Capnography monitoring in procedural sedation for bronchoscopy

A Blueprint for Success: Implementation of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Mandated Anesthesiology Oversight for Procedural Sedation in a Large Health System

In 2009, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued the §482.52 Condition of Participation (CoP) that the director of anesthesia services (DAS) is responsible for all anesthesia administered in the hospital, including moderate and deep procedural sedation provided by nonanesthesiologists. Although this mandate was issued several years ago, many anesthesiology departments remain uncertain as to how best to implement it, who needs to be involved, what resources are needed, and how to leverage this oversight to improve quality of care and patient safety. This article reviews the CMS CoP interpretive guidelines and other regulations as they relate to procedural sedation, outlines the components and benefits of anesthesiology oversight, and describes the tools and structure to implement these guidelines. In addition, we discuss some of the challenges surrounding this implementation. This initiative continues to evolve and expand as needs change and experience develops.

A Blueprint for Success: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Clinical Operations within a Bronchoscopy Suite

Building an efficient facility for advanced bronchoscopic procedures involves many considerations. This review places particular emphasis on anesthesiology services, based on experience at a tertiary/quaternary care referral academic medical center. Topics include equipment requirements, applicable clinical standards and multidisciplinary collaboration. Patient flow arrangements for both outpatients and inpatients, from pre-operative care to discharge/disposition are highlighted. The importance of effective business planning, personnel training, leadership, communication, teambuilding, quality of care and patient safety are also discussed.

Advanced Monitoring Is Associated with Fewer Alarm Events During Planned Moderate Procedure-Related Sedation: A 2-Part Pilot Trial

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Published ahead of print February 1, 2016

Diagnostic and interventional procedures are often facilitated by moderate procedure-related sedation. Many studies support the overall safety of this sedation; however, adverse cardiovascular and respiratory events are reported in up to 70% of these procedures, more frequently in very young, very old, or sicker patients. Monitoring with pulse oximetry may underreport hypoventilation during sedation, particularly if supplemental oxygen is provided. Capnometry may result in false alarms during sedation when patients mouth breathe or displace sampling devices. Advanced monitor use during sedation may allow event detection before complications develop. This 2-part pilot study used advanced monitors during planned moderate sedation to (1) determine incidences of desaturation, low respiratory rate, and deeper than intended sedation alarm events; and (2) determine whether advanced monitor use is associated with fewer alarm events.