Screening-Detected Lung Cancers: Is Systematic Nodal Dissection Always Essential?

Importance of Lymph Node Evaluation in ≤2-cm Pure-Solid Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of lymph node (LN) metastasis in small-sized lung cancer varies depending on the tumor size and proportion of ground-glass opacity. We investigated occult LN metastasis and prognosis in patients with small-sized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), mainly focusing on the pure-solid tumor.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with ≤2-cm clinical N0 NSCLC who underwent lung resection with curative intent from 2003 to 2017. Among them we analyzed patients who also underwent adequate complete systematic LN dissection. Pathologic results and disease-free survival of the radiologically mixed ground-glass nodule (mGGN) and pure-solid nodule (PSN) groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 1329 patients analyzed, 591 had mGGNs and PSNs. As tumor size increased, patients in the mGGN group showed no difference in LN metastasis: ≤1 cm, 2.27%; 1.0 to 1.5 cm, 2.19%; and 1.5 to 2.0 cm, 2.18% (P = .999). However the PSN group showed a significant difference in LN metastasis as the tumor size increased: ≤1 cm, 2.67%; 1.0 to 1.5 cm, 12.46%; and 1.5 to 2.0 cm, 21.31% (P < .001). In the multivariate analysis tumor size was a significant predictor of nodal metastasis in the PSN group but not in the mGGN group. In terms of 5-year disease-free survival, the mGGN group showed a better prognosis than the PSN group (94.4% vs 71.2%, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

We need to conduct a thorough LN dissection during surgery for small-sized NSCLC, especially for pure-solid tumors ≥ 1 cm.

The Role of Lymphadenectomy in Early-Stage NSCLC

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The involvement of lymph nodes by the tumor has a strong impact on survival of patients. For this reason, lymphadenectomy plays a crucial role in the staging and prognosis of NSCLC, to define the most appropriate therapeutic strategies concerning the stage of the disease. To date, the benefit, in terms of survival, of the different extents of lymphadenectomy remains controversial in the scientific community. It is recognized that metastatic involvement of mediastinal lymph nodes in lung cancer is one of the most significant prognostic factors, in terms of survival, and it is therefore mandatory to identify patients with lymph node metastases who may benefit from adjuvant therapies, to prevent distant disease and local recurrences. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the role of lymphadenectomy in early-stage NSCLC in terms of efficacy and accuracy, comparing systematic, sampling, and lobe-specific lymph node dissection and analyzing the existing critical issue, through a search of the most relevant articles published in the last decades.

Type of lymphadenectomy does not influence survival in pIa NSCLC patients who underwent VATS lobectomy: Results from the national VATS group database

INTRODUCTION

Stage Ia presents an optimal survival rate after surgical resection, but the type of lymphadenectomy to use in these patients is still debated. The aim of this study is evaluate if one type of lymphadenectomy adopted influences survival in patients who underwent VATS lobectomy for stage Ia NSCLC.

METHODS

Clinical and pathological data from pIa patients in the prospective VATS Italian nationwide registry were reviewed and analysed. Patients and tumour characteristics,type of lymphadenectomy (sampling or radical nodal dissection,MRLD), were collected and correlated to Overall Survival(OS) and Disease free Survival(DFS). The Kaplan-Meier product-limit method was used to estimate OS and DFS and the log-rank test was adopted to evaluate the differences between groups. A propensity match was performed to reduce bias due to the retrospective study design.

RESULTS

The final analysis was conducted on 2039 patients, 179 died during follow-up,recurrence rate was 13%. MRLD was performed in 1287(63.1%)patients. The univariable analysis identified as favourable prognostic factors for OS the female sex(p = 0.023), low ECOG-score(0.008),low SUVmax(p < 0.001), GGO appearance(p < 0.001), pT < 2 cm(p = 0.002) and low tumour grading(p = 0.002). The multivariable analysis confirmed as independent prognostic factors low ECOG-score(p = 0.012), low SUVmax(p < 0.001) and low tumour grading(p < 0.001). Analysing survival in patients with solid/sub-solid nodules and after propensity score matching for pTdimension and number of N2 resected lymphnodes, no OS differences were present comparing sampling vs MRLD.

CONCLUSION

Survival in pIa patients seems to be determined by patient and tumour characteristics such as performance status,grading and SUVmax. Type of lymphadnectomy did not seem to be correlated with OS in these patients.

