Ménière's Syndrome or Disease: Time Trends in Management and Quality of Evidence Over the Last Two Decades

The effectiveness of intratympanic injections with methylPREDnisolon versus placebo in the treatment of vertigo attacks in MENière's disease (PREDMEN trial): a study protocol for a phase-3 multicentre, double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Intratympanic corticosteroids are commonly used in the treatment of Menière's disease (MD). However, few and small randomised controlled trials (RCT) on the effectiveness of intratympanic corticosteroids have been performed. A recent Cochrane review suggested that a well-conducted placebo-controlled RCT with a large study population is required to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of intratympanic corticosteroids in MD. The following protocol describes a phase-3 multicentre, double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of methylprednisolone (62.5 mg/mL) to a placebo (sodium chloride 0.9%).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We aim to recruit 148 patients with unilateral MD from six hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients will be randomly assigned to either the methylprednisolone or the placebo group. Two injections will be given, one at baseline and one after 2 weeks. Follow-up assessments will be done at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. The primary outcome will be the frequency of vertigo attacks. Attacks will be evaluated daily with the DizzyQuest app. Secondary outcomes include hearing loss, tinnitus, health-related quality of life, use of co-interventions and escape medication, (serious) adverse events and cost-effectiveness. These will be evaluated with audiometry and multiple commonly used, validated questionnaires. For the primary and secondary outcomes mixed model analysis, generalised estimating equation analysis and logistic regression analysis will be used.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was submitted via the Clinical Trials Information System, reviewed and approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee Leiden The Hague Delft and the local institutional review board of each participating centre. All data will be presented ensuring the integrity and anonymity of patients. Results will be published in scientific journals and presented on (inter)national conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System, with the registration ID: NCT05851508.

Endolymphatic duct blockage surgery vs. intratympanic steroids for treatment of refractory Ménière's disease

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness of the Endolymphatic duct blockage (EDB) and intratympanic methylprednisolone(ITMP) injection to control refractory Ménière's disease(MD) symptoms and evaluate their impact on hearing level.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study in a tertiary care center.

METHODS

36 received ITMP injection and 52 EDB. Mean outcome measures at 24 months included vertigo control, tinnitus, aural fullness and hearing level: pure-tone average (PTA), bone conduction average(BCA) and speech discrimination score(SDS).

RESULTS

At 24 months postoperatively, 90.4% of the EDB group had complete control of vertigo and 43.4% of the ITMP group (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in tinnitus or aural fullness control (p = 0.34 and p 0.21 respectively). In each group, the drop in tinnitus and aural fullness frequency at 24 months were significant for EDB (p = 0.03; p < 0.001 respectively) and for ITMP group in tinnitus (p = 0.03) but not aural fullness (p = 0.063). At 24 months, PTA, BCA and SDS were significantly worst in the ITMP group when compared to preoperative levels (p = 0.038, p = 0.027, p = 0.016). PTA in the EDB group was stable with no difference compared to ITMP group (p = 0.48). BCA and SDS in the EDB group were stable and better than the ITMP group (p = 0.032; p = 0.036). In each group, vestibular paresis was not significantly different before (p = 0.06) and after treatment (p = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

EDB is more effective than the ITMP for controlling the vertigo symptoms of Ménière's disease and in preserving hearing function. It is a novel surgical technique with promising results for a complete treatment of Ménière's disease. ITMP decreases the frequency and the severity of the symptoms but only control vertigo in 27.8% of cases.

Pharmacologic and surgical therapies for patients with Meniere's disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Meniere's disease (MD) is a chronic condition of the inner ear consisting of symptoms that include vertigo attacks, fluctuating sensorineural hearing loss, tinnitus and aural fullness. Despite availability of various interventions, there is uncertainty surrounding their relative efficacy, thus making it difficult to select the appropriate treatments for MD. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the relative effects of the available pharmacologic and surgical interventions in patients with MD with regard to vertigo and other key patient outcomes based on data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

METHODS

Our published protocol registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019119129) provides details on eligibility criteria and methods. We searched various databases including MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library from inception to December 10th, 2018. Screening at citation and full-text levels and risk of bias assessment were performed by two independent reviewers in duplicate, with discrepancies resolved by consensus or third-party adjudication. Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMA) were performed for hearing change and vertigo control outcomes, along with pairwise meta-analyses for these and additional outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 2,889 unique citations, that yielded 23 relevant publications describing 18 unique RCTs (n = 1,231 patients). Overall, risk-of bias appraisal suggested the evidence base to be at unclear or high risk of bias. Amongst pharmacologics, we constructed treatment networks of five intervention groups that included placebo, intratympanic (IT) gentamicin, oral high-dose betahistine, IT steroid and IT steroid plus high-dose betahistine for NMAs of hearing change (improvement or deterioration) and complete vertigo control. IT steroid plus high-dose betahistine was associated with the largest difference in hearing improvement compared to placebo, followed by high-dose betahistine and IT steroid (though 95% credible intervals failed to rule out the possibility of no difference), while IT gentamicin was worse than IT steroid. The NMA of complete vertigo control suggested IT gentamicin was associated with the highest probability of achieving better complete vertigo control compared to placebo, followed by IT steroid plus high-dose betahistine. Only two studies related to surgical interventions were found, and data suggested no statistically significant difference in hearing changes between endolymphatic duct blockage (EDB) versus endolymphatic sac decompression (ESD), and ESD with or without steroid injection. One trial reported that 96.5% of patients in EDB group compared to 37.5% of the patients in ESD group achieved complete vertigo control 24 months after surgery (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

