Impact of Xylomethazoline on Eustachian Tube Function in Healthy Participants

Concordance Analysis of the Pressure Chamber and Tubomanometer According to Estève for the Determination of Eustachian Tube Opening Pressure

INTRODUCTION

For the diagnosis of Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD), clinical procedures such as tympanometry, micro-otoscopy, and maneuvers according to Toynbee and Valsalva only allow an indirect assessment for the moment. With a prevalence of up to 5%, the selection of patients with ETD and its subtypes is clinically relevant. Dynamic methods of Eustachian tube function assessment include a hypo/hyperbaric pressure chamber and Estève's tubomanometer (TMM). One method of assessing ETD is the evaluation of Eustachian tube opening pressure (ETOP).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a concordance analysis between pressure chamber and TMM to determine ETOP. For this purpose, we analyzed the measurements of both methods from 28 healthy subjects using Bland-Altman plots, regression according to Passing-Bablok and Lin's concordance correlations coefficient. The maximum tolerated clinical deviation of measured values was set at 10%.

RESULTS

A maximum of 53 measurements of ETOP between pressure chamber and TMM were compared. Mean ETOP for TMM was 28.7 hPa, passive opening was 32 hPa, Toynbee maneuver was 28.4 hPa, and Valsalva maneuver was 54.6 hPa. Concordance analysis revealed following results: passive opening versus TMM: Bland-Altman mean difference 3.3 hPa, limits of agreement ±31.8 hPa; Passing-Bablok regression y = 0.67 x + 9.36; Lin's rccc = 0.18. Toynbee versus TMM: Bland-Altman mean difference 0.7 hPa, limits of agreement ±35.8 hPa; Passing-Bablok regression y = 0.47x + 14.03; Lin's rccc = 0.14. Valsalva versus TMM: Bland-Altman mean difference 24.2 hPa, limits of agreement ±117.5 hPa; Passing-Bablok regression y = 0.17x + 25.12; Lin's rccc = 0.18.

CONCLUSION

Estève's tubomanometer and pressure chamber measurements of ETOP are not concordant. The two methods cannot be interchanged without reservation.

Intraindividual variability of the Eustachian tube function: a longitudinal study in a pressure chamber

INTRODUCTION

The Eustachian tube (ET) is essential for fast and direct pressure equalisation between middle ear and ambient pressure. It is not yet known to what extent Eustachian tube function in healthy adults changes in a weekly periodicity due to internal and external factors. This question is particularly interesting with regard to scuba divers among whom there is a need to evaluate intraindividual ET function variability.

METHODS

Continuous impedance measurement in a pressure chamber was performed three times at one-week intervals between measurements. Twenty healthy participants (40 ears) were enrolled. Using a monoplace hyperbaric chamber, individual subjects were exposed to a standardised pressure profile consisting of a 20 kPa decompression over 1 min, a 40 kPa compression over 2 min, and a 20 kPa decompression over 1 min. Measurements of Eustachian tube opening pressure (ETOP), opening duration (ETOD), and opening frequency (ETOF) were made. Intraindividual variability was assessed.

RESULTS

Mean ETOD during compression (actively induced pressure equalisation) on the right side was 273.8 (SD 158.8) ms, 259.4 (157.7) ms, and 249.2 (154.1) ms (Chi-square 7.30, P = 0.026) across weeks 1-3. Mean ETOD for both sides was 265.6 (153.3) ms, 256.1 (154.6) ms, and 245.7 (147.8) ms (Chi-square 10.00, P = 0.007) across weeks 1-3. There were no other significant differences in ETOD, ETOP and ETOF across the three weekly measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

This longitudinal study suggests low week-to-week intraindividual variability of Eustachian tube function.

[Is Flying or Diving risky after cochlear implantation? Examination in a pressure chamber]

OBJECTIVE

 Complications after cochlear implantation are relatively rare but patients are asked to follow certain behavioral rules. Until now there is no evidence if pressure changes that occur during flying and diving are safe for patients after cochlear implantation. For example, no recommendation exists for SCUBA- diving activities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 In a hypo-/hyperbaric pressure chamber patients after cochlear implantation were exposed to a standardized profile of decompression and compression simulating a flight in a common airplane and a dive. Pre and after the exposure in the pressure chamber, ENT examination and a control of impedances of the cochlear implant were performed. Additionally, patients filled in a questionnaire about complaints they had experienced in the pressure chamber or after.

