1
|
Porcel JM, Lee YCG. Advances in pleural diseases. Eur Respir J 2024; 63:2400593. [PMID: 38901889 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00593-2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- José M Porcel
- Pleural Medicine and Clinical Ultrasound Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, IRBLleida, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Y C Gary Lee
- University of Western Australia; Institute for Respiratory Health and Respiratory Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lau EPM, Faber S, Charlesworth C, Morey S, Vekaria S, Filion P, Chakera A, Lee YCG. Topical antibiotics prophylaxis for infections of indwelling pleural/peritoneal catheters (TAP-IPC): A pilot study. Respirology 2024; 29:176-182. [PMID: 37696757 DOI: 10.1111/resp.14595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) and indwelling peritoneal catheter (IPeC) have established roles in the management of malignant pleural and peritoneal effusions but catheter-related infections remain a major concern. Topical mupirocin prophylaxis has been shown to reduce peritoneal dialysis catheter infections. This study aimed to assess the (i) compatibility of IPC with mupirocin and (ii) feasibility, tolerability and compliance of topical mupirocin prophylaxis in patients with an IPC or IPeC. METHODS (i) Three preparations of mupirocin were applied onto segments of IPC thrice weekly and examined with scanning electron microscope (SEM) at different time intervals. (ii) Consecutive patients fitted with IPC or IPeC were given topical mupirocin prophylaxis to apply to the catheter exit-site following every drainage/dressing change (at least twice weekly) and followed up for 6 months. RESULTS (i) No detectable structural catheter damage was found with mupirocin applied for up to 6 months. (ii) Fifty indwelling catheters were inserted in 48 patients for malignant pleural (n = 41) and peritoneal (n = 9) effusions. Median follow-up was 121 [median, IQR 19-181] days. All patients tolerated mupirocin well; one patient reported short-term local tenderness. Compliance was excellent with 95.8% of the 989 scheduled doses delivered. Six patients developed catheter-related pleural (n = 3), concurrent peritoneal/local (n = 1) and skin/tract (n = 2) infections from Streptococcus mitis (with Bacillus species or anaerobes), Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. CONCLUSION This first study of long-term prevention of IPC- or IPeC-related infections found topical mupirocin prophylaxis feasible and well tolerated. Its efficacy warrants future randomized studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Estee P M Lau
- Pleural Medicine Unit, Institute for Respiratory Health, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sam Faber
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Chloe Charlesworth
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sue Morey
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sona Vekaria
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Pharmacy, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Pierre Filion
- PathWest Laboratory Medicine, QEII Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Aron Chakera
- Renal Unit, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Y C Gary Lee
- Pleural Medicine Unit, Institute for Respiratory Health, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chaddha U, Porcel JM, Murgu SD. Indwelling pleural catheters or chest drains for managing malignant pleural effusions: a distinction without a difference? Eur Respir J 2024; 63:2302268. [PMID: 38331440 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02268-2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Udit Chaddha
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - José M Porcel
- Pleural Medicine and Clinical Ultrasound Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, IRBLLEIDA, Lleida, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alexander M, Ishisaka Y, Miyakawa L, Rothman A. Assessing Factors That May Impact Physician-based Decisions for Placing Indwelling Pleural Catheters. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol 2024; 31:39-48. [PMID: 37185887 DOI: 10.1097/lbr.0000000000000926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Malignant pleural effusion is a common finding in patients with advanced cancer and is a frequent cause of dyspnea. Current guidelines indicate thoracentesis for symptomatic patients, while indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) are recommended for patients who develop pleural fluid re-accumulation. IPC maintenance, however, requires a significant level of financial and social support. This study aims to analyze potential influencing factors that may play a role in the decision for placing IPCs in patients with recurrent malignant pleural effusions. METHODS This study retrospectively collected baseline sociodemographic and laboratory data in patients who underwent thoracentesis for malignant pleural effusion from August 2016 to October 2021, and selected patients who presented with re-accumulation of pleural