The Modified Rambo Transcanal Approach for Cochlear Implantation in CHARGE Syndrome

Various approaches to the round window for cochlear implantation: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Round window approaches are used to insert a cochlear implant electrode array into the scala tympani. This study aimed to review the literature to find the reported round window approaches.

METHOD

This review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses ('PRISMA') guidelines. Articles that described their surgical approach to the round window were included. The PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched through to June 2021. The study protocol was registered on Prospero (reference number: CRD42021226940).

RESULTS

A total of 42 reports were included. The following approaches were documented: the standard facial recess, keyhole, retrofacial, modified suprameatal, transaditus, combined posterior tympanotomy and endomeatal, modified Veria, canal wall down approaches, and endoscopically assisted technique.

CONCLUSION

This review suggested that there are numerous distinct round window approaches, providing alternatives when the round window is inaccessible through the standard facial recess.

Quality of Life After Modified Rambo Ear Canal Closure in Pediatric and Adult Patients

OBJECTIVE

To present the surgical and quality of life (QOL) outcomes of patients who underwent blind sac closure of the external auditory canal (EAC) via a modified Rambo approach.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case review.

SETTING

Tertiary academic referral center.

METHODS

All patients who underwent EAC closure with a modified Rambo approach between 2015 and 2021 were evaluated. Complication rates, QOL estimations from a validated survey, and subjective cosmetic reports were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-five ears were closed in 31 patients. The most common indication for surgery was related to cochlear implantation and cochlear malformation or cholesteatoma (31.4%). No case involved an immediate complication requiring revision surgery, and 4 ears (11.4%) were suspected of having cholesteatoma within the surgical cavity at a mean 28.6-month follow-up. Adults (≥18 years) had significantly higher QOL scores than children in the medical resource subscale of the Chronic Ear Survey (P < .01), and patients undergoing concurrent EAC closure and skull base tumor removal scored higher than others (P = .04). Females reported higher cosmetic scores than males (P = .04). QOL and cosmetic scores compared favorably to previously published data involving the management of otologic disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Ear canal closure can be a useful technique for select adult and pediatric patients. Patient and surgeon concerns regarding QOL and cosmesis in ear canal closure should be explored prior to employing this surgical technique, though the present data suggest that the modified Rambo approach to closure is generally associated with reasonable outcomes in both areas.

Modified transcanal cochlear implantation in CHARGE syndrome: A case report

RATIONALE

Cochlear implantation (CI) in CHARGE syndrome is technically challenging because of the anatomical anomalies. This case aims to report a successful case of CI in CHARGE syndrome by using the modified transcanal approach with external auditory canal (EAC) obliteration.

PATIENT CONCERNS

The 3-year-old girl presented at the outpatient department with bilateral hearing loss and nasal obstruction since birth.

DIAGNOSIS

The patient had bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss, patent ductus arteriosus, atresia of the choanae, middle and inner ear anomalies, and growth retardation, fulfilling the criteria for typical CHARGE syndrome. High resolution temporal bone computed tomography scan revealed a poorly developed mastoid cavity, cochlear dysplasia, hypoplastic semicircular canals, ossicular chain malformation, and sigmoid sinus engorgement. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a narrow internal auditory canal and a hypoplastic cochlear nerve.

INTERVENTIONS

Modified transcanal approach with external auditory canal obliteration OUTCOMES:: CI was successfully done and there are no intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred after 1 year of follow up.

LESSONS

The modified transcanal approach is a reasonable and safer option for CI in CHARGE syndrome.

Rare case of bilateral aural atresia and cochlear dysplasia: when cochlear implantation is not the answer

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE

Reports of patients with concurrent middle and inner ear anomalies are rare. These patients present a surgical challenge for cochlear implantation. The surgical risk must be weighed against the predicted benefit of the patient's hearing outcome and subsequent development of speech and language as well as their quality of life.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

Thirteen-year-old boy presented to the Otology clinic for auditory rehabilitation options. He has mild developmental delay, is non-verbal and communicates via American Sign Language. He was born with bilateral aural atresia and never wore amplification. On exam he has grade 1 microtia and complete ear canal atresia bilaterally. His behavioural hearing test shows profound sensorineural hearing loss of both ears. The computed tomography scan shows bilateral underdeveloped and completely opacified mastoid and middle ear, complete bony atresia of the ear canals, and an under-partitioned cochlea with poorly defined modiolus, among other abnormalities. The patient and his family were counselled on the available options as well as the need for any further studies.

INTERVENTION

Counselling of patient and family.

CONCLUSION

While there have been reports in the literature of performing cochlear implantations in patients with a concurrent atresia and cochlear dysplasia, these were patients whose degree of inner ear anomalies was relatively minor and their prognosis of a good audiological outcome was favourable. The presented case is that of a patient for whom the surgical approach to the cochlea alone would be difficult. More importantly, his quality of life would not significantly improve in light of the predicted limited hearing and language development outcomes, given the severity of his inner ear abnormalities, limited communication abilities, prolonged period of deafness and developmental delays.