RESULTS

 A total of 11 subjects (17 ears with CI) were examined in the pressure chamber. 2/3 of the subjects stated that they had slight complaints during the examination. Only in one patient the measurement needed to be stopped due to pain. Seven patients showed a vascular injection of the malleus in ear microscopy. In none of the patients there was a subjective change in hearing after the examination. Objective measurements of the impedance did not show relevant changes.

CONCLUSION

 The exposure of cochlear implanted patients to overpressure and underpressure in a pressure chamber did not result in any significant deviation of the impedances, so that no further adjustment was necessary. Since there are no certified in vivo studies on pressure changes while diving and flying with a cochlear implant, further studies are required in order to be able to adequately advise CI patients about diving and flying.

Subjective and Objective Effectiveness of Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilatation for Patients With Eustachian Tube Dysfunction-Evaluation in a Pressure Chamber

INTRODUCTION

The Eustachian tube plays a crucial role in pressure equalization between the middle ear and ambient pressure for fast and large pressure differences. In patients with chronic Eustachian tube dysfunction, Eustachian tube balloon dilatation is increasingly used as surgical therapy. Subjectively, many patients report an improvement of the symptoms postoperatively. Hence, there is a need to objectively measure this effect.

METHODS

The objectivity of Eustachian tube balloon dilatation was evaluated using a precise method of measuring Eustachian tube function. In a hypo/hyperbaric pressure chamber, 23 ears in 13 patients were exposed to a standardized profile of compression and decompression before Eustachian tube balloon dilatation and 4 weeks afterwards. Standardized parameters of Eustachian tube function were determined and statistically compared before and 4 weeks after intervention. In addition, an Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ7) questionnaire was completed beforehand and 4 weeks postoperatively to determine subjective surgical success.

RESULTS

The results from the ETDQ7 questionnaire showed a significant improvement in symptoms after Eustachian tube balloon dilatation (p = 0.0002). Objective measurements results showed a significant reduction of the Eustachian tube opening pressure during pressure decrease 4 weeks after intervention (p = 0.0012).

CONCLUSION

Eustachian tube balloon dilatation significantly reduced Eustachian tube opening pressure, in addition to subjective improvement of symptoms determined by ETDQ7.

The effect of topical xylometazoline on Eustachian tube function

BACKGROUND

Topical nasal decongestants are frequently used as part of the medical management of symptoms related to Eustachian tube dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the effect of topical xylometazoline hydrochloride sprayed in the anterior part of the nose on Eustachian tube active and passive opening in healthy ears.

METHODS

Active and passive Eustachian tube function was assessed in healthy subjects before and after intranasal administration of xylometazoline spray, using tympanometry, video otoscopy, sonotubometry, tubo-tympano-aerodynamic-graphy and tubomanometry.

RESULTS

Resting middle-ear pressures were not significantly different following decongestant application. Eustachian tube opening rate was not significantly different following the intervention, as measured by all function tests used. Sonotubometry data showed a significant increase in the duration of Eustachian tube opening following decongestant application.

CONCLUSION

There remains little or no evidence that topical nasal decongestants improve Eustachian tube function. Sonotubometry findings do suggest that further investigation with an obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction patient cohort is warranted.

Evaluation of the Parameter "Mean Impedance" for Representing Eustachian tube Functions During Pressure Increase and Decrease in Pressure Chamber Measurements

HYPOTHESIS

The hypothesis of the study is that the mean impedance (MI) during compression and decompression provides additional information of the Eustachian tube (ET) function.

BACKGROUND

The continuous impedance measurement in a pressure chamber can provide valuable information about the opening function of the ET.

METHODS

Around 55 ear-healthy volunteers were examined in a pressure chamber. These were subjected to a decompression phase and a compression phase. The pressure change was constantly 20 kPa/min. Using evaluation software, the MI could be determined for both ears in each case for the phases of compression and decompression.

RESULTS

In 49 participants, we could interpret the data successfully. On average, an output value (without pressure changes) of the impedance of 0.58 ±0.11 Pa on the right side and 0.43 ± 0.1 Pa on the left side were measured. During decompression, 0.098 ± 0.05 Pa (right) and 0.087 ± 0.043 Pa (left) could be determined. For compression, values of 0.086 ± 0.044 Pa on the right and 0.079 ± 0.045 Pa on the left were detected. The retest reliability was higher with an intraclass correlation coefficient for the decompression MI of 0.833 than the 0.772 compression MI.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to measure MI in healthy subjects during compression and decompression. This value represents a good average in terms of the pressure tolerance of the middle ear. In future, studies will be required to determine whether MI will be a useful parameter in differentiating normal and abnormal ET function.

