Efficacy of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination 4 Years After Conization for High-Grade Cervical Neoplasia

Treatment characteristics, HPV genotype distribution and risk of subsequent disease among women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Europe: A systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

High-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), a premalignant lesion of the uterine cervix, is caused by persistent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection. CIN can be identified through screening programs and high-grade CIN is usually treated by ablation or excision. This study aimed to summarize the clinical management and outcomes among women with high-grade CIN in Europe.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify treatment methods and their frequency of use, report HPV genotype prevalence and distribution and summarize patterns for subsequent lesions after primary treatment, among women with high-grade CIN in Europe. Embase®, MEDLINE® and Cochrane databases were searched (1st January 2012 to 30th August 2022), along with relevant conference proceedings (2018-2022), inclusive. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) compliant methodology was adopted. Eligibility criteria included non-immunosuppressed female patients with CIN2+ from Europe (published in English).

RESULTS

In total, n = 55 studies were included. CIN excisional therapy was the most received treatment approach (15.8-100 %, loop electrosurgical excision procedure/large loop excision of the transformation zone most common), followed by ablative therapies (1-43.3 %, cold coagulation most common). Other approaches included 'wait and watch' (4.8-52.6 %) and hysterectomy (4.8-16.2 %). HPV positivity rates ranged from 67.8-100 % pre-conization and 4.7-32.8 % post-conization. The most prevalent HPV genotypes reported (both pre- and post-treatment) were HPV16 and HPV18. In patients who received excisional or ablative procedures subsequent CIN was most frequently diagnosed ≤6 months after treatment. The overall rate of subsequent CIN reported was 0.5-20.9 %.

CONCLUSION

Conization and ablation were the most common techniques, however, these procedures were associated with sub-optimal outcomes. Close clinical follow-up is important due to the risk of subsequent CIN or invasive cancer. This review serves as a reference point for the comparison of future treatment patterns as they evolve across Europe, following improved implementation of prophylactic HPV vaccination and screening.

Post-Conization HPV Vaccination and Its Impact on Viral Status: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Troms and Finnmark, 2022

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is associated with cellular changes in the cervix leading to cancer, which highlights the importance of vaccination in preventing HPV infections and subsequent cellular changes. Women undergoing the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), a treatment for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+), remain at risk of recurrence. This study assessed the effect of post-conization HPV vaccination on the viral status of women at six months post-conization, aiming to evaluate the vaccine's effectiveness in preventing recurrence of CIN2+. A retrospective cohort study was conducted among women in Troms and Finnmark who underwent conization in 2022. Using the SymPathy database and the national vaccination register (SYSVAK), we analyzed the vaccination statuses and HPV test results of women born before 1991, who had not received the HPV vaccine prior to conization. Out of 419 women undergoing conization, 243 met the inclusion criteria. A significant association was found between post-conization HPV vaccination and a negative HPV test at six months of follow-up (ARR = 12.1%, p = 0.039). Post-conization HPV vaccination significantly reduced the risk of a positive HPV test at the first follow-up, suggesting its potential in preventing the recurrence of high-grade cellular changes. However, the retrospective design and the insufficient control of confounding variables in this study underscore the need for further studies to confirm these findings.

Timing of HPV vaccination as adjuvant treatment of CIN2+ recurrence in women undergoing surgical excision: a meta-analysis and meta-regression

OBJECTIVE

The main aim was to determine the overall vaccine effectiveness (VE) against recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) including specific VE associated with timing of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination using data from published studies.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis and meta-regression.

DATA SOURCES

A computerised literature search was undertaken using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Derwent Drug File, ProQuest Science and Technology, Cochrane and MedRxiv databases. To be eligible, the studies, with no language restrictions, had to be published between 1 January 2001 and 25 May 2023.

REVIEW METHODS

Included were studies with an unvaccinated reference group that assessed CIN2+ recurrence irrespective of the HPV genotype in women undergoing conisation provided. The present study was carried out in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. The risk of study bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation guidelines were used to assess the strength of evidence for the primary outcome. Data synthesis was conducted using meta-analysis and meta-regression.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 14 322 publications, 20 studies with a total of 21 estimates were included. The overall VE against recurrent CIN2+ irrespective of the HPV genotype achieved 69.5% (95% CI: 54.7% to 79.5%). While the HPV vaccine valency, follow-up duration, type of study including its risk of bias had no effect on VE, the highest VE of 78.1% (95% CI: 68.7% to 84.7%) was reported for women receiving their first dose not earlier than the day of excision. This outcome was supported by additional analyses and a VE prediction interval ranging from 67.1% to 85.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of this meta-analysis and meta-regression convincingly showed the beneficial effect of post-excisional HPV vaccination against CIN2+ recurrence. Studies published to date have been unable to determine whether or not vaccination, completed or initiated before conisation, would be associated with more favourable results.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022353530.