To achieve both hearing preservation and vertigo control, the best treatment option among the pharmacologic interventions compared may be IT steroid plus high-dose betahistine, considering that IT gentamicin may have good performance to control vertigo but may be detrimental to hearing preservation with high cumulative dosage and short interval between injections. However, IT steroid plus high-dose betahistine has not been compared in head-to-head trials against other interventions except for IT steroid alone in one trial, thus future trials that compare it with other interventions will help establish comparative effectiveness with direct evidence.

What is the efficacy of gentamicin on the incidence of vertigo attacks and hearing in patients with Meniere's disease compared with steroids? A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of gentamicin and steroids in patients with Meniere's disease (MD).

METHODS

The study protocol was structured in accordance with the Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome (PICO) framework. We used "Endnote" (Thomson ResearchSoft; Stanford, Connecticut, the United States) to retrieve database documents. A systematic literature search of Web of Science and PubMed Database through May 2020 was conducted using specific search terms. Inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria, vertigo improvement, and exact hearing changes were defined. Review Manager 5.3 (Cochrane) was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 80 articles were searched from Web of Science and 23 articles were searched from PubMed database. After further reviewing the specific points of the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, 9 papers were finally selected. Intratympanic gentamicin (ITG) was superior to intratympanic steroid (ITS) in reducing the number of vertigo attacks (odds ratio (OR) 3.08, 95% confidence intervals (CI) [2.05-3.65]), probability (P) < 0.01). As for hearing improvement, we did the analysis twice. With all the studies included, the odds of hearing improvement (by "x") was 0.31 among patients receiving gentamicin compared to those treated by steroids (OR 0.31, 95% CI [0.16-0.61]). But after removing one study with outlying results from the analysis, this effect disappeared. Hearing loss of ITG and ITS was not statistically significant (P = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

ITG is superior to ITS in reducing the number of vertigo attacks in the treatment of MD (P < 0.01); the impact on hearing is more heterogeneous in the studies. Overall, there was no clear difference between ITG and ITS on hearing improvement and on hearing loss.

Clinical Practice Guideline: Ménière's Disease

OBJECTIVE

Ménière's disease (MD) is a clinical condition defined by spontaneous vertigo attacks (each lasting 20 minutes to 12 hours) with documented low- to midfrequency sensorineural hearing loss in the affected ear before, during, or after one of the episodes of vertigo. It also presents with fluctuating aural symptoms (hearing loss, tinnitus, or ear fullness) in the affected ear. The underlying etiology of MD is not completely clear, yet it has been associated with inner ear fluid (endolymph) volume increases, culminating in episodic ear symptoms (vertigo, fluctuating hearing loss, tinnitus, and aural fullness). Physical examination findings are often unremarkable, and audiometric testing may or may not show low- to midfrequency sensorineural hearing loss. Conventional imaging, if performed, is also typically normal. The goals of MD treatment are to prevent or reduce vertigo severity and frequency; relieve or prevent hearing loss, tinnitus, and aural fullness; and improve quality of life. Treatment approaches to MD are many and typically include modifications of lifestyle factors (eg, diet) and medical, surgical, or a combination of therapies.

PURPOSE

The primary purpose of this clinical practice guideline is to improve the quality of the diagnostic workup and treatment outcomes of MD. To achieve this purpose, the goals of this guideline are to use the best available published scientific and/or clinical evidence to enhance diagnostic accuracy and appropriate therapeutic interventions (medical and surgical) while reducing unindicated diagnostic testing and/or imaging.

Pharmacologic and surgical therapies for patients with Meniere's disease: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hearing loss is one of the leading causes of disability in Canada and worldwide, with more than one million Canadians enduring a hearing-related disability. Meniere's disease (MD) is a chronic condition of the inner ear, manifesting as a triad of disabling symptoms, including attacks of vertigo, fluctuating sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), and tinnitus. Impacts on quality of life are severe, particularly with respect to restrictions in social participation and physical activity, fatigue, and reduced capacity to work. Anxiety and other psychological disorders may result from the restrictions imposed on life, the constant uncertainty of vertigo attacks, and fluctuating SNHL, with neuroses and depression affecting 40 to 60% of sufferers of intractable MD. There is a need to establish the benefits of previously studied interventions with greater certainty. The planned systematic review and meta-analyses/network meta-analyses (NMAs) will assess the relative effects of competing pharmacologic and surgical interventions for management of MD in adults.

