Quality of Life in Patients With Vestibular Schwannomas According to Management Strategy

Comparative analysis of upfront stereotactic radiosurgery and watchful waiting in the management of newly diagnosed vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign intracranial tumors posing significant management challenges. This study aims to compare the outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and watchful waiting (WW) in the management of newly diagnosed VS, integrating findings from both retrospective and the pioneering V-REX prospective trial. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Studies directly comparing SRS with WW for newly diagnosed VS were included. Primary outcomes focused on hearing preservation assessed through the AAO-HNS or Gardner-Robertson hearing classification scales and tumor progression, with secondary outcomes focusing on neurological symptoms, and the need for further treatment. Thirteen studies encompassing 1,635 patients (WW: 891; SRS: 744) were included.While no significant difference was found in serviceable hearing loss at last follow-up (RR = 1.51, [95%CI: 0.98, 2.32], p = 0.06), significant differences favoring WW were observed in pure tone audiometry (PTA) (MD = -13.51 [95%CI: -22.66, -4.37], p = 0.004) and word recognition score (WRS) (MD = 20.48 [95%CI: 9.72, 31.25], p = 0.0002). Analysis of tumor progression indicated no overall significant difference in risk between SRS and WW (RR = 0.40, [95%CI 0.07, 2.40], p = 0.32), but subgroup analysis suggested a lower risk with SRS in certain contexts. The need for further treatments favored SRS (RR = 0.24, [95%CI: 0.07, 0.74], p = 0.007). No significant differences were found in tinnitus and imbalance between the two groups. This comprehensive analysis suggests no marked difference in functional hearing preservation between SRS and WW in managing VS. However, untreated tumors commonly necessitate additional interventions. These findings highlight the need for individualized treatment decisions and underscore the importance of continued monitoring. The study advocates for further prospective trials to refine management strategies for VS.

Comparing Patient Satisfaction After Upfront Treatment Versus Wait-and-Scan for Small Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

Management of small vestibular schwannoma (VS) remains controversial, as patients are typically candidates for all three management options including microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, or wait-and-scan. This study compares patient satisfaction across treatment modalities in patients with small VS.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Survey distributed to members of the Acoustic Neuroma Association and Mayo Clinic patients.

METHODS

Patients with small (<1 cm in any location) sporadic VS who completed at least one survey regarding treatment history and patient satisfaction were included.

RESULTS

Among 346 patients with small VS, 106 (31%) underwent microsurgery, 78 (23%) radiosurgery, 152 (44%) wait-and-scan, and 10 (3%) multimodal treatment. Collectively, 307 (89%) patients indicated "Yes, I am happy with my treatment type and in hindsight I would not change anything," and 39 (11%) indicated "No, in hindsight I would have chosen a different treatment type." Satisfaction differed significantly by treatment group with 85, 86, 96, and 40% of patients in the microsurgery, radiosurgery, wait-and-scan, and multimodal groups reporting that they were satisfied with treatment, respectively ( p < 0.001). Satisfaction also differed significantly among those undergoing upfront treatment with microsurgery or radiosurgery (81%), initial wait-and-scan followed by treatment (88%), and wait-and-scan only groups (96%; p = 0.001). Specifically, the wait-and-scan only group demonstrated greater satisfaction compared with the other two treatment strategies ( p < 0.05 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient satisfaction with the management of small VS is generally high. Management with wait-and-scan, even if treatment is eventually pursued, may offer higher patient satisfaction compared with upfront treatment.

Quality of life reporting in the management of posterior fossa tumours: A systematic review

Introduction

Survival amongst posterior fossa tumour (PFT) patients is improving. Clinical endpoints such as overall survival fail to depict QoL. There is yet to be a review of current QoL instruments used for adult PFTs. Aim of this review is to outline the QoL reporting in the management of PFTs and measure participation level.

Methods

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. A search strategy to identify adult patients with PFTs who took part in QoL metrics was conducted. Observational and experimental studies published from 1990 to date were included. Studies with a sample size less than 10 and performance measures such as Karnofsky Performance Status were not considered.

Results

A total of 116 studies were included in the final analysis. Vestibular schwannomas were the most common tumour pathology (n = 23,886, 92.6%) followed by pilocytic astrocytomas (n = 657, 2.5%) and meningiomas (n = 437, 1.7%) Twenty-five different QoL measures were used in the study pool. SF-36 was the most common (n = 55, 17 47.4%) QoL metric in the whole study pool, followed by the Penn Acoustic Neuroma QoL scale (n = 24, 20.7%) and Dizziness Handicap Inventory (n = 16, 13.8%). Seventy-two studies reported less-than 100% participation in QoL evaluation. The commonest reason for non-participation was a lack of response (n = 1,718, 60.8%), incomplete questionnaires (n = 268, 9.4%) and cognitive dysfunction (n = 258, 9.1%).

