Osteoblastic bone lesions developing during treatment with erlotinib indicate major response in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a brief report

Response rate specific to bone metastasis of various cancers for immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the prognosis of patients with cancer, such as melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, head and neck cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and urothelial carcinoma. The extension of life expectancy has led to an increased incidence of bone metastases (BM) among patients with cancer. BM result in skeletal-related events, including severe pain, pathological fractures, and nerve palsy. Surgery is typically required for the treatment of BM in patients with an impending fracture; however, it may be avoided in those who respond to ICIs. We systematically reviewed studies analyzing BM responses to treatment with ICIs.

METHODS

This study was conducted in accordance with the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020 statement and registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (ID: UMIN000053707). Studies reporting response rates based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) or the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDA) criteria specific for BM in patients treated with ICIs were included; reports of fewer than five cases and review articles were excluded. Studies involving humans, published in English and Japanese, were searched. The PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched. Ultimately, nine studies were analyzed. The Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies was used to assess the quality of studies.

RESULTS

Based on the MDA criteria, complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) was observed in 44-78% and 62% patients treated with ICIs plus denosumab for NSCLC and melanoma, respectively. According to the RECIST, CR or PR was recorded in 5% and 7-28% of patients treated with ICIs for renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although response rates to ICIs for BM are poor, patients treated with ICI plus denosumab for bone metastases with impending fractures from NSCLC and melanoma are likely to avoid surgery to prevent fractures.

Osteoblastic Bone Reaction Developing During Treatment With Sintilimab and Bevacizumab in a Patient With KRASG12V-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma

Osteoblastic bone reaction, the occurrence of new osteoblastic lesions, is a paradoxical phenomenon during the treatment of cancers and can be defined as disease progression or bone metastases. Osteoblastic bone reactions usually occur in patients who receive treatments such as chemotherapy or hormonal or targeted therapy; however, it is difficult to differentiate them from disease progression or an increase in osteoblastic activity in response to therapy. Although osteoblastic bone reaction in lung cancer has been described in a few reports, it has never been reported in patients with KRASG12V-mutant lung adenocarcinoma treated with immunotherapy and antiangiogenesis. Here, we describe a case of a 77-year-old male with KRASG12V-mutant lung adenocarcinoma whose osteoblastic bone response was found during treatment with sintilimab and bevacizumab. We showed the course of the disease as well as systematic imaging manifestations of lung cancer with osteoblastic bone reaction and discussed their mechanisms.

A Flare for the Unexpected: Bone Flare as Response to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment in a Lung Cancer Patient: New osteoblastic bone lesions in a lung cancer patient may represent bone flare and should not be misdiagnosed as disease progression

We report the case of a 72-year-old female never-smoker with stage IV endothelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated lung adenocarcinoma. This patient was started on first line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and seemingly developed new bone metastases under this treatment. As there was a remarkable discrepancy between the partial response seen in the primary tumor and non-osseous metastatic locations, the possibility of a bone flare phenomenon was considered. In this case report, we demonstrate that new bony lesions are not always synonymous with disease progression.

MRI-Guided Cryoablation of Epidural Malignancies in the Spinal Canal Resulting in Neural Decompression and Regrowth of Bone

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to describe the use of MRI to safely monitor cryoablation for the treatment of spinal epidural malignancies.

CONCLUSION

Use of MRI guidance to monitor percutaneous cryoablation allows ablation margins more distinct than those allowed by heat-based ablation modalities. MRI-guided cryoablation is a feasible option for treating epidural tumors involving the spinal canal, resulting in successful decompression of the tumor away from the spinal cord with regrowth of previously eroded bone around the spinal canal.

