The New Taxonomy of Lung Adenocarcinoma Stemming from a Multidisciplinary Integrated Approach: Novel Pathology Concepts and Perspectives

Comparative study of imaging and pathological evaluation of pneumonic mucinous adenocarcinoma

Patients with pneumonia-type lung cancer (PTLC) do not exhibit specific clinical features, which makes imaging diagnosis difficult. Therefore, the aetiology of the pathological changes occurring during PTLC remains unclear. The current study aimed to explore the possible mechanism of PTLC formation by CT scans and pathological analysis of the lungs. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the CT and pathological data of 17 cases of PTLC. The diagnosis of lung cancer was confirmed by pathology. The CT scans of nine patients indicated diffuse distribution of lesions in the lungs, whereas those of three patients indicated single-lung multi-leaf distribution, and those of the remaining five patients included single-leaf distribution. All patients demonstrated increased plaque or patchy density in the majority of the lesions located near the heart. The pathological types of the identified tumours were mucinous adenocarcinoma with adherent growth as the main sub-type. A large number of mucus lakes were observed, containing floating tumour cells, as determined by optical microscopy. In addition, a number of tumour cells were located in the residual alveolar wall of the observed mucus lakes. The results of the present study suggested that the mucinous adenocarcinoma tumour cells produced substantial quantities of mucus, and that the cells were scattered and planted along with the mucus through the airway, which led to possible development of pneumonia-type mucinous adenocarcinoma.

The impact of immunohistochemistry on the classification of lung tumors

INTRODUCTION

To highlight the role of immunohistochemistry to lung cancer classification on the basis of existing guidelines and future perspectives.

AREAS COVERED

Four orienting key-issues were structured according to an extensive review on the English literature: a) cancer subtyping; b) best biomarkers and rules to follow; c) negative and positive profiling; d) suggestions towards an evidence-based proposal for lung cancer subtyping. A sparing material approach based on a limited number of specific markers is highly desirable. It includes p40 for squamous cell carcinoma ('no p40, no squamous'), TTF1 for adenocarcinoma, synaptophysin for neuroendocrine tumors and vimentin for sarcomatoid carcinoma. A close relationship between genotype and phenotype also supports a diagnostic role for negative profiles. Expert commentary: Highly specific and sensitive IHC markers according to positive and negative diagnostic algorithms seem appropriate for individual patients' lung cancer subtyping.

Does Immunohistochemistry Affect Response to Therapy and Survival of Inoperable Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients? A Survey of 145 Stage III-IV Consecutive Cases

Whether non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) unveiled by immunohistochemistry (IHC) has the same clinical outcome as those typed by morphology is still matter of debate. A total of 145 stage III-IV, consecutive inoperable NSCLC patients treated by chemotherapy (133 cases) or EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (12 cases) and including 100 biopsies, 11 surgical specimens, and 34 cytological samples had originally accounted for 120 adenocarcinomas (ADs), 19 squamous cell carcinomas (SQCs), and 6 adenosquamous carcinomas (ADSQCs) by integrating morphology and thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF1)/p40 IHC. Thirty-two NSCLC–not otherwise specified (NSCLC-NOS) cases were identified by morphology revision of the original diagnoses, which showed solid growth pattern ( P < .001), 22 ADs, 5 SQCs, and 5 ADSQCs by IHC profiling ( P < .001), and 10 gene-altered tumors (3 EGFR, 5 KRAS, and 2 ALK). While no significant relationships were observed between response to therapy and original, morphology or IHC diagnoses, driver mutations and tumor differentiation by TTF1 expression, AD run better progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) than other tumor types by morphology ( P = .010 and P = .047) and IHC ( P = .033 and P = .046), respectively. Furthermore, patients with NSCLC-NOS confirmed as AD by IHC tended to have poorer OS ( P = .179) and PFS ( P = .193) similar to that of ADSQC and SQC ( P = .702 and P = .540, respectively). A category of less differentiated AD with poorer prognosis on therapy could be identified by IHC, while there were no differences for SQC or ADSQC. The terminology of “NSCLC-NOS, favor by IHC” is appropriate to alert clinicians toward more aggressive tumors.

