Update on rifampin and rifabutin drug interactions

Lack of CYP3A4 protein induction despite mRNA induction in primary hepatocytes exposed to rifabutin as a possible explanation for its low interaction risk in vivo

Rifampicin is a strong inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp/ABCB1), leading to profound drug-drug interactions. In contrast, the chemically related rifabutin does not show such pronounced induction properties in vivo. The aim of our study was to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the different induction potentials of rifampicin and rifabutin in primary human hepatocytes and to analyze the mechanism of potential differences. Therefore, we evaluated CYP3A4/ABCB1 mRNA expression (polymerase chain reaction), CYP3A4/P-gp protein expression (immunoaffinity-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, IA-LC-MS/MS), CYP3A4 activity (testosterone hydroxylation), and considered intracellular drug uptake after treatment with increasing rifamycin concentrations (0.01-10 µM). Furthermore, rifamycin effects on the protein levels of CYP2C8, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 were analyzed (IA-LC-MS/MS). Mechanistic analysis included the evaluation of possible suicide CYP3A4 inhibition (IC50 shift assay) and drug impact on translational efficiency (cell-free luminescence assays). Rifabutin accumulated 6- to 15-fold higher in hepatocytes than rifampicin, but induced CYP3A4 mRNA comparably to rifampicin (e. g. rifampicin 61-fold vs. rifabutin 44-fold, 72 h). While rifampicin for example enhanced protein (10 µM: 21-fold) and activity levels considerably (53-fold), rifabutin only slightly increased CYP3A4 protein expression (10 µM: 3.3-fold) or activity (11-fold) compared to rifampicin after 72 h. Both rifamycins similarly influenced expression of other eliminating proteins. A potential CYP3A4 suicide inhibition by a specific rifabutin metabolite or disruption of ribosome function were excluded experimentally. In conclusion, the lack of protein enhancement, could explain rifabutin's weaker induction-related drug-drug interaction risk in vivo.

The differences in drug disposition gene induction by rifampicin and rifabutin are unlikely due to different effects on important pregnane X receptor (NR1I2) splice variants

Rifampicin and rifabutin can activate the pregnane X receptor (PXR, NR1I2), thereby inducing pharmacokinetically important genes/proteins and reducing exposure to co-administered drugs. Because induction effects vary considerably between these antibiotics, differences could be due to unequal rifamycin-induced activation or tissue expression of the three major NR1I2 splice variants, PXR.1 (NM_003889), PXR.2 (NM_022002), and PXR.3 (NM_033013). Consequently, PXR activation (PXR reporter gene assays) and mRNA expression levels of total NR1I2, PXR.1, PXR.2, and PXR.3 were investigated by polymerase chain reaction in colon and liver samples from eleven surgical patients, in LS180 cells, and primary human hepatocytes. Compared to the colon, total NR1I2 mRNA expression was higher in the liver. Both tissues showed similar expression levels of PXR.1 and PXR.3, respectively. PXR.2 was not quantifiable in the colon samples. Rifampicin and rifabutin similarly enhanced PXR.1 and PXR.2 activity when transfected into LS180 cells, while PXR.3 could not be activated. In LS180 cells, rifampicin (10 μM) reduced total NR1I2 and PXR.3 expression 2-fold after 24 h, while rifabutin (10 μM) increased total NR1I2, PXR.1, PXR.2, and PXR.3 mRNA by approx. 50% after 96-h exposure. In primary human hepatocytes, rifampicin (10 μM) suppressed total NR1I2, PXR.1, and PXR.3 after 48-h exposure, and rifabutin (10 μM) had no significant impact on total NR1I2 or any of the splice variants studied. In conclusion, both antibiotics activated the studied PXR splice variants similarly but modified their expression differently. While rifampicin can suppress mRNA of PXR forms, rifabutin rather increases their expression levels.

Advances in Antiretroviral Therapy for Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Associated Tuberculosis

Tuberculosis is one of the most common opportunistic infections and a prominent cause of death in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, in spite of near-universal access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and tuberculosis preventive therapy. For patients with active tuberculosis but not yet receiving ART, starting ART after anti-tuberculosis treatment can complicate clinical management due to drug toxicities, drug-drug interactions and immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) events. The timing of ART initiation has a crucial impact on treatment outcomes, especially for patients with tuberculous meningitis. The principles of ART in patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis are specific and relatively complex in comparison to patients with other opportunistic infections or cancers. In this review, we summarize the current progress in the timing of ART initiation, ART regimens, drug-drug interactions between anti-tuberculosis and antiretroviral agents, and IRIS.

Rifabutin but not rifampicin can partly out-balance P-glycoprotein induction by concurrent P-glycoprotein inhibition through high affinity binding to the inhibitory site

Physiology-based pharmacokinetic modeling suggests that rifabutin can out-balance P-glycoprotein (P-gp) induction by concurrent P-gp inhibition. However, clinical or experimental evidence for this Janus-faced rifabutin effect is missing. Consequently, LS180 cells were exposed to a moderately (2 µM) and strongly (10 µM) P-gp-inducing concentration of rifampicin or rifabutin for 6 days. Cellular accumulation of the fluorescent P-gp substrate rhodamine 123 was evaluated using flow cytometry, either without (induction only) or with adding rifamycin drug to the cells during the rhodamine 123 efflux phase (induction + potential inhibition). Rhodamine 123 accumulation was decreased similarly by both drugs after 6-day exposure (2 µM: 55% residual fluorescence compared to non-induced cells, P < 0.01; 10 µM: 30% residual fluorescence compared to non-induced cells, P < 0.001), indicating P-gp induction. Rhodamine 123 influx transporters mRNA expressions were not affected, excluding off-target effects. Acute re-exposure to rifabutin, however, considerably re-increased rhodamine 123 accumulation (2 µM induction: re-increase by 55%, P < 0.01; 10 µM induction: 49% re-increase, P < 0.001), suggesting P-gp inhibition. In contrast, rifampicin only had weak effects (2 µM induction: no re-increase; 10 µM induction: 16% re-increase; P < 0.05). Molecular docking analysis eventually revealed that rifabutin has a higher binding affinity to the inhibitor binding site of P-gp than rifampicin (ΔG (kcal/mol) = -11.5 vs -5.3). Together, this study demonstrates that rifabutin can at least partly mask P-gp induction by P-gp inhibition, mediated by high affinity binding to the inhibitory site of P-gp.

Comprehensive in vitro analysis evaluating the variable drug-drug interaction risk of rifampicin compared to rifabutin

Compared to rifampicin (600 mg/day), standard doses of rifabutin (300 mg/day) have a lower risk of drug-drug interactions due to induction of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) or P-glycoprotein (Pgp/ABCB1) mediated by the pregnane X receptor (PXR). However, clinical comparisons with equal rifamycin doses or in vitro experiments respecting actual intracellular concentrations are lacking. Thus, the genuine pharmacological differences and the potential molecular mechanisms of the discordant perpetrator effects are unknown. Consequently, the cellular uptake kinetics (mass spectrometry), PXR activation (luciferase reporter gene assays), and impact on CYP3A4 and Pgp/ABCB1 expression and activity (polymerase chain reaction, enzymatic assays, flow cytometry) were evaluated in LS180 cells after treatment with different rifampicin or rifabutin concentrations for variable exposure times and eventually normalized to actual intracellular concentrations. In addition, inhibitory effects on CYP3A4 and Pgp activities were investigated. While rifampicin is poorly taken up by LS180 cells, it strongly activates PXR and leads to enhanced expression and activity of CYP3A4 and Pgp. In contrast, rifabutin is a significantly less potent and less efficient PXR activator and gene inducer, despite sixfold to eightfold higher intracellular accumulation. Finally, rifabutin is a potent inhibitor of Pgp (IC50 = 0.3 µM) compared to rifampicin (IC50 = 12.9 µM). Together, rifampicin and rifabutin significantly differ by their effects on the regulation and function of CYP3A4 and Pgp, even when controlled for intracellular concentrations. Rifabutin's concurrent Pgp inhibitory action might partly compensate the inducing effects, explaining its weaker clinical perpetrator characteristics.