Conclusion

Informed clinical decision-making in PFT patients requires the development of specific QoL outcomes. Core outcome sets, and minimal clinically important differences (MCID) are essential for these metrics to show clinically significant improvements in patient QoL.

A Systematic Review of Interventions for Balance Dysfunction in Patients With Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

Dizziness is a major contributing factor to poor quality of life for patients with vestibular schwannoma (acoustic neuroma). We wished to review the literature on interventions for balance dysfunction in these patients.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic literature review was performed identifying studies that measured balance function before and after treatment for vestibular schwannoma. Data sources include Medline (1950-present), EMBASE (1974-present), Cochrane Library (issue 3, 2008), NHS Centre of reviews and dissemination, Clinical Evidence, Cochrane central register of controlled trial, and CINAHL.

STUDY SELECTION

A minimum follow-up of 6 months was required, to estimate long-term balance function. Eight articles were identified, including five studies with surgical intervention, two studies with stereotactic radiotherapy, and one comparing the two. Study design was generally poor with a high risk of bias. These studies all utilized the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) as a measure of pre- and postintervention balance function.

DATA EXTRACTION

Results showed that overall DHI scores are not statistically affected by intervention irrespective of modality (surgery or stereotactic radiotherapy). Patients selected with severe dizziness, who undergo surgery, improved postoperatively. No other studies for severe dizziness were noted for comparison.

CONCLUSIONS

Age, sex, and tumor size have no statistically significant effect on DHI outcomes, and no evidence to suggest which treatment modality has better dizziness related outcomes.No specific treatment modality was superior in terms of long-term balance function. Patients with severe dizziness may benefit from surgery, although no comparator studies were identified.

Prospective Study of Disease-Specific Quality-of-Life in Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma Comparing Observation, Radiosurgery, and Microsurgery

BACKGROUND

Previous cross-sectional studies analyzing quality of life (QOL) outcomes in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) have shown surprisingly little difference among treatment modalities. To date, there is limited prospective QOL outcome data available comparing baseline to posttreatment scores.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal study using the disease-specific Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life (PANQOL) scale.

SETTING

Large academic skull base center.

PATIENTS

Patients diagnosed with unilateral VS who completed a baseline survey before treatment and at least one posttreatment survey.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in PANQOL scores from baseline to most recent survey.

RESULTS

A total of 244 patients were studied, including 78 (32%) who elected observation, 118 (48%) microsurgery, and 48 (20%) stereotactic radiosurgery. Patients who underwent microsurgery were younger (p < 0.001) and had larger tumors (p < 0.001) than those who underwent observation or radiosurgery; there was no significant difference in duration of follow-up among management groups (mean 2.1 yrs; p = 0.28). When comparing the total PANQOL score at baseline to the most recent survey, the net change was only -1.1, -0.1, and 0.3 points on a 100-point scale for observation, microsurgery, and radiosurgery, respectively (p = 0.89). After multivariable adjustment for baseline features, there were no statistically significant changes when comparing baseline to most recent scores within each management group for facial function, general health, balance, hearing loss, energy, and pain domains or total score. However, the microsurgical group experienced a 10.8-point improvement (p = 0.002) in anxiety following treatment, compared with 1.5 (p = 0.73) and 5.3 (p = 0.31) for observation and radiosurgery, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective longitudinal study investigating differences in QOL outcomes among VS treatment groups using the disease-specific PANQOL instrument, treatment did not modify QOL in most domains. Microsurgery may confer an advantage with regard to patient anxiety, presumably relating to the psychological benefit of "cure" from having the tumor removed.

The role of a virtual telephone clinic in the follow-up management of lateral skull base tumours

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article was to determine the impact of employing a telephone clinic for follow-up of patients with stable lateral skull-base tumours.

METHOD

An analysis of 1515 patients in the national lateral skull-base service was performed, and 148 patients enrolled in the telephone clinic to date were identified. The length of time that patients waited for results of their follow-up scans and the travel distance saved by patients not having to attend the hospital for their results was determined.

RESULTS

The mean time from scan to receiving results was 30.5 ± 32 days, 14 days sooner than in the face-to-face group (p = 0.0016). The average round-trip distance travelled by patients to the hospital for results of their scans was 256 ± 131 km.

CONCLUSION

The telephone clinic led to a significant reduction in time until patients received their scan results and helped reduce travel distance and clinic numbers in traditional face-to-face clinics.