fluid within 30 days or had a pulmonary physician's note documenting that IPC is a potential management option. Of these selected patients (IPC candidates), we stratified patients who underwent IPC placement and those who did not, and performed statistical analysis between these 2 groups. RESULTS One hundred seventy-six patients who underwent thoracentesis were regarded as IPC candidates. Almost all baseline sociodemographic characteristics, including ethnicity ( P =0.637), sex ( P =0.655), and marital status ( P =0.773) were similar between the 2 groups, but significantly higher ECOG scores ( P =0.049) were noted in the IPC group. No statistically significant differences were noted in age, body mass index, platelet, PTT, international normalized ratio, creatinine, white blood cell, red blood cells, fluid protein, or fluid lactate dehydrogenase. Fluid albumin ( P =0.057) and serum neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio ( P =0.003) were significantly higher in patients without IPC placement. CONCLUSION This study did not recognize any baseline sociodemographic factors that may contribute to the decision to place IPCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lina Miyakawa
- Department of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Mount Sinai Beth Israel
| | - Adam Rothman
- Department of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Mount Sinai Morningside-West, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Porcel JM, Cordovilla R, Tazi-Mezalek R, Barrios-Barreto D, Pérez-Pallarés J, Novais E Bastos H, Martínez-Tomás R, Flandes-Aldeyturriaga J, Cases-Viedma E, Recalde B, Botana-Rial M. Efficacy and Safety of Indwelling Catheter for Malignant Pleural Effusions Related to Timing of Cancer Therapy: A Systematic Review. Arch Bronconeumol 2023; 59:566-574. [PMID: 37429748 DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2023.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To compare the efficacy and safety of indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) in relation with the timing of systemic cancer therapy (SCT) (i.e., before, during, or after SCT) in patients with malignant pleural effusion (MPE). METHODS Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT), quasi-controlled trials, prospective and retrospective cohorts, and case series of over 20 patients, in which the timing of IPC insertion in relation to that of SCT was provided. Medline (via PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to January 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB) tool for RCTs and the ROB in non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) for non-randomized designs. RESULTS Ten studies (n=2907 patients; 3066 IPCs) were included. Using SCT while the IPC was in situ decreased overall mortality, increased survival time, and improved quality-adjusted survival. Timing of SCT had no effect on the risk of IPC-related infections (2.85% overall), even in immunocompromised patients with moderate or severe neutropenia (relative risk 0.98 [95%CI: 0.93-1.03] for patients treated with the combination of IPC and SCT). The inconsistency of the results or the lack of analysis of all outcome measures in relation to the SCT/IPC timing precluded drawing solid conclusions about time to IPC removal or need of re-interventions. CONCLUSIONS Based on observational evidence, the efficacy and safety of IPC for MPE does not seem to vary depending on the IPC insertion timing (before, during, or after SCT). The data most likely support early IPC insertion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José M Porcel
- Pleural Medicine Unit, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | - Helder Novais E Bastos
- Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal; Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), Universidade do Porto, Portugal; Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | | - Maribel Botana-Rial
- Pulmonary Department, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, EOXI Vigo, Pneumovigo I+I Research Group, Health Research Institute Galicia Sur (IIS Galicia Sur), Vigo, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Porcel JM, Bielsa S, Civit C, Aujayeb A, Janssen J, Bodtger U, Fjaellegaard K, Petersen JK, Welch H, Symonds J, Mitchell MA, Grabczak EM, Ellayeh M, Addala D, Wrightson JM, Rahman NM, Munavvar M, Koegelenberg CF, Labarca G, Mei F, Maskell N, Bhatnagar R. Clinical characteristics of chylothorax: results from the International Collaborative Effusion database. ERJ Open Res 2023; 9:00091-2023. [PMID: 37850216 PMCID: PMC10577597 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00091-2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Chylothorax is an uncommon medical condition for which limited data are available regarding the contemporary aetiology, management and outcomes. The goal of this study was to better define these poorly characterised features. Methods The medical records of adult patients diagnosed with chylothorax at 12 centres across Europe, America and South Africa from 2009-2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed. Results 77 patients (median age 69 years, male to female ratio 1.5) were included. Subacute dyspnoea was the most typical presenting symptom (66%). The commonest cause of chylothorax was malignancy (68.8%), with lymphoma accounting for 62% of these cases. Other aetiologies were trauma (13%), inflammatory/miscellaneous conditions (11.7%) and idiopathic cases (6.5%). At the initial thoracentesis, the pleural fluid appeared milky in 73%, was exudative in 89% and exhibited triglyceride concentrations >100 mg·dL-1 in 88%. Lymphangiography/lymphoscintigraphy were rarely ordered (3%), and demonstration of chylomicrons in pleural fluid was never ascertained. 