the SBRT group had a significantly lower rate of dyspnea, esophagitis and radiation pneumonitis; no significant difference was found in grade 3-5 AEs (risk ratio [RR]: 0.68 [0.30-1.53], P = .35).

CONCLUSIONS

With better survival and a lower rate of dyspnea, esophagitis and radiation pneumonitis than CRT, SBRT appears to be more suitable for patients with inoperable stage I NSCLC.

Predictors of pneumonitis-free survival following lung stereotactic body radiation therapy

Background

Radiation pneumonitis is a common toxicity following lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We explored whether motion management technique, in conjunction with patient and treatment characteristics, is a predictor of radiation pneumonitis-free survival (PNFS).

Methods

A single institution multi-center lung SBRT database was retrospectively reviewed. PNFS was defined as time to earliest onset of radiation pneumonitis or last clinical follow-up. Patients were simulated using a 4-dimensional approach, and those with 1 cm or greater tumor motion were selected for respiratory-gated treatment. Real-time Position Management and phase-based gating were employed. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were fit for relevant covariates to determine the impact of free-breathing versus respiratory-gated treatment on PNFS.

Results

The initial treatment courses of 208 patients were included, with a median follow-up length of 23 months. The median age at treatment was 71 years. About 91.8% of patient had early stage (T1-2) non-small cell lung cancer and were treated with common regimens including 10 Gy ×5, 12 Gy ×4 and 18 Gy ×3; 26.4% underwent respiratory-gated SBRT. The overall rate of grade 3 or higher radiation pneumonitis was 10.1%. PNFS was not significantly different between patients treated with respiratory-gated versus free-breathing SBRT (HR =0.88; P=0.707); tumor location and fractionation were predictors of PNFS in the multivariate setting.

Conclusions

The method of motion management does not appear to impact PNFS when the tolerance for tumor displacement is 1 cm or less for free-breathing treatment planning and delivery. This approach may be appropriate when selecting patients for respiratory gating.

Evaluating risk factors of radiation pneumonitis after stereotactic body radiation therapy in lung tumor: Meta-analysis of 9 observational studies

BACKGROUND

In this study, we assessed the association of SBRT (stereotactic body radiotherapy) dose and volume with radiation pneumonitis (RP) risk in lung tumor.

METHODS

Relevant articles were identified up to April 2018, using following databases; Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). The pooled OR (odds ratio) with 95% CI (confidence interval) data [mean ± SD (standard deviation)] obtained from different studies was analyzed by statistical analysis using a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model when appropriate.

RESULTS

The analysis was based on nine observational studies, which were identified based on the study selection criteria. Between RP and non-RP patients, no difference was observed based on age, but significant differences were observed based on planning target volume (PTV), mean ipsilateral lung dose (MLD), total MLD, and V5, V10, V20 and V40 (the percentage of lung volume exceeding 5, 10, 20 and 40 Gy). In addition, PTV >145 cm3, total MLD ≥4.7 Gy, V5 ≥26.8%, V10 >12% and V20 ≥5.8 were associated with RP risk. Overall, the grade assessments of V5 and V20 revealed moderate quality evidence.

CONCLUSION

The present study indicated V5 and V20 as major risk factors for RP after SBRT treatment in lung tumor. In addition, it was observed that lung DVH (Dose Volume Histogram) patterns should be assessed more carefully, while predicting RP incidence after SBRT.

CD8+ T-Cell Density Imaging with 64Cu-Labeled Cys-Diabody Informs Immunotherapy Protocols

Purpose: Noninvasive and quantitative tracking of CD8+ T cells by PET has emerged as a potential technique to gauge response to immunotherapy. We apply an anti-CD8 cys-diabody, labeled with 64Cu, to assess the sensitivity of PET imaging of normal and diseased tissue.Experimental Design: Radiolabeling of an anti-CD8 cys-diabody (169cDb) with 64Cu was developed. The accumulation of 64Cu-169cDb was evaluated with PET/CT imaging (0, 5, and 24 hours) and biodistribution (24 hours) in wild-type mouse strains (n = 8/group studied with imaging and IHC or flow cytometry) after intravenous administration. Tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells in tumor-bearing mice treated with CpG and αPD-1 were quantified and mapped (n = 6-8/group studied with imaging and IHC or flow cytometry).Results: We demonstrate the ability of immunoPET to detect small differences in CD8+ T-cell distribution between mouse strains and across lymphoid tissues, including the intestinal tract of normal mice. In FVB mice bearing a syngeneic HER2-driven model of mammary adenocarcinoma (NDL), 64Cu-169cDb PET imaging accurately visualized and quantified changes in tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells in response to immunotherapy. A reduction in the circulation time of the imaging probe followed the development of treatment-related liver and splenic hypertrophy and provided an indication of off-target effects associated with immunotherapy protocols.Conclusions: 64Cu-169cDb imaging can spatially map the distribution of CD8+ T cells in normal organs and tumors. ImmunoPET imaging of tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic CD8+ T cells detected changes in T-cell density resulting from adjuvant and checkpoint immunotherapy protocols in our preclinical evaluation. Clin Cancer Res; 24(20); 4976-87. ©2018 AACR.