Osteoblastic bone response mimicking bone progression during treatment with pembrolizumab in advanced cutaneous melanoma

Pembrolizumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Appearance of bone metastases, either osteolytic or osteoblastic, during treatment qualifies as disease progression. We report the case of a 64-year-old White woman with a metastatic melanoma undergoing second-line treatment with pembrolizumab. At first evaluation, after 3 months of therapy, computed tomography scans showed the onset of osteosclerotic lesions and a significant reduction in all the previously identified metastases; on the contrary, a fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET showed the normalization of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in all the baseline lesions, including bone metastases. Osteoblastic response, consisting of occurrence of new osteoblastic lesions on computed tomography imaging, as a consequence of an osteoblastic reaction of previously undetectable bone metastases, has been reported in some cancers that receive treatments such as chemotherapy, hormonal or targeted therapy. However, it had never been reported in patients with melanoma treated with immunotherapy. An apparent worsening of bone imaging on standard computed tomography scan in patients under checkpoint inhibitor should not lead to modification of treatment strategy, because misinterpretation as disease progression may lead to the premature cessation of a beneficial treatment and finally have a negative effect on patients' clinical outcome.

Epidermal growth factor receptor is associated with the onset of skeletal related events in non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Bone metastasis and skeletal related events (SREs) are common in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) could benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, it is unclear whether SRE is influenced by EGFR status. We aimed to evaluate the correlation of EGFR status and TKIs with the incidence of SREs.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of stage IV NSCLC patients with bone metastasis. Incidence rate of SREs was collected and was compared using chi-square test. Logistic-regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors predicting the incidence of SREs.

Results

410 eligible patients were enrolled in the study. 49.0% were detected with EGFR mutation. 49.8% of patients received EGFR-TKIs therapy prior to the onset of SREs. 42.7% experienced at least one SRE. Patients who were treated with TKIs held lower incidence of SREs than patients who were not treated with TKIs (23.5% vs 61.7%, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that poor performance status (OR 5.550, 95%CI 2.290-13.450; p<0.001) and mutant EGFR (OR 3.050, 95%CI 1.608-5.787, p=0.001) were independent risk factors predicting the onset of SREs, while the usage of TKIs (OR 0.102, 95%CI 0.054-0.193, p<0.001) was a protective factor of SREs in NSCLC patients with bone metastasis.

Conclusions

This study indicates that the incidence of SREs is common in both patients with and without EGFR mutation. Poor performance ability and mutant EGFR imply higher risks of SREs, while the usage of TKIs may be a protective factor of SREs.

Osteoblastic progression during EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in mutated non-small cell lung cancer: a potential blunder

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

Bone flare reaction as a sign of response to antineoplastic treatment has been redefined, including the onset of new osteoblastic lesions. If misunderstood as skeletal progression, this finding could lead to erroneous therapy discontinuation, changing the disease clinical course. We aim to describe this clinical phenomenon in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene-activating mutations treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the computed tomography scans of 43 EGFR-mutated patients with NSCLC treated with EGFR-TKI, analyzing the bone response in terms of increase in the quantity and/or density of lesions, and assessing objective tumor response to treatment.

RESULTS

Osteoblastic reaction was detected in 10 cases (23%), showing different patterns: dimensional or density increase of known osteosclerotic metastases (pattern A, n = 4); response of previously lytic lesions (pattern B, n = 2); onset of new osteosclerotic lesions (pattern C, n = 4). Seven patients had partial response to TKI treatment, with response rate of 70%, vs 50% of patients with bone metastases without this reaction. No difference in terms of median overall survival or progression-free survival emerged between patients with or without osteoblastic reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

The correct clinico-radiologic interpretation of osteoblastic reaction is crucial to avoid waste of therapeutic lines when TKI treatment has not yet exhausted its potential effectiveness. Clinical implications of ambiguous radiologic findings as described in this study deserve further discussion.

