Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration With a 19-G Needle Device

Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Aspiration With a 19-Gauge Needle vs 21- and 22-Gauge Needles for Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is commonly used to evaluate mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Studies focusing on malignant lymphadenopathy have compared 21- and 22-gauge (21G and 22G, respectively) needles and have not identified an advantage of one needle size over the other in terms of diagnostic yield.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does the 19-gauge (19G) EBUS needle offer greater diagnostic yield and sensitivity vs the 21G and 22G EBUS needles for a diagnosis of sarcoidosis, lymphoma, or mediastinal lymphadenopathy not yet diagnosed?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This study retrospectively examined records of 730 patients from the Stather Canadian Outcomes Registry for Chest Procedures (SCOPE) database who underwent EBUS-TBNA for a diagnosis of suspected sarcoidosis, lymphoma, or mediastinal lymphadenopathy not yet diagnosed. A propensity score analysis of two groups was performed. One group comprised patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA with a 19G needle, the other with a 21G or 22G needle. Cases for analysis were selected with a 1:2 ratio of 19G vs 21/22G using logistic regression and random matching with all eligible 19G cases included.

RESULTS

There were 137 patients (312 targets) in the 19G group and 274 patients (631 targets) in the 21/22G group in the propensity score analysis. The diagnostic yield was 107 of 137 (78.1%) in the 19G group vs 194 of 274 (70.8%) in the 21/22G group (difference, 7.3%; 95% CI, -1.9 to 15.6; P = .116). The sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA for sarcoidosis was 80 of 84 (95.2%) in the 19G group vs 150 of 156 (96.2%) in the 21/22G group (difference, 1.0%; 95% CI, -4.2 to 8.2; P = .71). In patients with a final diagnosis of lymphoma, EBUS was diagnostic in 10 of 13 (76.9%) in the 19G group vs 12 of 12 (100%) in the 21/22G group (difference, 23.1%; 95% CI, -5.4 to 50.3; P = .08).

INTERPRETATION

The study did not identify an advantage of the 19G EBUS needle over the 21/22G EBUS needles for diagnostic yield nor sensitivity for sarcoidosis or lymphoma.

Effect of Needle Size on Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis with Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disease characterized by noncaseating granulomatous inflammation that most commonly involves the lungs. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has become an invaluable tool in the assessment of patients with mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathy. Objective: It has been hypothesized that use of the larger 19-gauge (G) needle with EBUS-TBNA improves diagnostic sensitivity in sarcoidosis. However, it is unclear whether the existing literature supports this supposition. Data Sources: A literature search of Embase and Medline was performed by two reviewers. Included articles were evaluated for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Data Extraction: For quantitative analysis, we performed a meta-analysis using a binary random-effects model to determine pooled sensitivity. Subgroup analysis was performed based on needle size, use of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), study design, and prevalence of sarcoidosis in study group. Synthesis: Sixty-five studies with a total of 4,242 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall pooled sensitivity for diagnosis of sarcoidosis was 83.99% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81.22-86.53) among all studies. The 19G subgroup had a significantly higher sensitivity (93.73%; 95% CI, 89.72-97.74%; I² = 0.00%; P < 0.01) compared with the 21G subgroup (84.61%; 95% CI, 78.80-90.42%; I² = 69.83%), 22G subgroup (84.07%; 95% CI, 80.90-87.24%; I² = 85.21%) or unspecified 21G/22G subgroup (78.85%; 95% CI, 70.81-86.90%; I² = 84.47%). There were no significant differences with use of ROSE or prevalence of sarcoidosis or by study design. Conclusions: The use of 19G needles during EBUS-TBNA had the highest diagnostic sensitivity based on available studies. Further randomized controlled trials using 19G needles should be considered in patients with suspected sarcoidosis.

Does prior mediastinal lymph node aspiration contribute to false-positive positron emission tomography–computed tomography?

Background

Proper staging of the mediastinum is an essential component of lung cancer evaluation. Positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PETCT) and endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) are an integral part of this process. False-positive PETCT results can occur following surgical procedures but has not been demonstrated following EBUS-TBNA. We aimed to determine whether false-positive PETCT rates increase when EBUS-TBNA is performed prior to PETCT.

Study design and methods

A retrospective review was carried out of clinical cases that underwent both PETCT and EBUS-TBNA within 30 days for the suspected malignancy. The impact of test sequence on the PETCT false-positive rate (FPR) was determined using Generalised Estimating Equation logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 675 lymph node stations were sampled and imaged on PETCT. Overall, 332 (49.2%) nodes were sampled by EBUS-TBNA before PETCT, and 343 (50.8%) afterwards, with the interval between EBUS and subsequent PETCT being a mean±sd of 11.6±6.8 days (range 1–29). The FPR on qualitative PETCT for the EBUS first group was 41 (23.2%) out of 164, and for PETCT first it was 57 (29.0%) out of 193 for a difference of 5.8% (95% CI −3.4–14.7, p=0.22). In the regression model, EBUS as the first test was associated with a lower FPR when using the clinical PETCT interpretation.

Interpretation

The performance of EBUS-TBNA sampling did not influence the FPR of PETCT when bronchoscopy took place in the 30 days prior to testing. Test sequence should be selected based on other clinical considerations.

In patients with suspected malignancy undergoing endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) as well as PETCT scan, performing the TBNA prior to PETCT does not increase the rate of false-positive PET scan resultshttps://bit.ly/3gFy6Fi

Tissue Acquisition During EBUS-TBNA: Comparison of Cell Blocks Obtained From a 19G Versus 21G Needle

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that needle gauge size has no significant impact on diagnostic yield during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). Our objective was to determine whether cell blocks obtained via the new Flex 19G EBUS-TBNA needle would contain more cellular material based on cell area compared with those obtained from a 21G needle.

METHODS

A prospective analysis of patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA at our institutions was performed. Sampling of the same lesion(s) with both the Flex 19G and 21G needles was performed in an alternating manner. In total, 47 patients with suspected lung cancer or mediastinal/hilar lymphadenopathy were included with a total of 83 lesions biopsied. Cell block area was calculated using the Aperio ImageScope software.

RESULTS

Mean cell area in the Flex 19G group was 7.34±12.46 mm compared with 5.23±10.73 mm in the 21G group (P=0.02). In the malignant subgroup, the average cell area was 16.16±16.30 mm in the Flex 19G group versus 11.09±15.55 mm in the 21G group (P=0.02). No significant difference was noted in the mean cell area within the nonmalignant subgroup, 1.80±3.01 mm in the 19G group versus 1.56±1.79 mm in the 21G group (P=0.60).

CONCLUSION

The cell area obtained via the 19G needle was significantly larger than that obtained with the 21G needle. Further multicenter randomized studies are needed to identify the utility of the Flex 19G needle in diagnosing/subtyping lymphoproliferative disorders and adequacy for molecular testing in non-small cell lung cancer.

Biopsy needles for mediastinal lymph node sampling by endosonography: current knowledge and future perspectives

Due to the increasing role of endosonography [endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and esophageal ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA)] in the diagnosis of several lung diseases, the knowledge of technical aspects is mandatory to optimize the success of the procedure. Among those technicalities related to the procedure, the choice of a needle over another one-either in terms of dimension and type-may have a role in the diagnostic process, especially in some diseases such as lymphoproliferative disorders. In this review, we analyze the current knowledge about the biopsy needle for endosonography, providing also some hints for the future.