Overview of the outcomes of robotic segmentectomy and lobectomy

Segmentectomy has gained popularity in the latest years as a valid alternative to lobectomy. Initially reserved to patient unfit for lobar lung resection, this procedure is now offered also in selected patient with <2 cm peripheral lung cancer confined to an anatomic segment with no nodal involvement on preoperative evaluation. The introduction of screening with low-dose CT chest scan allowed the identification of lung cancer at early stages, making possible to schedule a more conservative lung surgery. A major improvement came also from minimally invasive surgery (MIS), reducing complication rate with comparable survival rates when compared to open surgery. However, due to long learning curve and uncomfortable instruments handling of video-assisted thoracoscopy, many surgeons still prefer to perform segmentectomies through a thoracotomy and thus increasing perioperative morbidity and leading to post-thoracotomy syndrome due to rib-spreading. Robotic assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) can avoid this throwback, combining the handling of open surgery with lesser invasiveness of thoracoscopy. Although literature has given strong evidences in favour of robotic lobectomies, data are still limited regarding segmentectomies performed with this technique. Moreover, no results are still available from the two ongoing randomized controlled trials comparing segmentectomy to lobectomy and so the latter represent the oncologically proper procedure for lung cancer along with lymph-node dissection. In this review we analyse the literature currently available on outcomes of lobar and sublobar anatomical resection performed by RATS, with a brief mention of the existing surgical techniques of port positioning and the costs of this procedure.

Pre-surgical assessment of mediastinal lymph node metastases in patients having ≥ 30 mm non-small-cell lung cancers

INTRODUCTION

Computed tomography (CT) and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission-tomography (FDG-PET) measurements of mediastinal lymph nodes (MLNs) of patients with non-small-cell-lung-cancers (NSCLCs) ≤ 30 mm in maximum diameter are recommended for pre-surgical prediction of MLN metastases.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients at Mount Sinai Health System enrolled in the Initiative for Early Lung Cancer Research on Treatment (IELCART), prospective cohort between 2016 and 2020, who had pre-surgical FDG-PET and underwent surgery with MLN resection and/or pre-operative endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) for a first primary NSCLC ≤ 30 mm in maximum diameter on pre-surgical CT.

RESULTS

Among 470 patients, none with part-solid (n = 63) or nonsolid (n = 23) NSCLCs had MLN metastases. Solid NSCLCs were identified in 384 patients, none in typical carcinoid (n = 48) or NSCLC ≤ 10 mm in maximum diameter (n = 47, including 8 typical carcinoids) had MLN metastases. Among the remaining 297 patients with solid NSCLCs 10.1-30.0 mm, 7 (2.4%) had MLN metastases. Area-under-the-curve (AUC) for predicting MLN metastases in solid NSCLCs 10.1-30.0 mm, using the CT maximum short-axis MLN diameter was 0.62 (95% CI:0.44-0.81, p = 0.18) and using the highest SUVmax of any MLN, AUC was 0.58 (95% CI:0.39-0.78,p = 0.41). Neither AUCs were significantly different from chance alone. Optimal cutoff for prediction of MLN metastases was ≥ 18.9 mm for CT maximum short-axis diameter [sensitivity 14.3% (95%CI:0.0%-57.9%); specificity 100.0% (95%CI:98.9%-100.0%)] and for highest SUVmax was ≥ 11.7 [sensitivity 14.3% (95%CI:0.0%-57.9%) and specificity 99.7% (95%CI:98.3%-100.0%)].

CONCLUSIONS

CT and SUVmax had low sensitivity but high specificity for predicting MLN metastases in solid NSCLCs 10.1-30.0 mm. Clinical Stage IA NSCLCs ≤ 30 mm should be based on CT maximum tumor diameter and MLN maximum short-axis diameter ≤ 20 mm.

Enlarged Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Computed Tomography are a Valuable Prognostic Factor in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Pathologically Negative Lymph Nodes

Background

Most non-small cell lung cancer patients with enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes (LN) in preoperative computer tomography (CT) images are diagnosed with N0 in the pathological examination after surgery. However, these patients seem to have worse survival than those without enlarged mediastinal LN in our clinical practice. This study aimed to investigate whether the size of mediastinal LN is correlated with the prognosis in pathological N0 patients, which could help us to predict the prognoses further.

Methods

The retrospective cohort study involved 758 N0 patients with a thin layer CT scan. We have measured the size of mediastinal LN, including long diameter, short diameter, and volume on CT image, and classified patients by X-tile. Next, we explored the risk factors of enlarged LN by univariate and multivariate logistic analysis. Then, we have compared the 5-year cancer-specific survival by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank method. Multivariate Cox analysis was utilized to further survival analysis. Finally, we have constructed the prediction model by nomogram.

Results

A total of 150 N0 patients (19.8%) had mediastinal LN enlargement in our study. After multivariate logistic analysis, we found the LN enlargement was significantly correlated with age (p=0.001), pathology (p < 0.001) and tumor recurrence (p < 0.001). The patients with LN enlargement had a worse 5-year cancer-specific survival (75.3% vs 92.8%, p < 0.001) after Kaplan-Meier analysis. Patients with a larger volume had increased risk of tumor-associated death when compared with the normal group (p < 0.001) by multivariate Cox analyses.