67% of patients required interventional pleural procedures. Dietary measures were infrequently followed (36%). No patient underwent thoracic duct ligation or embolisation. Morbidity included infections (18%), and thrombosis in malignant aetiologies (16%). The 1-year mortality was 47%. Pleural fluid protein >3.5 mg·dL-1 (sub-distribution hazard ratio (SHR) 4.346) or lactate dehydrogenase <500 U·L-1 (SHR 10.21) increased the likelihood of effusion resolution. Pleural fluid protein ≤3.5 mg·dL-1 (HR 4.047), bilateral effusions (HR 2.749) and a history of respiratory disease (HR 2.428) negatively influenced survival. Conclusion Chylothoraces have a poor prognosis and most require pleural interventions. Despite the standard recommendations, lymphatic imaging is seldom used, nor are dietary restrictions followed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José M. Porcel
- Pleural Medicine Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, IRBLleida, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Silvia Bielsa
- Pleural Medicine Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, IRBLleida, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Carmen Civit
- Pleural Medicine Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, IRBLleida, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Avinash Aujayeb
- Respiratory Department, Northumbria Healthcare Foundation Trust, Cramlington, UK
| | - Julius Janssen
- Respiratory Department, Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Uffe Bodtger
- Respiratory Research Unit PLUZ, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark
| | - Katrine Fjaellegaard
- Respiratory Research Unit PLUZ, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark
| | - Jesper Koefod Petersen
- Respiratory Research Unit PLUZ, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark
| | - Hugh Welch
- Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Respiratory Department, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Jenny Symonds
- Respiratory Department, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael A. Mitchell
- Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | | | - Mohamed Ellayeh
- Department of Chest Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Dinesh Addala
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - John M. Wrightson
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Najib M. Rahman
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Mohammed Munavvar
- Respiratory Department, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Preston, UK
- University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Coenraad F.N. Koegelenberg
- Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Gonzalo Labarca
- Division of Internal Medicine, Complejo Asistencial Dr Víctor Ríos Ruiz, Los Angeles, Chile
- Molecular and Translational Immunology Laboratory, Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidad de Concepcion, Concepcion, Chile
| | - Federico Mei
- Respiratory Disease Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Ancona, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Nick Maskell
- Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Respiratory Department, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Rahul Bhatnagar
- Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Respiratory Department, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Porcel JM. Expert Review on Contemporary Management of Common Benign Pleural Effusions. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2023. [PMID: 37263288 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1769096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) and cirrhosis are frequently associated with pleural effusions (PEs). Despite their apparently benign nature, both HF-related effusions and hepatic hydrothorax (HH) have poor prognosis because they represent an advanced stage of the disease. Optimization of medical therapy in these two entities involve not only the use of diuretics, but also other pharmacological therapies. For instance, all HF patients with reduced or mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction can benefit from angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, beta blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. Conversely, it is better for HH patients to avoid nonselective beta blockers. Refractory cardiac- and cirrhosis-related PEs are commonly managed by iterative