The Progressive Nature of Menière's Disease: Stress Projections and Lesion Analysis

Acute histological reactions in the otolith organs to inner ear drug delivery through a cochlear implant

Introduction

Cochlear implantation is currently regarded as a safe and minimally invasive procedure. However, cochlear implantation can have an impact on vestibular function, despite the lack of correlation between patient symptomatology and damage in vestibular tests. Thus, the present study aims to analyze the presence of hydrops and histological reactions at the level of the vestibule after cochlear implantation with dexamethasone pump delivery in Macaca fascicularis (Mf).

Materials and methods

A detailed histological study was conducted on a total of 11 Mf. All 11 Mf were divided into three groups: 5 Mf were implanted with an electrode array HL-14 connected to a pump delivering FITC-dextran for 24 h (Group A); 4 Mf were implanted with a CI electrode array attached to a pump for FITC-dextran delivery for 7 days (Group B); and 2 Mf were considered the control group, without any kind of cochlear device implantation (Group C). After drug deliver, the selected macaques were euthanized to collect tissue samples for histological analysis. An experienced observer, focusing on the utricle and saccule areas, conducted a blinded inner ear histology analysis.

Results

Surgical procedures were successfully performed in all cases. No signs of cochlear reaction to the device were observed, including neither collapse nor fibrosis. Endolymphatic sinus dilatation was observed in Mf4A and Mf3B, while cochlear hydrops was observed in Mf3A. The mean areas of the utricle and saccule exhibited some statistically significant differences, specifically, in the saccule between groups C and both groups A (p = 0.028) and B (p = 0.029); however, no significant differences were observed between groups A and B or among comparisons of the utricle.

Discussion

A significant concern relates to the safety of cochlear implantation with regard to vestibular preservation and hearing. New advancements in electrode arrays, such as CI devices coupled with delivery pumps, pose a challenge in maintaining minimally traumatic surgical concept-based procedures without affecting the inner ear homeostasis. The implantation of this device may cause vestibular hydrops in the saccule, indicating that the longer the time of substance release, the greater the grade of hydrops evidenced at the saccular level. Apart from this finding, the risk of histological damage to the vestibule is low.

The Biomechanics of Lesion Formation in Endolymphatic Hydrops: Single and Double Hit Mechanisms

BACKGROUND

The vestibular membranes of the cochlea and saccule are subject to two simultaneous constraints as they deform in endolymphatic hydrops. Boundary tethers impose a bulge-type constraint during pressure-induced transverse membrane displacement, while inherent elasticity imposes a stretch-type constraint during stress-induced longitudinal membrane distention.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to reconcile the effect of these dual constraints on membrane deformation. It is hypothesized that it is the interaction of these constraints that determines whether a stable membrane configuration can be achieved or progression to endolymphatic hydrops will occur.

METHODS

Reissner's membrane was modeled as a flat elastic ribbon that was bound along its lateral edges and subject to trans-mural pressure. The bulge and stretch constraints on membrane deformation were formulated mathematically. A graphic solution of the constraint functions was used to examine the nature of the interaction and determine how pressure and elasticity influence the hydropic process.

RESULTS

The graphic analysis shows how bulge and stretch phenomena interact to achieve an equilibrium point that satisfies both physical requirements. Nominal values of pressure and elasticity are projected to result in a stable membrane equilibrium in the precritical zone with the modest isolated increases in either parameter alone compatible with stability. However, a sufficiently large increase in either pressure or elasticity alone can constitute a single hit mechanism to exceed the critical point and destabilize the membrane. Moreover, simultaneous modest increases in both pressure and elasticity, neither of which would be sufficient in its own right, can be additive and constitute a double hit mechanism to destabilize the membranes as well. Finally, extreme values of pressure and elasticity that fail to intersect imply that no solution is feasible and that the affected membranes will fail immediately.

CONCLUSIONS

Sufficiently large increases in either endolymphatic pressure or membrane elasticity alone can destabilize the membranes and constitute single hit mechanisms for inducing hydrops. Combined moderate increases in both trans-mural pressure and membrane elasticity can also destabilize the membranes and constitute a double hit mechanism for hydrops induction.