Guo H, Li P, Guo D, Gao A, Zhao P, Fu A, Li C, Lu J. Analysis of clinical characteristics and automatic monitoring of drug-induced arrhythmias in 167,546 inpatients.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2023;
79:759-765. [PMID:
37039873 DOI:
10.1007/s00228-023-03492-6]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to analyze the occurrence characteristics, clinical manifestations, medication distribution, and incidence of drug-induced arrhythmias in a real-world inpatient population.
METHODS
According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria as well as the ADR evaluation criteria, we retrospectively evaluated hospitalized patients in 2019 using the arrhythmia module of the Adverse Drug Event Active Surveillance and Assessment System-II (ADE-ASAS-II). A detailed analysis was performed on the demographic data, ADR manifestations, and medication distribution of 2097 patients with drug-induced arrhythmias and QT interval prolongation.
RESULTS
Of the 167,546 hospitalized patients, there were 1809 cases of drug-induced arrhythmias, with an incidence of 1.08%. The ADRs in 45.35% of positive patients occurred within 3 days after medication administration, and 46.73% of the patients were 65 years old or older. The predominant ADRs identified in this study were extrasystole, tachycardia, and QT interval prolongation, of which the incidence was 0.20%. Levofloxacin was the most involved drug, and levofloxacin-associated rates of incidence of arrhythmia and QT interval prolongation were 1.24% and 0.44%, respectively. The risk factors for drug-induced arrhythmias were male sex, advanced age, emaciation, obesity, and underlying illnesses such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular diseases, and hepatic and renal inadequacy (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
The incidence of drug-induced arrhythmias was in the range of common, while QTc interval prolongation was occasional. It is necessary to pay attention to patients with risk factors.
Collapse