Management and Outcomes of Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma: A Longitudinal Study Over 12 Years

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the management of sporadic vestibular schwannomas (VS) with a 12-year follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of all VS patients initially treated in 2005 in a tertiary referent center.

METHODS

Initial decision making for microsurgical resection (MSR) or wait-and-scan (WaS) was according to VS size and hearing; subsequently, MSR or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was proposed dependent on VS growth and size, hearing, and patient's age or willingness.

RESULTS

Two hundred and one sporadic VS were included. The first management apportionment was 120 WaS (61.5%), 72 MSR (37%), three SRS (1.5%), and six others refused MSR and were lost to follow-up (LFU). Within 1 year, 95 (47%) VS were surgically removed; 17 (8.5%) were treated by SRS; and 35 (17.5%) were LFU. The proportions for SRS and LFU were virtually unchanged for the following years, and the proportion under MSR increased slightly within 3 years and then remained stable. Finally, at 12 years, 104 (51.5%) cases had been operated on, 21 (10.5%) treated by SRS, 23 (11.5%) still under WaS, and 53 (26.5%) LFU, which were mainly intracanalicular. The initially and subsequently operated cases presented similar hearing preservation rates and good facial nerve function outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This longitudinal study of a large number of VS, which were diagnosed over a short period of time and followed for 12 years, provides new information on both the natural history of these benign tumors and individual patient concerns. This study recommends use of the WaS policy for small and mid-sized VS before active therapeutic decision making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 131:E970-E976, 2021.

SF-36 scores predict postoperative delirium after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy

OBJECTIVE

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is one of the most common causes of spinal cord dysfunction. Surgery for CSM is generally effective, but postoperative delirium is a potential complication. Although there have been some studies that investigated postoperative delirium after spine surgery, no useful tool for identifying high-risk patients has been established, and it is unknown if 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores can predict postoperative delirium. The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between preoperative SF-36 scores and postoperative delirium after surgery for CSM.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients who underwent surgery for CSM at the authors' institution were enrolled in this study. Medical records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed. Patient background, preoperative laboratory data, preoperative SF-36 scores, the preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score for the evaluation of cervical myelopathy, and perioperative factors were selected as potential risk factors for postoperative delirium. These factors were evaluated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Ten patients were diagnosed with postoperative delirium. Univariable analysis revealed that the physical functioning score (p = 0.01), general health perception score (p < 0.01), and vitality score (p < 0.01) of the SF-36 were significantly lower in patients with postoperative delirium than in those without. The total number of medications was significantly higher in the delirium group compared with the no-delirium group (p = 0.02). In contrast, there were no significant differences between the delirium group and the no-delirium group in cervical JOA scores (p = 0.20). Multivariable analysis revealed that a low general health perception score was an independent risk factor for postoperative delirium (p = 0.02; odds ratio 0.810, 95% confidence interval 0.684-0.960).

CONCLUSIONS

Some of the SF-36 scores were significantly lower in patients with postoperative delirium than in those without. In particular, the general health perception score was independently correlated with postoperative delirium. SF-36 scores could help identify patients at high risk for postoperative delirium and aid in the development of prevention strategies.

Quality of life related to symptomatic outcomes in patients with vestibular schwannomas: A Canadian Centre perspective

Patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) typically present with hearing loss and tinnitus as well as variable cranial nerve dysfunctions. Surgical resection, stereotactic radiotherapy and/or conservative management employing serial magnetic resonance or computed tomography imaging serve as the main treatment options. Quality of life (QoL) may be impacted by the extent of tumour burden and exacerbated or relieved by treatment. Subjective assessment and quality of life inventories provide valuable information in client centered approaches with important implications for treatment. The intention of QoL measurements affecting VS patients within a clinical setting is to facilitate discussions regarding treatment options and objectively evaluate patient- centered clinical outcomes in a naturalistic setting.

Comparison of balance outcomes according to treatment modality of vestibular schwannoma

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare balance outcomes according to treatment modality of vestibular schwannoma (VS) via a meta-analysis that divided measuring tools of balance outcomes into three categories based on type.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature from January 1966 to September 2017 was performed, looking for studies about long-term balance outcomes after microsurgery (MS), radiotherapy (RT), or observation for VS. A comprehensive meta-analysis was used to analyze effect sizes, explore possible causes of heterogeneity, and check publication bias with a funnel plot and Egger's regression.