therapeutic thoracentesis. When repeated aspirations are needed, thereby diminishing quality of life, the insertion of an indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) may be warranted. However, in selected HH patients who are diuretic-resistant or diuretic-intractable, placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts should be considered as a bridge to liver transplantation, whereas in transplant candidates the role of IPC is debatable. Another benign condition, pleural tuberculosis (TB) is a serious health problem in developing countries. Diagnostic certainty is still a concern due to the paucibacillary nature of the infection, although the use of more sensitive nucleic acid amplification tests is becoming more widespread. Its treatment is the same as that of pulmonary TB, but the potential drug interactions between antiretroviral and anti-TB drugs in HIV-coinfected patients as well as the current recommended guidelines for the different types of anti-TB drugs resistance should be followed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José M Porcel
- Pleural Medicine Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, IRBLleida, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bedawi EO, Ricciardi S, Hassan M, Gooseman MR, Asciak R, Castro-Añón O, Armbruster K, Bonifazi M, Poole S, Harris EK, Elia S, Krenke R, Mariani A, Maskell NA, Polverino E, Porcel JM, Yarmus L, Belcher EP, Opitz I, Rahman NM. ERS/ESTS statement on the management of pleural infection in adults. Eur Respir J 2023; 61:2201062. [PMID: 36229045 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01062-2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Pleural infection is a common condition encountered by respiratory physicians and thoracic surgeons alike. The European Respiratory Society (ERS) and European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) established a multidisciplinary collaboration of clinicians with expertise in managing pleural infection with the aim of producing a comprehensive review of the scientific literature. Six areas of interest were identified: 1) epidemiology of pleural infection, 2) optimal antibiotic strategy, 3) diagnostic parameters for chest tube drainage, 4) status of intrapleural therapies, 5) role of surgery and 6) current place of outcome prediction in management. The literature revealed that recently updated epidemiological data continue to show an overall upwards trend in incidence, but there is an urgent need for a more comprehensive characterisation of the burden of pleural infection in specific populations such as immunocompromised hosts. There is a sparsity of regular analyses and documentation of microbiological patterns at a local level to inform geographical variation, and ongoing research efforts are needed to improve antibiotic stewardship. The evidence remains in favour of a small-bore chest tube optimally placed under image guidance as an appropriate initial intervention for most cases of pleural infection. With a growing body of data suggesting delays to treatment are key contributors to poor outcomes, this suggests that earlier consideration of combination intrapleural enzyme therapy (IET) with concurrent surgical consultation should remain a priority. Since publication of the MIST-2 study, there has been considerable data supporting safety and efficacy of IET, but further studies are needed to optimise dosing using individualised biomarkers of treatment failure. Pending further prospective evaluation, the MIST-2 regimen remains the most evidence based. Several studies have externally validated the RAPID score, but it requires incorporating into prospective intervention studies prior to adopting into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eihab O Bedawi
- Oxford Pleural Unit, Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sara Ricciardi
- Unit of Thoracic Surgery, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
- PhD Program Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maged Hassan
- Chest Diseases Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Michael R Gooseman
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Rachelle Asciak
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| | - Olalla Castro-Añón
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Lucus Augusti University Hospital, EOXI Lugo, Cervo y Monforte de Lemos, Lugo, Spain
- C039 Biodiscovery Research Group HULA-USC, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Karin Armbruster
- Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary Medicine, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martina Bonifazi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
- Respiratory Diseases Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Ospedali Riuniti", Ancona, Italy
| | - Sarah Poole
- Department of Pharmacy and Medicines Management, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Elinor K Harris
- Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Stefano Elia
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
- Thoracic Surgical Oncology Programme, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Rafal Krenke