Conclusion

N0 patients with larger mediastinal LN had a worse 5-year cancer-specific survival and a higher risk of recurrence. The volume of LN was the most valuable prognostic factor in N0 patients.

Pre-surgical assessment of mediastinal lymph node metastases in Stage IA non-small-cell lung cancers

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of CT and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography for pre-surgical staging of mediastinal lymph node metastases (N2/N3) of non-small-cell-lung-cancers ≤30 mm.

METHODS

We reviewed a total of 263 patients from a prospective cohort study, who underwent resection including mediastinal lymph nodes, for first primary non-small-cell-lung-cancer ≤30 mm in maximum diameter on pre-surgical CT. Cutoff criteria for short-axis diameter on CT of the largest N2/N3 node of 10, 15, and 20 mm and positron emission uptake of 2.5, 3.0, and 4.0 were evaluated using Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC) assessment. Accuracy criterion was used to determine the optimal cutoffs.

RESULTS

Of 263 patients, 9 had nonsolid, 42 part-solid, and 212 solid non-small-cell-lung-cancers. Post-surgically, none of the 51 patients with nonsolid or part-solid cancers had mediastinal lymph node metastases. Among the 212 patients with solid cancers, 23 had N2 node metastases. For the 212 patients with solid cancers, the AUC for CT lymph node measurements was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.57-0.77), significantly higher (p = 0.001) than chance alone, while the AUC for SUVmax measurements, 0.56 (95% CI: 0.48-0.65), was not (p = 0.13). Optimal CT cutoff was >20 mm had low sensitivity of 30.4% (95% CI: 11.6%-49.2%) but high specificity of 99.5% (95% CI: 98.4%-100.0%).

CONCLUSION

Based on these results, clinical Stage IA for non-small-cell-lung-cancers with nonsolid, part-solid, or solid consistency should be based on pre-surgical CT maximum tumor diameter and lymph node short-axis measurements on CT ≤20 mm. Further prospective evaluation of these clinical Stage IA staging criteria is needed.

Independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis in 2623 patients with Non-Small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

this study attempts to identify the independent risk factors that can predict lymph node metastasis for the patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and guide doctor adoption of individualized treatment for such patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was approved by the Hospital's Ethics Committee and all patients had signed informed consent forms. We retrospectively reviewed NSCLC patients who had undergone surgical resection from December 2008 to December 2013.The statistical significance of evaluation variables and lymph node metastasis was determined with Pearson's Chi-square test. The risk factors of lymph node metastasis were determined through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. And for the age and tumor diameter factors, optimal cutoff points were determined with a receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

In the present study, a total of 2623 patients were included in the study, and 779 patients with lymph node metastasis. Three independent risk factors were identified: age, tumor diameter and Ki-67 index. We found that <65 years of age (Adjusted-OR:1.921), ≥2.85 cm of tumor diameter (Adjusted-OR:3.141), and 5%~25% in Ki-67 group (Adjusted-OR:2.137),≥25% (Adjusted-OR:3.341) were significant. Also we found that 307 patients with lymph node metastasis and the lymph node metastasis rate was 51.0%, when the age<65 years, Ki-67 index≥25%, and the tumor diameter≥2.85 cm. On the contrary, there were only 2 patients with lymph node metastasis, and the rate of lymph node metastasis was 5.1%.

CONCLUSION

Identifying three independent risk factors that predict lymph node metastasis in non-small cell patients, Among NSCLC patients in whom all three predictors were identified, and over a half of the patients showed lymph node metastasis.

Preoperative predictors of lymph node metastasis in clinical T1 adenocarcinoma

Background

The subcategory “solid component of tumor” is a new criterion of tumor categories in the updated eighth edition of the TNM classification. Nevertheless, the predictors of lymph node metastasis among patients with clinical T1 adenocarcinoma, based on the TNM classification 8^th edition, remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the preoperative predictors of lymph node metastasis in clinical T1 adenocarcinoma by comparing clinicopathological characteristics between the groups with and without lymph node metastasis.

Methods

We performed a retrospective observational single-center study at the Sendai Kousei Hospital. From January 2012 to September 2019, we included 515 patients who underwent curative lobectomy or segmentectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection among those with clinical T1 adenocarcinoma according to the UICC-TNM staging 8^th edition. They were divided into two groups: those with lymph node metastasis (positive group) and those without (negative group). The clinicopathological factors were retrospectively analyzed and compared between the groups.

Results

In univariate analysis, carcinoembryonic antigen (>5.0 ng/mL) (P=0.0007), maximum standardized uptake (>3.5) (P<0.0001), clinical T factor (T1c) (P<0.0001), and consolidation tumor ratio (>0.85) (P<0.0001) were significant predictors of lymph node metastasis. Multivariate analysis revealed that maximum standardized uptake SUVmax (>3.5) (odds ratio =10.4, P<0.0001) was independently associated with lymph node metastasis. In univariate analysis, carcinoembryonic antigen (>5.0) (P=0.048) was the only predictor of lymph node metastasis among patients of cT1b, while no parameters were identified as significant predictors among patients of cT1c.