RESULTS

Among 633 references, 34 were included in the meta-analysis. Perceived dizziness improvement rate was significantly higher in the MS group than in the RT group (odds ratio [OR]: 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08 to 2.40; P < .05, I² = 4.18], but no significant difference was observed between the two groups with regard to validated dizziness questionnaire score (standardized mean difference: 0.04; 95% CI: -0.36 to 0.44; P = .84, I² = 69.61) or dizziness or disequilibrium-related symptom incidence rate (OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.50 to 1.68; P = .77, I² = 0). In a subanalysis conducted within the groups after intervention, the MS group demonstrated a lower vertigo incidence rate (P < .001), and the RT group experienced a significant reduction in validated dizziness questionnaire score (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that MS should be considered at least equal to RT in regard to resolving long-term dizziness and improving balance outcomes. Furthermore, well-designed studies are necessary to predict balance outcomes after VS treatment and to choose from among possible treatment options.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2a Laryngoscope, 130:178-189, 2020.

Quality of life in the management of small vestibular schwannomas: Observation, radiotherapy and microsurgery

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare quality of life (QOL) in small unilateral vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients managed by microsurgery, radiotherapy or observation.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective chart review.

METHODS

The study included a total of 142 patients with VS stage 1 or 2 according to the Koos classification and treated between January 2004 and December 2015. Microsurgery, radiotherapy and observation groups comprised 43, 46 and 53 patients, respectively. All patients completed four QOL (questionnaires: Short-Form Health Survey 36, Hearing Handicap Inventory, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and Dizziness Handicap Inventory Short-Form). Clinical symptoms and QOL were compared among groups.

RESULTS

The average time interval between management and filling in the questionnaires was 66 months. There was no difference in QOL between the three groups on any of the four questionnaires. The most debilitating symptom was vertigo for all three groups. Tinnitus was a pejorative factor in the surgery group. Hearing level was deteriorated after microsurgery but there was no significant difference between the radiotherapy group and the middle fossa approach.

CONCLUSION

Patients with small VS stage 1 and 2 had similar QOL, irrespective of management by observation, radiotherapy or microsurgery. The overall predictor for long-term reduced QOL was vertigo. Vestibular rehabilitation could improve QOL in symptomatic patients.

The Feasibility of a Modified Exclusive Endoscopic Transcanal Transpromontorial Approach for Vestibular Schwannomas

Objective  We evaluated the feasibility of an exclusive endoscopic transcanal transpromontorial approach (EETTA) for the treatment of small vestibular schwannomas (VSs) limited to the internal auditory canal (IAC), and introduced a modification without external auditory canal closure.

Methods  Between June 2016 and June 2017, seven patients with VS underwent surgery using a modified EETTA. Treatment outcomes, including efficacy of tumor resection, preservation of function, operation time, and quality of life (QOL), were evaluated.

Results  The patients preoperatively exhibited Koos Grade I/II tumors and severe-to-profound hearing loss. Gross total resection was accomplished in all cases. There were no major complications, and all patients exhibited normal facial nerve function immediately after surgery. The mean follow-up period was 12.9 months. The operation time (average 196.3 ± 64.9 minutes) and hospitalization period (average 7.4 ± 1.0 days) were favorable. Short Form-36 scores for QOL showed unremarkable results compared with previous reports.

Conclusions  The modified EETTA was effective in the removal of VSs in the IAC. It can be an alternative surgical option for small VSs.

Cochlear obliteration following a translabyrinthine approach and its implications in cochlear implantation

The most frequent sequelae following a translabyrinthine approach for vestibular schwannoma resection is complete hearing loss on the affected side. Such patients could benefit from a cochlear implant, provided that two essential requisites are met before surgery: a preserved cochlear nerve and a patent cochlea to accommodate the electrode array. The goal of our study is to determine the prevalence and extent of cochlear ossification following a translabyrinthine approach. Postoperative MRI of 41 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified according to the degree of cochlear obliteration into three groups (patent cochlea, partially obliterated cochlea and totally obliterated cochlea). The interval between surgery and the first MRI was studied as well as its relationship with the rate of cochlear ossification. At first postoperative MRI (mean interval of 20 months), 78% of patients showed some degree of cochlear ossification. Differences were found in the time interval between surgery and first MRI for each group, showing a smaller interval of time the patent cochlea group (p > 0.05). When MRI was performed before the first year after surgery, a larger rate of patent cochlea was found (p > 0.05). The present study suggests that cochlear ossification is a time-depending process, whose grounds are still to be defined.

Quality of life in patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma on wait and see - strategy

OBJECTIVE

A 'wait and see' strategy is an option when managing patients with small vestibular schwannomas (VS). A risk of growth and worsening of hearing may influence a patient's daily quality of life (QOL). Therefore, the present study focused on QOL parameters in patients who are on a 'wait and see' strategy following magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based diagnosis of small unilateral VS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-five patients (mean age 64.4 years; male:female, 32:33) who suffered from a small unilateral VS (9.34 mm, range 1.5-23 mm) between 2013 and 2016 were included in a prospective single center study. During follow-up, in addition to clinical and neurological examinations and MRI imaging, all patients answered the Short Form 36 questionnaire once to characterize QOL. Additionally, the severity of tinnitus was determined by the Mini-TQ-12 from Hiller and Goebel.