Tumor-free osteosclerotic lesions in patients treated for metastatic melanoma using BRAF inhibitors

BRAF inhibitors (vemurafenib and dabrafenib) are commonly prescribed in BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma and allow improvement of the overall survival and progression-free survival. They are, however, accompanied by many adverse effects which mainly affect the skin. We observed on computed tomographic scans in three different patients after 3 months of treatment, the onset of osteosclerotic lesions. In parallel, the computed tomographic scans showed a significant reduction in all of the previously identified metastases in all patients. The occurrence of such bone modifications under treatment was reported previously in others cancers, such as inoperable non-small-cell lung cancers under epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, as the 'osteoblastic bone flare phenomenon'. However, it had never been reported in melanoma patients treated with targeted therapies, and the results of two performed bone biopsies are reported here. This phenomenon is generally believed to indicate a better response under treatment, whereas in our study, the patients experienced, after a short partial response, a severe cerebral relapse leading to death. Finally, although its physiopathological mechanisms are poorly understood, the occurrence of tumor-free osteosclerotic lesions in patients under BRAF inhibitors should not be misinterpreted as a progression of the disease.

TLG-S criteria are superior to both EORTC and PERCIST for predicting outcomes in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma treated with erlotinib

PURPOSE

In this retrospective review of prospectively collected data, we sought to investigate whether early FDG-PET assessment of treatment response based on total lesion glycolysis measured using a systemic approach (TLG-S) would be superior to either local assessment with EORTC (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) criteria or single-lesion assessment with PERCIST (PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors) for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma treated with erlotinib. We also examined the effect of bone flares on tumor response evaluation by single-lesion assessment with PERCIST in patients with metastatic bone lesions.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from 23 patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma treated with erlotinib. All participants underwent FDG-PET imaging at baseline and on days 14 and 56 after completion of erlotinib treatment. In addition, diagnostic CT scans were performed at baseline and on day 56. FDG-PET response was assessed with TLG-S, EORTC, and PERCIST criteria. Response assessment based on RECIST 1.1 (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) from diagnostic CT imaging was used as the reference standard. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) served as the main outcome measures.

RESULTS

We identified 13 patients with bone metastases. Of these, four (31 %) with persistent bone uptake due to bone flares on day 14 were erroneously classified as non-responders according to the PERCIST criteria, but they were correctly classified as responders according to both the EORTC and TLG-S criteria. Patients who were classified as responders on day 14 based on TLG-S criteria had higher rates of 2-year PFS (26.7 % vs. 0 %, P = 0.007) and OS (40.0 % vs. 7.7 %, P = 0.018). Similar rates were observed in patients who showed a response on day 56 based on CT imaging according to the RECIST criteria. Patients classified as responders on day 14 according to the EORTC criteria on FDG-PET imaging had better rates of 2-year OS than did non-responders (36.4 % vs. 8.3 %, P = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

TLG-S criteria may be of greater help in predicting survival outcomes than other forms of assessment. Bone flares, which can interfere with the interpretation of treatment response based on PERCIST criteria, are not uncommon in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma treated with erlotinib.

Alkaline phosphatase flare phenomenon following epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: Report of a case and case review

Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) flare phenomenon documented as scintigraphic flare phenomenon due to elevated serum ALP levels produced by osteoblasts reflects an osteoblastic reaction in response to the effective therapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report a case of ALP flare following gefitinib treatment for NSCLC. We also retrospectively analyzed the prevalence of ALP flare in lung cancer patients treated via epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor in our hospital. Recognition of this phenomenon is important for physicians treating NSCLC patients to avoid discontinuation of a potentially beneficial treatment because of misdiagnosis for refractory multiple bone metastasis or adverse effect.

[Extension study and evaluation of the therapeutic response in a patient with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma using sequential study with ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT and ¹⁸F-fluoride PET-CT]

We report a case of a patient with lung adenocarcinoma and bone and extraosseus metastases studied with (18)F-FDG PET-CT, (99m)Tc-HMDP and (18)F-fluoride PET-CT. It assesses the usefulness of (18)F-FDG PET-CT for initial staging of the disease and monitoring response to therapy. For the study of the sclerotic bone metastases it shows the superiority of 99mTc-HMDP bone scintigraphy and (18)F-fluoride PET-CT over (18)F-FDG PET-CT, and (18)F-fluoride PET-CT over bone scintigraphy. It also shows the usefulness of (18)F-fluoride PET-CT for monitoring the bone metastases.