Conclusions

SUVmax and CEA are useful preoperative predictors of lymph node metastases in patients with clinical T1 adenocarcinoma, stratified to T1b and T1c, based on the 8^th TNM classification.

Minimizing residual occult nodal metastasis in NSCLC: recent advances, current status and controversies

Introduction: Nodal involvement in lung cancer is a significant determinant of prognosis and treatment management. New evidence exists regarding the management of occult lymph node metastasis and residual disease in the fields of imaging, mediastinal staging, and operative management.Areas covered: This review summarizes the latest body of knowledge on the identification and management of occult lymph node metastasis in NSCLC. We focus on tumor-specific characteristics; imaging modalities; invasive mediastinal staging; and operative management including, technique, degree of resection, and lymph node examination.Expert opinion: Newly identified risk-factors associated with nodal metastasis including tumor histology, location, radiologic features, and metabolic activity are not included in professional societal guidelines due to the heterogeneity of their reporting and uncertainty on how to adopt them into practice. Imaging as a sole diagnostic method is limited. We recommend confirmation with invasive mediastinal staging. EBUS-FNA is the best initial method, but adoption has not been uniform. The diagnostic algorithm is less certain for re-staging of mediastinal nodes after neoadjuvant therapy. Mediastinal node sampling during lobectomy remains the gold-standard, but evidence supports the use of minimally invasive techniques. More study is warranted regarding sublobar resection. No consensus exists regarding lymph node examination, but new evidence supports reexamination of current quality metrics.

Factors associated with nodal metastasis in 2-centimeter or less non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Lymph node involvement is an important determinant of treatment and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and must be determined via surgical lymph node (LN) evaluation. However, lymphadenectomy is associated with multiple significant morbidities. Recent studies have suggested LN evaluation can be foregone in some or all patients with NSCLC ≤2.0 cm. Our objective was to identify whether these patients may be safely spared the morbidity of lymphadenectomy.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective study of patients treated for NSCLC ≤2.0 cm at a single institution from 2005 to 2017. We examined patient, demographic, and tumor variables for associations with LN metastases via univariable and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 555 patients met our inclusion criteria. Our primary independent variables included tumor size, histology, and histologic subtype. Although tumors ≤1 cm were less likely to have LN metastases than 1.1- to 2-cm tumors (6.8% vs 13.3%), there was no statistically significant difference. Histologic type was not associated with LN status. In an adenocarcinoma subgroup analysis, micropapillary predominant tumors were more likely to have LN metastases. All invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas and minimally invasive adenocarcinomas were N0.

CONCLUSIONS

LN evaluation may be unnecessary in patients with minimally invasive adenocarcinoma or invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas ≤2.0 cm. However, this information is rarely available pre- or intraoperatively. Thus, we recommend LN evaluation always be performed when possible, even for subcentimeter NSCLC, unless the histology is absolutely certain. To our knowledge, this is the largest dataset published to study patients with NSCLC ≤2.0 cm.

Comparison of deep or moderate neuromuscular blockade for thoracoscopic lobectomy: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Laparoscopic surgery typically requires deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB), but whether deep or moderate NMB is superior for thoracoscopic surgery remains controversial.

Methods

Patients scheduled for thoracoscopic lobectomy under intravenous anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive moderate [train of four (TOF) 1–2] or deep NMB [TOF 0, post-tetanic count (PTC) 1–5]. Depth of anesthesia was controlled at a Narcotrend rating of 30 ± 5 in both groups. The primary outcome was the need to use an additional muscle relaxant (cisatracurium) during surgery. Secondary outcomes included surgeon satisfaction, recovery time of each stage after drug withdrawal [time from withdrawal until TOF recovery to 20% (antagonists administration), 25, 75, 90, 100%], blood gas data, VAS pain grade after extubation, the time it takes for patients to begin walking after surgery, postoperative complications and hospitalization time. Results were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.

Results

Thirty patients were enrolled per arm, and all but one patient in each arm was included in the final analysis. Among patients undergoing moderate NMB, surgeons applied additional cisatracurium in 8 patients because of body movement and 5 because of coughing (13/29, 44.8%). Additional cisatracurium was not applied to any of the patients undergoing deep NMB (p < 0.001). Surgeons reported significantly higher satisfaction for patients undergoing deep NMB (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon rank sum test). The mean difference between the two groups in the time from withdrawal until TOF recovery of 25% or 90% was 10 min (p < 0.001). The two groups were similar in other recovery data, blood gas analysis, VAS pain grade, days for beginning to walk and mean hospitalization time.

