Physicians’ Awareness, Attitudes, and Experiences Regarding Imiquimod Treatment of Vaginal and Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Construction of ceRNA network and key gene screening in cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to construct an endogenous competition network for cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions using differential gene screening.

METHODS

GSE149763 was used to screen differentially expressed long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and mRNAs to predict correlated microRNAs (miRNAs). The correlated miRNAs and GSE105409 were used to screen differentially expressed miRNAs for differential co-expression analysis, and the co-expressed differentially expressed miRNAs were used to predict correlated mRNAs. Differentially expressed mRNAs, miRNAs, and lncRNAs were visualized, and differential gene screening, enrichment, and pathway analysis were performed.

RESULTS

The ceRNA network of cervical squamous intraepithelial was successfully established and a potential differentially expressed network was identified. The key genes were VEGFA and FOS, and the key pathway was the MAPK signaling pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

The differential expression and potential effects of the lncRNA BACH1-IT1/miR-140-5p/VEGFA axis, key genes, VEGFA and FOS, and MAPK signaling in CIN were clarified, and the occurrence and potential effects of CIN were further clarified. The underlying molecular mechanism provides a certain degree of reference for subsequent treatments and experimental research.

Topical Imiquimod Treatment of High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (TOPIC-3): A Nonrandomized Multicenter Study

Topical imiquimod could be an alternative, noninvasive, treatment modality for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). However, evidence is limited, and there are no studies that compared treatment effectiveness and side effects of topical imiquimod cream to standard large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) treatment. A multi-center, nonrandomized controlled trial was performed among women with a histologic diagnosis of CIN 2/3. Women were treated with either vaginal imiquimod (6.25 mg 3 times weekly for 8 to 16 wk) or LLETZ according to their own preference. Successful treatment was defined as the absence of high-grade dysplasia at the first follow-up interval after treatment (at 20 wk for the imiquimod group and at 26 wk for the LLETZ group). Secondary outcome measures were high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) clearance, side effects, and predictive factors for successful imiquimod treatment. Imiquimod treatment was successful in 60% of women who completed imiquimod treatment and 95% of women treated with LLETZ. hrHPV clearance occurred in 69% and 67% in the imiquimod group and LLETZ group, respectively. This study provides further evidence on topical imiquimod cream as a feasible and safe treatment modality for high-grade CIN. Although the effectiveness is considerably lower than LLETZ treatment, imiquimod treatment could prevent initial surgical treatment in over 40% of women and should be offered to a selected population of women who wish to avoid (repeated) surgical treatment of high-grade CIN.

Imiquimod for vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia 2-3: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The treatment strategy for vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN) 2-3 has not been established. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of imiquimod in VaIN 2-3.

METHODS

Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched from their inception until October 2019 and articles reporting imiquimod treatment for VaIN 2-3 were extracted. Additionally, the clinical records of women with VaIN 2-3 who had been treated with imiquimod in Shizuoka General Hospital from January 2016 to May 2020 were investigated. The data from the systematic search and the data from our hospital were analyzed, and a pooled complete response (CR) rate and response rate of imiquimod treatment for VaIN 2-3 were estimated. As a subgroup analysis, the CR rates and response rates were compared between women with and without a history of hysterectomy, and the rate ratio was calculated.

RESULTS

Five articles described 28 women with VaIN 2-3 who underwent imiquimod treatment, and nine women with VaIN 2-3 were treated with imiquimod in our hospital. The discontinuation of the treatment was required in only one patient of the reported cases. The pooled CR rate and response rate of imiquimod, regardless of a history of hysterectomy, was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.59-0.87) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.71-0.97), respectively. In the subgroup analysis, the CR rate in patients with hysterectomy was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.11-1.0) and in those without hysterectomy was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.30-0.84), and the rate ratio was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.48-1.19). The pooled response rates with and without a history of hysterectomy were not estimated, and the rate ratio was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.54-1.09).

CONCLUSION

Imiquimod can be an effective treatment for vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia 2-3.

Recurrent vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia successfully treated with topical imiquimod: A case report

Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN) is a rare disease associated with human papillomavirus infection. High-grade VAIN is typically treated with either excisional or ablative therapy. However, recurrent VAIN lesions are common and these treatments cause vaginal scarring. Recent studies have indicated that 5% imiquimod is an effective treatment for VAIN. The present report describes a case of a woman diagnosed with recurrent VAIN 3 who was treated with a 5% topical imiquimod cream and achieved a complete response after excision and CO₂ laser vaporization. A 53-year-old, gravida 5, para 2 postmenopausal woman who was diagnosed with papillary squamous cell carcinoma by biopsy underwent conization, total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. A histological examination revealed grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with free surgical margins. At 3 years after the hysterectomy, the vaginal smear revealed atypical squamous cells, leading to a pathological diagnosis of VAIN 3. Partial vaginectomy was performed, and VAIN 3 was detected in the lesion with positive margins. At 4 months into follow-up, the vaginal smear revealed a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), and subsequent biopsy during colposcopy revealed a pathological diagnosis of VAIN 3. At 3 months after CO₂ laser vaporization, the vaginal smear revealed HSIL with suspected recurrence and imiquimod treatment was initiated. One sachet of 5% imiquimod cream (0.25 g) was placed in the entire vagina three times per week for 14 weeks with no apparent complications. At 3 years after the treatment, there has been no recurrence. This case demonstrated that topical imiquimod with careful follow-up is an effective treatment for VAIN and is well-tolerated. Further clinical evidence of the effectiveness and safety of imiquimod in patients diagnosed with VAIN is required.

Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Patients Preferences for Surgery or Immunotherapy with Imiquimod

Imiquimod has been studied as a noninvasive pharmacological treatment alternative to large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), to prevent long-term obstetric complications from surgical treatment. This study aims to investigate womens' preferences for treatment of high-grade CIN with imiquimod or LLETZ. A labeled discrete choice experiment was conducted among 100 women with abnormal cervical cytology in 5 hospitals in the Netherlands between March 2014 and December 2015. Participants were asked to choose between imiquimod treatment or standard surgical treatment in 9 separate scenarios, based on the following treatment characteristics: treatment success rate, rate of side effects, risk of premature birth in subsequent pregnancies, and risk of subfertility after treatment. The levels of these characteristics differed for the imiquimod alternatives. Women assigned a positive utility to LLETZ compared with imiquimod. When making a choice for imiquimod, women preferred a higher treatment success rate and a lower risk of premature birth, infertility and side effects. The choice for imiquimod treatment was also influenced by the intention of a future pregnancy. Subgroup analyses revealed that a lower efficacy regarding imiquimod might be more acceptable for women who desired a future pregnancy compared with women who did not desire a future pregnancy. Women with a future pregnancy wish may prefer treatment of high-grade CIN with imiquimod cream over LLETZ, if the risk of subfertility and premature birth is low.