Mycobacteria in Organ Transplant Recipients

This review describes the epidemiology and risk factors of tuberculosis (TB) in solid organ transplant recipients. We discuss the pre-transplant screening for risk of TB and management of latent TB in this population. We also discuss the challenges of management of TB and other difficult to treat mycobacteria such as Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium avium complex. The drugs for the management of these infections include rifamycins which have significant drug interactions with immunosuppressants and must be monitored closely.

Do Anti-Biofilm Antibiotics Have a Place in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis?

The choice of antibiotic regimens for use in patients presenting with diabetic foot osteomyelitis and their duration differs according to the situation. Antibiotics play a more important role in the medical option where no infected bone has been resected, while their role is reduced but not negligible in the case of surgical options. Some studies have reported the presence of biofilm structures in bone samples taken from patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis, which raises the question of the place of anti-biofilm antibiotic regimens in this setting. During the last two decades, clinical studies have suggested a potential benefit for anti-biofilm antibiotics, mainly rifampicin against staphylococci and fluoroquinolones against gram-negative bacilli. However, no data from randomized controlled studies have been reported so far. The present work provides a summary of the available data on the question of the place of anti-biofilm antibiotics for the treatment of diabetic foot osteomyelitis, but also the potential limitations of such treatments.

Pharmacologic management of Mycobacterium chimaera Infections: A Primer for Clinicians

Mycobacterium chimaera, a member of the Mycobacterium avium complex, can cause infections in individuals after open heart surgery due to contaminated heater-cooler units. The diagnosis can be challenging, as the incubation period can be quite variable, and symptoms are nonspecific. In addition to aggressive surgical management, combination pharmacologic therapy is the cornerstone of therapy, which should consist of a macrolide, a rifamycin, ethambutol, and amikacin. Multiple second-line agents may be utilized in the setting of intolerances or toxicities. In vitro susceptibility of these agents is similar to activity against other species in the Mycobacterium avium complex. Drug–drug interactions are frequently encountered, as many individuals have chronic medical comorbidities and are prescribed medications that interact with the first-line agents used to treat M. chimaera. Recognition of these drug–drug interactions and appropriate management are essential for optimizing treatment outcomes.

Validation and application of a quantitative liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay for the analysis of rifapentine and 25-O-desacetyl rifapentine in human milk

A robust analytical method based on liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry was developed and validated to quantify rifapentine and 25-O-desacetyl rifapentine in human breast milk to aid in determining the breastfed infant risk to the excreted drug in human milk. Samples were extracted by a combination of protein precipitation and solid phase extraction using rifampicin-d3 as an internal standard. An Agilent® Poroshell 120 EC-C18 (4.6 mm × 50 mm, 2.7 µm) column was used for chromatographic separation employing an isocratic mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile: methanol: 0.1% formic acid (55/5/40, v/v/v) at a flow rate of 450 µL/min, and with a total run time of four minutes. Mass detection was on an AB Sciex API 4000 mass spectrometer using electrospray ionization in the positive mode and based on multiple reaction monitoring data acquisition. Rifapentine was accurately quantified across a concentration range of 2.00-2000 ng/mL and 25-O-desacetyl rifapentine from 4.00 to 2000 ng/mL. During validation, the inter- and intra-day accuracy and precision at the tested QC concentrations (N = 18) for rifapentine were between 97.4% and 100.6%, and 3.1% and 8.3%, respectively. The inter- and intra-day accuracy and precision for 25-O-desacetyl rifapentine were between 96.4% and 106.3%, and 6.7% and 11.8%, respectively. No significant matrix effects were observed, and the method was shown to be specific for rifapentine and 25-O-desacetyl rifapentine. Human milk samples (N = 22) generated during a phase I/II clinical trial were successfully analysed for rifapentine and 25-O-desacetyl rifapentine using this validated method. Concentrations for rifapentine and 25-O-desacetyl rifapentine in human milk samples (N = 22) ranged from 11.2-1180 ng/mL and 7.11-573 ng/mL, respectively.

In Vitro Activity of Rifabutin against Mycobacterium abscessus, Including Clarithromycin-Insusceptible Multidrug-Resistant Clinical Isolates

The antibiotic options available for Mycobacterium abscessus (M. abscessus) infection are limited and no definitive therapeutic strategies have been formulated. The recent discovery that rifabutin is active against M. abscessus has raised interest in using rifabutin to treat this intractable disease. In this study, we evaluated the in vitro activity of rifabutin against 194 M. abscessus clinical isolates collected during 2012 January to 2017 December. As respected, rifabutin demonstrated considerably lower MICs against M. abscessus, with an MIC₅₀ of 2μg/ml and MIC₉₀ of 4μg/ml, respectively. Notably, the anti-M.abscessus activity was even stronger among clarithromycin-insusceptible strains. In addition, M. abscessus isolates with a rough morphotype were more sensitive to rifabutin compared with those forming smooth colonies when considered as a whole or in separate subspecies. Results from synergistic experiments revealed that the in vitro activity of rifabutin was significantly enhanced by the addition of amikacin, suggesting a promising strategy for M. abscessus infection combination treatment. Finally, five and three mutation patterns in rpoB and arr, respectively, were identified among the 194 strains through whole genome sequencing. However, none of them conferred rifabutin resistance. Our study is among the first to report the susceptibility of M. abscessus to rifabutin in vitro with a large amount of clinical isolates, suggesting that rifabutin is active, both alone and in combination, against M. abscessus and is worth considering as part of a combination treatment regimen for M. abscessus infections.

Moxifloxacin Concentrations in the Knee Joint, Tibial Bone, and Soft Tissue When Combined with Rifampicin: A Randomized Porcine Microdialysis Study

BACKGROUND

Peri and postoperative antibiotics are key adjuvant treatment tools in the management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of rifampicin on the area under the moxifloxacin concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24) in the synovial fluid of the knee joint, tibial bone, and adjacent subcutaneous tissue under steady-state conditions using microdialysis in a porcine model.

METHODS

Twenty female pigs were randomized to receive oral treatment with moxifloxacin monotherapy (Group A, n = 10) of 400 mg once daily for 3 days or a combination therapy (Group B, n = 10) of 400 mg of moxifloxacin once daily for 3 days and 450 mg of rifampicin twice daily for 7 days. Microdialysis was used for sampling the synovial fluid of the knee joint, tibial cancellous and cortical bone, and adjacent subcutaneous tissues. Plasma samples were taken as a reference. Measurements were obtained for 24 hours.