[¹⁸F]FDG positron emission tomography within two weeks of starting erlotinib therapy can predict response in non-small cell lung cancer patients

Purpose

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether [¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT, performed within two weeks of starting erlotinib therapy can predict tumor response defined by RECIST 1.1 criteria after 8 weeks of treatment in patients with inoperable (stage IIIA to IV) non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Patients and Methods

Three [¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT scans were acquired in 12 patients before (5±4 days) and after 9±3 days (early PET) and 60±6 days (late PET) of erlotinib therapy. Conventional evaluation, including at least chest CT (baseline versus after 8 weeks of treatment), was performed according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Change in [¹⁸F]FDG uptake was compared with conventional response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

By using ROC analysis, the Area Under the Curve for prediction of metabolic non-progressive disease (mNP) by early PET was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.62 to 1.1; P = 0.04) at a cut-off of 21.6% reduction in maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax). This correctly classified 11/12 patients (7 with true progressive disease; 4 with true non-progressive disease; 1 with false progressive disease). Non-progressive disease after 8 weeks of treatment according to RECIST 1.1 criteria was significantly more frequent in patients classified mNP (P = 0.01, Fisher's exact test). mNP patients showed prolonged PFS (HR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.59; P<0.01) and OS (HR = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.84; P = 0.03). Late PET analysis provided concordant results.

Conclusion

Morphologic response, PFS and OS survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients can be predicted by [¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT scan within 2 weeks after starting erlotinib therapy.

Flare response versus disease progression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

We present a case report of a patient with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had a series of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) scans for assessment of response to treatment. A restaging 18F-FDG PET/CT scan after six cycles showed increased FDG activity in the bone lesions with reduced activity in the lung and liver lesions. The increased bone activity was considered to be due to flare phenomenon rather than metastasis. A short interval follow up scan after 1 month was advised to confirm this interpretation but this repeat scan showed disease relapse. Although the flare phenomenon does exist, caution should be exercised in attributing increased tracer uptake in the lesions in patients with adenocarcinoma of lung and especially those who have received erlotinib during the course of their treatment. Distinguishing the 'flare phenomenon' and 'disease progression' is at times difficult but is important since misdiagnosis may result in an unnecessary delay in patient management.

High prevalence of osteoblastic bone reaction in computed tomography scans of an European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer prospective randomised phase II trial in extensive stage small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Osteoblastic bone reaction is an important phenomenon defined by an increase in apparent bone density of previously known bone metastasis or development of new osteoblastic lesions in the presence of response in other tumour sites. Osteoblastic bone reaction in lung cancer has only been described in a few reports and mostly in patients with pre-existing bone metastasis.

METHODS

In this report we present the data of an independent, blinded and preplanned radiological review of the occurrence of osteoblastic lesions in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The computed tomography (CT) scans of the chest and upper abdomen of 71/88 patients who had an investigator reported complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) were retrospectively analysed for the development of osteoblastic lesions. Furthermore, baseline exams were reviewed for the presence and location of bone metastasis and local radiological reports were reviewed for any knowledge of bone metastasis.

RESULTS

There were 14 patients with osteoblastic bone lesions in the reviewed follow-up CT scans. Three patients had known bone metastases at baseline, and 11 patients had no history or findings of bone metastases on the baseline scan. During the course of the disease, 13 out of 14 patients developed new osteoblastic lesions, while all responded in other sites. The prevalence of osteoblastic bone reaction in our study was 19.7%.

CONCLUSION

In this study osteoblastic bone reaction was observed in a larger number of patients without previously documented bone metastases, indicating a high prevalence of occult bone metastases in SCLC. If bone metastases are not documented at diagnosis, then osteoblastic bone reaction may cause confusion in a responding patient.