Conclusions

Deep NMB can reduce the use of additional muscle relaxant and increase surgeon satisfaction during thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-IOR-15007117, 22 September 2015.

Do the surgical results in the National Lung Screening Trial reflect modern thoracic surgical practice?

INTRODUCTION

Surgical data from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) has yet to be closely examined. We sought to analyze surgical procedures and complications from the NLST to determine their relevance to modern surgical practice.

METHODS

The NLST database was queried for patients who underwent surgical resection for confirmed lung cancer, specifically evaluating postoperative complications. Numerical variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared using the χ² test. Logistic regression uni- and multivariable analysis of independent risk factors of postoperative complications was performed.

RESULTS

At operation, 80% of patients (n = 821) had lobectomy, 4.1% (n = 42) had pneumonectomy, and 16.1% (n = 166) had sublobar resection, among whom 69% (n = 114) had wedge resection. Only 29.6% (n = 305) of the cohort had a thoracoscopic resection. Although the overall rate of surgical patients with any complication was 31% (n = 318), only 15.5% of patients (n = 160) had major complications, most commonly prolonged air leaks (n = 67, 6.5%). Respiratory failure (n = 28, 2.7%), prolonged ventilation (n = 9, 0.9%), myocardial infarction or cardiac arrest (n = 7, 0.7%), and stroke (n = 2, 0.2%) were rare events. Overall 30-day mortality in patients undergoing resection was 1.7% (n = 18). On multivariable analysis, greater smoking pack history (odds ratio [OR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.001-1.01) and pulmonary comorbidities (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.98-1.82) were significant or approached significance for an association with complications/death, whereas sublobar resection (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38-0.94) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery approach (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.56-1.04) were significant or approached significance for an association with decreased rates of complications/death.

CONCLUSIONS

Operative mortality and postoperative morbidity were very low in patients undergoing resection for screen-detected lung cancer. Increased use of sublobar resection and minimally invasive surgical approaches may be associated with fewer complications.

Association of lymph node involvement with the prognosis of pathological T1 invasive non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Lymph node involvement could help to predict the prognosis of pathological T1 (pT1, diameters of ≤3 cm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study assessed the clinicopathological factors and associated lymph node involvement in invasive lung adenocarcinoma (IAC) and squamous cell lung cancer (SCC) and the overall and disease-free survival associated with these factors.

METHODS

Three hundred and twenty-five patients with pathological T1 NSCLC (253 IAC and 72 SCC) were retrospectively analyzed from a pool of 1094 primary lung cancer patients. The data were assessed using multiple logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

Among patients with a ≤30-mm tumor lesion (N = 325), N1 and N2 lymph node involvement was found in 28 (8.6%) and 34 (10.4%) patients, respectively. Lymph node metastasis occurred in 13.0% (33/253) of pT1 IAC patients and 40.3% (29/72) of SCC patients. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, SCC by histology, and tumor lesions larger than 1.0 cm were associated with lymph node involvement (P < 0.0001, <0.0001, and 0.048, respectively). In IAC patients, negative lymph nodes were associated with better overall survival compared with lymph node-positive ones (P = 0.021). No significant difference was observed in SCC patients regardless of lymph node status (P = 0.40). Multivariable Cox analysis revealed that lymph node involvement was an independent prognostic predictor of overall IAC patient survival (P = 0.041), but not of SCC patient survival (P = 0.470). Chemotherapy was administered to 72.2% (52/72) of SCC patients, a significantly higher rate when compared with that of IAC patients (42.3%, 107/253).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node metastasis was inversely associated with the overall survival of IAP patients, but not with the survival of SCC patients. Patients with pT1 SCC exhibited a significantly higher rate of lymph node involvement when compared with IAC patients. Thus, a systematic lymph node dissection should be performed in pT1 IAC patients, especially in patients with IAC larger than 1.0 cm, for additional treatment selections to improve survival.

Predictors and Patterns of Regional Recurrence Following Lung SBRT: A Report From the Elekta Lung Research Group

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to determine the predictors and patterns of regional recurrence (RR) following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for primary lung cancers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Details of patient factors, treatment, and outcome factors were extracted from a multi-institutional (5) database. All events were calculated from the end of radiotherapy. Estimates of local recurrence, RR, and distant metastases (DM) were calculated using the competing risk method. Cause-specific and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Details of locations and number of simultaneous RRs were categorized by lymph node anatomic station.