RESULTS

Coadministration of moxifloxacin and rifampicin resulted in reductions of the moxifloxacin AUC0-24 in all targeted tissue compartments by 67% to 85% (p < 0.05). The corresponding change in plasma was 20% (p = 0.49). For both groups, the tissue penetration (the ratio of tissue free fraction AUC0-24 to plasma free fraction AUC0-24 [fAUCtissue/fAUCplasma]) was incomplete in all investigated compartments. The highest moxifloxacin tissue penetration was in the knee joint synovial fluid: 0.59 (Group A) and 0.24 (Group B). The lowest tissue penetration was in the cortical bone: 0.17 (Group A) and 0.03 (Group B).

CONCLUSIONS

We found a significant reduction of the moxifloxacin concentration, expressed as the AUC0-24, in tissues relevant to acute PJI treatment when coadministered with rifampicin.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The concentrations within the targeted tissue compartments were reduced significantly more than the concentrations in plasma, which may be particularly important as plasma concentrations are used in clinical practice to assess moxifloxacin treatment sufficiency.

A Case Report of Excessive Use of Clozapine Combined With Clonazepam

INTRODUCTION

For patients with schizophrenia, clozapine (CLZ) in combination with clonazepam (CLNAZ) is one of the viable therapeutic options. We successfully reduced the doses of CLZ and CLNAZ to the safe range of a polydrug abuse patient. As far as we know, this is the first case of this problem. As there are no relevant guidelines to reduce CLZ or CLNAZ, we hope to share this case to provide a reference for the prevention and treatment of similar patients with multidrug abuse.

CASE PRESENTATION

This case report describes a 46-year-old male with a 24-year history of schizophrenia. His main clinical manifestations are auditory hallucinations, persecutory delusion, and emotional instability. In 2012, the patient started taking rifampicin due to tuberculosis and gradually overused CLZ and CLNAZ. Before admission, he took 1,275 mg of CLZ every day and 26 mg of CLNAZ every night. With the help of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) and pharmacogenetic testing, we gradually reduced his daily dose of CLZ and CLNAZ and formulated a more reasonable dosing schedule for him. At the time of discharge, the patient took CLZ 450 mg per day and CLNAZ 2 mg per night, with no obvious symptoms of psychosis.

CONCLUSION

In the process of drug maintenance treatment of schizophrenia, it is necessary to adopt TDM strategy to reduce and treat the abuse of multiple prescription drugs.

Model-based comparative analysis of rifampicin and rifabutin drug-drug interaction profile

Rifamycins are widely used for treating mycobacterial and staphylococcal infections. Drug-drug interactions (DDI) caused by rifampicin (RIF) is a major issue. We used a model-based approach to predict the magnitude of DDI with RIF and rifabutin (RBT) for 217 cytochrome P450 (CYP) substrates. On average, DDI caused by low-dose RIF were twice more potent than those caused by RBT. Contrary to RIF, RBT appears unlikely to cause severe DDI, even with sensitive CYP substrates.

Inhibition of RNA Polymerase by Rifampicin and Rifamycin-Like Molecules

RNA polymerases (RNAPs) accomplish the first step of gene expression in all living organisms. However, the sequence divergence between bacterial and human RNAPs makes the bacterial RNAP a promising target for antibiotic development. The most clinically important and extensively studied class of antibiotics known to inhibit bacterial RNAP are the rifamycins. For example, rifamycins are a vital element of the current combination therapy for treatment of tuberculosis. Here, we provide an overview of the history of the discovery of rifamycins, their mechanisms of action, the mechanisms of bacterial resistance against them, and progress in their further development.

Safety implications of combined antiretroviral and anti-tuberculosis drugs

Introduction: Antiretroviral and anti-tuberculosis (TB) drugs are often co-administered in people living with HIV (PLWH). Early initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) during TB treatment improves survival in patients with advanced HIV disease. However, safety concerns related to clinically significant changes in drug exposure resulting from drug-drug interactions, development of overlapping toxicities and specific challenges related to co-administration during pregnancy represent barriers to successful combined treatment for HIV and TB.Areas covered: Pharmacokinetic interactions of different classes of ART when combined with anti-TB drugs used for sensitive-, drug-resistant (DR) and latent TB are discussed. Overlapping drug toxicities, implications of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), safety in pregnancy and research gaps are also explored.Expert opinion: New antiretroviral and anti-tuberculosis drugs have been recently introduced and international guidelines updated. A number of effective molecules and clinical data are now available to build treatment regimens for PLWH with latent or active TB. Adopting a systematic approach that also takes into account the need for individualized variations based on the available evidence is the key to successfully integrate ART and TB treatment and improve treatment outcomes.

Role of pharmacogenetics in rifampicin pharmacokinetics and the potential effect on TB–rifampicin sensitivity among Ugandan patients

Background

Suboptimal anti-TB drugs exposure may cause multidrug-resistant TB. The role of African predominant SLCO1B1 variant alleles on rifampicin pharmacokinetics and the subsequent effect on the occurrence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis–rifampicin sensitivity needs to be defined. We describe the rifampicin population pharmacokinetics profile and investigate the relevance of SLCO1B1 genotypes to rifampicin pharmacokinetics and rifampicin-TB sensitivity status.

Methods

Fifty patients with TB (n=25 with rifampicin-resistant TB and n=25 with rifampicin-susceptible TB) were genotyped for SLOC1B1 rs4149032 (g.38664C&gt;T), SLOC1B1*1B (c.388A&gt;G) and SLOC1B1*5 (c.521 T&gt;C). Steady state plasma rifampicin levels were determined among patients infected with rifampicin-sensitive TB. Data were analysed using NONMEM to estimate population rifampicin pharmacokinetics as well as the effect of SLOC1B1 genotypes on rifampicin pharmacokinetics and on rifampicin-TB sensitivity status.

Results

Overall allele frequencies of SLOC1B1 rs4149032, *1B and *5 were 0.66, 0.90 and 0.01, respectively. Median (IQR) Cmax and Tmax were 10.2 (8.1–12.5) mg/L and 1.7 (1.125–2.218) h, respectively. Twenty-four percent of patients exhibited Cmax below the recommended 8–24 mg/L range. SLOC1B1 genotypes, gender and age did not influence rifampicin pharmacokinetics or TB-rifampicin sensitivity.

Conclusions

Although SLOC1B1 genotype, age and gender do not influence either rifampicin pharmacokinetics or rifampicin-TB sensitivity status, one in every four Ugandan TB patients achieve subtherapeutic plasma rifampicin concentrations.

A case report of mucocutaneous tuberculosis after orthotopic liver transplantation: a challenging diagnosis

Background

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is responsible for high morbidity and mortality in immune-compromised hosts.

Case presentation

We present a rare case of cutaneous tuberculosis after orthotopic liver transplantation without involvement of any other organs.

Conclusion

TB risk-factors assessment, careful LTBI screening and treatment according to national guidelines, as well as a reduction in missed opportunity for prevention are necessary to avoid MTB related disease in fragile patients.

A pilot study to determine the occurrence of concomitant diseases and drug intake in patients on antituberculosis therapy

Introduction:

Altered pharmacokinetics of antituberculosis (anti-TB) drugs due to interaction with non-TB medications or concomitant diseases may lead to suboptimal plasma levels of the affected drugs and hence contribute to the emergence of drug resistance in mycobacteria. Yet, few studies have investigated the prevalence of concomitant drug intake or concurrent diseases in patients on anti-TB therapy (ATT). The objective of this study is to study the prevalence of concomitant diseases and intake of non-TB drugs in patients on ATT.

Methods:

Adult patients who were undergoing treatment for TB at a directly observed treatment short-course (DOTS) center were interviewed to find out any concomitant drug intake and ailments they were suffering from. Data were also collected from the patients’ treatment cards.