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Diseases and Allergy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Alessandro Mariani
- Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart Institute (InCor) do Hospital das Clnicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Nick A Maskell
- Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Eva Polverino
- Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Institut de Recerca Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jose M Porcel
- Pleural Medicine Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Lonny Yarmus
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elizabeth P Belcher
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Isabelle Opitz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Najib M Rahman
- Oxford Pleural Unit, Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Chinese Academy of Medical Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang M, Sparrow K, Chan C, Gillson A, Stollery D, Li P. Effect of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapies on removal of indwelling pleural catheters in non-small cell lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusions. Respir Med 2023; 206:107093. [PMID: 36549515 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.107093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2022] [Revised: 11/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) are a mainstay therapy for malignant pleural effusions (MPEs). Many patients treated with IPCs achieve pleurodesis. We aimed to identify the effect of systemic therapies for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on IPC removal in patients with associated MPEs. METHODS We completed a retrospective cohort study of adult IPC recipients with metastatic NSCLC at the pleural effusion clinic at the Royal Alexandra Hospital from 2009 to 2020. We used logistic regression to assess the rates of IPC removal and Cox regression to assess the time to IPC removal. RESULTS 232 patients met inclusion criteria with 248 IPCs reviewed. The overall pleurodesis rate was 42.7% with a median time to pleurodesis of 68 (IQR 38-140) days. In univariate analysis, chemotherapy (OR 1.86, CI 0.99-3.49) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) targeted therapy (OR 3.81, CI 1.86-7.79) were associated with higher rates of pleurodesis. In multivariate analysis, increased rates of pleurodesis were associated with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) of ≤2 (OR 4.82, CI 2.24-10.37) and EGFR targeted therapy (OR 3.87, CI 1.80-8.32). Earlier IPC removal was associated with EGFR targeted therapy in both univariate (HR 1.84, CI 1.20-2.83) and multivariate analysis (HR 1.86, CI 1.19-2.92). CONCLUSIONS Treatment with EGFR targeted therapy is associated with increased rates and earlier removal of IPC in patients with NSCLC in our cohort. Further large cohort studies are required to determine if this relationship persists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Wang
- Department of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Kaitlin Sparrow
- Department of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Chrystal Chan
- Department of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Ashley Gillson
- Department of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Daniel Stollery
- Department of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Pen Li
- Department of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Recuero Díaz JL, Figueroa Almánzar S, Gálvez Muñoz C, Lázaro Sierra J, López Porras M, Márquez Medina D, Nabal Vicuña M, Sánchez Moreno L, González Cantalejo M, Porcel JM. Recommendations of the Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery for the management of malignant pleural effusion. Cir Esp 2022; 100:673-683. [PMID: 35667609 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2022.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
This article summarizes the clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) sponsored by the Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery (SECT). Ten clinical controversies were elaborated under the methodology of PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) questions and the quality of the evidence and grading of the strength of the recommendations was based on the GRADE system. Immunocytochemical and molecular analyses of pleural fluid may avoid further invasive diagnostic procedures. Currently, the definitive control of MPE can be achieved either by pleurodesis (talc poudrage or slurry) or the insertion of a indwelling pleural catheter (IPC). It is likely that the combination of both techniques (i.e., thoracoscopy with talc poudrage and insertion of a IPC, or instillation of talc slurry through a IPC) will have a predominant role in the future therapeutic management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Luis Recuero Díaz
- Servicio de Cirugía Torácica, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IIS) de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain.