RESULTS

A total of 734 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up was 3.0 years in surviving patients. Four hundred seventy-six (65%) patients had pathologic proof of disease. There were 64 patients with RR. The 2-year local recurrence, RR, and distant metastases rates were 5.6%, 9.0%, and 14.6% respectively. The 2-year cause-specific and overall survival were 89.9% and 63.7%, respectively. There were 136 simultaneous sites of RR. There were 21 recurrences in stations 4R (15.4%), 9 (6.6%) in 4L, 30 (22%) in 7, 19 (13.9%) in 10R, and 14 (10.3%) in 10L. The most common stations for isolated recurrence (n = 19) were station 7 (n = 5; 26.3%) and station 10R (n = 6; 31.6%). The most common RR levels were stations 4 and 7 for right and left upper lobe, stations 5, 7, and 10 for left lower lobe tumors, and stations 7 and 10 for right lower lobe tumors.

CONCLUSION

Stations 4, 7, and 10 were the most common stations for RR. These patterns of recurrence may guide nodal staging procedures prior to SBRT.

Surgical treatment of early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer

Surgical resection remains the standard of care for functionally operable early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and resectable stage IIIA disease. The role of invasive staging and restaging techniques is currently being debated, but they provide the largest biopsy samples which allow for precise mediastinal staging. Different types of operative procedures are currently available to the thoracic surgeon, and some of these interventions can be performed by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) with the same oncological results as those by open thoracotomy. The principal aim of surgical treatment for NSCLC is to obtain a complete resection which has been precisely defined by a working group of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). Intraoperative staging of lung cancer is of utmost importance to decide on the extent of resection according to the intraoperative tumour (T) and nodal (N) status. Systematic nodal dissection is generally advocated to evaluate the hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes which are subdivided into seven zones according to the most recent 7th tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) classification. Lymph-node involvement not only determines prognosis but also the administration of adjuvant therapy.

In 2011, a new multidisciplinary adenocarcinoma classification was published introducing the concepts of adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma. This classification has profound surgical implications. The role of limited or sublobar resection, comprising anatomical segmentectomy and wide wedge resection, is reconsidered for early-stage lesions which are more frequently encountered with the recently introduced large screening programmes. Numerous retrospective non-randomised studies suggest that sublobar resection may be an acceptable surgical treatment for early lung cancers, also when performed by VATS.

More tailored, personalised therapy has recently been introduced. Quality-of-life parameters and surgical quality indicators become increasingly important to determine the short-term and long-term impact of a surgical procedure. International databases currently collect extensive surgical data, allowing more precise calculation of mortality and morbidity according to predefined risk factors. Centralisation of care has been shown to improve results. Evidence-based guidelines should be further developed to provide optimal staging and therapeutic algorithms.

Lung cancer screening: the European perspective

European studies have contributed significantly to the understanding of lung cancer screening. Smoking within screening, quality of life, nodule management, minimally invasive treatments, cancer prevention programs, and risk models have been extensively investigated by European groups. Mortality data from European screening studies have not been encouraging so far, but long-term results of the NELSON study are eagerly awaited. Investigations on molecular markers of lung cancer are ongoing in Europe; preliminary results suggest they may become an important screening tool in the future.

Systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy or mediastinal lymph node sampling in patients with pathological stage I NSCLC: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the evidence comparing systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy (SML) and mediastinal lymph node sampling (MLS) in the treatment of pathological stage I NSCLC using meta-analytical techniques.

METHODS

A literature search was undertaken until January 2014 to identify the comparative studies evaluating 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates. The pooled odds ratios (OR) and the 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) were calculated with either the fixed or random effect models.

RESULTS

One RCT study and four retrospective studies were included in our meta-analysis. These studies included a total of 711 patients: 317 treated with SML, and 394 treated with MLS. The SML and the MLS did not demonstrate a significant difference in the 1-year survival rate. There were significant statistical differences between the 3-year (P = 0.03) and 5-year survival rates (P = 0.004), which favored SML.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that in pathological stage I NSCLC, the MLS can get the similar outcome to the SML in terms of 1-year survival rate. However, the SML is superior to MLS in terms of 3- and 5-year survival rates.

Positron emission tomography in the diagnostic work-up of screening-detected lung nodules

Low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening for lung cancer can reduce lung cancer mortality, but overdiagnosis, false positives and invasive procedures for benign nodules are worrying. We evaluated the utility of positron emission tomography (PET)-CT in characterising indeterminate screening-detected lung nodules. 383 nodules, examined by PET-CT over the first 6 years of the COSMOS (Continuous Observation of Smoking Subjects) study to diagnose primary lung cancer, were reviewed and compared with pathological findings (surgically-treated patients) or follow-up (negative CT for ⩾2 years, considered negative); 196 nodules were malignant. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of PET-CT for differentially diagnosing malignant nodules were, respectively, 64%, 89% and 76% overall, and 82%, 92% and 88% for baseline-detected nodules. Performance was lower for nodules found at repeat annual scans, with sensitivity ranging from 22% for nonsolid to 79% for solid nodules (p=0.0001). Sensitivity (87%) and specificity (73%) were high for nodules ⩾15 mm, better (sensitivity 98%) for solid nodules ⩾15 mm. PET-CT was highly sensitive for the differential diagnosis of indeterminate nodules detected at baseline, nodules ⩾15 mm and solid nodules. Sensitivity was low for sub-solid nodules and nodules discovered after baseline for which other methods, e.g. volume doubling time, should be used.