Results:

A total of 105 patients were interviewed for the study over a period of 1 month. Among these, 66 (62.9%) patients reported having taken a non-ATT drug in the last 3 months, 61 (58.1%) of which were drugs that may affect the ATT. A comparable number of patients (61 [58.1%]) reported suffering from one or the other concurrent illnesses or symptoms while on DOTS, including one patient with AIDS and eight with diabetes mellitus. Fluoroquinolones had been prescribed to four patients while on DOTS.

Conclusion:

A large proportion of the patients with TB were found to be on non-TB concomitant medications including drugs with potential for interactions that are capable of affecting ATT outcomes. It is, therefore, important that the patients and prescribing physicians be aware of any possible drug interactions.

How can we improve the outcome for transplant patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial infections?

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are environmental organisms that are rapidly emerging as pathogens in the transplant population. The prevalence of infection in transplant recipients remains unknown. While guidelines exist for treatment of NTM, neither the American Thoracic Society, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, nor the British Thoracic Society guidelines dictate the approach needed for transplant recipients. Here, we summarize risk factors, important diagnostic and treatment facts, and preventive measures to be taken to help improve outcomes of those infected with NTM infections.

Three months of rifapentine and isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection in hemodialysis patients: High rates of adverse events

The consequences of once-weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid for 3 months (3HP) against latent tuberculosis infections in hemodialysis patients have not been studied before. This is the first study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of 3HP in this population and revealed a completion rate of 65.4%. The therapy was not associated with hepatotoxicity, but with high rates of adverse events (69.2%).

Management and diagnosis of tuberculosis in solid organ transplant candidates and recipients: Expert survey and updated review. J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis 2018;11:37-46. [PMID: 31720390 PMCID: PMC6830179 DOI: 10.1016/j.jctube.2018.04.001]

Background : Optimal screening and management of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and active tuberculosis (TB) in solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates and recipients is necessary to prevent morbidity and mortality. Methods : We conducted a cross-sectional survey of TB and transplant experts across the United States reviewing the clinical practice preferences on key management issues related to LTBI and TB in SOT candidates and recipients. Results : Thirty TB and 13 SOT experts were surveyed (response rate = 53.8%). Both groups agreed that tuberculin skin test (TST) and chest x-ray screening in SOT candidates was useful (78.6% and 84.6%, respectively). TST after SOT was not useful for most transplant experts and TB experts (0% vs. 32.1%, respectively), but both groups were split on usefulness of interferon gamma release assays (IGRA) in SOT recipients (42.9% TB experts vs. 46.2% SOT experts). Most experts recommend LTBI treatment prior to SOT if close monitoring is assured (82.1% TB experts vs. 76.9% transplant experts). LTBI treatment with isoniazid was preferred for patients on calcineurin inhibitors. Evaluation for suspected TB in SOT recipients varied, but most TB experts favored sputum testing (88.9%) whereas most transplant experts favored bronchoscopic testing (69.2%). Preferred TB treatment regimens in SOT recipients were similar to regimens recommended for immunocompetent patients. Conclusions : Most TB and transplant experts recommend evaluation and treatment for LTBI in SOT candidates. Liver transplant candidates, however, should only be treated if close monitoring can be assured and after consulting with a hepatologist. Practice preferences varied regarding the initial diagnostic approach for suspected TB in SOT recipients; however, most experts agreed that SOT recipients should receive similar treatments as immunocompetent patients.

Induction of human cytochrome P450 3A4 by the irreversible myeloperoxidase inactivator PF-06282999 is mediated by the pregnane X receptor

1. 2-(6-(5-Chloro-2-methoxyphenyl)-4-oxo-2-thioxo-3,4-dihydropyrimidin-1(2H)-yl) acetamide (PF-06282999) is a member of the thiouracil class of irreversible inactivators of human myeloperoxidase enzyme and a candidate for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. PF-06282999 is an inducer of CYP3A4 mRNA and midazolam-1'-hydroxylase activity in human hepatocytes, which is consistent with PF-06282999-dose dependent decreases in mean maximal plasma concentrations (C_max) and area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) of midazolam in humans following 14-day treatment with PF-06282999. 2. In the present study, the biochemical mechanism(s) of CYP3A4 induction by PF-06282999 was studied. Incubations in reporter cells indicated that PF-06282999 selectively activated human pregnane X receptor (PXR). Treatment of human HepaRG cells with PF-06282999 led to ∼14-fold induction in CYP3A4 mRNA and 5-fold increase in midazolam-1'-hydroxylase activity, which was nullified in PXR-knock out HepaRG cells. TaqMan® gene expression analysis of human hepatocytes treated with PF-06282999 and the prototypical PXR agonist rifampin demonstrated increases in mRNA for CYP3A4 and related CYPs that are regulated by PXR. 3. Docking studies using a published human PXR crystal structure provided insights into the molecular basis for PXR activation by PF-06282999. Implementation of PXR transactivation assays in a follow-on discovery campaign should aid in the identification of back-up compounds devoid of PXR activation and CYP3A4 induction liability.

Rifabutin Is Active against Mycobacterium abscessus Complex

Lung infections caused by Mycobacterium abscessus are emerging as a global threat to individuals with cystic fibrosis and to other patient groups. Recent evidence for human-to-human transmission worsens the situation. M. abscessus is an intrinsically multidrug-resistant pathogen showing resistance to even standard antituberculosis drugs, such as rifampin. Here, our objective was to identify existing drugs that may be employed for the treatment of M. abscessus lung disease. A collection of more than 2,700 approved drugs was screened at a single-point concentration against an M. abscessus clinical isolate. Hits were confirmed with fresh solids in dose-response experiments. For the most attractive hit, growth inhibition and bactericidal activities against reference strains of the three M. abscessus subspecies and a collection of clinical isolates were determined. Surprisingly, the rifampin derivative rifabutin had MICs of 3 ± 2 μM (3 μg/ml) against the screening strain, the reference strains M. abscessus subsp. abscessus ATCC 19977, M. abscessus subsp. bolletii CCUG 50184-T, and M. abscessus subsp. massiliense CCUG 48898-T, as well as against a collection of clinical isolates. Furthermore, rifabutin was active against clarithromycin-resistant strains. In conclusion, rifabutin, in contrast to rifampin, is active against the Mycobacterium abscessus complex bacteria in vitro and may be considered for treatment of M. abscessus lung disease.

Interaction of Rifampin and Darunavir-Ritonavir or Darunavir-Cobicistat In Vitro

Treatment of HIV-infected patients coinfected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis is challenging due to drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between antiretrovirals (ARVs) and antituberculosis (anti-TB) drugs. The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of cobicistat (COBI) or ritonavir (RTV) in modulating DDIs between darunavir (DRV) and rifampin (RIF) in a human hepatocyte-based in vitro model. Human primary hepatocyte cultures were incubated with RIF alone or in combination with either COBI or RTV for 3 days, followed by coincubation with DRV for 1 h. The resultant DRV concentrations were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection, and the apparent intrinsic clearance (CL_int.app.) of DRV was calculated. Both RTV and COBI lowered the RIF-induced increases in CL_int.app. in a concentration-dependent manner. Linear regression analysis showed that log₁₀ RTV and log₁₀ COBI concentrations were associated with the percent inhibition of RIF-induced elevations in DRV CL_int.app., where β was equal to -234 (95% confidence interval [CI] = -275 to -193; P < 0.0001) and -73 (95% CI = -89 to -57; P < 0.0001), respectively. RTV was more effective in lowering 10 μM RIF-induced elevations in DRV CL_int.app. (half-maximal [50%] inhibitory concentration [IC₅₀] = 0.025 μM) than COBI (IC₅₀ = 0.223 μM). Incubation of either RTV or COBI in combination with RIF was sufficient to overcome RIF-induced elevations in DRV CL_int.app., with RTV being more potent than COBI. These data provide the first in vitro experimental insight into DDIs between RIF and COBI-boosted or RTV-boosted DRV and will be useful to inform physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models to aid in optimizing dosing regimens for the treatment of patients coinfected with HIV and M. tuberculosis.

