"The best-laid plans ... often go awry ..."

Scarred Lung. An Update on Radiation-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis

Radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis is a common severe long-time complication of radiation therapy for tumors of the thorax. Current therapeutic options used in the clinic include only supportive managements strategies, such as anti-inflammatory treatment using steroids, their efficacy, however, is far from being satisfactory. Recent studies have demonstrated that the development of lung fibrosis is a dynamic and complex process, involving the release of reactive oxygen species, activation of Toll-like receptors, recruitment of inflammatory cells, excessive production of nitric oxide and production of collagen by activated myofibroblasts. In this review we summarized the current state of knowledge on the pathophysiological processes leading to the development of lung fibrosis and we also discussed the possible treatment options.

Radiation induced lung injury: prediction, assessment and management

Radiation induced lung injury has long been considered a treatment limiting factor for patients requiring thoracic radiation. This radiation induced lung injury happens early as well as late. Radiation induced lung injury can occur in two phases viz. early (<6 months) when it is called radiation pneumonitis and late (>6 months) when it is called radiation induced lung fibrosis. There are multiple factors that can be patient, disease or treatment related that predict the incidence and severity of radiation pneumonitis. Radiation induced damage to the type I pneumocytes is the triggering factor to initiate such reactions. Over the years, radiation therapy has witnessed a paradigm shift in radiation planning and delivery and successfully reduced the incidence of lung injury. Radiation pneumonitis is usually a diagnosis of exclusion. Steroids, ACE inhibitors and pentoxyphylline constitute the cornerstone of therapy. Radiation induced lung fibrosis is another challenging aspect. The pathophysiology of radiation fibrosis includes continuing inflammation and microvascular changes due to pro-angiogenic and pro- fibrogenic stimuli resembling those in adult bronchiectasis. General supportive management, mobilization of airway secretions, anti-inflammatory therapy and management of acute exacerbations remains the treatment option. Radiation induced lung injury is an inevitable accompaniment of thoracic radiation.

Meta-analysis of incidence of early lung toxicity in 3-dimensional conformal irradiation of breast carcinomas

Background

This meta-analysis aims to ascertain the significance of early lung toxicity with 3-Dimensional (3D) conformal irradiation for breast carcinomas and identify the sub-groups of patients with increased risk.

Methods

Electronic databases, reference sections of major oncological textbooks and identified studies were searched for synonyms of breast radiotherapy and radiation pneumonitis (RP). Major studies in thoracic irradiation were reviewed to identify factors frequently associated with RP. Meta-analysis for RP incidence estimation and odds ratio calculation were carried out.

Results

The overall incidence of Clinical and Radiological RP is 14% and 42% respectively. Ten studies were identified. Dose-volume Histogram (DVH) related dosimetric factors (Volume of lung receiving certain dose, V_dose and Mean lung Dose, MLD), supraclavicular fossa (SCF) irradiation and age are significantly associated with RP, but not sequential chemotherapy and concomitant use of Tamoxifen. A poorly powered study in IMN group contributed to the negative finding. Smoking has a trend towards protective effect against RP.

Conclusion

Use of other modalities may be considered when Ipsilateral lung V_20Gy > 30% or MLD > 15 Gy. Extra caution is needed in SCF and IMN irradiation as they are likely to influence these dosimetric parameters.

Isolated lung perfusion with gemcitabine combined with radiotherapy: no additional lung toxicity in an experimental model

OBJECTIVES

Isolated lung perfusion with gemcitabine is an effective technique for the treatment of lung metastases in an experimental model. In clinical studies, increased toxicity has been observed when combining intravenous gemcitabine with radiotherapy (RT). The goal of our study was to determine whether RT in combination with isolated lung perfusion increases lung toxicity.

METHODS

Rodents were randomized into eight groups: sham group, RT, intravenous gemcitabine, intravenous gemcitabine combined with RT, isolated lung perfusion with hydroxyethyl starch (HES) or gemcitabine, isolated lung perfusion with HES or gemcitabine combined with RT. Gemcitabine was administered in a dose of 40 mg/kg and RT as a single fraction of 8 Gy. The effect on lung tissue was evaluated by % fibrosis in a haematoxylin-eosin stain and by % alveoli that contained siderophages on Perls stain. A total of 36 slices were made per treatment and per stain. The results of different groups were compared using logistic regression.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between treatment with intravenous gemcitabine and RT. Isolated lung perfusion with gemcitabine showed significant more histopathologic changes compared with intravenous gemcitabine (P < 0.0001). When RT was added, there was no fibrosis after intravenous gemcitabine and mild-to-moderate haemosiderosis. After isolated lung perfusion with gemcitabine combined with RT, there was moderate to severe fibrosis and mild to severe haemosiderosis. Adding RT to isolated lung perfusion with gemcitabine showed no significant difference compared to isolated lung perfusion alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of isolated lung perfusion and RT is feasible in an experimental model. No additional toxicity of RT was observed compared to isolated lung perfusion alone. Further studies are necessary to determine efficacy of this combined treatment.