| | | | - Carlos Gálvez Muñoz
- Servicio de Cirugía Torácica, Hospital Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Javier Lázaro Sierra
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IIS) de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain; Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Royo Villanova, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Marta López Porras
- Servicio de Cirugía Torácica, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Diego Márquez Medina
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IIS) de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain; Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - María Nabal Vicuña
- Cuidados Paliativos, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
| | - Laura Sánchez Moreno
- Servicio de Cirugía Torácica, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - Mar González Cantalejo
- Servicio de Información Biomédica y Biblioteca, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - José M Porcel
- Unidad de Medicina Pleural, Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain; Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida Fundació Dr. Pifarré (IRBLleida), Lleida, Spain; Universitat de Lleida, Lleida. Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang S, Zhang R, Wan C, Qin J, Hu X, Shen Y, Chen L, Wen F. Incidence of complications from indwelling pleural catheter for pleural effusion: A meta-analysis. Clin Transl Sci 2022; 16:104-117. [PMID: 36253892 PMCID: PMC9841307 DOI: 10.1111/cts.13430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) is widely used in patients with pleural effusion (PE). This meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively summarize the clinical complication from IPC. We searched four large electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library) for potentially relevant studies and assessed the included studies' quality using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies' criteria. Extracted data were used to pool rates, and to conduct subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Forty-one studies involving a cumulative 4983 patients with 5650 IPCs were included in this meta-analysis. The overall incidence of IPC complications was 20.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.0-26.3). The top four complications were: overall infection incidence 5.7% (95% CI: 0.7-2.4); overall catheter abnormality incidence 4.4% (95% CI: 2.8-6.3); pain incidence 1.2% (95% CI: 0.4-2.4); and overall loculation incidence 0.9% (95% CI: 0.1-2.1). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses for overall complications and infections by country, PE site, and PE type demonstrated these factors did not contribute significantly to heterogeneity. Further subgroup analyses for infection of benign PE showed that the overall infection incidence (12.6% [95% CI: 8.1-17.8] vs 0.7% [95% CI: 0.0-4.5]) and empyema incidence (9.1% [95% CI: 5.3-13.8] vs 0.0% [95% CI: 0.0-2.3]) of patients with liver-related PE were significantly higher than that of patients with heart-related PE. Our meta-analysis showed reliable pooled incidences of IPC-related complications, with infection being the most common. These results serve to remind clinicians about the incidence of IPC-related complications and emphasize the importance of taking corresponding preventive and therapeutic steps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuyan Wang
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineDivision of Pulmonary Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy of ChinaWest China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Rui Zhang
- Department of Medical InformaticsWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Chun Wan
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineDivision of Pulmonary Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy of ChinaWest China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Jiangyue Qin
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineDivision of Pulmonary Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy of ChinaWest China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Xueru Hu
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineDivision of Pulmonary Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy of ChinaWest China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Yongchun Shen
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineDivision of Pulmonary Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy of ChinaWest China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Lei Chen
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineDivision of Pulmonary Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy of ChinaWest China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Fuqiang Wen
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineDivision of Pulmonary Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy of ChinaWest China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Porcel JM. Nonmalignant Pleural Effusions. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2022; 43:570-582. [PMID: 36104027 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