The cursed duet today: Tuberculosis and HIV-coinfection

The tuberculosis (TB) and HIV syndemic continues to rage and are a major public health concern worldwide. This deadly association raises complexity and represent a significant barrier towards TB elimination. TB continues to be the leading cause of death amongst HIV-infected people. This paper reports the challenges that lay ahead and outlines some of the current and future strategies that may be able to address this co-epidemic efficiently. Improved diagnostics, cheaper and more effective drugs, shorter treatment regimens for both drug-sensitive and drug-resistant TB are discussed. Also, special topics on drug interactions, TB-IRIS and TB relapse are also described. Notwithstanding the defeats and meagre investments, diagnosis and management of the two diseases have seen significant and unexpected improvements of late. On the HIV side, expansion of ART coverage, development of new updated guidelines aimed at the universal treatment of those infected, and the increasing availability of newer, more efficacious and less toxic drugs are an essential element to controlling the two epidemics. On the TB side, diagnosis of MDR-TB is becoming easier and faster thanks to the new PCR-based technologies, new anti-TB drugs active against both sensitive and resistant strains (i.e. bedaquiline and delamanid) have been developed and a few more are in the pipeline, new regimens (cheaper, shorter and/or more effective) have been introduced (such as the "Bangladesh regimen") or are being tested for MDR-TB and drug-sensitive-TB. However, still more resources will be required to implement an integrated approach, install new diagnostic tests, and develop simpler and shorter treatment regimens.

Effect of Rifampin on Thyroid Function Test in Patients on Levothyroxine Medication

Background

Levothyroxine (LT4) and rifampin (RIF) are sometimes used together; however, no clinical studies have assessed the effects of these drugs on thyroid function or the need to adjust LT4 dose.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 71 Korean patients who started RIF during LT4 treatment. Clinically relevant cases that required dose adjustment according to the American Thyroid Association (ATA)/American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) guidelines were identified, and risk factors of increased LT4 dose were analyzed.

Results

After administering RIF, median serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level (2.58 mIU/L, interquartile range [IQR] 0.21–7.44) was significantly higher than that before RIF (0.25 mIU/L, IQR, 0.03–2.62; P < 0.001). An increased LT4 dose was required for 50% of patients in the TSH suppression group for thyroid cancer and 26% of patients in the replacement group for hypothyroidism. Risk factor analysis showed that remaining thyroid gland (odds ratio [OR] 9.207, P = 0.002), the time interval between starting RIF and TSH measurement (OR 1.043, P = 0.019), and baseline LT4 dose per kg body weight (OR 0.364, P = 0.011) were clinically relevant variables.

Conclusions

In patients receiving LT4, serum thyroid function test should be performed after starting RIF treatment. For patients with no remnant thyroid gland and those receiving a lower LT4 dose, close observation is needed when starting RIF and TB medication.

Coadministration of Rifampin Significantly Reduces Odanacatib Concentrations in Healthy Subjects

This open-label 2-period study assessed the effect of multiple-dose administration of rifampin, a strong cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and P-glycoprotein inducer, on the pharmacokinetics of odanacatib, a cathepsin K inhibitor. In period 1, 12 healthy male subjects (mean age, 30 years) received a single dose of odanacatib 50 mg on day 1, followed by a 28-day washout. In period 2, subjects received rifampin 600 mg/day for 28 days; odanacatib 50 mg was coadministered on day 14. Blood samples for odanacatib pharmacokinetics were collected at predose and on day 1 of period 1 and day 14 of period 2. Coadministration of odanacatib and rifampin significantly reduced odanacatib exposure. The odanacatib AUC_0-∞ geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of odanacatib + rifampin/odanacatib alone was 0.13 (0.11-0.16). The harmonic mean ± jackknife standard deviation apparent terminal half-life (t_½ ) was 71.6 ± 10.2 hours for odanacatib alone and 16.0 ± 3.4 hours for odanacatib + rifampin, indicating greater odanacatib clearance following coadministration with rifampin. Samples were collected in period 2 during rifampin dosing (days 1, 14, and 28) and after rifampin discontinuation (days 35, 42, and 56) to evaluate the ratio of plasma 4β-hydroxycholesterol to total serum cholesterol as a CYP3A4 induction biomarker; the ratio increased ∼5-fold over 28 days of daily dosing with 600 mg rifampin, demonstrating sensitivity to CYP3A4 induction.

Long-Term Effect of Rifampicin-Based Anti-TB Regimen Coadministration on the Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Efavirenz and 8-Hydroxy-Efavirenz in Ethiopian Patients

We compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure parameters of efavirenz (EFV) and its major inactive metabolite, 8-hydroxy-efavirenz (8-OH-EFV), in an open-label, single-sequence, and parallel design of HIV-infected and tuberculosis (TB)-HIV-coinfected Ethiopian patients in the HIV-TB Pharmagene study with 20 and 33 patients, respectively. Both treatment groups underwent PK sampling following oral 600 mg EFV in week 16 of initiating EFV-based combination antiretroviral therapy. The TB-HIV-coinfected group repeated the PK sampling 8 weeks after stopping rifampin (RIF)-based anti-TB treatment. Between-treatment group analysis indicated no significant effect of RIF-based anti-TB cotreatment on PK exposure parameters of EFV, nor was there a significant effect after controlling for sex or CYP2B6 genotype. However, RIF-based therapy in TB-HIV-coinfected patients had significantly increased 8-OH-EFV PK exposure measures and metabolic ratio relative to HIV-only patients, AUC_0-24 greater by 79%. The effect was more prominent in women and CYP2B6*6 carriers in within-sex and CYP2B6 genotype comparisons. Within-subject comparisons for AUC_0-24 and C_max when "on" and "off" RIF-based anti-TB cotreatment showed geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of 100.5% (98.7%-102.3%) and 100.2% (98.1%-102.4%), respectively, for EFV and 98.6% (95.5%-101.7%-) and 97.6% (92.2%-103.0%), respectively, for 8-OH-EFV. We report no significant influence of RIF-based anti-TB cotherapy on the EFV PK exposure measures. The study also calls for caution related to higher exposure to 8-OH-EFV during simultaneous coadministration of EFV and RIF-based anti-TB regimens, which may be associated with neurotoxicity, particularly in female patients and CYP2B6*6 carriers.

Rifabutin: where do we stand in 2016?