METHODS

An experienced medical information specialist in consultation with the review team will develop the electronic search strategies. We will search various databases including MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library with no date or language restrictions for published literature, and key clinical trial registries for in-progress and completed trials. Screening of the literature will be performed by two reviewers independently using pre-specified eligibility criteria, and quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. We will resolve disagreements through consensus or third-party adjudication. When applicable, meta-analyses and NMAs will be pursued to compare interventions in terms of their effects on outcomes, including frequency and severity of vertigo, occurrence and intensity of tinnitus, changes in hearing and speech recognition, quality of life, and harms. Separate analyses exploring the effects of pharmacologic and surgical approaches will be performed.

DISCUSSION

Our planned systematic review will provide informative evaluations of existing treatments for management of Meniere's disease. The findings will inform practitioners as to the relative benefits and harms of the existing competing interventions for MD, offer optimal clinical treatment strategies, identify evidence gaps, and determine promising therapies for evaluation in future trials.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42019119129.

Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency and menière's disease: Interventional versus medical therapy

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To evaluate the incidence of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in Menière's disease patients and the effect of bilateral percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the jugular/azygos veins compared to medical therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective case-control study.

METHODS

Five hundred fourteen subjects were included in the study, 412 affected by definite Menière's disease, and 102 healthy controls. All patients underwent audiovestibular and vascular examination. Patients with Menière's disease and concomitant cerebrospinal venous insufficiency were divided in two subgroups: patients who underwent vascular intervention with bilateral percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of the jugular/azygos veins and patients treated with medical therapy.

RESULTS

Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency was diagnosed in 330/412 (80.1%) Menière's disease patients and in 12/102 healthy individuals (11.8%) (P < .001). In the two chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency subgroups, a significant difference in Dizziness Handicap Inventory scores was found between patients in the PTA group compared to patients treated with medical therapy (31 ± 8.6 vs. 48.1 ± 14.4; P < .001); no significant differences were found for the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory scores (50.8 ± 16.58 vs. 49.6 ± 17.5; P = .23). Subjective evaluation of aural fullness was significantly better in patients in the PTA group (P = .003) as well as pure-tone average, which was significantly different between groups (49.8 ± 16.5 dB in the PTA group vs. 55.8 ± 13 in the medical therapy group; P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study confirm the close relationship between vascular disorders and Menière's disease. The encouraging responses to vascular interventional therapy on Meniére's disease symptoms suggest that this may be a promising path for interpretation and treatment of this complex disease.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2b Laryngoscope, 130: 2040-2046, 2020.

Intratympanic Therapies in Ménière Disease: Evaluation of Outcomes and Early Vertigo Control

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcomes of intratympanic (IT) dexamethasone and gentamicin in Ménière Disease (MD).

METHODS

Charts of adult patients with unilateral definite MD receiving IT gentamicin or dexamethasone from 2005 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had at least 6 months follow-up. Failure in each group was defined as the need for more aggressive therapy. Prior to 2011, all patient received IT gentamicin, administered as primary therapy after failure of conservative treatment measures. Gentamicin was administered every 2 weeks, up to three injections, until vertigo control was achieved. Beginning in 2011, the treatment protocol shifted to IT dexamethasone as initial treatment, with gentamicin used for dexamethasone failures. Dexamethasone was administered weekly for up to three injections. Treatments could be repeated if symptoms recurred.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients received IT dexamethasone, and 70 patients received IT gentamicin. Dexamethasone patients received a mean of 3.3 injections compared to 2.7 in the gentamicin group (P = 0.011). There were 12 (38%) failures in the dexamethasone group and only seven (10%) gentamicin failures (P = 0.025). No patients failed both treatments. The mean time to failure in the dexamethasone group was 5 months, whereas in the gentamicin group it was 27 months. Change in pure tone audiometry from baseline was not different between treatment groups (P = 0.30).

CONCLUSION

Subjects receiving IT gentamicin required fewer injections and had a significantly longer time to failure than IT dexamethasone. Audiometric outcomes were similar between the groups. The use of IT gentamicin as initial therapy for early and long-term control of MD is safe and effective.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 129:216-221, 2019.

Inpatient Treatment of Patients Admitted for Dizziness: A Population-Based Healthcare Research Study on Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome

OBJECTIVE

To determine inpatient treatment rates of patients with dizziness with focus on diagnostics, treatment and outcome.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective population-based study.

SETTING

Inpatients in the federal state Thuringia in 2014.