The efficacy of human papillomavirus prophylactic vaccination after conization in preventing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence: A prospective observational study in China

High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection is the cause of most cervical cancers. Since therapeutic vaccines are not yet available for clinical practice, the administration of HPV prophylactic vaccines in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) arouses great interest and its value after excisional treatment of CIN remains unclear. We conducted this prospective cohort study to evaluate the impact of HPV prophylactic vaccination on preventing women from subsequent infection and cervical lesions after excision treatment. 148 patients after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for CIN2+ disease received HPV prophylactic vaccination (6/11/16/18 vaccine, Gardasil®, Merck) after surgery (V-group) and 273 didn't get vaccination (NV-group). The HPV infection rates at the first and second year after LEEP were significantly lower in the V-group than that in NV-group (P = 0.049 and P = 0.026). CIN2+ recurrence was observed in 29 cases (10.62 %) in the NV-group and 2 cases (2.03 %) in the V-group. Logistic regression analysis showed that the HPV16/18 infection, the CIN3 pathology after LEEP and no vaccination after LEEP were significant risk factors of recurrence. Patients without HPV vaccination had a higher CIN2+ recurrence rate (OR = 12.35, 95 % CI 1.919-79.492, P = 0.008). Our study showed the quadrivalent prophylactic HPV vaccination after LEEP had a significantly protective role in the prevention of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion recurrence. Further randomized, controlled trials are required in elucidating the efficacy of the prophylactic HPV vaccines using shortly after LEEP in patients with CIN disease.

Effectiveness of Prophylactic Human Papillomavirus Vaccine in the Prevention of Recurrence in Women Conized for HSIL/CIN 2-3: The VENUS Study

Background: Recent data have shown that the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine could impact on a decrease in high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in women who have undergone surgical treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination against persistent/recurrent disease in patients undergoing conization for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-grade 2-3 (HSIL/CIN 2-3). Methods: From January 2009 to March 2019, 563 patients with HSIL/CIN 2-3 underwent conization. The population was divided into two groups according to vaccination status: vaccinated-group (V-Group) and non-vaccinated-group (NV-Group). Bivalent or quadrivalent vaccines were administered indiscriminately. A follow-up was scheduled every 6–12 months according to clinical guidelines. The mean follow-up was 29.6 vs. 36.5 months in the V-group and NV-group, respectively. Results: 277 (49.2%) women were vaccinated, while 286 (50.8%) were not. Overall, persistent/recurrent HSIL/CIN 2-3 was presented by 12/277 (4.3%) women in the V-Group and 28/286 (9.8%) in the NV-Group (HR: 0.43, 95% Confidence interval 0.22–0.84, p = 0.014). Vaccination was associated with a 57% reduction in HSIL persistence/recurrence after treatment. When no disease was present in the first 6-month follow-up visit, persistence/recurrence rates were very low in both groups: 1.1% in the V-Group vs. 1.5% in the NV-Group (p > 0.05). The factor associated with a high-risk of HSIL persistence/recurrence was the presentation of a positive co-test in the first control after treatment (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our results corroborate the benefit of HPV vaccination in woman treated for HSIL/CIN 2-3, showing a reduction of persistent/recurrent HSIL/CIN 2-3.

If prophylactic HPV vaccination is considered in a woman with CIN2+, what is the value and should it be given before or after the surgical treatment?

Since the introduction of human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination, the number of precancerous lesions has decreased in countries with a high HPV vaccination coverage. Currently women who present with a precancerous cervical lesions (CIN2 + ), are often not vaccinated or not vaccinated with the latest vaccine. Although resection of the precancerous lesion is the standard approach, the guidelines regarding vaccination are not clear. Vaccination will be valuable in reducing the risk of recurrence. Therefore, it is beneficial to understand the importance of vaccination or revaccination with the nonavalent vaccine in these cases. Furthermore, the timing of vaccination, either before or after surgery, should be determined. To answer these questions, twelve studies regarding vaccination and conization were reviewed. The inconsistency of study designs and inclusion criteria between the different studies introduced a considerable risk of bias. Nevertheless, the analysis showed that 43 women needed to be vaccinated and treated for CIN2 + lesions to prevent a recurrence. The ideal timing could not be established, but theoretically vaccination before the start of treatment was most logic. Although the data is not level 1 evidence, these recommendations should be used during counseling in the clinical setting until results of ongoing randomized controlled trials become available.