2nd ESMO Consensus Conference on Lung Cancer: early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer consensus on diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

To complement the existing treatment guidelines for all tumour types, ESMO organises consensus conferences to focus on specific issues in each type of tumour. The 2nd ESMO Consensus Conference on Lung Cancer was held on 11-12 May 2013 in Lugano. A total of 35 experts met to address several questions on non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in each of four areas: pathology and molecular biomarkers, first-line/second and further lines in advanced disease, early-stage disease and locally advanced disease. For each question, recommendations were made including reference to the grade of recommendation and level of evidence. This consensus paper focuses on early-stage disease.

Pathologic classification of adenocarcinoma of lung

Recently, the 1999/2004 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of adenocarcinoma became less useful from a clinical standpoint as most adenocarcinomas belonged to the mixed subtype and the term bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) gave rise to much confusion among clinicians. For these reasons a new adenocarcinoma classification was introduced in 2011 by a joint working group of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), American Thoracic Society (ATS), and European Respiratory Society (ERS). This represents an international, multidisciplinary effort joining pathologists, molecular biologists, pulmonary physicians, thoracic oncologists, radiologists, and thoracic surgeons. Currently, a distinction is made between pre-invasive lesions, minimally invasive and invasive lesions. The confusing term BAC is not used anymore and new subcategories include adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma. Several aspects of this classification are discussed with main emphasis on its correlation with imaging techniques and its impact on diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. On chest computed tomography (CT) a distinction is made between solid and subsolid nodules, the latter comprising ground glass opacities (GGO), and partly solid lesions. Several studies incorporating CT and positron emission tomographic (PET) data show a good imaging-pathologic correlation. With the implementation of screening programs early lung cancer has become a hotly debated topic and sublobar resection is currently reconsidered for early lesions without lymph node involvement. This new classification will also have an impact on the TNM classification. Thoracic surgeons will continue to play a major role in the application, evaluation and further refinement of this new adenocarcinoma classification.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for differentiating N0 versus N1 lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the value of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for differentiating cN0 versus cN1 non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective review of EBUS-TBNA results in patients with potentially resectable clinical N0 or N1 non-small cell lung cancer based on computed tomography and positron emission tomography was performed. Systematic mediastinal and hilar lymph node sampling was performed by EBUS-TBNA. Lymph nodes larger than 5 mm in short axis or suspicious nodes were targeted. In the absence of N2 or N3 disease, patients underwent resection with lymph node dissection.

RESULTS

A total of 981 patients underwent EBUS-TBNA during the study period, of which 163 patients met the study criteria. There were 94 cN0 and 69 cN1 patients. A total of 453 lymph nodes (338 mediastinal and 115 N1 lymph nodes, average 2.8 nodes/patient) were sampled. Endobronchial ultrasound upstaged 9 (5.5%) patients to N2 disease, but was falsely negative in the mediastinum in 7 (4.3%) patients. In cN0 patients, EBUS confirmed N0 in 87 (53.4%) and upstaged in 7 (4.3%, N1 in 1, N2 in 6). In cN1 patients, EBUS confirmed N1 in 19 (11.7%), downstaged in 47 (28.8%), and upstaged in 3 (1.8%). The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and negative predictive value of EBUS-TBNA to accurately differentiate between N0 and N1 disease was 76.2%, 100%, 96.6%, and 96.2%, respectively. The accuracy of mediastinal staging was 95.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration can accurately access the hilar and interlobar lymph nodes in patients with potentially resectable lung cancer. Accurate assessment of cN0 versus cN1 by EBUS-TBNA may be used to guide induction therapy before surgery.

Treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

The treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients with good or low surgical risk is primarily surgical resection. However, this area is undergoing many changes. With a greater prevalence of CT imaging, many lung cancers are being found that are small or constitute primarily ground-glass opacities. Treatment such as sublobar resection and nonsurgical approaches such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are being explored. With the advent of minimally invasive resections, the criteria to classify a patient as too ill to undergo an anatomic lung resection are being redefined.

METHODS

The writing panel selected topics for review based on clinical relevance to treatment of early-stage lung cancer and the amount and quality of data available for analysis and relative controversy on best approaches in stage I and II NSCLC: general surgical care vs specialist care; sublobar vs lobar surgical approaches to stage I lung cancer; video-assisted thoracic surgery vs open resection; mediastinal lymph node sampling vs lymphadenectomy at the time of surgical resection; the use of radiation therapy, with a focus on SBRT, for primary treatment of early-stage NSCLC in high-risk or medically inoperable patients as well as adjuvant radiation therapy in the sublobar and lobar resection settings; adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage NSCLC; and the impact of ethnicity, geography, and socioeconomic status on lung cancer survival. Recommendations by the writing committee were based on an evidence-based review of the literature and in accordance with the approach described by the Guidelines Oversight Committee of the American College of Chest Physicians.