Rifabutin is a spiro-piperidyl-rifamycin structurally closely related to rifampicin that shares many of its properties. We attempted to address the reasons why this drug, which was recently recognized as a WHO Essential Medicine, still had a far narrower range of indications than rifampicin, 24 years after its launch. In this comprehensive review of the classic and more recent rifabutin experimental and clinical studies, the current state of knowledge about rifabutin is depicted, relying on specific pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, antimicrobial properties, resistance data and side effects compared with rifampicin. There are consistent in vitro data and clinical studies showing that rifabutin has at least equivalent activity/efficacy and acceptable tolerance compared with rifampicin in TB and non-tuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Clinical studies have emphasized the clinical benefits of low rifabutin liver induction in patients with AIDS under PIs, in solid organ transplant patients under immunosuppressive drugs or in patients presenting intolerable side effects related to rifampicin. The contribution of rifabutin for rifampicin-resistant, but rifabutin-susceptible, Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates according to the present breakpoints has been challenged and is now controversial. Compared with rifampicin, rifabutin's lower AUC is balanced by higher intracellular penetration and lower MIC for most pathogens. Clinical studies are lacking in non-mycobacterial infections.

Drug interaction considerations in the therapeutic use of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs) of the sulfonamide and sulfamate type are clinically used drugs as diuretics, antiglaucoma, antiepileptic, antiobesity and anti-high altitude disease agents. Anticancer agents based on CAIs are also in clinical development for the management of hypoxic, metastatic tumors. Acetazolamide, methazolamide, dichlorophenamide, dorzolamide and brinzolamide are mainly used as antiglaucoma drugs, sulthiame, topiramate and zonisamide as antiepileptic/antiobesity agents, celecoxib and polmacoxib are dual carbonic anhydrase/cycloxygenase inhibitors. Girentuximab, a monoclonal antibody and SLC-0111, a sulfonamide inhibitor, are in clinical trials as anticancer agents.

AREAS COVERED

The drug interactions with many classes of pharmacological agents are reviewed. Some of these drugs, such as acetazolamide, topiramate and celecoxib show a large number of interactions with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), diuretics, antiepileptics, immunosupressants, anticholinesterase drugs, β-blockers, anesthetics, oral contraceptives, anticancer agents, antifungals, anti-mycobacterials, lithium, metformin and clopidogrel.

EXPERT OPINION

The multiple drug interactions in which CAIs are involved should be carefully considered when such drugs are used in combination with the drug classes mentioned above, as the risks of developing toxicity and serious side effects if the dosages are not adjusted are high. There are also synergistic effects between CAIs and some NSAIDs, anticancer agents and benzodiazepines for the management of cystoid macular edema, some tumor types and neuropathic pain, respectively.

Early onset of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease contributes to the lethal outcome in lung transplant recipients: report of two cases and review of the literature

Lung transplant (LuTx) recipients represent a population at risk of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD). Yet the risk factors, the timing of NTM-PD after transplantation, and the association with allograft dysfunction all remain poorly defined. We report 2 cases of early-onset NTM-PD and review the literature, focusing on NTM-PD in LuTx recipients not colonized with NTM prior to transplantation. In addition, we summarize the main characteristics and differences between early- and late-onset disease.

Rifampin-warfarin interaction in a mitral valve replacement patient receiving rifampin for infective endocarditis: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Warfarin therapy is associated with many drug interactions that may cause a significant alteration in its anticoagulant effect. Rifampin is a widely used antimicrobial that has major interactions with several medications including warfarin due to its strong P-glycoprotein and liver enzyme inducer activity especially on CYP2C9, CYP3A4, CYP1A2 and CYP2C19.

PRESENTATION

We report a case of a 34-year-old Srilankan female chronically treated with warfarin for her mitral valve replacement. The patient developed infective endocarditis and was started on a 6-week treatment with rifampin along with other antibiotics. Warfarin dose was increased from 52.5 to 210 mg/week over the course of the rifampin therapy, however, the INR remained subtherapeutic throughout the whole period and reached 2.4 by the end of rifampin therapy.

DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION

Anticoagulation management was challenging in the period following the end of rifampin therapy as well, and multiple dose adjustments starting with an increase and followed by reduction were required till she was stable on an 80 mg/week warfarin dose 5 weeks post-rifampin therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest the importance of close monitoring of warfarin therapy during and after the use of rifampin to minimize the risks of under and over-anticoagulation and improve the safety and efficacy of warfarin therapy.

The ethics of a clinical trial when the protocol clashes with international guidelines

Due to their nature and complexity, clinical trials often take some time to launch after the protocol has been designed and ethics approval obtained. During this time, there may be changes in international treatment guidelines and recommendations that result in a conflict between study protocol and recommended international best practice. Here, we describe the situation that arose in a pharmacokinetic study on the use of two different doses of rifabutin in patients with human immunodeficiency virus-associated tuberculosis who initiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) with a lopinavir-ritonavir-based regimen in South Africa and Viet Nam. The study protocol specified that ART should be started 10 weeks after the start of anti-tuberculosis treatment. The study in South Africa was approved in June 2008, went ahead as scheduled and was completed in August 2010. The study in Viet Nam was approved in October 2008 and was started in June 2010. A few weeks later, the World Health Organization released their 2010 guidelines for adult ART; one of its strong recommendations (with moderate quality of evidence) was that ART should be started 2-8 weeks after the start of anti-tuberculosis treatment. Emerging scientific evidence also supported this recommendation. The investigators felt that the Viet Nam study protocol was in conflict with recommended international best practice, and the trial was stopped in October 2010. An amended study protocol in which ART was started at 2 weeks was developed and implemented. The ethics issues around this decision and the need to change the study protocol are discussed in this article.

Factors Associated with the Development of Drug Resistance Mutations in HIV-1 Infected Children Failing Protease Inhibitor-Based Antiretroviral Therapy in South Africa

OBJECTIVE

Limited data are available from the developing world on antiretroviral drug resistance in HIV-1 infected children failing protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy, especially in the context of a high tuberculosis burden. We describe the proportion of children with drug resistance mutations after failed protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy as well as associated factors.

METHODS

Data from children initiated on protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy with subsequent virological failure referred for genotypic drug resistance testing between 2008 and 2012 were retrospectively analysed. Frequencies of drug resistance mutations were determined and associations with these mutations identified through logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The study included 65 young children (median age 16.8 months [IQR 7.8; 23.3]) with mostly advanced clinical disease (88.5% WHO stage 3 or 4 disease), severe malnutrition (median weight-for-age Z-score -2.4 [IQR -3.7;-1.5]; median height-for-age Z-score -3.1 [IQR -4.3;-2.4]), high baseline HIV viral load (median 6.04 log10, IQR 5.34;6.47) and frequent tuberculosis co-infection (66%) at antiretroviral therapy initiation. Major protease inhibitor mutations were found in 49% of children and associated with low weight-for-age and height-for-age (p = 0.039; p = 0.05); longer duration of protease inhibitor regimens and virological failure (p = 0.001; p = 0.005); unsuppressed HIV viral load at 12 months of antiretroviral therapy (p = 0.001); tuberculosis treatment at antiretroviral therapy initiation (p = 0.048) and use of ritonavir as single protease inhibitor (p = 0.038). On multivariate analysis, cumulative months on protease inhibitor regimens and use of ritonavir as single protease inhibitor remained significant (p = 0.008; p = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

Major protease inhibitor resistance mutations were common in this study of HIV-1-infected children, with the timing of tuberculosis treatment and subsequent protease inhibitor dosing strategy proving to be important associated factors. There is an urgent need for safe, effective, and practicable HIV/tuberculosis co-treatment in young children and the optimal timing of treatment, optimal dosing of antiretroviral therapy, and alternative tuberculosis treatment strategies should be urgently addressed.

