Transcanal Blind Sac Closure of the External Auditory Canal After Skull Base Surgery to Treat CSF Leak: Technique and Results

An algorithm for the surgical approach to spontaneous temporal bone CSF leak

OBJECTIVE

To suggest a comprehensive algorithm for the surgical approach for correcting of sources of temporal bone CSF leaks.

METHODS

A case series for patients operated in a single academic tertiary referral center between 2011 and 4.2022. Included in the study were 46 patients, 5 of whom had a bilateral problem, resulting in 51 pathologic temporal bones. The presentation was an active CSF leak (38 patients) or bacterial otogenic meningitis (8 patients). Follow up ranged from 8 months to 5 years.

RESULTS

Of the 42 ears operated via the default middle fossa approach, 37 were successful (88 %) in controlling CSF leak. None had intracranial complications or sensorineural hearing loss. Location, number and size of the defects, hearing status, associated superior semicircular canal dehiscence, additional intra-temporal or intra-cranial pathologies may indicate a transmastoid approach. Of the six ears that had a canal wall up mastoidectomy as a primary procedure, one required revision due to ongoing CSF leak. Five revision cases and three primary cases were effectively sealed with a subtotal petrosectomy and obliteration. One was lost to follow-up. Hearing was reconstructed with bone-anchored hearing implants in 6 out of these 8 ears.

CONCLUSIONS

The middle fossa approach could be used as a default approach for sealing TD. There are a number of indications for transmastoid approaches in both primary and revision cases. Obliteration of the ear was used in all revision cases. The suggested algorithm can help in planning surgery for temporal bone CSF leaks or a history of otogenic meningitis.

Surgical Closure of the Eustachian Tube Through Middle Fossa and Transmastoid Approaches: A Pilot Cadaveric Anatomy Study

BACKGROUND

Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea after temporal bone surgery involves drainage from the Eustachian tube (ET) into the nasopharynx, causing significant patient morbidity. Variable anatomy of the ET accounts for failures of currently used ET obliteration techniques.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the surgical anatomy of the ET and examine possible techniques for ET closure through middle fossa (MF) and transmastoid approaches.

METHODS

We described the surgical anatomy of the ET from the MF and transmastoid approaches in 5 adult cadaveric heads, measuring morphometric and surgical anatomy parameters and establishing targets for definite ET obliteration.

RESULTS

The osseous ET measured an average of 19.53 mm (±1.56 mm), with a mean diameter of 2.24 mm (±0.29 mm). The shortest distance between the greater superficial petrosal nerve and the ET junction was 6.61 mm (±0.61 mm). Shortest distances between the ET junction and the foramen spinosum and posterior border of the foramen ovale were 1.09 mm (±0.24 mm) and 2.03 mm (±0.30 mm), respectively. Closure of the cartilaginous ET may be performed by folding it in on itself, securing it by packing, suturing, or surgical clip ligation.

CONCLUSION

Definite obliteration of the cartilaginous ET appears feasible and the most definite approach to eliminate egress of cerebrospinal fluid to the nasopharynx using the MF approach. This technique may be used as an adjunct to skull base procedures where ET closure is planned.

Role of the neurotologist in posterior fossa meningioma surgery

Posterior fossa meningiomas that impinge on structures of the temporal bone or clivus may be difficult to access for optimal resection that maximizes tumor control and minimizes short- and long-term morbidities. To address this challenge, the contemporary neurosurgery-neurotology team works collaboratively by managing patients jointly at every stage of care: preoperative evaluation, intraoperative intervention, and postoperative treatment. The neurotologist is important at all stages of posterior fossa meningioma surgery. First, detailed preoperative evaluation of auditory, facial, vestibular, and lower cranial nerve integrity enables assessment of new neurologic deficit risk, prognosis of functional recovery, and pros and cons of candidate surgical approaches. Second, intraoperative partitioning of surgical steps by provider and adopting an overlapping tumor resection philosophy creates an efficient and confident surgical team built on trust. Third, postoperative closure of cerebrospinal fluid leak and treatment of facial weakness, audiovestibular dysfunction, and voicing and swallowing impairments organized by the neurotologist reduces the impact of negative outcomes. The role of the neurotologist in posterior fossa meningioma surgery is to deliver nuanced evaluative metrics, facilitate shared decision making, perform precise bone and soft tissue microsurgery, and mitigate perioperative morbidities.

Minimally invasive endoscopic repair of refractory lateral skull base cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: case report and review of the literature

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks occur in approximately 10% of patients undergoing a translabyrinthine, retrosigmoid, or middle fossa approach for vestibular schwannoma resection. Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea also results from trauma, neoplasms, and congenital defects. A high degree of difficulty in repair sometimes requires repetitive microsurgical revisions-a rate of 10% of cases is often cited. This can not only lead to morbidity but is also costly and burdensome to the health care system. In this case-based theoretical analysis, the authors summarize the literature regarding endoscopic endonasal techniques to obliterate the eustachian tube (ET) as well as compare endoscopic endonasal versus open approaches for repair. Given the results of their analysis, they recommend endoscopic endonasal ET obliteration (EEETO) as a first- or second-line technique for the repair of CSF rhinorrhea from a lateral skull base source refractory to spontaneous healing and CSF diversion. They present a case in which EEETO resolved refractory CSF rhinorrhea over a 10-month follow-up after CSF diversions, wound reexploration, revised packing of the ET via a lateral microscopic translabyrinthine approach, and the use of a vascularized flap had failed. They further summarize the literature regarding studies that describe various iterations of EEETO. By its minimally invasive nature, EEETO imposes less morbidity as well as less risk to the patient. It can be readily implemented into algorithms once CSF diversion (for example, lumbar drain) has failed, prior to considering open surgery for repair. Additional studies are warranted to further demonstrate the outcome and cost-saving benefits of EEETO as the data until now have been largely empirical yet very hopeful. The summaries and technical notes described in this paper may serve as a resource for those skull base teams faced with similar challenging and otherwise refractory CSF leaks from a lateral skull base source.