Assessment of the Importance of Tympanic Membrane Mechanoreceptors on Eustachian Tube Function Based on Pressure Chamber Measurements

INTRODUCTION

Previously, it was demonstrated how the Eustachian tube (ET) opening function can be influenced by middle ear pressure and movement of the tympanic membrane via neural control. Mechanoreceptors on the tympanic membrane may be part of the afferent arc and could influence the middle ear pressure by activating the musculus veli palatini as part of a reflex.

METHODS

In a hypo and hyperbaric pressure chamber, 17 participants (34 ears) were twice exposed to a standardized pressure profile of pressure decrease and increase. The ET function reflecting parameters-ET opening pressure (ETOP), ET opening duration (ETOD), and ET opening frequency (ETOF)-were determined before and after local anesthesia of the right tympanic membrane.

RESULTS

After pressure exposure by pressure increase (active induced equalization) and pressure decrease (passive equalization) there was no significant difference between the mean value of ETOP, ETOD, and ETOF before and after local anesthesia of the right tympanic membrane on the right (anesthetized) or left side (not anesthetized).

CONCLUSION

These results may lead to the hypothesis that tympanic membrane mechanoreceptors may play a minor role in regulating the ET function in humans.

Influence of repetitive diving in saltwater on pressure equalization and Eustachian tube function in recreational scuba divers

INTRODUCTION

We investigated in a prospective, observational trial the feasibility of using the Eustachian tube function test (ETFT) to measure the effect of repetitive pressure exposure during open seawater dives on Eustachian tube function.

METHODS

The study included 28 adult divers during six consecutive days of diving in the Red Sea. Participants underwent otoscopy and ETFT before the first dive, between each dive and after the last dive. ETFT included regular tympanometry (R-tymp), tympanometry after Valsalva (V-tymp) and after swallowing (S-tymp). The R-tymp was obtained as 'baseline' peak pressure. After a Valsalva, the peak pressure should shift (positively), revealing a positive shift of the tympanic membrane. This pressure shift is defined here as R-VdP. The changes in compliance and peak pressure were recorded and correlated with otoscopic findings and diving experience. Middle ear barotrauma was scored using the Edmonds modified TEED scale.

RESULTS

The 28 participants performed 437 dives. Positive shift of pressure in the middle ear was evident with significant changes from day one to day three (P < 0.0001). Divers with barotrauma showed significantly lower values of R-tymp peak pressure and significantly higher negative R-VdP, compared to divers with normal otoscopic findings (P < 0.05). Diving experience significantly correlated with R-tymp peak pressure and prevalence of middle ear barotrauma.

CONCLUSION

Significant changes in middle ear pressure and pressure equalization from repeated pressure exposure in saltwater were seen using ETFT. Repetitive, multi-day diving led to significantly decreased compliance and increased R-tymp peak pressure (overpressure) in the middle ear. Most profound changes were observed in less and intermediate experienced divers.

Prevalence of Barotrauma in Recreational Scuba Divers After Repetitive Saltwater Dives

INTRODUCTION

The aim was to investigate the prevalence of middle ear barotrauma (MEB) and to establish risk factors of MEB after repeated saltwater dives.

METHODS

In this prospective observational cohort study 28 divers were examined over 6 consecutive days of diving in the Red Sea, Egypt. Participants underwent an otoscopic examination before the first dive, between each dive and after the last dive. In addition, they performed Valsalva maneuver (VM) and were questioned about dive-related complaints. Otoscopic findings were classified according to TEED classification for MEB (0 = normal otoscopy to 4 = perforation) separately for each ear. First examination was conducted before the first dive. Final examination, including a questionnaire, was conducted at least 12 h after the last dive.

RESULTS

In total, 436 dives were performed and 1161 otoscopic findings were analyzed. All participants showed a normal eardrum and a positive VM during initial exam. MEB prevalence (TEED >0) was 36.5% at final examination. Prevalence increased significantly with number of dives per day (p < 0.001) as with number of diving days (p = 0.032). Neither depth nor duration of dives significantly influenced MEB prevalence (all p > 0.05). More experienced divers (>200 dives lifetime) showed significantly less barotrauma (p < 0.0001). Despite the high prevalence of MEB, 81.7% (316 of 387) of all dives were reported asymptomatic.