Treatment optimization in patients co-infected with HIV and Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections: focus on drug-drug interactions with rifamycins

Tuberculosis (TB) and HIV continue to be two of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in the world, and together are responsible for the death of millions of people every year. There is overwhelming evidence to recommend that patients with TB and HIV co-infection should receive concomitant therapy of both conditions regardless of the CD4 cell count level. The principles for treatment of active TB disease in HIV-infected patients are the same as in HIV-uninfected patients. However, concomitant treatment of both conditions is complex, mainly due to significant drug-drug interactions between TB and HIV drugs. Rifamycins are potent inducers of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) pathway, leading to reduced (frequently sub-therapeutic) plasma concentrations of some classes of antiretrovirals. Rifampicin is also an inducer of the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 enzymes and interferes with drugs, such as integrase inhibitors, that are metabolized by this metabolic pathway. Rifampicin is also an inducer of the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein, which may also lead to decreased bioavailability of concomitantly administered antiretrovirals. On the other side, rifabutin concentrations are affected by the antiretrovirals that induce or inhibit CYP enzymes. In this review, the pharmacokinetic interactions, and the relevant clinical consequences, of the rifamycins-rifampicin, rifabutin, and rifapentine-with antiretroviral drugs are reviewed and discussed. A rifampicin-based antitubercular regimen and an efavirenz-based antiretroviral regimen is the first choice for treatment of TB/HIV co-infected patients. Rifabutin is the preferred rifamycin to use in HIV-infected patients on a protease inhibitor-based regimen; however, the dose of rifabutin needs to be reduced to 150 mg daily. More information is required to select optimal treatment regimens for TB/HIV co-infected patients whenever efavirenz cannot be used and rifabutin is not available. Despite significant pharmacokinetic interactions between antiretrovirals and antitubercular drugs, adequate clinical response of both infections can be achieved with an acceptable safety profile when the pharmacological characteristics of drugs are known, and appropriate combination regimens, dosing, and timing of initiation are used. However, more clinical research is needed for newer drugs, such as rifapentine and the recently introduced integrase inhibitor antiretrovirals, and for specific population groups, such as children, pregnant women, and patients affected by multidrug-resistant TB.

Effect of rifampin and rifabutin on serum itraconazole levels in patients with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis and coexisting nontuberculous mycobacterial infection

We investigated the effects of rifampin and rifabutin on serum itraconazole levels in patients with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Serum itraconazole concentrations were significantly lower in patients who received itraconazole with rifampin (median, 0.1 μg/ml; P < 0.001) or rifabutin (median, 0.34 μg/ml; P < 0.001) than those receiving itraconazole alone (median, 5.92 μg/ml). Concomitant use of rifampin or rifabutin and itraconazole should be avoided in patients with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis and coexisting mycobacterial infections.

Pharmacokinetic interaction of rifapentine and raltegravir in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVES

Latent tuberculosis infection and tuberculosis disease are prevalent worldwide. However, antimycobacterial rifamycins have drug interactions with many antiretroviral drugs. We evaluated the effect of rifapentine on the pharmacokinetic properties of raltegravir.

METHODS

In this open-label, fixed-sequence, three-period study, 21 healthy volunteers were given: raltegravir alone (400 mg every 12 h for 4 days) on days 1-4 of Period 1; rifapentine (900 mg once weekly for 3 weeks) on days 1, 8 and 15 of Period 2 and raltegravir (400 mg every 12 h for 4 days) on days 12-15 of Period 2; and rifapentine (600 mg once daily for 10 scheduled doses) on days 1, 4-8 and 11-14 of Period 3 and raltegravir (400 mg every 12 h for 4 days) on days 11-14 of Period 3. Plasma raltegravir concentrations were measured. ClinicalTrials.gov database: NCT00809718.

RESULTS

In 16 subjects who completed the study, coadministration of raltegravir with rifapentine (900 mg once weekly; Period 2) compared with raltegravir alone resulted in the geometric mean of the raltegravir AUC from 0 to 12 h (AUC0-12) being increased by 71%; the peak concentration increased by 89% and the trough concentration decreased by 12%. Coadministration of raltegravir with rifapentine in Period 3 did not change the geometric mean of the raltegravir AUC0-12 or the peak concentration, but it decreased the trough concentration by 41%. Raltegravir coadministered with rifapentine was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

The increased raltegravir exposure observed with once-weekly rifapentine was safe and tolerable. Once-weekly rifapentine can be used with raltegravir to treat latent tuberculosis infection in patients who are infected with HIV.

Understanding pharmacokinetics to improve tuberculosis treatment outcome

INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis (TB) remains the leading cause of death from a curable infectious disease; drug-resistant TB threatens to dismantle all prior gains in global control. Suboptimal circulating anti-TB drug concentrations can lead to lack of cure and acquired drug resistance.

AREAS COVERED

This review will introduce pharmacokinetic parameters for key anti-TB drugs, as well as the indications and limitations of measuring these parameters in clinical practice. Current and novel methodologies for delivering anti-TB pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic data are highlighted and gaps in operational research described.

EXPERT OPINION

Individual pharmacokinetic variability is commonplace, underappreciated and difficult to predict without therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Pharmacokinetic thresholds associated with poor TB treatment outcome in drug-susceptible TB have recently been described and may now guide the application of TDM, but require validation in a variety of settings and comorbidities. Dried blood spots for TDM and prepackaged multidrug plates for minimum inhibitory concentration testing will overcome barriers of accessibility and represent areas for innovation. Operationalizing pharmacokinetics has the potential to improve TB outcomes in the most difficult-to-treat forms of the disease such as multidrug resistance. Clinical studies in these areas are eagerly anticipated and we expect will better define the rational introduction of novel therapeutics.

Tuberculosis among HIV-infected patients in Stockholm, Sweden, 1987-2010: treatment outcomes and adverse reactions

BACKGROUND

The treatment of patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis (TB) is challenging. The aim of this study was to compare socio-demographic and clinical characteristics among HIV-infected patients before and after the introduction of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) in a Swedish cohort, and to identify factors associated with anti-TB treatment success as well as adverse reactions.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study of HIV/TB co-infected patients in Stockholm County from 1987 to 2010. The study population was stratified into an early and a late cohort (before and after the introduction of cART in 1996). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 127 patients; the majority were foreign-born (87%). The proportion of female patients more than doubled from the early to the late cohort, and anti-TB treatment success increased from 65% to 91%. The median duration of successful treatment was 8 months in both cohorts. Predictors of treatment success in the late cohort were cART (odds ratio (OR) 13.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-114.8) and a CD4 cell count at TB diagnosis > 200 cells/μl (OR 17.2, 95% CI 1.2-236.6). Severe adverse reactions in the late cohort occurred in 23% and were associated with the initiation of cART after TB diagnosis (OR 13.3, 95% CI 1.6-112.4).

CONCLUSION

The introduction of cART was favourable for the treatment outcome of HIV-infected patients with concomitant TB. However, adverse reactions increased in patients who initiated cART during anti-TB treatment and these patients require careful attention.

Randomised pharmacokinetic trial of rifabutin with lopinavir/ritonavir-antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis in Vietnam

Background

Rifampicin and protease inhibitors are difficult to use concomitantly in patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis because of drug-drug interactions. Rifabutin has been proposed as an alternative rifamycin, but there is concern that the current recommended dose is suboptimal. The principal aim of this study was to compare bioavailability of two doses of rifabutin (150 mg three times per week and 150 mg daily) in patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis who initiated lopinavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy in Vietnam. Concentrations of lopinavir/ritonavir were also measured.

