Chemotherapy effectiveness after first-line gefitinib treatment for advanced lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma (formerly advanced bronchioloalveolar carcinoma): exploratory analysis of the IFCT-0401 trial

Characteristics and Prognostic Nomogram for Primary Lung Lepidic Adenocarcinoma

Background

Lepidic adenocarcinoma (LPA) is an infrequent subtype of invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma (ADC). However, the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of LPA have not been elucidated.

Methods

Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database of 4191 LPA patients were retrospectively analyzed and compared with non-LPA pulmonary ADC to explore the clinicopathological and prognosis features of LPA. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were performed to identify independent survival predictors for further nomogram development. The nomograms were validated using the concordance index, receiver operating characteristic curves, and calibration plots, as well as decision curve analysis, in both the training and validation cohorts.

Results

Compared with non-LPA pulmonary ADC patients, those with LPA exhibited unique clinicopathological features, including more elderly and female patients, smaller tumor size, less pleural invasion, and lower histological grade and stage. Multivariate analyses showed that age, sex, race, tumor location, primary tumor size, pleural invasion, histological grade, stage, primary tumor surgery, and chemotherapy were independently associated with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with LPA. The nomograms showed good accuracy compared with the actual observed results and demonstrated improved prognostic capacity compared with the TNM stage.

Conclusions

LPA is more frequently diagnosed in older people and women. LPA was inclined to be smaller in tumor size and lower in tumor grade and staging, which may indicate a favorable prognosis. The constructed nomograms accurately predict the long-term survival of LPA patients.

Favorable response to pemetrexed, cisplatin and bevacizumab in invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma: A case report and literature review

Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) was formerly referred to as mucinous bronchioloalveolar carcinoma. The lack of effective chemotherapy and comprehensive treatment for this type of tumor poses a great challenge in clinical practice. We herein report the case of a male patient with IMA who was treated with a combination of pemetrexed (500 mg/m²), cisplatin (75 mg/m²) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) as first-line chemotherapy. The patient achieved significant radiological improvement with 6 courses of this regimen. After the tumor progressed, the patient again achieved marked improvement with an additional 4 courses of the same regimen. The patient survived for a total of 30 months after the first chemotherapy. Therefore, bevacizumab in combination with pemetrexed/cisplatin may be an effective strategy for the treatment of IMA. The available literature on this chemotherapy regimen was also reviewed and discussed in the present study.

Overall response to first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor and second-line chemotherapy is predictive of survival outcome in epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

First-line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective for the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma with an EGFR-sensitizing mutation, but resistance is inevitable. Chemotherapy is widely used in the second-line setting. The outcome following this treatment scheme has not been thoroughly evaluated.

METHODS

From 2007 to 2011, consecutive patients with mutated EGFR receiving first-line TKI and second-line chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. The overall response was categorized into double responder, single responder and double nonresponder.

RESULTS

Following this treatment scheme, baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1 (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.37-0.98; p = 0.041) and double responder (HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.07-0.78; p = 0.018) were independent predictors of overall survival. Absence of pleural metastasis independently predicted the response to first-line TKI (OR 2.60; 95% CI 1.13-5.99; p = 0.025). In TKI responders, ECOG performance status 0-1 before chemotherapy (OR 4.95; 95% CI 1.15-21.28; p = 0.006), an exon 19 deletion (OR 4.74; 95% CI 1.30-17.21; p = 0.018) and progression-free survival (PFS) on first-line TKI (OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01-1.09; p = 0.049) independently predicted the response to second-line chemotherapy. A moderate linear relationship (Pearson's r = 0.441; p = 0.001) existed between the PFS of this treatment scheme in TKI responders.

CONCLUSION

The status of double responder to first-line TKI and second-line chemotherapy was predictive of improved survival in EGFR-mutated adenocarcinoma.

Erlotinib versus carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced lepidic adenocarcinoma: IFCT-0504

The IFCT-0504 phase II trial evaluated the efficacy of erlotinib versus carboplatin-paclitaxel (CP) as first-line treatment in 130 cases of advanced lepidic-predominant adenocarcinoma (ADC).The primary objective of the study was treatment efficacy, evaluated based on an end-point of disease control at 16 weeks.The primary objective was met, with a disease control in 35 (53%) out of 66 patients treated with CP and in 25 (39.1%) out of 64 patients treated with erlotinib. Median progression-free survival (PFS) for the total population was 3.6 months. The disease control rate did not differ between either the therapeutic arms or pathological subtypes, whereas there was a strong interaction between treatment arms and tumour pathological subtypes for PFS (p=0.009). Mucinous tumour patients treated with erlotinib exhibited an increased progression risk (hazard ratio 3.4, 95% CI 1.7-6.5; p≤0.001). The PFS for nonmucinous tumour patients was similar in both arms. Median overall survival was 20.1 months and did not differ between therapeutic arms. These findings were not further elucidated by molecular analyses and the toxicity profiles were as expected.Our study demonstrated the dominant role of CP alongside erlotinib in the management of advanced lepidic ADC. Based on these findings, erlotinib should not be administered in first-line therapy to patients with lepidic ADC in the absence of an epidermal growth factor receptor mutation.