Lung cancer staging: clinical and radiologic perspectives

Published in 2009, the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system is the culmination of an extensive worldwide initiative to standardize and validate lung cancer staging. Unlike prior editions, the new staging system is now inclusive of small cell carcinoma and carcinoid tumors. In addition, significant changes were made to the T and M descriptors, resulting in improved prognostic stratification of disease. This review article highlights these changes, the rationale for their inclusion in the new staging manual, and the role of the radiologist in determining stage.

Radiologic implications of the 2011 classification of adenocarcinoma of the lung

Now the leading subtype of lung cancer, adenocarcinoma received a new classification in 2011. For tumors categorized previously as bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC), criteria and terminology had not been uniform, so the 2011 classification provided four new terms: (a) adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), representing histopathologically a small (≤3-cm), noninvasive lepidic growth, which at computed tomography (CT) is usually nonsolid; (b) minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, representing histopathologically a small (≤3-cm) and predominantly lepidic growth that has 5-mm or smaller invasion, which at CT is mainly nonsolid but may have a central solid component of up to approximately 5 mm; (c) lepidic predominant nonmucinous adenocarcinoma, representing histopathologically invasive adenocarcinoma that shows predominantly lepidic nonmucinous growth, which at CT is usually part solid but may be nonsolid or occasionally have cystic components; and (d) invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma, histopathologically showing lepidic growth as its predominant component, which at CT varies widely from solid to mostly solid to part solid to nonsolid and may be single or multiple (when multifocal, it was formerly called multicentric BAC). In addition, new histopathologic subcategories of acinar, papillary, micropapillary, and solid predominant adenocarcinoma are now described, all as nonmucinous, predominantly invasive, may include a small lepidic component, and at CT are usually solid but may include a small nonsolid component. The micropapillary subtype has a poorer prognosis than the other subtypes. In addition, molecular genetic correlations for the subcategories of adenocarcinoma of the lung are now a topic of increasing interest. As the new classification enters common use, further descriptions of related correlations can be anticipated.

ΔNp63 (p40) and thyroid transcription factor-1 immunoreactivity on small biopsies or cellblocks for typing non-small cell lung cancer: a novel two-hit, sparing-material approach

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosing non-small cell lung cancer on biopsy/cellblock samples by morphology may be demanding. As sparing material for molecular testing is mandatory, a minimalist immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based diagnostic approach is warranted by means of novel, reliable, and easy-to-assess biomarkers.

METHODS

Forty-six consecutive biopsy/cellblock samples and the corresponding resection specimens (as the gold standard for morphology and IHC) from 30 adenocarcinomas (AD), 10 squamous carcinomas (SQC), 5 adenosquamous carcinomas (ADSQC), and 1 sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC) were IHC-evaluated for p40 [corresponding to nontransactivating ΔNp63 isoforms] and thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF1) by semiquantitative assessment. For p40, also immunodecoration intensity was taken into account and dichotomized as strong or low.

RESULTS

Nonrandom and overlapping distributions of the relevant markers were found in biopsy/cellblock and surgical specimens, which closely correlated with each other and the diverse tumor categories, with no differences in area under curve-receiver-operating-characteristic curves for each marker between any two samples, including p40 and p63. Diagnostic combinations were p40-/TTF1+ or TTF1- for AD (where p40 was negative, apart from 5/30 AD showing at the best 1-2% tumor cells with low intensity); p40+/TTF1- (p40 strong and by far higher than 50%) for SQC; and p40+/TTF1+ or p40+/TTF1- (p40 strong and less than 50%) for ADSQC. The single SC case was p40-/TTF1-, suggesting glandular lineage. Practically, 41/46 (89%) tumors were correctly classified by IHC on small samples, including 30 AD, 10 SQC, 1/5 ADSQC, and no SC. Underdiagnosis of ADSQC was actually because of sampling error of biopsies/cellblocks rather than insufficient biomarker robustness, whereas underdiagnosis of SC was really because of the failure of either marker to highlight epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

CONCLUSIONS

This minimalist IHC-based model of p40 and TTF1 on biopsy/cellblock samples was effective to correctly subtype most cases of lung cancer.