Although the potential causes of nonmalignant pleural effusions are many, the management of a few, including complicated pleural infections and refractory heart failure and hepatic hydrothoraces, can be challenging and requires the assistance of interventional pulmonologists. A pragmatic approach to complicated parapneumonic effusions or empyemas is the insertion of a small-bore chest tube (e.g., 14-16 Fr) through which fibrinolytics (e.g., urokinase and alteplase) and DNase are administered in combination. Therapeutic thoracenteses are usually reserved for small to moderate effusions that are expected to be completely aspirated at a single time, whereas video-assisted thoracic surgery should be considered after failure of intrapleural enzyme therapy. Refractory cardiac and liver-induced pleural effusions portend a poor prognosis. In cases of heart failure-related effusions, therapeutic thoracentesis is the first-line palliative therapy. However, if it is frequently needed, an indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) is recommended. In patients with hepatic hydrothorax, repeated therapeutic thoracenteses are commonly performed while a multidisciplinary decision on the most appropriate definitive management is taken. The percutaneous creation of a portosystemic shunt may be used as a bridge to liver transplantation or as a potential definitive therapy in nontransplant candidates. In general, an IPC should be avoided because of the high risk of complications, particularly infections, that may jeopardize candidacy for liver transplantation. Even so, in noncandidates for liver transplant or surgical correction of diaphragmatic defects, IPC is a therapeutic option as valid as serial thoracenteses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José M Porcel
- Pleural Medicine Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, IRBLleida, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Recuero Díaz JL, Figueroa Almánzar S, Gálvez Muñoz C, Lázaro Sierra J, López Porras M, Márquez Medina D, Nabal Vicuña M, Sánchez Moreno L, González Cantalejo M, M. Porcel J. Recomendaciones de la Sociedad Española de Cirugía Torácica para el manejo del derrame pleural maligno. Cir Esp 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2022.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
14
|
Porcel JM. Mesotelioma pleural. Med Clin (Barc) 2022; 159:240-247. [DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2022.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
15
|
Gilbert CR, Porcel JM. Management of recurrent transudative pleural effusions: can we REDUCE unnecessary interventions? Eur Respir J 2022; 59:59/2/2101942. [PMID: 35210303 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01942-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher R Gilbert
- Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.,Center for Lung Cancer Research in Honor of Wayne Gittinger, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - José M Porcel
- Pleural Medicine Unit, Dept of Internal Medicine, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, IRBLleida, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sundaralingam A, Bedawi EO, Harriss EK, Munnavar M, Rahman NM. The Frequency, Risk Factors and Management of Complications from Pleural Procedures. Chest 2021; 161:1407-1425. [PMID: 34896096 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.11.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Pleural disease is a common presentation and spans a heterogenous population across broad disease entities but a common feature is the requirement for interventional procedures. Despite the frequency of such procedures, there is little consensus on rates of complications and risk factors associated with such complications. Here follows a narrative review based on a structured search of the literature. Searches were limited to 2010 onwards, in recognition of the sea-change in procedural complications following the mainstream use of thoracic ultrasound (US). Procedures of interest were limited to thoracocentesis, intercostal drains (ICD), indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) and local anaesthetic thoracoscopy (LAT). 4308 studies were screened, to identify 48 studies for inclusion. Iatrogenic pneumothorax (PTX) remains the commonest complication following thoracocentesis: 3.3% (95% CI, 3.2-3.4), though PTX requiring intervention was rare: 0.3% (95% CI, 0.2-0.4) when the procedure was US guided. Drain blockage and displacement are the commonest complications following ICD insertion (6.3%, and 6.8%, respectively). IPC related infections can be a significant problem: 5.8% (95% CI, 5.1-6.7), however most cases can be managed without removal of the IPC. LAT has an overall mortality of 0.1% (95% CI, 0.03-0.3). Data on safety and complication rates in procedural interventions are limited by methodological problems and novel methods to study this topic bears consideration. Whilst complications remain rare events, once encountered, they have the potential to rapidly escalate. It is of paramount importance for operators to prepare and have in place plans for such events, to ensure high quality and above all, safe care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anand Sundaralingam
- Oxford Pleural Unit, Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Churchill Hospital.