CONCLUSIONS

After 6 days of repetitive diving, MEB prevalence was high (36.5%). It was the most often cause of otalgia in divers. Cumulative pressure exposure during repetitive dives resulted in significant increase of MEB. Diving experience significantly reduced the MEB prevalence. Interestingly, the severity of MEB did not correlate with subjective complaints.

Reliability of Eustachian tube function measurements in a hypobaric and hyperbaric pressure chamber

OBJECTIVES

Measurement of the Eustachian tube (ET) function is a challenge. The demand for a precise and meaningful diagnostic tool increases-especially because more and more operative therapies are being offered without objective evidence. The measurement of the ET function by continuous impedance recording in a pressure chamber is an established method, although the reliability of the measurements is still unclear.

METHODS

Twenty-five participants (50 ears) were exposed to phases of compression and decompression in a hypo- and hyperbaric pressure chamber. The ET function reflecting parameters-ET opening pressure (ETOP), ET opening duration (ETOD) and ET opening frequency (ETOF)-were determined under exactly the same preconditions three times in a row. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland and Altman plot were used to assess test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

ICCs revealed a high correlation for ETOP and ETOF in phases of decompression (passive equalisation) as well as ETOD and ETOP in phases of compression (active induced equalisation). Very high correlation could be shown for ETOD in decompression and ETOF in compression phases. The Bland and Altman graphs could show that measurements provide results within a 95 % confidence interval in compression and decompression phases.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that measurements in a pressure chamber are a very valuable tool in terms of estimating the ET opening and closing function. Measurements show some variance comparing participants, but provide reliable results within a 95 % confidence interval in retest. This study is the basis for enabling efficacy measurements of ET treatment modalities.

[The pressure-equalizing function of the Eustachian tube : Evaluation in a hypo-/hyperbaric pressure chamber]

BACKGROUND

The Eustachian tube connects the tympanic cavity (cavum tympani) and the nasopharynx, and enables pressure equalization between the middle ear and ambient pressure. Functional pressure compensation is very important for flying and diving in particular, due to non-physiologically large pressure differences.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of the pressure-equalizing function of the Eustachian tube is still a clinical challenge. This review article evaluates the existing data.

METHODS

Based on a selective literature search, different methods for evaluation of tube function are presented and evaluated, with special reference to evaluation of the pressure-equalizing function in a hypo-/hyperbaric pressure chamber.

RESULTS

The pressure chamber enables the dynamics of active and passive pressure compensation to be provoked and also permits accurate measurement of pressures in the millibar range.

CONCLUSION

A pressure chamber seems to be suitable to evaluate Eustachian tube function and therapeutic approaches to tube dysfunction. Further studies are needed to assess the value of the pressure chamber in combination with other functional tests.

Detection of eustachian tube openings by tubomanometry in adult otitis media with effusion

Otitis media with effusion (OME) is a common disease and eustachian tube (ET) dysfunction is widely known to be related to the incidence of OME; however, objective evaluation tools for ET function are lacking. To evaluate ET openings by tubomanometry (TMM) in adult patients with otitis media with effusion (OME), the ET patency of 123 ears, including 63 ears of OME patients and 60 control ears, were tested using TMM and tympanometry. ET patency was evaluated by the R value and ET score, and was compared to the tympanogram results. The eustachian tube dysfunction questionnaire (ETDQ-7) was used to assess the severity of the symptoms in OME patients. The results showed that the rates of restricted opening or blocked ET under pressures of 30, 40, and 50 mbar by TMM testing were 10, 5, and 0 %, respectively (control group) and 76.19, 66.7, and 57.97 %, respectively (OME group) (p < 0.05 for all pressure groups). However, the rates were 77.42, 71.97, and 61.29 % in the type B tympanogram group, and 75, 62.5, and 46.87 % in the type C tympanogram group; no significant difference was found at each testing pressure (p = 0.821, 0.246, and 0.516; respectively) between these tympanogram groups. The mean ETDQ-7 score in OME patients was 16.40 ± 10.72, which was significantly negatively correlated with the ET score at 30 and 40 mbar (30 mbar: correlation coefficient -0.29, p = 0.025; 40 mbar: correlation coefficient -0.28; p = 0.030), but not at 50 mbar (correlation coefficient -0.013, p = 0.924). These findings showed that ET blockage or delayed opening were found in most adult patients with OME when evaluated by this innovative and semi objective TMM, testing pressures should be considered when assessing the results of TMM in OME patients.