Methods

This was a randomized, open-label, multi-dose, two-arm, cross-over trial, conducted in Vietnamese adults with HIV-associated tuberculosis in Ho Chi Minh City (Clinical trial registry number NCT00651066). Rifabutin pharmacokinetics were evaluated before and after the introduction of lopinavir/ritonavir -based antiretroviral therapy using patient randomization lists. Serial rifabutin and 25-O-desacetyl rifabutin concentrations were measured during a dose interval after 2 weeks of rifabutin 300 mg daily, after 3 weeks of rifabutin 150 mg daily with lopinavir/ritonavir and after 3 weeks of rifabutin 150 mg three times per week with lopinavir/ritonavir.

Results

Sixteen and seventeen patients were respectively randomized to the two arms, and pharmacokinetic analysis carried out in 12 and 13 respectively. Rifabutin 150 mg daily with lopinavir/ritonavir was associated with a 32% mean increase in rifabutin average steady state concentration compared with rifabutin 300 mg alone. In contrast, the rifabutin average steady state concentration decreased by 44% when rifabutin was given at 150 mg three times per week with lopinavir/ritonavir. With both dosing regimens, 2 – 5 fold increases of the 25-O-desacetyl- rifabutin metabolite were observed when rifabutin was given with lopinavir/ritonavir compared with rifabutin alone. The different doses of rifabutin had no significant effect on lopinavir/ritonavir plasma concentrations.

Conclusions

Based on these findings, rifabutin 150 mg daily may be preferred when co-administered with lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00651066

Tuberculous pericarditis with and without HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has altered the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, treatment considerations and natural history of tuberculous (TB) pericarditis with significant implications for clinicians. The caseload of TB pericarditis has risen sharply in TB endemic areas of the world where co-infection with HIV is common. Furthermore, TB is the cause in greater than 85 % of cases of pericardial effusion in HIV-infected cohorts. In the absence of HIV, the morbidity of TB pericarditis is primarily related to the ferocity of the immune response to TB antigens within the pericardium. In patients with HIV, because TB pericarditis more often occurs as part of a disseminated process, the infection itself has a greater impact on the morbidity and mortality. HIV-associated TB pericarditis is a more aggressive disease with a greater degree of myocardial involvement. Patients have larger pericardial effusions with more frequent hemodynamic compromise and more significant ST segment changes in the electrocardiogram. HIV alters the natural history and outcomes of TB pericarditis. Immunocompromised participants appear less likely to develop constrictive pericarditis and have a significantly higher mortality compared with their immunocompetent counterparts. Finally co-infection with HIV has resulted in a number of areas of uncertainty. The mechanisms of myocardial dysfunction are unclear, new methods of improving the yield of TB culture and establishing a rapid bacterial diagnosis remain a major challenge, the optimal duration of anti-TB therapy has yet to be established, and the role of corticosteroids has yet to be resolved.

Regulation of microRNA expression by rifampin in human hepatocytes

Rifampin causes drug interactions by altering hepatic drug metabolism. Because microRNAs (miRNAs) have been shown to regulate genes involved in drug metabolism, we determined the effect of rifampin on the expression of hepatic miRNAs. Primary human hepatocytes from seven subjects were treated with rifampin, and the expression of miRNA and cytochrome P450 (P450) mRNAs was measured by TaqMan assays and RNA-seq, respectively. Rifampin induced the expression of 10 clinically important and 13 additional P450 genes and repressed the expression of 9 other P450 genes (P < 0.05). Rifampin induced the expression of 33 miRNAs and repressed the expression of 35 miRNAs (P < 0.05). Several of these changes were highly negatively correlated with the rifampin-induced changes in the expression of their predicted target P450 mRNAs, supporting the possibility of miRNA-induced regulation of P450 mRNA expression. In addition, several other miRNA changes were positively correlated with the changes in P450 mRNA expression, suggesting similar regulatory mechanisms. Despite the interindividual variability in the rifampin effects on miRNA expression, principal components analysis clearly separated the rifampin-treated samples from the controls. In conclusion, rifampin treatment alters miRNA expression patterns in human hepatocytes, and some of the changes were correlated with the rifampin-induced changes in expression of the P450 mRNAs they are predicted to target.

PXR antagonists and implication in drug metabolism

Adopted orphan nuclear receptor (NR), pregnane X receptor (PXR), plays a central role in the regulation of xeno- and endobiotic metabolism. Since the discovery of the functional role of PXR in 1998, there is evolving evidence for the role of PXR agonists in abrogating metabolic pathophysiology (e.g., cholestasis, hypercholesterolemia, and inflammation). However, more recently, it is clear that PXR is also an important mediator of adverse xeno- (e.g., enhances acetaminophen toxicity) and endobiotic (e.g., hepatic steatosis) metabolic phenotypes. Moreover, in cancer therapeutics, PXR activation can induce drug resistance, and there is growing evidence for tissue-specific enhancement of the malignant phenotype. Thus, in these instances, there may be a role for PXR antagonists. However, as opposed to the discovery efforts for PXR agonists, there are only a few antagonists described. The mode of action of these antagonists (e.g., sulforaphane) remains less clear. Our laboratory efforts have focused on this question. Since the original discovery of azoles analogs as PXR antagonists, we have preliminarily defined an important PXR antagonist pharmacophore and developed less-toxic PXR antagonists. In this review, we describe our published and unpublished findings on recent structure-function studies involving the azole chemical scaffold. Further work in the future is needed to fully define potent, more-selective PXR antagonists that may be useful in clinical application.

Addition of rifampin to vancomycin for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: what is the evidence?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate evidence supporting efficacy and safety of the combination of vancomycin and rifampin for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (1946-February 2013), EMBASE (1974-February 2013) and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched.

STUDY SELECTION

All human prospective trials and retrospective studies evaluating clinical outcomes of vancomycin-rifampin combinations were included. Case reports, case series, and in vitro or animal data were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Full-text articles were included and abstracts excluded; 43 of 421 references were reviewed. Five articles met inclusion and were evaluated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A nonrandomized prospective trial reported complete clearance of MRSA bacteremia at 24 hours in all 14 burn patients receiving vancomycin-rifampin therapy. In a case-control study of 42 patients with MRSA endocarditis, adding rifampin prolonged bacteremia (5.2 vs 2.1 days, p < 0.001), decreased survival rates (79% vs 95%, p = 0.048), resulted in drug interactions (52% of cases), and increased hepatic transaminases (21% vs 2%, p = 0.014). In a retrospective analysis of 28 patients with persistent MRSA bacteremia requiring salvage therapy, switching from vancomycin-based to linezolid-based treatment was associated with better salvage success than adding rifampin (88% vs 0%, p < 0.001). In a randomized open-label trial of 42 patients with MRSA endocarditis, addition of rifampin to vancomycin did not affect cure rates (90% combination vs 82% monotherapy, p > 0.20), but increased duration of bacteremia (9 vs 7 days, p > 0.20) compared with vancomycin monotherapy. Another randomized open-label trial of combination versus monotherapy for MRSA pneumonia in 93 intensive care unit patients reported higher clinical successes (53.7% vs 31.0%, p = 0.047), similar 30-day mortality rates, and more adverse events with combination therapy (11 vs 6).

CONCLUSIONS

Limited evidence exists to support the adjunctive use of rifampin to treat MRSA infections. The combination may increase drug interactions, adverse effects, and rifampin resistance. Further studies are needed to define the role of rifampin adjunct therapy.