Optimizing radiation dose and fractionation for the definitive treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Radiation therapy is the foundation for treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a disease that is often inoperable and has limited long term survival. Local control of disease is strongly linked to patient survival and continues to be problematic despite continued attempts at changing the dose and fractionation of radiation delivered. Technological advancements such as 4-dimensional computed tomography (CT) based planning, positron emission tomography (PET) based target delineation, and daily image guidance have allowed for ever more accurate and conformal treatments. A limit to dose escalation with conventional fractions of 2 Gy once per day appears to have been reached at 60 Gy in the randomized trial Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0617. Higher doses were surprisingly associated with worse overall survival. Approaches other than conventional dose escalation have been explored to better control disease including accelerating treatment to limit tumor repopulation both with hyperfractionation and its multiple small (<2 Gy) fractions each day and with hypofractionation and its single larger (>2 Gy) fraction each day. These accelerated regimens are increasingly being used with concurrent chemotherapy, and multiple institutions have reported it as tolerable. Tailoring treatment to individual patient disease and normal anatomic characteristics has been explored with isotoxic dose escalation up to the tolerance of organs at risk, with both hyperfractionation and hypofractionation. Metabolic imaging during and after treatment is increasingly being used to boost doses to residual disease. Boost doses have included moderate hypofractionation of 2-4 Gy, and more recently extreme hypofractionation with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). In spite of all these changes in dose and fractionation, lung and cardiovascular toxicity remain obstacles that limit disease control and patient survival.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung, spine and oligometastatic disease: current evidence and future directions

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) also referred to as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), is a technique which has emerged over the past two decades due to improvements in radiation technology. Unlike conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) which traditionally delivers radiation in small doses [approximately 2 Gray (Gy) per fraction] over several weeks, SBRT, typically delivered in one to eight fractions, is a technique whereby potentially ablative doses of radiotherapy (usually 7.5-20 Gy per fraction) can be delivered with steeper dose gradients and sub millimetre precision, minimising risk to surrounding normal tissues. The potential benefits of excellent tumor control with low toxicity has led to the increasing use of SBRT in a number of clinical situations. Due to compelling evidence, SBRT is now the treatment of choice for medically inoperable patients with peripherally located stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Controversy remains however as to its efficacy and safety for central or ultra-central lung tumors. The evidence base supporting the use of SBRT as a novel treatment for spinal metastases and oligometastases is rapidly expanding but challenges remain in these difficult patient populations. In an era where targeted therapy and improved systemic treatments for stage IV cancer have resulted in increased disease-free survival, and our knowledge of the oligometastatic state is ever expanding, using SBRT to treat metastatic disease and gain durable local control is increasingly desirable. Several randomized trials are currently underway and are sure to provide valuable information on the benefit and utility of SBRT across many tumor sites including early-stage NSCLC, spinal metastases and oligometastatic disease. Recognizing the evolving role of SBRT in clinical practice, this paper provides a critical review of recent developments in each of these areas particularly highlighting the challenges facing clinicians and discusses potential areas for future research.

Dosimetric comparison of CT-guided iodine-125 seed stereotactic brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of NSCLC

This study aimed to assess the dosimetric differences between iodine-125 seed stereotactic brachytherapy (SBT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). An SBT plan and an SBRT plan were generated for eleven patients with T1-2 NSCLC. Prescription of the dose and fractionation (fr) for SBRT was 48Gy/4fr. The planning aim for SBT was D90 (dose delivered to 90% of the target volume)≥120Gy. Student’s paired t test was used to compare the dosimetric parameters. The SBT and SBRT plans had comparable PTV D90 (104.73±2.10Gyvs.107.64±2.29Gy), and similar mean volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose (V100%) (91.65% vs.92.44%, p = 0.410). The mean volume receiving 150% of the prescribed dose (V150%) for SBT was 64.71%, whereas it was 0% for SBRT. Mean heterogeneity index (HI) deviation for SBT vs. SBRT was 0.73 vs. 0.19 (p<0.0001), and the mean conformity index (CI) for SBT vs. SBRT was 0.77 vs. 0.81 (p = 0.031). The mean lung doses (MLD) in SBT were significantly lower than those in SBRT (1.952±0.713 vs. 5.618±2.009, p<0.0001). In conclusion, compared with SBRT, SBT can generate a comparable dose within PTV, while the organs at risk (OARs) only receive a very low dose. But the HI and CI in SBT were lower than in SBRT.

Immunological effect of local ablation combined with immunotherapy on solid malignancies

Recent comprehensive investigations clarified that immune microenvironment surrounding tumor cells are deeply involved in tumor progression, metastasis, and response to treatment. Furthermore, several immunotherapeutic trials have achieved successful results, and the immunotherapeutic agents are available in clinical practice. To enhance their demonstrated efficacy, combination of immunotherapy and ablation has begun to emerge. Local ablations have considerable advantages as an alternative therapeutic option, especially its minimal invasiveness. In addition, local ablations have shown immune-regulatory effect in preclinical and clinical studies. Although the corresponding mechanisms are still unclear, the local ablations combined with immunotherapy have been suggested in the treatment of several solid malignancies. This article aims to review the published data on the immune-regulatory effects of local ablations including stereotactic body radiotherapy, cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, and high-intensity-focused ultrasound. We also discuss the value of local ablations combined with immunotherapy. Local ablations have the potential to improve future patient outcomes; however, the effectiveness and safety of local ablations combined with immunotherapy should be further investigated.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has had a profound impact on the treatment paradigm for medically inoperable patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Local control and survival outcomes from prospective collaborative trials using SBRT have been highly favorable in this challenging patient population. Further study in medically operable patients is ongoing; however, randomized trials to help answer this question have terminated early because of poor accrual. Available prospective and retrospective data are discussed for the use of SBRT with regard to the medically inoperable and operable patient populations, as well as considerations for fractionation, dose, and toxicity.