RESULTS

It was found during follow-up that there was no lowering of QOL in patients with small VS who were on 'wait and see' strategy compared with Germany's general population and no tumor growth was detected in 53 patients (81.5%). Patients with a tumor diameter larger than 10 mm did not suffer from stronger tinnitus, vertigo or unsteadiness than the group with an average tumor size, which is smaller than 10 mm. Sixty-two patients (95.4%) showed ipsilateral hearing loss and three of these reported deafness (4.6%). Severe vertigo or tinnitus is connected with lower levels of mental component scale and physical component scale. These findings reduced the QOL (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In our series, QOL is not influenced in patients with unilateral untreated small VS in comparison to Germany's general population. This is helpful information when advising patients during follow-up and finding out the optimal timing of individual treatment.

"Wait and scan" management of patients with vestibular schwannoma and the relevance of non-contrast MRI in the follow-up

Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is a slow-growing benign neoplasm. There has been an evolution in the management of VS from active treatments (microsurgery and stereotactic radiotherapy) to conservative management (wait and scan). Regular MRI scanning is necessary to monitor tumor progression. Conservative management causes significantly less complications and offers a higher quality of life compared with active treatments. The mean growth rate of VS varies from 0.4 to 2.9 mm/year, and spontaneous shrinkage is observed in 3.8 percent of tumors during observation. If significant growth occurs, active treatment is considered. Significant growth is defined as an increase of at least 3 mm in the largest extrameatal diameter in any plane between the first and last available scans. The vestibulocochlear nerve is surrounded by cerebrospinal fluid, which provides natural contrast for MRI; thus, gadolinium may not be needed to detect VS. Specific sequences have high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detection of progression. Hypointense signal in the ipsilateral inner ear fluid might be a useful sign to distinguish VS from meningioma. In this paper, we summarize the current status of research on conservative management and non-contrast MRI for the detection of VS.

Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas and Quality of Life Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Further investigation is needed to look at the impact of vestibular schwannoma (VS) on the health-related quality of life (QOL) of participants who undergo Gamma Knife® radiosurgery (GKRS).

OBJECTIVES

Investigators compared the QOL for VS participants to reported US population norms in order to evaluate disease burden and long-term QOL several years after GKRS.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study surveyed participants to assess hearing status, tinnitus, imbalance, vertigo, as well as the Short-Form 36-item Health Questionnaire (SF-36). The data were normalized, age adjusted, and functional status was correlated to determine clinically significant differences.

RESULTS

A total of 353 participants who underwent GKRS between 1997 and 2007 were included in this study with a median postoperative period of 5 years. SF-36 scores were very similar to population norms, and age-adjusted scores for participants followed the US population curve. Frequent vertigo and balance problems had the largest statistically and clinically significant effect on physical and mental component summary scores followed by nonuseful hearing in the tumor ear.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants reported a good long-term QOL that was very similar to the QOL of US population norms. Of the common VS symptoms, vertigo had the greatest impact on QOL followed by imbalance and then hearing loss.

The Impact of Primary Treatment Strategy on the Quality of Life in Patients with Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

To assess the quality of life (QoL) in a representative sample of patients with vestibular schwannoma and to ascertain the differences in outcomes associated with distinct management strategies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with vestibular schwannoma attending a tertiary referral center were asked to complete the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Brain Questionnaire, which assesses QoL in 5 domains: physical, social, emotional and functional, and a brain cancer-specific domain. Results were analyzed in the overall cohort and in surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, and conservative management subgroups. The relationship between patient clinical characteristics and QoL outcome also was analyzed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

There were 83 survey respondents with an average age of participants of 57 years and a mean follow-up of 4.9 years. QoL was statistically significantly lower in the surgery subgroup within the Physical QoL domain (P = 0.039); however, there was no significant difference in overall QoL between the 3 subgroups of surgery, radiosurgery, and conservative management (P = 0.17). A poor QoL outcome was associated with the number of symptoms at diagnosis, greater tumor size, and a surgical management strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

The QoL within this patient cohort was extremely variable in each management group, mirroring the heterogeneous natural history of this disease process. QoL in patients with vestibular schwannoma cannot be predicted based on management strategy alone, but a poor QoL outcome is more likely in patients with larger, symptomatic tumors that are treated surgically.