PATIENTS

All 1,262 inpatients (62% females, median age: 61 yr) treated for inpatient dizziness were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The association between analyzed parameters and probability of improvement and recovery was tested using univariable and multivariable statistics.

RESULTS

Final diagnosis at demission was peripheral vestibular disorder (PVD), central vestibular disorder (CVD), cardiovascular syndrome, somatoform syndrome, and unclassified disease in 75, 9, 3, 0.6, and 13%, respectively. The most frequent diseases were acute vestibular neuritis (28%) and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (22%). The follow-up time was 38 ± 98 days. 88.5% of patients showed at least an improvement of complaints and 31.4% a complete recovery. The probability for no improvement from inpatient dizziness was higher if the patient had a history of ear/vestibular disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.506; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.301-1.742), and was taking more than two drugs for comorbidity (HR = 1.163; CI = 1.032-1.310). Compared with final diagnosis of cardiovascular syndrome, patients with PVD (HR = 1.715; CI = 1.219-2.415) and CVD (HR = 1.587; CI = 1.076-2.341) had a worse outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Inpatient treatment of dizziness was highly variable in daily practice. The population-based recovery rate was worse than reported in clinical trials. We need better ways to implement clinical trial findings for inpatients with dizziness.

International consensus (ICON) on treatment of Ménière's disease

OBJECTIVE

To present the international consensus for recommendations for Ménière's disease (MD) treatment.

METHODS

Based on a literature review and report of 4 experts from 4 continents, the recommendations have been presented during the 21st IFOS congress in Paris, in June 2017 and are presented in this work.

RESULTS

The recommendation is to change the lifestyle, to use the vestibular rehabilitation in the intercritic period and to propose psychotherapy. As a conservative medical treatment of first line, the authors recommend to use diuretics and Betahistine or local pressure therapy. When medical treatment fails, the recommendation is to use a second line treatment, which consists in the intratympanic injection of steroids. Then as a third line treatment, depending on the hearing function, could be either the endolymphatic sac surgery (when hearing is worth being preserved) or the intratympanic injection of gentamicin (with higher risks of hearing loss). The very last option is the destructive surgical treatment labyrinthectomy, associated or not to cochlear implantation or vestibular nerve section (when hearing is worth being preserved), which is the most frequent option.

Recent surgical options for vestibular vertigo

Vertigo is not a well-defined disease but a symptom that can occur in heterogeneous entities diagnosed and treated mainly by otolaryngologists, neurologists, internal medicine, and primary care physicians. Most vertigo syndromes have a good prognosis and management is predominantly conservative, whereas the need for surgical therapy is rare, but for a subset of patients often the only remaining option. In this paper, we describe and discuss different surgical therapy options for hydropic inner ear diseases, Menière's disease, dehiscence syndromes, perilymph fistulas, and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. At the end, we shortly introduce the most recent developments in regard to vestibular implants. Surgical therapy is still indicated for vestibular disease in selected patients nowadays when conservative options did not reduce symptoms and patients are still suffering. Success depends on the correct diagnosis and choosing among different procedures the ones going along with an adequate patient selection. With regard to the invasiveness and the possible risks due to surgery, in depth individual counseling is absolutely necessary. Ablative and destructive surgical procedures usually achieve a successful vertigo control, but are associated with a high risk for hearing loss. Therefore, residual hearing has to be included in the decision making process for surgical therapy.

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: Contemporary review and implications for the otolaryngologist

OBJECTIVES

1) Review controversies pertaining to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. 2) Discuss the evolving role of otolaryngologists in managing this disease and related disorders.

DATA SOURCES

Primary literature review, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website, International Classification of Headache Disorders, Second Edition.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the primary literature was performed from 1990 to 2016 utilizing keywords idiopathic intracranial hypertension, pseudotumor cerebri, benign intracranial hypertension, spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leak, and encephalocele. Articles were included at the discretion of the authors based on novel and/or historical contributions to the literature.

RESULTS

The incidence of idiopathic intracranial hypertension is increasing along with the obesity epidemic. Undiagnosed patients may present to otolaryngologists with pulsatile tinnitus, dizziness, sleep apnea, and spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Although diagnosis is predicated upon imaging findings and lumbar puncture, radiographic signs including empty sella, optic nerve dilation, and globe flattening may suggest the diagnosis. The most effective intervention is weight loss combined with acetazolamide. Surgery is reserved for severe or refractory symptoms and can be highly morbid. Otolaryngologists are increasingly responsible for managing a number of secondary disorders including cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea and otorrhea. Failure to manage intracranial hypertension may lead to adverse surgical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The knowledge base for idiopathic intracranial hypertension has greatly expanded over the past 25 years. This disease is associated with a number of conditions directly relevant to otolaryngologists. A keen understanding of this disorder and its management may optimize outcomes in a growing number of patients. Laryngoscope, 128:248-256, 2018.