RESULTS

Surgical resection remains the primary and preferred approach to the treatment of stage I and II NSCLC. Lobectomy or greater resection remains the preferred approach to T1b and larger tumors. The use of sublobar resection for T1a tumors and the application of adjuvant radiation therapy in this group are being actively studied in large clinical trials. Every patient should have systematic mediastinal lymph node sampling at the time of curative intent surgical resection, and mediastinal lymphadenectomy can be performed without increased morbidity. Perioperative morbidity and mortality are reduced and long-term survival is improved when surgical resection is performed by a board-certified thoracic surgeon. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II NSCLC is recommended and has shown benefit. The use of adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy for stage I NSCLC is of unproven benefit. Primary radiation therapy remains the primary curative intent approach for patients who refuse surgical resection or are determined by a multidisciplinary team to be inoperable. There is growing evidence that SBRT provides greater local control than standard radiation therapy for high-risk and medically inoperable patients with NSCLC. The role of ablative therapies in the treatment of high-risk patients with stage I NSCLC is evolving. Radiofrequency ablation, the most studied of the ablative modalities, has been used effectively in medically inoperable patients with small (&lt; 3 cm) peripheral NSCLC that are clinical stage I.

Predictive value of primary fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose standard uptake value for a better choice of systematic nodal dissection or sampling in clinical stage ia non--small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To determine whether the standard uptake value (SUV) of the primary lesion can predict mediastinal lymph node metastasis in clinical stage IA non--small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

At 5 centers, patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC from February 2004 to August 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. Data from Shandong Cancer Hospital and from the Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Harbin Medical University were used as a testing set, and data from the other 3 institutions were used as the validation set. Final diagnosis was established based on the histopathologic examination.

RESULTS

Data from 144 patients were collected for the study. The primary results in our study showed that maximal SUV (SUVmax) of primary tumor might be a predictor of lymph node metastasis (χ(2) = 10.424; P = .001) and the best cutoff value was 7.25 (P = .029). For the testing set, lymph node metastasis rates in low-grade group (SUVmax < 7.25) and high-grade group (SUVmax > 7.25) were 5% (2/43) and 36% (9/25) (P = .001) For the total data set, lymph node metastasis rate was 7% (6/93) in low-grade group (SUVmax < 7.25) and 26% (13/51) in high-grade group (SUVmax > 7.25) (χ(2)= 10.424; P = .001). A multivariate analysis revealed that no factors were applied to predict the probability of metastasis. But the analysis showed a weak correlation between SUVmax and nodal status (r = 0.21; P = .011) with bivariate correlation.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of our data suggested that fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose SUVmax of the primary tumor might be a predictor of lymph node involvement in stage IA NSCLC. The rate of mediastinal lymph node metastasis of patients with a lower fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography SUVmax might be relatively low, which provides more evidence for clinical procedures of clinical stage IA NSCLC.

Prognostic role of station 3A mediastinal nodes for non-small-cell lung cancers

OBJECTIVES

Station 3A nodes have been commonly neglected in surgical practice. This retrospective study collected information on the incidence and risk factors of Station 3A node to ascertain the prognostic role of 3A nodal involvement.

METHODS

A total of 180 consecutive pN2 (stage IIIa) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases who underwent systemic lymphadenectomy and contained Station 3A nodes were enrolled. Survival rates were calculated according to the final pathology of Station 3A lymph node: Station 3A node (+) and Station 3A node (-). Statistical analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Station 3A nodal metastasis was validated in 32 cases, and the incidence of Station 3A node involvement was 17.8%. Station 3A nodes involvement was strongly associated with the metastatic status of Station 4R nodes and histological nature of pulmonary cancer. The overall 3-year survival was 53% and median survival time was 40.6 months. The 3-year survival difference was significant between Station 3A node (-) and Station 3A node (+) (63 vs 22%, χ(2) = 16.426, P < 0.001). Moreover, the overall 3-year survival was closely related with the number of involved nodal zones (χ(2) = 31.156, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed two statistically significant risk factors for survival including metastasis of Station 3A node and the number of positive nodal zones (hazard ratios [HR]: 2.702; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.008-7.242; P = 0.027; and HR: 7.404; 95% CI: 3.263-16.936, P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The involvement of Station 3A lymph nodes predicts poor prognosis of right-sided stage pIIIa-N2 NSCLC patients. Therefore, systemic lymphadenectomy for right-sided cancers should include Station 3A nodes when ascertaining a complete resection.