| | - Eihab O Bedawi
- Oxford Pleural Unit, Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Churchill Hospital
| | | | | | - Najib M Rahman
- Oxford Pleural Unit, Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Churchill Hospital; University of Oxford, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Miller RJ, Chrissian AA, Lee YCG, Rahman NM, Wahidi MM, Tremblay A, Hsia DW, Almeida FA, Shojaee S, Mudambi L, Belanger AR, Bedi H, Gesthalter YB, Gaynor M, MacKenney KL, Lewis SZ, Casal RF. AABIP Evidence-informed Guidelines and Expert Panel Report for the Management of Indwelling Pleural Catheters. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol 2020; 27:229-245. [PMID: 32804745 DOI: 10.1097/lbr.0000000000000707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While the efficacy of Indwelling pleural catheters for palliation of malignant pleural effusions is supported by relatively robust evidence, there is less clarity surrounding the postinsertion management. METHODS The Trustworthy Consensus-Based Statement approach was utilized to develop unbiased, scientifically valid guidance for the management of patients with malignant effusions treated with indwelling pleural catheters. A comprehensive electronic database search of PubMed was performed based on a priori crafted PICO questions (Population/Intervention/Comparator/Outcomes paradigm). Manual searches of the literature were performed to identify additional relevant literature. Dual screenings at the title, abstract, and full-text levels were performed. Identified studies were then assessed for quality based on a combination of validated tools. Appropriateness for data pooling and formation of evidence-based recommendations was assessed using predetermined criteria. All panel members participated in development of the final recommendations utilizing the modified Delphi technique. RESULTS A total of 7 studies were identified for formal quality assessment, all of which were deemed to have a high risk of bias. There was insufficient evidence to allow for data pooling and formation of any evidence-based recommendations. Panel consensus resulted in 11 ungraded consensus-based recommendations. CONCLUSION This manuscript was developed to provide clinicians with guidance on the management of patients with indwelling pleural catheters placed for palliation of malignant pleural effusions. Through a systematic and rigorous process, management suggestions were developed based on the best available evidence with augmentation by expert opinion when necessary. In addition, these guidelines highlight important gaps in knowledge which require further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell J Miller
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Naval Medical Center San Diego
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego
| | - Ara A Chrissian
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda
| | - Y C Gary Lee
- Centre for Respiratory Research, School of Medicine
- Institute for Respiratory Health, University of Western Australia
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
- Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Najib M Rahman
- Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Momen M Wahidi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham
| | - Alain Tremblay
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - David W Hsia
- Harbor-University of California Los Angeles Medical Center
- Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-University of California Los Angeles, Torrance
| | | | - Samira Shojaee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Lakshmi Mudambi
- Section of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, VA Portland Health Care System
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Adam R Belanger
- Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Harmeet Bedi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford
| | - Yaron B Gesthalter
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Karen L MacKenney
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Roberto F Casal
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Malignant Pleural Effusion: Diagnosis and Management. Can Respir J 2020; 2020:2950751. [PMID: 33273991 PMCID: PMC7695997 DOI: 10.1155/2020/2950751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 07/05/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Symptomatic malignant pleural effusion is a common clinical problem. This condition is associated with very high mortality, with life expectancy ranging from 3 to 12 months. Studies are contributing evidence on an increasing number of therapeutic options (therapeutic thoracentesis, thoracoscopic pleurodesis or thoracic drainage, indwelling pleural catheter, surgery, or a combination of these therapies). Despite the availability of therapies, the management of malignant pleural effusion is challenging and is mainly focused on the relief of symptoms. The therapy to be administered needs to be designed on a case-by-case basis considering patient's preferences, life expectancy, tumour type, presence of a trapped lung, resources available, and experience of the treating team. At present, the management of malignant pleural effusion has evolved towards less invasive approaches based on ambulatory care. This approach spares the patient the discomfort caused by more invasive interventions and reduces the economic burden of the disease. A review was performed of the diagnosis and the different approaches to the management of malignant pleural effusion, with special emphasis on their indications, usefulness, cost-effectiveness, and complications. Further research is needed to shed light on the current matters of controversy and help establish a standardized, more effective management of this clinical problem.
Collapse
|
19
|
Rendón-Ramírez EJ, Cedillo-Huerta HE, Colunga-Pedraza PR, Renpenning-Carrasco EW, Mercado-Longoria R, González-Guerrero JF, Porcel JM. An Inexpensive Way to Drain Malignant Effusions With Indwelling Pleural Catheters and Its Impact on Performance Status and Pleurodesis. Experience from a Tertiary Hospital in México. OPEN RESPIRATORY ARCHIVES 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.opresp.2020.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
|
20
|
Porcel JM. PLEASE, take a deep breath. Eur Respir J 2020; 55:55/5/2000501. [PMID: 32409425 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00501-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2020] [Accepted: 02/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- José M Porcel
- Pleural Medicine Unit, Dept of Internal Medicine, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, IRBLleida, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| |
Collapse
|